Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2017, Volume: 4 Issue: 3, 296 - 303, 30.09.2017
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.697

Abstract

References

  • Bakirci, K. (2017). An Assessment on the Relevant Provisions of Equality Institution Law, the Constitution, and Labor Law, The Congress of Labor 2, Istanbul, p. 65-75.
  • Chevallier, J. (2011), “Le Défenseur des droits: unité ou diversité?”, Revue française d’administration publique, 2011/3 (no. 139), p.433-445.
  • Cluzel-Métayer, L. (2011), “Réflexion a propos de la saisine du Défenseur des droits”, ?”, Revue française d’administration publique, 2011/3 (no. 139), p.447-460.
  • Eren, H. (2016). Human Rights and Equality Institution of Turkey, 2016.
  • Leconte, V. (2016), “L’intervention du Défenseur des droits en matiere de protection sociale des femmes”, Regards, 2016/2(No.50), p.61-74.
  • Odyakmaz, Z., Keskin, B., Deniz, Y. (2016). “An Assessment on Law No. 6701 on Human Rights and Equality Institution of Turkey-I”, Journal of Court of Jurisdictional Disputes, No. 7, p. 721-761.
  • Ogusgil, V. A. (2015), “An Assessment of Human Rights Institution of Turkey In Light of United Nations Paris Principles on the Way to the European Union”, Turkish World Journal of Social Sciences, No 74, p. 175-198.
  • Tezcan, D., Erdem M., R., Sancakdar, O., Onok, R., M. (2016), Manual of Human Rights, 6th Edition
  • European Commission, Turkey 2016 Report, http://www.ab.gov.tr/files/5%20Ekim/son__2016_ilerleme_raporu_tr.pdf

CAN HUMAN RIGHTS AND EQUALITY INSTITUTION OF TURKEY PLAY AN ACTIVE ROLE IN COMBATING DISCRIMINATION?

Year 2017, Volume: 4 Issue: 3, 296 - 303, 30.09.2017
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.697

Abstract



Purpose – This study investigates whether the Law No. 6701 on Human Rights and
Equality Institution of Turkey (HREIT) will be effective in the struggle
against discrimination in Turkey.  



Methodology
This study critically evaluates the articles of the law from the perspective of
human rights law.



Findings- This study determines that that the law considers only a limited number of issues
as the basis for discrimination  and  in case of discrimination other than this
limited number of underlying issues, one cannot apply to the Institution.
Furthermore, the conditions to apply to the institution are challenging.



Conclusion-  This study clarifies that when the current legal framework is taken into consideration, it
unfortunately does not seem possible for HREIT to play an active role when
combating discrimination. 



References

  • Bakirci, K. (2017). An Assessment on the Relevant Provisions of Equality Institution Law, the Constitution, and Labor Law, The Congress of Labor 2, Istanbul, p. 65-75.
  • Chevallier, J. (2011), “Le Défenseur des droits: unité ou diversité?”, Revue française d’administration publique, 2011/3 (no. 139), p.433-445.
  • Cluzel-Métayer, L. (2011), “Réflexion a propos de la saisine du Défenseur des droits”, ?”, Revue française d’administration publique, 2011/3 (no. 139), p.447-460.
  • Eren, H. (2016). Human Rights and Equality Institution of Turkey, 2016.
  • Leconte, V. (2016), “L’intervention du Défenseur des droits en matiere de protection sociale des femmes”, Regards, 2016/2(No.50), p.61-74.
  • Odyakmaz, Z., Keskin, B., Deniz, Y. (2016). “An Assessment on Law No. 6701 on Human Rights and Equality Institution of Turkey-I”, Journal of Court of Jurisdictional Disputes, No. 7, p. 721-761.
  • Ogusgil, V. A. (2015), “An Assessment of Human Rights Institution of Turkey In Light of United Nations Paris Principles on the Way to the European Union”, Turkish World Journal of Social Sciences, No 74, p. 175-198.
  • Tezcan, D., Erdem M., R., Sancakdar, O., Onok, R., M. (2016), Manual of Human Rights, 6th Edition
  • European Commission, Turkey 2016 Report, http://www.ab.gov.tr/files/5%20Ekim/son__2016_ilerleme_raporu_tr.pdf
There are 9 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

Basak Gunes This is me

Publication Date September 30, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2017 Volume: 4 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Gunes, B. (2017). CAN HUMAN RIGHTS AND EQUALITY INSTITUTION OF TURKEY PLAY AN ACTIVE ROLE IN COMBATING DISCRIMINATION?. Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting, 4(3), 296-303. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2017.697

Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting (JEFA) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. JEFA aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in the area of economics, finance, accounting and auditing. The editor in chief of JEFA invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JEFA publishes academic research studies only. JEFA charges no submission or publication fee.

Ethics Policy - JEFA applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JEFA is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract and method).

Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.