Evaluation of The Relationship Between Drone Pilots and Humour in Türkiye

Year 2022, Volume 6, Issue 3, 365 - 371, 22.11.2022

Tamer SAVAŞ Serdar KOCAEKŞİ

https://doi.org/10.30518/jav.1138220

Abstract

This study aims to analyse the sense of humour of drone pilots depending on the amount of time they have used the drones, the sort of instruction they have gotten, and their educational levels. The study covers 148 male drone pilots with drone education backgrounds. The Humour Styles Questionnaire is used to collect data for this study. The specified statistics, reliability analysis and MANOVA analyses were employed to analyse the collected data.

As a consequence of these analyses, there was no significant statistical difference between the humour questionnaire sub-dimensions of participative humour, self-developing humour, aggressive humour, and self-destructing humour. Participatory humour, self-enhancing humour, offensive humour, and self-defeating humour sub-dimensions were not significantly different by income level. There was no statistically significant difference in the sub-dimensions of the humour scale according to education level: participative humour, self-enhancing humour, offensive humour and self-defeating humour. As a result, the sense of humour of drone pilots does not differ based on the type of schooling, income level, or education level within the contents of this study.

Keywords

drone, pilot, education, humor, aviation

References

• Akıl, A. M., and Eker, E., (2018). An analysis of the relationship between humor tendencies and demographic features among university students, Aydın Journal of Humanity and Society, Vol.4 No.2, pp.1-12.
• Bergson, H. (1996). Laughter (p. 105). Peter Smith Publisher Inc.
• Bipp, T., Kleingeld, A., Van Den Tooren, M., and Schinkel, S. (2015). The effect of self-set grade goals and core self-evaluations on academic performance: A diary study. Psychological Reports, Vol. 117 No. 3, pp.917-930.
• Dursun, N. (2019). The comparison of humor style between physical education and sport school students and some faculties, Master's thesis.
• Değer, A. and Fidan, O. (2004). Dil becerilerinin geliştirilmesinin aktif öğrenme sürecine katkısı, 1st Active Education Congress Proceedings Book, Dokuz Eylül Publications, pp.157-162.
• Erentay S. (2012). Mizahi mizaç her derde ilaç, Psikeart Humor Magazine, Vol. 22, pp.36-38.
• Ergözen Ö. (2018). The effects of nurses’ humor styles on job satisfaction, Master's thesis, Okan University, Institute of Health Sciences, p.97
• Fidanoğlu, O. (2006). The relationship between marital adjustment, humor style and anxiety level, Master's thesis, Marmara University, Institute of Education Sciences, p.214
• Freud, S. (1998). Jokes and Their Relation to the Unconscious, Payel Publishing House
• Global Market (2021). Commercial Drone Market Growth—Industry Analysis Report 2024. available at: https://www.gminsights.com/industry-analysis/ unmanned-aerial-vehicles-UAV- commercialdrone-market (Accessed: 10 June 2021)
• Greengross, G. (2008). Survival of the funniest [Review of the book Psychology of humor: An integrative approach, by R. Martin]. Evolutionary Psychology, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 90–95.
• Hampes, W. (2006). Humor and shyness: The relation between humor styles and shyness, Humor. International Journal of Humor Research. Vol. 19, pp. 179–187.
• Heath R. L. (1998). Humor Following Cerebrovascular Accident. University of Kentucky, Umi, Dissertation Information Service
• İkadın, T. (1998). Humor and Psychoanalysis. Yüz Yılın Psikanalizi, Vol. 9, pp. 201- 204
• Kramen-Kahn, B., and Hansen, N. D. (1998). Rafting The Rapids: Occupational Hazards, Rewards, And Coping Strategies of Psychotherapists, Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. Vol. 29, pp. 130–134.
• Kazarian, S. S. and Martin, R. A. (2004). Humour Styles, Personality, And Wellbeing Among Lebanese University Students, Europen Journal of Personality, Vol. 18, No.3, pp. 209- 219.
• Keith-Spiegel, P. (1972). Early conceptions of humor: Varieties and issues, The psychology of humor, Theoretical perspectives and empirical issues, pp.4-39.
• Koçubaba, A., (2019). The effects of humor styles and perceived family attitudes on university students, Master's thesis, İstanbul: Üsküdar University, p. 100.
• Kuiper, N. A., Martin R. A. and Olinger, L. J. (1993). Coping humor, stress and cognitive appraisals. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science. Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 81-96.
• Martin, R. A. (1998). Approaches to the sense of humor: A historical review. The Sense of Humor: Explorations of a Personality Characteristic, pp.15– 60.
• Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., and Weir, K. (2003). Individual Differences ın Uses of Humor and Their Relation to Psychological Well-Being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire, Journal of Research in Personality, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 48-75.
• Mannıng, K. (2002). Lighten Up! An Analysis of the Role of Humor as An Instructional Practice in The Urban And Culturally Diverse. Middle School Classroom, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, UMI Dissertation Information Service, Cleveland State University,
• McGhee, P.E. (1983). Understanding and Promoting the Development of Children’s Humor, USA, Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.
• Morreall, J. (1997). Taking laughter seriously, İstanbul: İris Publishing.
• Öngören, F. (1998). Cumhuriyet’in 75. Yılında Türk Mizahi ve Hicvi. İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Publishing.
• Özkan, H. İ. (2008). Öğretmen ve Öğrencideki Mizah Anlayışının Sınıf Atmosferine Etkisi. Master's thesis, Selcuk University, Konya, p.102
• Romero, E. J., and Cruthirds, K. W. (2006). The Use of Humor in the Workplace, Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 58-69.
• Ruch, W. (1998). The sense of humor: explorations of a personality characteristic. HUMOR: International Journal of Humor Research (HR), Vol. 3, X-498.
• Sanders, B. (2001). Kahkahanın Zaferi: Yıkıcı Tarih Olarak Gülme. Ayrıntı Publishing.
• Satil, Y. E. (2019). Comparison of humor styles of the spouses of healthy and risky pregnant women, Master’s thesis, Gaziantep University, Institute of Health Sciences, p.78
• Sepetci, C. (2010). Okul Yöneticilerinin Mizah Tarzlarının Betimlenmesi, Master's thesis, Gaziosmanpasa University, Tokat, p.106
• DGCA (2021). İnsansız Hava Aracı Sistemleri Talimatı (SHT-İHA)”, Ankara, avaible at https://web.shgm.gov.tr/documents/sivilhavacilik/files/mevzuat/sektorel/talimatlar/2020/SHT-IHA_Rev-04.pdf Accessed: 25 September 2021.
• Sousa, L. M. M., Marques-Vieira, C. M. A., Antunes, A. V., Frade, M. D. F. G., Severino, S. P. S., and Valentim, O. S. (2019). Humor intervention in the nurse-patient interaction. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, Vol. 72, pp.1078-1085.
• Spencer, G. (1989). An Analysis of Jab-Baiting Humor On The College Campus, Humor, International Journal Of Humor Research, Vol. 2, pp. 329-348
• Susa A. (2002). Humor type, orgnizational climate and outcomes; the shortest distance between an organization’s environment and the bottomline is laughter. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Nebraska, Umi Dissertation Information Service.
• Sümer, M., (2008). Pre-school teaching students’ styles of coping with stress and the comparison of their manners of humor in accordance with various variables. Master's thesis, Konya: Selçuk Üniversity, p.145
• Steele, K. E. (1998). The Positive and negative effects of the use of humor classroom setting. Unpublished Master Thesis, Salem Teikyo University, The faculty of the master of art
• Türkmen, F. (1996). Mizahta Üstünlük Teorisi ve Nasrettin Hoca Fıkraları. V. Milletlerarası Türk Halk Kültürü Kongresi Nasreddin Hoca Seksiyon Bildirileri, pp.24-25, Ankara.
• Ünal D. (2018). Determination of the Relationship between the Humorous Styles and Burnout Levels of Nurses Working in Pediatric Clinics. Bülent Ecevit University, Health Sciences Institute, p.80
• Yerlikaya, N. (2007). The relationship between humor styles and coping styles of high school students. Master's thesis, Çukurova University, Adana, p. 94
• Yılmaz K. (2011). An Analysis of Humor Styles of School Administrators. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 27-44.
• William F. (1987). Humor and Paradox. American Behavirol Scientist, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp.42-71
• Williams, F. C. (2001). Humor and the retention of lecture material by student-athletes in a mentor information session. The Pennsylvania State University.
• Zigler, E., Levine, J., and Gould, L. (1966). Cognitive Processes in the Development of Children’s Appreciation of Humor, Child Development, Vol. 37, pp.507-518