OECD Ülkelerinde Kentleşme ve Gelir Eşitsizliği

Year 2024, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 82 - 99, 24.12.2024

Ali Kara Bulut , Ebru Topcu

https://doi.org/10.56668/jefr.1505213

Abstract

Günümüzde kentleşme, hızlı büyüme, teknolojik ilerlemeler ve değişen sosyal dinamiklerle karakterize edilmektedir. Bununla birlikte, kentleşmenin sağladığı avantajlar toplumun tüm kesimleri arasında adil dağılmamaktadır. Bu durum gelişmekte olan ve gelişmiş ülkelerde gelir eşitsizliğinde artışlara yol açmaktadır. Dünya nüfusunun yarısından fazlasının kentlerde yaşadığı dikkate alındığında, kentleşme ve gelir eşitsizliği arasındaki karmaşık dinamikleri anlamak, kapsamlı ve sürdürülebilir kalkınma oluşturmayı amaçlayan politika yapıcılar için hayati öneme sahiptir. Bu bağlamda, çalışmanın temel amacı OECD ülkelerinde 2003-2019 döneminde kentleşme ve gelir eşitsizliği arasındaki ilişkinin panel regresyon yöntemi ile incelenmesidir. Sabit etkili Driscoll-Kraay tahmincisinden elde edilen bulgular, kentleşme ile gelir eşitsizliği arasında pozitif yönlü bir ilişki olduğunu göstermiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, Kuznets’in (1955) ters U hipotezini desteklemektedir.

Keywords

Gelir Eşitsizliği, Kentleşme, OECD Ülkeleri

Ethical Statement

Etik kurul izni ve/veya yasal/özel izin alınmasına gerek olmayan bu çalışmada araştırma ve yayın etiğine uyulmuştur.

Urbanization and Income Inequality in OECD Countries

Abstract

Urbanization nowadays is characterized by rapid growth, technological advancements, and evolving social dynamics. However, the advantages provided by urbanization are not distributed equitably among all segments of society. This leads to increases in income inequality in developing and developed countries. Considering that more than half of the world's population lives in cities, understanding the complex dynamics between urbanization and income inequality is crucial for policymakers aiming to create comprehensive and sustainable development. In this context, the primary objective of the study is to examine the relationship between urbanization and income inequality in OECD countries during the period 2003-2019 using the panel regression method. Driscoll-Kraay fixed effects estimator show that there is a positive relationship between urbanization and income inequality. Findings support Kuznets' (1955) inverted U hypothesis.

Keywords

Income Inequality, Urbanization, OECD Countries

References

• Acheampong, A.O., Adebayo, T.S., Dzator, J. and Koomson, İ. (2023). İncome inequality and economic growth in BRİCS: İnsights from non-parametric techniques. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 21: 619–640.
• Adams, S. and Klobodu, E.K.M. (2019). Urbanization, economic structure, political regime and income inequality. Social Indicators Research, 142(3): 971–995.
• Akita, T. (2024). Urbanization and income inequality (International University of Japan Research Institute Working Paper No. EMS_2024_01). Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iuj/wpaper/ems_2024_01.html
• Alamanda, A. (2021). The effect of economic growth on income inequality: Panel data analysis from fifty countries. Info Artha, 5(1): 1-10.
• Ali, İ. M.A., Attiaoui, İ., Khalfaoui, R. and Tiwari, A.K. (2022). The effect of urbanization and industrialization on income inequality: An analysis based on the method of moments quantile regression. Social Indicators Research, 161: 29–50.
• Angeles, L. (2010). An alternative test of Kuznets’ hypothesis. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 8: 463–473.
• Annez, P.C. and Buckley, R.M. (2009). Urbanization and growth: Setting the context. In M. Spence P.C. Annez and R.M. Buckley (Eds.), Urbanization and growth. (pp. 1-45). Washington: Commission on Growth and Development.
• Azam, M. (2019). Inequality and economic growth in Asia and the Pacific region. African and Asian Studies, 18(3): 288–314.
• Balcilar, M., Gupta, R., Ma, W. and Makena, P. (2021). Income inequality and economic growth: A re-examination of theory and evidence. Review of Development Economics, 25(2): 737–757.
• Baltagi, B.H. and Wu, P.X. (1999). Unequally spaced panel data regressions with AR (1) disturbances. Econometric Theory, 15(16): 814-823.
• Barro, R.J. (1999). Inequality, growth, and investment (NBER Working Paper No. 7038). Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w7038/w7038.pdf
• Barro, R.J. (2000). İnequality and growth in a panel of countries. Journal of Economic Growth, 5(1): 5-32.
• Bertinelli, L. and Black, D. (2004). Urbanization and growth. Journal of Urban Economics, 56(1): 80-96.
• Bhargava, A., Franzini, L. and Narendranathan, W. (1982). Serial correlation and the fixed effects model. Review of Economic Studies, 49(4): 533-549.
• Breusch, T.S. and Pagan, A. (1980). The lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1): 239-253.
• Buchholz, M. (2023). Does urbanization increase inequality? Race, gender, and the urban wage premium. Journal of Urban Affairs: 1–19.
• Chen, B. and Lin, J.Y. (2014). Development strategy, urbanization and the urban-rural income gap in China. Social Sciences in China, 35(1): 5-20.
• Chen, Y., Luo, P. and Chang, T. (2020). Urbanization and the urban–rural income gap in China: A continuous wavelet coherency analysis. Sustainability, 12(19): 8261.
• Cleff, T. (2019). Applied statistics and multivariate data analysis for business and economics. Springer International Publishing: Switzerland.
• Daoud, J.I. (2017). Multicollinearity and regression analysis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 949: 012009.
• Driscoll, J.C. and Kraay, A.C. (1998). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4): 549-560.
• Fay, M. and Opal, C. (2000). Urbanization without growth: A not so-uncommon phenomenon (The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, WPS2412). Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/287181468741917609/Urbanization-without-growth-a-not-so-uncommon-phenomenon
• Ha, N.M., Le, N.D. and Trung-Kien, P. (2019). The impact of urbanization on income inequality: A study in Vietnam. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 12(3): 146.
• Hausman, J.A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6): 1251– 1272.
• He, L. and Zhang, X. (2022). The distribution effect of urbanization: Theoretical deduction and evidence from China. Habitat International, 123: 102544.
• Henderson, V. (2003). The urbanization process and economic growth: The so-what question. Journal of Economic Growth, 8(1): 47-71.
• İm, K.S., Peseran, M. and Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1): 53-74.
• Jean, S., Causa, O., Jimenez, M. and Wanner, İ. (2007) . Migration in OECD countries: Labour market impact and integration issues (OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 562). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/18151973
• Kanbur, R. and Zhuang, J. (2013). Urbanization and inequality in Asia. Asian Development Review, 30(1): 131–147.
• Keyifli, N. (2020). Kentleşme ile gelir eşitsizlig i arasındaki ilişki: Bootstrap panel granger nedensellik analizi. UİİİD-IJEAS, (30): 211-228.
• Kim, J.H. (2019). Multicollinearity and misleading statistical results. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 72(6): 558-569.
• Knowles, S. (2005). Inequality and economic growth: The empirical relationship reconsidered in the light of comparable data. Journal of Development Studies, 41(1): 135-159.
• Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, (45): 1–28.
• Lall, S.V., Selod, H. and Shalizi, Z. (2006). Rural-urban migration in developing countries: A survey of theoretical predictions and empirical findings (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3915) Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=920498
• Lu, M. and Chen, Z. (2006). Urbanization, urban-biased policies, and urban-rural inequality in China, 1987-2001. Chinese Economy, 39(3): 42 – 63.
• Maket, İ., Kanó, İ.S. and Vas, Z. (2023). Urban agglomeration and income inequality: İs Kuznets Hypothesis valid for Sub-Saharan Africa?. Social Indicators Research, 170: 933–953.
• Mdingi, K. and Ho, S.Y. (2021). Literature review on income inequality and economic growth. MethodsX, 8: 101402.
• Oyvat, C. (2016). Agrarian structures, urbanization, and inequality. World Development, (83): 207–30.
• Panizza, U. (2022). Income inequality and economic growth: Evidence from American data. Journal of Economic Growth, 7(1): 25–41.
• Partridge, M.D. (1997). Is inequality harmful for growth? Comment. The American Economic Review, 87(5): 1019–1032.
• Pesaran, M.H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels (Cambridge Working Papers in Economics No. 0435.). Retrieved from https://www.econ.cam.ac.uk/research-files/repec/cam/pdf/cwpe0435.pdf
• Royuela V, Veneri P, Ramos R. (2014). Income inequality, urban size and economic growth in OECD Regions (OECD Regional Development Working Papers No. 2014/10). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/20737009
• Sagala, P., Akita, T. and Yusuf, A.A. (2014). Urbanization and expenditure inequality in Indonesia: Testing the Kuznets hypothesis with provincial panel data. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 7: 133–147.
• Savranlar, B. and Topcu, E. (2023). Urbanization and urban-rural income inequality in Latin America. İstanbul İktisat Dergisi - Istanbul Journal of Economics, 73(1): 261-279.
• Shin, I. (2012). Income inequality and economic growth. Economic Modelling, 29(5): 2049-2057.
• Siddique, M.A.B., Wibowo, H. and Wu, Y. (2014). Fiscal decentralisation and inequality in Indonesia: 1999–2008 (University of Western Australia, Business School Discussion Paper 14.22). Retrieved from https://ecompapers.biz.uwa.edu.au/paper/PDF%20of%20Discussion%20Papers/2014/14-22%20Fiscal%20Decentralisation%20and%20Inequality%20in%20Indonesia%201999-2008.pdf
• Solarin, S.A., Erdogan, S. and Pata, U.K. (2023). Convergence of income inequality in OECD countries since 1870: A multi-method approach with structural change. Social Indicators Research, (166): 601–626. Su, C.W., Liu, T.Y., Chang, H.L. and Ziang, X-Z. (2015). Is urbanization narrowing the urban-rural income gap? A cross-regional study of China. Habitat International, (48): 79-86.
• Sulemana, İ., Nketiah-Amponsah, E., Codjoe, E.A. and Andoh, J.A.N. (2019). Urbanization and income inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa. Sustainable Cities and Society, 48: 101544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101544
• Taresh, A.A., Sari, D.W. and Purwono, R. (2021). Analysis of the relationship between income inequality and social variables: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Scientific Papers Economics and Sociology, 14(1): 103-119.
• Topuz, S.H. (2022). The relationship between income inequality and economic growth: Are transmission channels effective?, Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, 162(3): 1177-1231.
• United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). Sustainable Development Goals. https://www.undp.org/sustainable-development-goals/
• Wan, G., Zhang, X. and Zhao, M. (2022). Urbanization can help reduce income inequality. Npj Urban Sustainability, 2: 1-8.
• Wang, Z. (2011). A reexamination of urbanization and urban-rural income gap in China. Economic Geography, 8: 1289 – 1293.
• Wang, X., Shao, S. and Li, L. (2019). Agricultural inputs, urbanization, and urban-rural income disparity: Evidence from China. China Economic Review, (55): 67-84.
• World Development Indicators (WDI). Retrieved from https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
• World Social Report (WSR) (2020). Inequality in a Rapidly Changing (World United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs). Retrieved from https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/wp-content/uploads/sites/22/2020/02/World-Social-Report2020-FullReport.pdf
• Wu, D. and Rao, D.S.P. (2017). Urbanization and income ınequality in China: An empirical investigation at provincial level. Social Indicators Research, 131(1): 189-214.
• Yao, Y. and Jiang, L. (2021). Urbanization forces driving rural urban income disparity: Evidence from metropolitan areas in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 312: 127748.
• Yerdelen Tatoğlu, F. (2016). Panel veri ekonometrisi (genişletilmiş 3. baskı). Beta: İstanbul.
• Yerdelen Tatoğlu, F. (2020). Panel zaman serileri analizi (stata uygulamalı). Beta: İstanbul.
• Yuan, Y., Wang, M., Zhu, Y., Huang, X. and Xiong, X. (2020). Urbanization’s effects on the urban-rural income gap in China: A meta-regression analysis. Land Use Policy, 99: 104995.
• Zhao, X. and Liu, L. (2022). The impact of urbanization level on urban–rural income gap in China based on spatial econometric model. Sustainability, 14(21): 13795.
• Zhong, S., Wang, M., Zhu, Y., Chen, Z. and Huang, X. (2022). Urban expansion and the urban–rural income gap: Empirical evidence from China. Cities, 129: 103831.
• Zhou, Q. and Shi, W. (2022). How does town planning affect urban-rural income inequality: Evidence from China with simultaneous equation analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning, 221: 104380.