jegys Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists 2149-360X Genç Bilge Yayıncılık 10.17478/jegys.623308 Other Fields of Education Studies on Education Alan Eğitimleri Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar Cognitive Level of Characters in the Indonesian Novel As a Source of Learning https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7241-4681 Huda Miftakhul Huda Malang State University Ghazali Abdul Syukur Malang State University Siswanto Wahyudi Malang State University Hasanah Muakibatul Malang State University 12 15 2019 7 4 931 952 09 23 2019 11 09 2019 Copyright © 2013, Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists 2013 Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists

This qualitative study aims at finding the level ofcognitive of the characters in the Indonesian novel. The data in this studywere collected through intensive reading based on Maryamah Karpov. The contentis the characterizations belongs to the level of cognitive including memorizing,understanding, applying, analyzing, assessing, and creating. The process ofdata analysis is categorized into three stages, namely data reduction, datapresentation, and conclusion. The result shows that the characterization of novelis identified as the level of cognitive of understanding, applying, analyzing,evaluating, and creating. In fact, the characterization also fills eachindicator of cognitive level. Novel Maryamah Karpov is at a level of judging(C5) and creating (C6). The novel is classified into a high level of cognitiveand is suitable as a source of learning in high schools. The drawing of recommendationbased on this study is that teachers need to study the level of cognitive of anynovel as a learning resource because the harmony between the level of cognitiveand the level of intelligence of the students will have a significant effect.

 Cognitive level behavior of the characters indonesian novel Barter, N. (2016). Strategy Textbooks and the Environment Construct. Organization & Environment, 29(3), 332. Beauvais, C. (2015). The Mighty Child: Time and Power in Children’s Literature. John Benjamins Publishing Company (4th ed., Vol. 5). Amsterdam. Cartwright, K. B., Coppage, E. A., Lane, A. B., Singleton, T., Marshall, T. R., & Bentivegna, C. (2017). Cognitive flexibility deficits in children with specific reading comprehension difficulties. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 50, 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.01.003 Crane, N., Zusho, A., Ding, Y., & Cancelli, A. (2017). Domain-specific metacognitive calibration in children with learning disabilities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 50, 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.09.006 Dore, R. A., Hassinger-Das, B., Brezack, N., Valladares, T. L., Paller, A., Vu, L., … Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2018). The parent advantage in fostering children’s e-book comprehension. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 44, 24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.02.002 Eanes, R. (1997). Content area literacy: teaching for today and tomorrow. Texas: Delmar Publishers. Hansen, N., Jordan, N. C., & Rodrigues, J. (2017). Identifying learning difficulties with fractions: A longitudinal study of student growth from third through sixth grade. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 50, 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.11.002 Krathwohl, L. W. A. D. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational of Objectives. New York: Longman. Marni, S., Suyono, Roekhan, & Harsiati, T. (2019). Critical Thinking Patterns of First-Year Students in Argumentative Essay. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(September), 683–697. Marzano, R. J. (1992). A Different Kind of Classroom: Teaching with Dimensions of Learning. Alexandria, Virginia, USA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD). Miles, B. M., Huberman, M. (1992) Analisis Data Kualitatif Buku Sumber tentang Metode-metode Baru. Jakarta: UIP. Riemer, N. (2019). Cognitive Linguistics and the Public Mind : Idealist Doctrines, Materialist Histories. Language & Communication, 64, 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.09.002 Shamionov, R. M., & Grigoryev, A. V. (2019). The Image of Socially Active Individual in the Representations of Student Youth.” International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 7(1), 15-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/ijcrsee1901015S Smith, B. (2002). Breaking through: college reading. New York: Longman. Vandenbroucke, L., Verschueren, K., Desoete, A., Aunio, P., Ghesquière, P., & Baeyens, D. (2018). Crossing the bridge to elementary school: The development of children’s working memory components in relation to teacher-student relationships and academic achievement. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 42(August 2017), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.08.004 Vieluf, S., & Kerstin, G. (2019). Making Intercultural Learning in EFL Lessons Interesting The Role of Teaching Processes and Individual Learning Prerequisites and Their Interactions. Teaching and Teacher Education Journal, 79, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.11.019 Wollman-Bonilla, J.E. & Werchadlo, B. (1995). Literature Response Journals in a First - Grade Classroom. Language Arts, 72(8), 562-570. Zhdanko, A. (2019). Identification of Cognitive Manipulations that Have The Greatest Impact on Students in The Internet. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 7(1), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.5937/ijcrsee1901035Z