Retraction: Effects Of Mothers Perceived Social Support During Postnatal Period On Their Perceived Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy

Year 2022, , 81 - 88, 27.01.2022

Tuba Gıynaş , Nurdan Akçay Didişen

https://doi.org/10.30621/jbachs.978506

This article was retracted on May 31, 2024. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jbachs/issue/84913/1493741

Abstract

Aim: This study was carried out to determine the effects of mothers perceived social support during postnatal period on their perceived breastfeeding self-efficacy
Material and method: The research is cross-sectional study. The study was carried out with 200 mother who presented to a private University Hospital for delivery in western Turkey between February 2016 and June 27. The data were collected using sociodemographic characteristics questionnaire, Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support and Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale. Percentages, Kruskal Wallis one-way analysis of variance, Mann Whitney u test and spearman’s correlation analysis were used to analyze the data.
Results: The mean scores the participating mothers obtained from the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support and Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale were 73.35 ± 12.01 and 59.11 ± 8.18 respectively. There was a statistically significant correlation between the variables such as the participating mothers’ education status and their families’ place of residence, and the mean score they obtained from the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. The correlation between the variables such as the participating mothers’ age, educational status, number of deliveries, breastfeeding status and their husbands' age and the mean score they obtained from the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale was also statistically significant.
Conclusion: The correlation analysis performed at the end of the present study revealed that there was a positive, weak, statistically significant relationship between the mean scores the participating mothers obtained from the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support and Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale.

Keywords

Perceived social support, breastfeeding self efficacy, mother

References

• Yıldız D. Doğum sonrası dönemde annelerin bebek bakımı konusunda danışmanlık gereksinimleri ve yaklaşımlar. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi. 2008; 50 (4), 294-298.
• Cangöl E, Şahin HN. Emzirmeyi Etkileyen Faktörler ve Emzirme Danışmanlığı Zeynep Kamil Bülteni. 2014; 45(3): 100-105.
• American Academy of Pediatrics. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics, 2012;129, e827–e841.
• World Health Organization. Ten Facts on Breastfeeding. Geneva. 2013. Available at: http://www.who.int/features/factfiles/breastfeeding/en/ (accessed: 23 May 2021).
• Güldür A. Evaluation of self-efficiency and post- labor breastfeeding behavior of mothers that completed A breastfeeding education program and mothers that was not educated in accordance with such A program (dissertation). Health Sciences Institute. İstanbul: Okan Üniv. 2016.
• Yenal K. Tokat MA. Ozan YD. Çeçe Ö. Abalın FB. (2013). Annelerin Emzirme Öz-yeterlilik Algıları ile Emzirme Başarıları Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi. Hemşirelikte Eğitim ve Araştırma Dergisi. 2013; 10 (2): 14-19
• Uçan S. The effect of breafeeding education given to parents on the duration of breastfeeding, cultural behavior and parent-baby attachment (dissertation). Health Sciences Institute. Konya: Selçuk Üniv. 2016.
• Kaya D, Pirinçci. E. 0–24 Aylık Çocuğu Olan Annelerin Anne Sütü ve Emzirme İle İlgili Bilgi ve Uygulamaları, TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin. 2009; 8 (6).
• Candan Ö. Social support systems of couples who experiencing pregnancy loss and the effects of nursing care on depression levels (dissertation). Health Sciences Institute. İstanbul: Haliç Üniv. 2012.
• Yılmaz F. Examination of the relationship between perceived social support and adaptation to motherhood in pregnants (dissertation). Health Sciences Institute Erzurum: Atatürk Üniv. 2012.
• Erdemoğlu Ç. Determination of the correlation of gender of fetus with prenatal attachment and perceived social support level (dissertation). Health Sciences Institute. Erzurum: İnönü Üniv. 2016.
• Küçükoğlu S. The effect of natural nutrition education given mothers with low-birth weight babies on mothers breastfeeding self-efficacy level breastfeeding success and baby’s growth (dissertation). Health Sciences Institute. Erzurum: Atatürk Üniv. 2011.
• Dennis C L, Faux S. Development and Psychometric Testing of the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale, Research in Nursing&Health. 1999; 22: 399- 409. Meedya S, Fahy K, Kable A. Factors that positively influence breastfeeding duration to 6 months: a literature review. Women and Birth. 2010; 23, 135–145.
• Otsuka K, Dennis CL, Tatsuoka H, Jimba M. The relationship between breastfeeding self-efficacy and perceived insufficient milk among Japanese mothers. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing. 2008; 37, 546–555.
• Wilhelm SL, Rodehorst TK, Stepans MBF, Hertzog M, Berens C. Influence of intention and self-efficacy levels on duration of breastfeeding for Midwest rural mothers. Applied Nursing Research. 2008; 21, 123–130.
• Küçükoğu S, Çelebioğlu A, Coskun D. Yenidoğan Kliniğinde Bebeği Yatan Annelerin Postpartum Depresyon Belirtileri Ve Emzirme Özyeterlilik Düzeylerinin Belirlenmesi. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2014; 3 (3); 921-932
• Gökçeoğlu E. The research of relationship between breastfeeding self efficacy of mothers and perceptions of the adequacy of milk (dissertation). Health Sciences Institute. Erzurum: Atatürk Üniv. 2014.
• Aluş M. The effect of antenatal education on mothers breastfeeding self -eefficacy and breastfeeding success (dissertation). Health Sciences Institute. İzmir: Dokuz Eylül Üniv. 2009.
• Bandura A. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Education & Behavior. 2004; 31, 143-164.
• Gümüssoy S. Analysis of mothers breastfeeding selfefficacy and duration during postpartum period (dissertation). Health Sciences Institute. İzmir: Ege Üniv. 2012.
• Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GK. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. Journal of Personality Assessment. 1988; 52(1), 30–41. https:// doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2.
• Eker D, Arkar H, Yaldız H. Çok Boyutlu Algılanan Sosyal Destek Ölçeğinin Gözden Geçirilmiş Formunun Faktör Yapısı, Geçerlik ve Güvenirliği, Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi. 2001; 12(1):17-25.
• Erdem K. Determination of relationship between social support perceived and depression in infertile women (dissertation). Health Sciences Institute. Erzurum: Atatürk Üniv. 2012.
• Wutke K. Dennis CL. The reliability and validity of the Polish version of the breastfeeding self-efficacy scale-short form: Translation and psychometric assessment. International Journal of Nursing Studie. 2007; 44: 1439-1446.
• Bandura A. Social Cognitive Theory. In E. Barnouw (Ed.), International Encyclopedia Of Communications, New York: Oxford University Press, 1989; (4), 92-96.
• Zhu J, Chan WC, Zhou X, Ye B, He HG. Predictors of breast feeding self-efficacy among Chinese mothers: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey. Midwifery. 2014; 30 (6) : 705-11. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.12.008.
• Demirtaş B. Cultural values that affect breast-feeding (dissertation). Health Sciences Institute. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniv. 2005.
• Susin LRO, GiuglianiER, Kummer SC, Maciel M, Simon C, da Silveira LC. Does Parental Breastfeeding Knowledge Increase Breastfeeding Rates?. Birth 1999; 26 (3): 149-56.
• Gözükara F. Effect of the breastfeeding teaching and counselling services given to the parents on breastfeeding behaviour (dissertation). Health Sciences Institute. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniv. 2012.
• Gözükara F. Emzirmenin Başarılmasında Anahtar Faktör: Baba Desteğinin Sağlanması ve Hemşirenin Rolleri, Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2014; 11 (3): 289- 296.