Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

ANNOUNCEMENT EFFECT ANOMALY AND ITS DETERMINANTS ON SEASONED EQUITY OFFERINGS: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY

Year 2018, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 168 - 183, 13.07.2018
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.823

Abstract

Purpose - This study investigates announcement effect anomaly on Seasoned Equity Offerings (seos) conducted in Borsa Istanbul for the 2010 – 2015 period and analyze its determinants.

Methodology - Event study and regression analysis were used to determine in order to observe abnormal returns in case of announcement performed. For the purpose of comparing results based on announcement was published or not, Paired Sample Statistics test was used. To find out announcement effect anomaly’s determinants regression analysis was used through Panel Dynamic OLS (PDOLS) method.

Findings- Abnormal average returns and abnormal cumulative returns were observed as negative both in case of announcement or not. But negative returns is significantly higher when announcement is made.

Conclusion- Announcement effect anomaly has been confirmed and it has been determined that Leverage Change Ratio, Nominal Capital Increase, CAR (-10,1) variables have positive effect on seos while M/B ratio has negative effect.

References

  • Ahsan, M. and Alam, N. 2014. Sectoral Decomposition of the Announcement Effect of Rights Offerings: Evidence from Bangladesh. Investment Management and Financial Innovations. 11(4): 254 -267.
  • Akdağ, M. 2011. SPSS’de İstatistiksel Analizler.https://cms.inonu.edu.tr /uploads/old/5/1328/spss-testleri.doc. [Erişim Tarihi : 09.08.2017].
  • Allen, D.E. and Soucik, V. 2008. Long Run Underperformance of Seasoned Equity Offerings Fact or An Illusion. Journal Mathematics and Computers in Simulation. 78 (3):146 - 154.
  • Asquith, P. and Mullins, D. W. 1986. Equity Issues and Offering Dilution. Journal of Financial Economics. (15): 61 - 89.
  • Barclay, J. and Litzenberger, H.R. 1988. Announcement Effect of New Equity Issues and The Use of Intraday Price Data. Journal of Financial Economics. 12(1): 71-99.
  • Bayless, M. and Chaplinsky, S. 1996. Is There a Window of Opportunity For Seasoned Equity Issuance ?. The Journal of Finance. 51(1): 253 - 278.
  • Beninga, S. 2012. Financial Modelling (Third Edition). London: The Mit Press.
  • Brown, S.,J. and Warner, J. B. 1985. Using Daily Stock Returns. Journal of Financial Economics. 14(1): 3-31.
  • Dubois, M. and P. Jeanneret, 2000. The long-run performance of seasoned equity offerings with rights: evidence from the Swiss market [online]. Available: http://ssrn.com/ abstract=239873
  • Dutordoir, M. and Hodrick, L.S. 2012. Stock Returns Around Corporate Security Offering Announcements. Columbia Business School Research Paper. 12(11):1-55.
  • Eckbo, B. E. and Masulis, R. W. 1995. Seasoned Equity Offerings: A Survey. Series of Handbooks In Operations Research and Management Science. [online]. Available: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1299872
  • Eckbo, B. E., Masulis, R. W. and Norli, Q. 2005. Security Offerings. Handbook of Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance. [online]. Available: http://ssrn.com/abstract=863664
  • Gujarati, D.N. 2004. Basic Econometrics (Fourth Edition). McGraw Hill.
  • Jensen, C. M. 1986. Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance and Takeovers. American Economic Review. 76(2): 323 – 329.
  • Kaya, T. 2012. The Short Term Performance of Initial Public Offerings in Istanbul Stock Exchange: 2010-2011 Application. Journal of Business, Economics and Finance. 1(1): 64-76.
  • Masulis, R. W. and Korwar, A. N. 1986. Seasoned Equity Offerings: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Financial Economics. 15(1/2): 91 – 118.
  • Mazgit, İ. 2013. Endeks Kapsamında Olmanın Hisse Senedi Getirilerine Etkisi: BIST Temettü 25 Endeksi Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Sosyoekonomi Dergisi. 20(20): 225-264
  • Mikkelson, H. and W. Partch, M. M. 1986. Valuation Effects of Security Offerings and The Issuance Process. The Journal of Financial Economics. 15(1-2): 31-60.
  • Miller, H. M. and Rock, K. 1985. Dividend Policy Under Asymmetric Information. The Journal of American Finance Association. 40(4): 1031 – 1051.
  • Modigliani, F. and Miller, H. M. 1958. The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and The Theory of Investment. American Economic Association. 48(3): 261 -297.
  • Myers, S. C. and Majluf, N. S. 1984. Corporate Financing And Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information The Investors Do Not Have. Working Paper. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Ruutu, K. 2010. Ownership Structure And Choice of Issue Method In Seasoned Equity Offerings. Master Thesis. Helsinki School of Economics Accounting and Finance Department.
  • Shahid, H., Xia, X., Mahmood, F. and Usman, M. 2010. Behaviour of Information Asymmetry During SEOs Issue Process: Evidence From China. Asian Journal of Management Research.
  • Scholes, M. S. 1972. The Market for Securities: Substitution versus Price Pressure and the Effects of Information on Share Prices. The Journal of Business. 45(2): 179 - 211.
  • Shen, Y. 2006. Seasoned Equity Offerings : Evidence From P.R. China. Master Thesis. Concordia University, Montreal Canada.
  • Wruck, K. 1989. Equity ownership concentration and firm value : Evidence from private equity financings. Journal of Financial Economics. 23(1): 3 – 28.
  • Wu, X., Wang, Z and Yao, J. 2005. Understanding the Positive Announcement Effects of the Private Equity Placements: New Insights from Hong Kong Data. Review of Finance. 9(3): 385 – 414.
Year 2018, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 168 - 183, 13.07.2018
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.823

Abstract

References

  • Ahsan, M. and Alam, N. 2014. Sectoral Decomposition of the Announcement Effect of Rights Offerings: Evidence from Bangladesh. Investment Management and Financial Innovations. 11(4): 254 -267.
  • Akdağ, M. 2011. SPSS’de İstatistiksel Analizler.https://cms.inonu.edu.tr /uploads/old/5/1328/spss-testleri.doc. [Erişim Tarihi : 09.08.2017].
  • Allen, D.E. and Soucik, V. 2008. Long Run Underperformance of Seasoned Equity Offerings Fact or An Illusion. Journal Mathematics and Computers in Simulation. 78 (3):146 - 154.
  • Asquith, P. and Mullins, D. W. 1986. Equity Issues and Offering Dilution. Journal of Financial Economics. (15): 61 - 89.
  • Barclay, J. and Litzenberger, H.R. 1988. Announcement Effect of New Equity Issues and The Use of Intraday Price Data. Journal of Financial Economics. 12(1): 71-99.
  • Bayless, M. and Chaplinsky, S. 1996. Is There a Window of Opportunity For Seasoned Equity Issuance ?. The Journal of Finance. 51(1): 253 - 278.
  • Beninga, S. 2012. Financial Modelling (Third Edition). London: The Mit Press.
  • Brown, S.,J. and Warner, J. B. 1985. Using Daily Stock Returns. Journal of Financial Economics. 14(1): 3-31.
  • Dubois, M. and P. Jeanneret, 2000. The long-run performance of seasoned equity offerings with rights: evidence from the Swiss market [online]. Available: http://ssrn.com/ abstract=239873
  • Dutordoir, M. and Hodrick, L.S. 2012. Stock Returns Around Corporate Security Offering Announcements. Columbia Business School Research Paper. 12(11):1-55.
  • Eckbo, B. E. and Masulis, R. W. 1995. Seasoned Equity Offerings: A Survey. Series of Handbooks In Operations Research and Management Science. [online]. Available: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1299872
  • Eckbo, B. E., Masulis, R. W. and Norli, Q. 2005. Security Offerings. Handbook of Corporate Finance: Empirical Corporate Finance. [online]. Available: http://ssrn.com/abstract=863664
  • Gujarati, D.N. 2004. Basic Econometrics (Fourth Edition). McGraw Hill.
  • Jensen, C. M. 1986. Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance and Takeovers. American Economic Review. 76(2): 323 – 329.
  • Kaya, T. 2012. The Short Term Performance of Initial Public Offerings in Istanbul Stock Exchange: 2010-2011 Application. Journal of Business, Economics and Finance. 1(1): 64-76.
  • Masulis, R. W. and Korwar, A. N. 1986. Seasoned Equity Offerings: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Financial Economics. 15(1/2): 91 – 118.
  • Mazgit, İ. 2013. Endeks Kapsamında Olmanın Hisse Senedi Getirilerine Etkisi: BIST Temettü 25 Endeksi Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Sosyoekonomi Dergisi. 20(20): 225-264
  • Mikkelson, H. and W. Partch, M. M. 1986. Valuation Effects of Security Offerings and The Issuance Process. The Journal of Financial Economics. 15(1-2): 31-60.
  • Miller, H. M. and Rock, K. 1985. Dividend Policy Under Asymmetric Information. The Journal of American Finance Association. 40(4): 1031 – 1051.
  • Modigliani, F. and Miller, H. M. 1958. The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and The Theory of Investment. American Economic Association. 48(3): 261 -297.
  • Myers, S. C. and Majluf, N. S. 1984. Corporate Financing And Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information The Investors Do Not Have. Working Paper. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Ruutu, K. 2010. Ownership Structure And Choice of Issue Method In Seasoned Equity Offerings. Master Thesis. Helsinki School of Economics Accounting and Finance Department.
  • Shahid, H., Xia, X., Mahmood, F. and Usman, M. 2010. Behaviour of Information Asymmetry During SEOs Issue Process: Evidence From China. Asian Journal of Management Research.
  • Scholes, M. S. 1972. The Market for Securities: Substitution versus Price Pressure and the Effects of Information on Share Prices. The Journal of Business. 45(2): 179 - 211.
  • Shen, Y. 2006. Seasoned Equity Offerings : Evidence From P.R. China. Master Thesis. Concordia University, Montreal Canada.
  • Wruck, K. 1989. Equity ownership concentration and firm value : Evidence from private equity financings. Journal of Financial Economics. 23(1): 3 – 28.
  • Wu, X., Wang, Z and Yao, J. 2005. Understanding the Positive Announcement Effects of the Private Equity Placements: New Insights from Hong Kong Data. Review of Finance. 9(3): 385 – 414.
There are 27 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Mustafa Cikrikci 0000-0002-2805-6079

Mustafa Ozyesil 0000-0002-4442-7087

Publication Date July 13, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 5 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Cikrikci, M., & Ozyesil, M. (2018). ANNOUNCEMENT EFFECT ANOMALY AND ITS DETERMINANTS ON SEASONED EQUITY OFFERINGS: EVIDENCE FROM TURKEY. Journal of Economics Finance and Accounting, 5(2), 168-183. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2018.823

Journal of Economics, Finance and Accounting (JEFA) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. JEFA aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in the area of economics, finance, accounting and auditing. The editor in chief of JEFA invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. JEFA publishes academic research studies only. JEFA charges no submission or publication fee.

Ethics Policy - JEFA applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). JEFA is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract and method).

Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.