<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN"
        "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.4/JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article  article-type="research-article"        dtd-version="1.4">
            <front>

                <journal-meta>
                                                                <journal-id>jegys</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                                                                                    <journal-title>Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
                                        <issn pub-type="epub">2149-360X</issn>
                                                                                            <publisher>
                    <publisher-name>Genç Bilge Yayıncılık</publisher-name>
                </publisher>
                    </journal-meta>
                <article-meta>
                                        <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17478/jegys.660201</article-id>
                                                                <article-categories>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="en">
                                                            <subject>Other Fields of Education</subject>
                                                            <subject>Studies on Education</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="tr">
                                                            <subject>Alan Eğitimleri</subject>
                                                            <subject>Eğitim Üzerine Çalışmalar</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                    </article-categories>
                                                                                                                                                        <title-group>
                                                                                                                                                            <article-title>Challenges and Possibilities in Teaching and Learning of Calculus : A Case Study of India</article-title>
                                                                                                    </title-group>
            
                                                    <contrib-group content-type="authors">
                                                                        <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">
                                        https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6178-1187</contrib-id>
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Alam</surname>
                                    <given-names>Ashraf</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                                    <aff>Department of Education, University of Delhi, India</aff>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                                                </contrib-group>
                        
                                        <pub-date pub-type="pub" iso-8601-date="20200315">
                    <day>03</day>
                    <month>15</month>
                    <year>2020</year>
                </pub-date>
                                        <volume>8</volume>
                                        <issue>1</issue>
                                        <fpage>407</fpage>
                                        <lpage>433</lpage>
                        
                        <history>
                                    <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="20191216">
                        <day>12</day>
                        <month>16</month>
                        <year>2019</year>
                    </date>
                                                    <date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="20200303">
                        <day>03</day>
                        <month>03</month>
                        <year>2020</year>
                    </date>
                            </history>
                                        <permissions>
                    <copyright-statement>Copyright © 2013, Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists</copyright-statement>
                    <copyright-year>2013</copyright-year>
                    <copyright-holder>Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists</copyright-holder>
                </permissions>
            
                                                                                                                        <abstract><p>Introducing, and thereafter teaching calculus to senior secondary, early college and university students, at the expense of algebra and geometry, is causing half-baked calculus being served to relatively under-prepared students. In line with this proposition, the current research aims to identify how cognition of calculus takes place among learners, what teaching methodologies are used by Indian teachers, what pedagogical techniques are most efficient in calculus teaching, and what prerequisites are called for before commencement of the course on calculus? For this extensive study, data was gathered from school teachers and assistant/associate professors of colleges and universities, having more than 6 years of calculus teaching experience, drawn from 26 schools, 19 colleges and 7 university departments, spanning across 23 different states and union territories of India. A total of 142 teachers took part in this study. Data was collected using schedules, classroom observations, focus group interviews, and informal discussions that were carried out both before and after the classroom teaching. NVivo and Concordance softwares were used for analysis of the emerging content and classroom discourses. The study traversing between February 2016 to April 2019, is qualitative in its framework and lies purely within the interpretivist paradigm. The findings of this research shall mellow the understanding of calculus cognition operational among school, college and university going students.</p></abstract>
                                                            
            
                                                                                        <kwd-group>
                                                    <kwd>Calculus</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Classroom</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Curriculum</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Differentiation</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Evaluation</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Integration</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Learning</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Mathematics Education</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                            
                                                                                                                                                    </article-meta>
    </front>
    <back>
                            <ref-list>
                                    <ref id="ref1">
                        <label>1</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Armstrong, G., Garner, L., &amp; Wynn, J. (1994). Our experience with two reformed calculus programs. Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 4(4), 301-311.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref2">
                        <label>2</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Artigue, M. (2001). What can we learn from educational research at the university level? The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level (pp. 207-220): Springer.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref3">
                        <label>3</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Asiala, M., Cottrill, J., Dubinsky, E., &amp; Schwingendorf, K. E. (1997). The development of students&#039; graphical understanding of the derivative. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 16(4), 399-431.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref4">
                        <label>4</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bell, A., &amp; Janvier, C. (1981). The interpretation of graphs representing situations. For the learning of mathematics, 2(1), 34-42.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref5">
                        <label>5</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bonsangue, M. V., &amp; Drew, D. E. (1995). Increasing minority students&#039; success in calculus. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1995(61), 23-33.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref6">
                        <label>6</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bookman, J. (1993). An expert novice study of metacognitive behavior in four types of mathematics problems. Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 3(3), 284-314.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref7">
                        <label>7</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bookman, J., &amp; Blake, L. (1996). Seven years of Project CALC at Duke University approaching steady state? Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 6(3), 221-234.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref8">
                        <label>8</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bookman, J., &amp; Friedman, C. P. (1994). A comparison of the problem solving performance of students in lab based and traditional calculus. Research in collegiate mathematics education I, 4, 101-116.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref9">
                        <label>9</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bowers, D. (1999). Animating web pages with the TI-92. Retrieved July.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref10">
                        <label>10</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Brunsell, E., &amp; Horejsi, M. (2013). Flipping Your Classroom in One&quot; Take&quot;. The Science Teacher, 80(3), 8.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref11">
                        <label>11</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Buck, R. (1970). A generalized Hausdorff dimension for functions and sets. Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 33(1), 69-78.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref12">
                        <label>12</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., Nicholls, J., Wheatley, G., Trigatti, B., &amp; Perlwitz, M. (1991). Assessment of a problem-centered second-grade mathematics project. Journal for research in mathematics education, 3-29.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref13">
                        <label>13</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Confrey, J. (1981). Conceptual Change, Number Concepts And The Introduction To Calculus.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref14">
                        <label>14</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Dada, O., &amp; Akpan, S. M. Discriminant Analysis of Psycho-Social Predictors of Mathematics Achievement of Gifted Students in Nigeria. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 581-594.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref15">
                        <label>15</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">David, H. (2014). Israel’s Achievements in Mathematics in the Last International Examinations: Part I: The TIMSS 2011. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 2(1), 11-17.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref16">
                        <label>16</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Davis, R. B., &amp; Vinner, S. (1986). The notion of limit: Some seemingly unavoidable misconception stages. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref17">
                        <label>17</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">De Guzmán, M., Hodgson, B. R., Robert, A., &amp; Villani, V. (1998). Difficulties in the passage from secondary to tertiary education. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the international Congress of Mathematicians.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref18">
                        <label>18</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Demana, F. D., Waits, B. K., &amp; Clemens, S. R. (1993). Precalculus: Functions and graphs: Addison Wesley.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref19">
                        <label>19</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Dossey, J. A. (1992). The nature of mathematics: Its role and its influence. Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 39, 48.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref20">
                        <label>20</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Douglas, R. G. (1995). The first decade of calculus reform. UME trends, 6(6), 1-2.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref21">
                        <label>21</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Dreyfus, T., &amp; Eisenberg, T. (1983). The function concept in college students: Linearity, smoothness and periodicity. Focus on learning problems in mathematics, 5(3), 119-132.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref22">
                        <label>22</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Dreyfus, T., &amp; Eisenberg, T. (1984). Intuitions on functions. The Journal of experimental education, 52(2), 77-85.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref23">
                        <label>23</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Dreyfus, T., &amp; Eisenberg, T. (2012). On different facets of mathematical thinking The nature of mathematical thinking (pp. 269-300): Routledge.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref24">
                        <label>24</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Dubinsky, E. (2002). Reflective abstraction in advanced mathematical thinking Advanced mathematical thinking (pp. 95-126): Springer.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref25">
                        <label>25</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ferrini-Mundy, J., &amp; Graham, K. (1994). Research in calculus learning: Understanding of limits, derivatives, and integrals. MAA notes, 31-46.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref26">
                        <label>26</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ferrini-Mundy, J., &amp; Graham, K. G. (1991). An overview of the calculus curriculum reform effort: Issues for learning, teaching, and curriculum development. The American Mathematical Monthly, 98(7), 627-635.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref27">
                        <label>27</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ferrini-Mundy, J., &amp; Lauten, D. (1993). Teaching and learning calculus. Research ideas for the classroom: High school mathematics, 155-176.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref28">
                        <label>28</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Fulton, K. (2012). Upside down and inside out: Flip your classroom to improve student learning. Learning &amp; Leading with Technology, 39(8), 12-17.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref29">
                        <label>29</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Gardiner, T. (1995). Mathematics hamstrung by long divisions. The Sunday Times, 22.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref30">
                        <label>30</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Garofalo, J. (1989). Beliefs and their influence on mathematical performance. The Mathematics Teacher, 82(7), 502-505.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref31">
                        <label>31</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Gray, E. M., &amp; Tall, D. O. (1994). Duality, ambiguity, and flexibility: A&quot; proceptual&quot; view of simple arithmetic. Journal for research in mathematics education, 116-140.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref32">
                        <label>32</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hartinah, S., Suherman, S., Syazali, M., Efendi, H., Junaidi, R., Jermsittiparsert, K., &amp; Umam, R. Probing-Prompting Based On Ethnomathematics Learning Model: The Effect On Mathematical Communication Skill. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(4), 799-814.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref33">
                        <label>33</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Herreid, C. F., &amp; Schiller, N. A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 62-66.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref34">
                        <label>34</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hiebert, J., &amp; Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 65-97.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref35">
                        <label>35</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kaput, J. J. (1998). Representations, inscriptions, descriptions and learning: A kaleidoscope of windows. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 17(2), 265-281. 
Kay, R., &amp; Kletskin, I. (2012). Evaluating the use of problem-based video podcasts to teach mathematics in higher education. Computers &amp; Education, 59(2), 619-627.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref36">
                        <label>36</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kennedy, D. (2000). AP calculus for a new century: Consultado el.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref37">
                        <label>37</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Koirala, H. P. (1997). Teaching of calculus for students’ conceptual understanding. The Mathematics Educator, 2(1), 52-62.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref38">
                        <label>38</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kök, B., &amp; Davaslıgil, Ü. (2014). The effect of teaching geometry which is differentiated based on the parallel curriculum for gifted/talented students on spatial ability. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 2(1), 40-52.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref39">
                        <label>39</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., &amp; Whitt, E. J. (2011). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter: John Wiley &amp; Sons.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref40">
                        <label>40</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Legrand, M. (1993). Débat scientifique en cours de mathématiques. Repères irem, 10, 123-159.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref41">
                        <label>41</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Leinbach, C. (1997). The curriculum in the age of CAS. The state of computer algebra in mathematics education. Bromley, England: Chartwell-Bratt.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref42">
                        <label>42</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Markovits, Z., Eylon, B.-S., &amp; Bruckheimer, M. (1986). Functions today and yesterday. For the learning of mathematics, 6(2), 18-28. 
Mathematics, N. C. o. T. o. M. C. o. S. f. S. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics: Natl Council of Teachers of.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref43">
                        <label>43</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Meadows, M. (2016). Where Are All the Talented Girls? How Can We Help Them Achieve in Science Technology Engineering and Mathematics? Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 4(2), 29-42.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref44">
                        <label>44</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Monk, D. H. (1987). Secondary school size and curriculum comprehensiveness. Economics of Education Review, 6(2), 137-150.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref45">
                        <label>45</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Monk, S., &amp; Nemirovsky, R. (1994). The case of Dan: Student construction of a functional situation through visual attributes. CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education, 4, 139-168.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref46">
                        <label>46</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Neumark, V. (1995). For the love of maths. Times Educational Supplement, 8.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref47">
                        <label>47</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Noddings, N., Maher, C. A., &amp; Davis, R. B. (1990). Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics : National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref48">
                        <label>48</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Orton, A., &amp; Wain, G. (1994). The aims of teaching mathematics. Issues in teaching mathematics, 1-20.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref49">
                        <label>49</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Palmiter, J. R. (1991). Effects of computer algebra systems on concept and skill acquisition in calculus. Journal for research in mathematics education, 151-156.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref50">
                        <label>50</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Pardimin, P., Arcana, N., &amp; Supriadi, D. Developing Media Based on the Information and Communications Technology to Improve The Effectiveness of The Direct Instruction Method in Mathematics Learning. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(4), 1311-1323.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref51">
                        <label>51</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Park, K., &amp; Travers, K. J. (1996). A comparative study of a computer-based and a standard college first-year calculus course. CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education, 6, 155-176.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref52">
                        <label>52</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Piaget, J. (1985). The equilibration of cognitive structures (T. Brown &amp; KJ Thampy, Trans.). Cambridge: Harvard University Presss.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref53">
                        <label>53</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Praslon, F. (1999). Discontinuities regarding the secondary/university transition: The notion of derivative as a specific case. Paper presented at the PME conference.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref54">
                        <label>54</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Repo, S. (1994). Understanding and reflective abstraction: Learning the concept of derivative in a computer environment. International DERIVE Journal, 1(1), 97-113.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref55">
                        <label>55</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ruddick, K. W. (2012). Improving chemical education from high school to college using a more hands-on approach: The University of Memphis.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref56">
                        <label>56</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Schnepp, M., &amp; Nemirovsky, R. (2001). Constructing a foundation for the fundamental theorem of calculus. The roles of representation in school mathematics, 90-102.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref57">
                        <label>57</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Schoenfeld, A. H. (1995). A brief biography of calculus reform. UME trends, 6(6), 3-5.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref58">
                        <label>58</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Selden, J., Selden, A., &amp; Mason, A. (1994). Even good calculus students can&#039;t solve nonroutine problems. MAA notes, 19-28.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref59">
                        <label>59</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Sfard, A. (1992). Operational origins of mathematical objects and the quandary of reification-the case of function. The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy, 25, 59-84.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref60">
                        <label>60</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Skemp, R. R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics teaching, 77(1), 20-26.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref61">
                        <label>61</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Smith, D. A., &amp; Moore, L. C. (1990). Duke university: Project calc. Priming the calculus pump: Innovations and resources, 51-74.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref62">
                        <label>62</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Smith, D. A., &amp; Moore, L. C. (1991). Project CALC: An integrated laboratory course. The laboratory approach to teaching calculus. The Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DC, 81-92.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref63">
                        <label>63</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Solow, A. E. (1994). Preparing for a new calculus: Conference proceedings: Mathematical Assn of Amer.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref64">
                        <label>64</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Tall, D. (1992). The transition to advanced mathematical thinking: Functions, limits, infinity and proof. Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, 495-511.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref65">
                        <label>65</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Tall, D. (1996). Functions and Calculus (Vol. 1): Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref66">
                        <label>66</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Tall, D., &amp; Blackett, N. (1986). Investigating graphs and the calculus in the sixth form. Exploring mathematics with microcomputers, 156-175.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref67">
                        <label>67</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Tall, D., &amp; Schwarzenberger, R. (1978). Conflicts in the learning of real numbers and limits. Mathematics teaching, 82.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref68">
                        <label>68</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Tall, D., &amp; Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and continuity. Educational studies in mathematics, 12(2), 151-169.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref69">
                        <label>69</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Tortop, H. S. (2014). Examining the effectiveness of the in-service training program for the education of the academically gifted students in Turkey: A case study. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 2(2), 67-86.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref70">
                        <label>70</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Vinner, S., &amp; Dreyfus, T. (1989). Images and definitions for the concept of function. Journal for research in mathematics education, 356-366.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref71">
                        <label>71</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">White, P., &amp; Mitchelmore, M. (1996). Conceptual knowledge in introductory calculus. Journal for research in mathematics education, 27, 79-95.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref72">
                        <label>72</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Williams, S. R. (1991). Models of limit held by college calculus students. Journal for research in mathematics education, 22(3), 219-236.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref73">
                        <label>73</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Young, G. S. (1987). Present problems and future prospects. Calculus for a new century, 172-175.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref74">
                        <label>74</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Zappe, S., Leicht, R., Messner, J., Litzinger, T., &amp; Lee, H. W. (2009). &quot; Flipping&quot; the classroom to explore active learning in a large undergraduate course. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                            </ref-list>
                    </back>
    </article>
