Beden Eğitimi Öğretmeni Adaylarının Serbest Zaman Sıkılma Algısı, Yaşam Doyumu ve Sosyal Bağlılık Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi

Year 2018, Volume: 6 Issue: 12, 342 - 357, 03.12.2018

Feyza Meryem Kara Bülent Gürbüz Sonnur Küçük Kılıç Erman Öncü

https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.466740

Cited By: 10

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı; beden eğitimi öğretmeni
adaylarının serbest zaman sıkılma algısı, yaşam doyumu ve sosyal bağlılık
düzeylerini bazı değişkenlere göre incelemek ve aralarındaki ilişkiyi
belirlemektir. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak, “Serbest Zamanlarda
Sıkılma Algısı Ölçeği”, “Yaşam Doyumu Ölçeği ve “Sosyal Bağlılık Ölçeği" kullanılmıştır.
Katılımcıların serbest zamanlarında sıkılma ve doyumsuzluk algıları, yaşam
doyumları ve sosyal bağlılıkları cinsiyet değişkenine göre anlamlı bir şekilde
farklılaşmamaktadır. Öğretmen adaylarının serbest zamanlarında sıkılma ve
doyumsuzluk algıları ile yaşam doyumları sınıf ve düzenli olarak fiziksel
aktiviteye katılma durumu değişkenlerine göre anlamlı bir şekilde
farklılaşmazken, sosyal bağlılıkları ise sınıf ve düzenli olarak fiziksel
aktiviteye katılma durumu değişkenlerine göre anlamlı bir şekilde
farklılaşmaktadır. Diğer yandan öğretmen adaylarının serbest zamanlarında
sıkılma ve doyumsuzluk algıları ile sosyal bağlılıkları ekonomik durum
değişkenine göre anlamlı bir şekilde farklılaşmazken yaşam doyumları ise
ekonomik durum değişkenine göre anlamlı bir şekilde farklılaşmaktadır.

Keywords

Serbest zamanlarda sıkılma algısı, yaşam doyumu, sosyal bağlılık, beden eğitimi öğretmeni adayı

An Investigation of Physical Education Pre-Service Teachers’ Leisure Boredom, Life Satisfaction and Social Connectedness

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze
perceived levels of leisure boredom, life satisfaction and social connectedness
of physical education pre-service teachers according to some demographic
variables, and to determine the relationship between leisure boredom, life
satisfaction and social connectedness. “Leisure Boredom Scale”, “Satisfaction
with Life Scale” and “Social Connectedness Scale” were used to collect data.
There were no significant differences between the leisure boredom,
dissatisfaction, life satisfaction and social connectedness of the participants
and their genders. While there were no significant differences between leisure
boredom, dissatisfaction and life satisfaction of the participants and grade
level and participation physical activity regularly, there were significant
differences between social connectedness and grade level and participation
physical activity regularly. On the other hand, there were no significant
differences between leisure boredom, dissatisfaction and social connectedness
of the participants and economic situation, there were significant differences
between life satisfaction and economic situation.

Keywords

Leisure boredom, life satisfaction, social connectedness, pre-service physical education teacher

References

• Ading, C. E., Seok, C. B., Hashmi, S. I., & Maakip, I. (2012). Religion and gender differences in stress, happiness and life satisfaction. Southeast Asia Psychology Journal, 1,46-55.
• Blais, J. J., Craig, W. M., Pepler, D., & Connolly, J. (2008). Adolescents online: The importance of Internet activity choices to salient relationships. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 37(5):522-536.
• Budría, S., & Ferrer‐I‐Carbonell, A. (2018). Life satisfaction, income comparisons and individual traits. Review of Income and Wealth. DOI: 10.1111/roiw.12353
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2012). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Chen, C., & Leung, L. (2016). Are you addicted to Candy Crush Saga? An exploratory study linking psychological factors to mobile social game addiction. Telematics and Informatics, 33(4), 1155-1166.
• Chen, L. J., & Chung, S. K. (2007). Loneliness, social connectedness, and family income among undergraduate females and males in Taiwan. Social Behavior and Personality: an International Journal, 35(10), 1353-1364.
• De Ree, J., & Alessie, R. (2011). Life satisfaction and age: Dealing with underidentification in age-period-cohort models. Social Science & Medicine, 73(1), 177-182.
• De Vos, J. (2018). Analysing the effect of trip satisfaction on satisfaction with the leisure activity at the destination of the trip, in relationship with life satisfaction. Transportation, 1-23.
• Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.
• Durak, M., Şenol-Durak, E. & Gençöz, T. (2010). Psychometric properties of the satisfaction with life scale among turkish university students, correctional officers, and elderly adults. Social Indicators Research, 99(3), 413-429.
• Duru, E. (2007). An adaptation study of social connectedness scale in turkish culture. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 26, 85-94.
• Duru, E. (2008). The role of social support and social connectedness in predicting loneliness. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 23(61), 25-26.
• Garcia, P., & McCarthy, M. (2000). Measuring health: A step in the development of city fhealth profiles. In Measuring Health: a step in the development of city health profiles. WHO Regional Office for Europe. Copenhagen: WHO.
• Gere, J., & Schimmack, U. (2017). Benefits of income: Associations with life satisfaction among earners and homemakers. Personality and Individual Differences, 119, 92-95.
• Hendrickson, B., Rosen, D., & Aune, R. K. (2011). An analysis of friendship networks, social connectedness, homesickness, and satisfaction levels of international students. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(3), 281-295.
• Iso-Ahola, S. E. & Weissinger, E. (1990). Perceptions of boredom in leisure: conceptualization, reliability and validity of the leisure boredom scale. Journal of Leisure Research, 22(1), 1–17.
• Iwasaki, Y. (2007). Leisure and quality of life in an international and multicultural context: what are majör pathways linking leisure to quality of life? Social Indicators Research, 82(2), 233–264.
• Kara, F. M., Gürbüz, B. & Öncü, E. (2014). Leisure boredom scale: the factor structure and the demographic differences. The Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise. 16(2):28-35.
• Karasar, N. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
• Lee, R. M. & Robbins, B. S. (1995). Measuring belongingness: The social connectedness and social assurance scales. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42(2), 232-241.
• Leung, L. (2008). Leisure boredom, sensation seeking, self-esteem, addiction symptoms and patterns of mobile phone use. in: E. Korini, M. Tanis, S. Utz, A. Linden (Eds.), Mediated interpersonal communication, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, chapter:18, pp. 359-381.
• Lin, C. H., Lin, S. L., & Wu, C. P. (2009). The effects of parental monitoring and leisure boredom on adolescents’ internet addiction. Adolescence, 44(176), 993–1004.
• Margolis, S., Schwitzgebel E., Ozer, D. J. & Lyubomirsky, S. (2018): A new measure of life satisfaction: the riverside life satisfaction scale, Journal of Personality Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2018.1464457
• McCaul, L. K. (1998). Relationships among adolescent substance use, leisure boredom, and physical activity (Unpublished Master Thesis). Brock University St. Catharines Faculty of Education, Ontario.
• Morris, P. A., & Gennetian, L. A. (2003). Identifying the effects of income on children's development using experimental data. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(3), 716-729.
• Pavot W. & Diener, E. (2008) The satisfaction with life scale and the emerging construct of life satisfaction, The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(2), 137-152, DOI:10.1080/17439760701756946
• Sarol, H., & Çimen, Z. (2017). Why people participate leisure time physical activity: a Turkish perspective. Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences, 8(1), 63-72.
• Schmiedeberg, C., & Schröder, J. (2017). Leisure activities and life satisfaction: An analysis with German panel data. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 12(1), 137-151.
• Shields, M.A., Price, S.W., Wooden, M.(2009). Life satisfaction and the economic and social characteristics of neighbourhoods. Journal of Population Economics. 22(2), 421–443. doi: 10.1007/s00148-007-0146-7.
• Uz-Baş, A. (2011). Investigating levels and predictors of life saticfaction among prospective teachers. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 44, 71-88.
• Wainwright, N., & Surtees, P. (2002). Childhood adversity, gender, and depression over the life-course. Journal o f Affective Disorders, 72(1), 33-45.
• Watkins, M. & Bond, C. (2007). Ways of experiencing leisure. Leisure Sciences, 29(3), 287-307, DOI: 10.1080/01490400701259985
• Wegner, L. (2011). Through the l ens of a peer: Understanding leisure boredom and risk behaviour in adolescence. South African Journal of Occupational Therapy, 41(1), 18–24.
• Yang, B., & Brown, B. (2015). Factors involved in associations between Facebook use and college adjustment: Social competence, perceived usefulness, and use patterns. Computers in Human Behavior, 46, 245–253.
• Yaşartürk, F., Akyüz, H., & Karataş, İ. (2017). Examination of university students’ levels of leisure boredom perception and life satisfaction towards recreative activities. International Journal of Cultural and Social Studies, 3(2), 239-252.