Research Article
PDF Mendeley EndNote BibTex Cite

Developing the Creative Thinking Task for Children

Year 2022, Volume 10, Issue 2, 313 - 333, 30.06.2022
https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.1127472

Abstract

In this study, it was aimed to examine the validity and reliability of the Creative Thinking Task for Children (CTTC) developed to evaluate creative thinking skills. The study group consists of 755 participants (aged 11-14) who are attending 5th, 6th, 7th and 8th grades in the central districts of Ankara. The data were obtained with the personal information form CTTC. CTTC has a structure that is scored between 0-3 and consists of tasks. Expert opinions, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were used to evaluate the validity of the measurement tool, and the Cronbach Alpha Internal Consistency Coefficient was used to determine its reliability. As a result of the analysis, it was determined that the model, which consists of originality, fluency, elaboration and divergent thinking sub-dimensions and 11 items, has a structure that fits very well. Internal consistency coefficients of CTTC; .73 in originality sub-dimension, .61 in fluency sub-dimension, elaboration sub-dimension. 60, .69 for divergent thinking sub-dimension and .67 for the whole. According to the findings of the study, it can be said that the Creative Thinking Task for Children is a valid and reliable measurement tool that can be used to evaluate creative thinking skills in Turkish culture.

References

  • Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing. 5th Edition. MacMillen Inc.
  • Argun, Y. (2004). Okul öncesi dönemde yaratıcılık ve eğitimi. Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Artut, K. (2004). An investigation on children’s development level of drawing during pre-school illustration education. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 13(1).
  • Ayman-Nolley, S. (1999). A Piagetian perspective on the dialectic process of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 12(4), 267-275. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1204_4
  • Batson, D., & Ventis, L. (1982). The Religious Experience: A Social-Psychological Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem Akademi.
  • Chambers, J. A. (1973). College teachers: Their effect on creativity of students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65(3), 326. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035632
  • Chien, C. Y., & Hui, A. N. (2010). Creativity in early childhood education: Teachers’ perceptions in three Chinese societies. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 5(2), 49-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2010.02.002
  • Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of applied psychology, 78(1), 98.
  • Cowley, S. (2005). Letting the buggers be creative. Continuum International Publishing Group.
  • Cronbach, L.J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing. 5th Edition. Harper & Row.
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Çok Değişkenli İstatistik: SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamaları. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
  • Dağ İ. (2005) Psikolojik Test ve Ölçeklerde Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik, 3P Psikiyatri Psikoloji Psikofarmakoloji Dergisi, Cilt 13, Ek Sayı 4, 2005;17-23.
  • Deng, L., Wang, L., & Zhao, Y. (2016). How creativity was affected by environmental factors and individual characteristics: A cross-cultural comparison perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 28(3), 357-366.
  • Doi Y, Minowa M. Factor structure of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire in the Japanese general adult population. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences. 2003;57:379-383.
  • Fautley, M., & Savage, J. (2007). Creativity in secondary schools. Learning Matters.
  • Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological assessment, 7(3), 286.
  • Gow, G. (2000). Understanding and teaching creativity. Tech Directions, 59(6), 32.
  • George D, & Mallery P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. 2nd Edition. McGraw-Hill.
  • Guilford, J. P. (1967). Creativity: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1967.tb00002.x
  • Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7(2), 191-205.
  • Hickey, M., & Webster, P. (2001). Creative thinking in music. Music Educators Journal, 88(1), 19-23.
  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Evaluating model fit: a synthesis of the structural equation modelling literature. In 7th European Conference on research methodology for business and management studies (pp. 195-200).
  • Hoyle, R.H. (1995). ‘The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. In R.H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling, concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 1–15). Sage.
  • Hoyle, R. H. (2000). Confirmatory factor analysis. In Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 465-497). Academic Press.
  • Jellen, H., & Urban, K.K. (1986). The TCT-DP (Test for Creative Thinking – Drawing Production): An instrument that can be applied to most age and ability groups. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 11, 138-155.
  • Kalaycı, Ş. (2014). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri. Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Kale, N. (1994), Three intellectual abilities: Critical thinking, creative thinking, problem solving. Yaşadıkça Eğitim Dergisi, 28, 24- 27.
  • Karabey, B. & Yürümezoğlu, K. (2015). A review for creativity and giftedness with perspective of intelligence theories. Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 40, 86-106.
  • Katz, S. L. (2009). Dichotomous forces of inspiration in the creative process: A study of within-domain versus beyond-domain music composers [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Harvard University Department of Education.
  • Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. Routledge.
  • Kirisoglu, O. T. (2002). Sanatta Eğitim: Görmek, öğrenmek, yaratmak. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
  • Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel psychology, 28(4), 563-575.
  • Leech, N. L., Barrett, K. C., & Morgan, G. A. (2005). SPSS for intermediate statistics: Use and interpretation. Psychology Press.
  • Marsh, R. L., Landau, J. D., & Hicks, J. L. (1996). How examples may (and may not) constrain creativity. Memory & cognition, 24(5), 669-680.
  • McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., & Arenberg, D. (1980). Constancy of adult personality structure in males: Longitudinal, cross-sectional and times-of-measurement analyses. Journal of Gerontology, 35(6), 877-883.
  • Öncü, T. (2003). Torrance Yaratıcı Düşünme Testleri-Şekil Testi Aracılığıyla 12-14 Yaşları Arasındaki Çocukların Yaratıcılık Düzeylerinin Yaş ve Cinsiyete Göre Karşılaştırılması. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi. 43(1), 221-237.
  • Özden, Y. (2000). Öğrenme ve öğretme. Pegem Yayıncılık.
  • Özözer, Y. (2005). Ne parlak fikir! Yaratıcı düşünme yöntemleri. Sistem Yayıncılık.
  • Parkin, D. M., & Bray, F. I. (2005). Descriptive studies. In Handbook of epidemiology (pp. 157-230). Springer.
  • Raudsepp, E., (1979), "How Creative Are You?". Personnel Journel, April, s. 218-220. Retrieved from, https://everything2.com/title/How+Creative+Are+You.
  • Rawlinson, J. G. (1995). Yaratıcı düşünme ve beyin. Rota Yayıncılık.
  • Runco, M. A. (1991). Divergent thinking. Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  • Savage, J., & Fautley, M. (2007). Creativity in secondary education. Learning Matters. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446278727
  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). Cambridge University Press.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., and Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. 4th Edition. Allyn and Bacon.
  • Tavakol, M. & Dennick, R. (2011) Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education. 2, 53-55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
  • Taylor, C. W. (1988). Various approaches to and definitions of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (p. 99–121). Cambridge University Press.
  • Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. American Psychological Association.
  • Torrance, E. P. (1974). Norms-technical manual: Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Ginn & Co.
  • Torrance, E. P. (1977). Creativity in the classroom. National Education Association.
  • Üstündağ, T. (2004). Yaratıcı drama öğretmenimin günlüğü. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. Vernon, P. E. (1989). The nature-nurture problem in creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity: Perspectives on individual differences (pp. 93–110). Plenum Press.
  • Watkins, M. W. (2006). Determining parallel analysis criteria. Journal of modern applied statistical methods, 5(2), 344-346. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1162354020
  • Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). A new look at the creativity‐intelligence distinction. Journal of personality, 33(3), 348-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1965.tb01391.x
  • Webster, P. R. (2002). Creativity and music education: Creative thinking in music: Advancing a model. Creativity and music education, 1, 33. Retrieved from, http://www.peterrwebster.com/pubs/WillinghamBook.pdf
  • Wegerif, R. (2007). Dialogic education and technology: Expanding the space of learning (Vol. 7). Springer Science & Business Media. Retrieved from, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rupert-Wegerif/publication/316806471_Dialogic_Education_and_Technology/links/5db0a675a6fdccc99d9321a4/Dialogic-Education-and-Technology.pdf
  • Williams, F. E. (1980). Creativity Assessment Packet (CAP). DOK Publishers.
  • Wu, X., Yang, W., Tong, D., Sun, J., Chen, Q., Wei, D., ... & Qiu, J. (2015). A meta‐analysis of neuroimaging studies on divergent thinking using activation likelihood estimation. Human brain mapping, 36(7), 2703-2718. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22801

Year 2022, Volume 10, Issue 2, 313 - 333, 30.06.2022
https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.1127472

Abstract

References

  • Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing. 5th Edition. MacMillen Inc.
  • Argun, Y. (2004). Okul öncesi dönemde yaratıcılık ve eğitimi. Anı Yayıncılık.
  • Artut, K. (2004). An investigation on children’s development level of drawing during pre-school illustration education. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 13(1).
  • Ayman-Nolley, S. (1999). A Piagetian perspective on the dialectic process of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 12(4), 267-275. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1204_4
  • Batson, D., & Ventis, L. (1982). The Religious Experience: A Social-Psychological Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem Akademi.
  • Chambers, J. A. (1973). College teachers: Their effect on creativity of students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65(3), 326. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035632
  • Chien, C. Y., & Hui, A. N. (2010). Creativity in early childhood education: Teachers’ perceptions in three Chinese societies. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 5(2), 49-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2010.02.002
  • Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of applied psychology, 78(1), 98.
  • Cowley, S. (2005). Letting the buggers be creative. Continuum International Publishing Group.
  • Cronbach, L.J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing. 5th Edition. Harper & Row.
  • Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Çok Değişkenli İstatistik: SPSS ve LISREL Uygulamaları. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
  • Dağ İ. (2005) Psikolojik Test ve Ölçeklerde Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik, 3P Psikiyatri Psikoloji Psikofarmakoloji Dergisi, Cilt 13, Ek Sayı 4, 2005;17-23.
  • Deng, L., Wang, L., & Zhao, Y. (2016). How creativity was affected by environmental factors and individual characteristics: A cross-cultural comparison perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 28(3), 357-366.
  • Doi Y, Minowa M. Factor structure of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire in the Japanese general adult population. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences. 2003;57:379-383.
  • Fautley, M., & Savage, J. (2007). Creativity in secondary schools. Learning Matters.
  • Floyd, F. J., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological assessment, 7(3), 286.
  • Gow, G. (2000). Understanding and teaching creativity. Tech Directions, 59(6), 32.
  • George D, & Mallery P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. 2nd Edition. McGraw-Hill.
  • Guilford, J. P. (1967). Creativity: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1967.tb00002.x
  • Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7(2), 191-205.
  • Hickey, M., & Webster, P. (2001). Creative thinking in music. Music Educators Journal, 88(1), 19-23.
  • Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Evaluating model fit: a synthesis of the structural equation modelling literature. In 7th European Conference on research methodology for business and management studies (pp. 195-200).
  • Hoyle, R.H. (1995). ‘The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. In R.H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling, concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 1–15). Sage.
  • Hoyle, R. H. (2000). Confirmatory factor analysis. In Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 465-497). Academic Press.
  • Jellen, H., & Urban, K.K. (1986). The TCT-DP (Test for Creative Thinking – Drawing Production): An instrument that can be applied to most age and ability groups. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 11, 138-155.
  • Kalaycı, Ş. (2014). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri. Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Kale, N. (1994), Three intellectual abilities: Critical thinking, creative thinking, problem solving. Yaşadıkça Eğitim Dergisi, 28, 24- 27.
  • Karabey, B. & Yürümezoğlu, K. (2015). A review for creativity and giftedness with perspective of intelligence theories. Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 40, 86-106.
  • Katz, S. L. (2009). Dichotomous forces of inspiration in the creative process: A study of within-domain versus beyond-domain music composers [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Harvard University Department of Education.
  • Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. Routledge.
  • Kirisoglu, O. T. (2002). Sanatta Eğitim: Görmek, öğrenmek, yaratmak. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
  • Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel psychology, 28(4), 563-575.
  • Leech, N. L., Barrett, K. C., & Morgan, G. A. (2005). SPSS for intermediate statistics: Use and interpretation. Psychology Press.
  • Marsh, R. L., Landau, J. D., & Hicks, J. L. (1996). How examples may (and may not) constrain creativity. Memory & cognition, 24(5), 669-680.
  • McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., & Arenberg, D. (1980). Constancy of adult personality structure in males: Longitudinal, cross-sectional and times-of-measurement analyses. Journal of Gerontology, 35(6), 877-883.
  • Öncü, T. (2003). Torrance Yaratıcı Düşünme Testleri-Şekil Testi Aracılığıyla 12-14 Yaşları Arasındaki Çocukların Yaratıcılık Düzeylerinin Yaş ve Cinsiyete Göre Karşılaştırılması. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi. 43(1), 221-237.
  • Özden, Y. (2000). Öğrenme ve öğretme. Pegem Yayıncılık.
  • Özözer, Y. (2005). Ne parlak fikir! Yaratıcı düşünme yöntemleri. Sistem Yayıncılık.
  • Parkin, D. M., & Bray, F. I. (2005). Descriptive studies. In Handbook of epidemiology (pp. 157-230). Springer.
  • Raudsepp, E., (1979), "How Creative Are You?". Personnel Journel, April, s. 218-220. Retrieved from, https://everything2.com/title/How+Creative+Are+You.
  • Rawlinson, J. G. (1995). Yaratıcı düşünme ve beyin. Rota Yayıncılık.
  • Runco, M. A. (1991). Divergent thinking. Ablex Publishing Corporation.
  • Savage, J., & Fautley, M. (2007). Creativity in secondary education. Learning Matters. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446278727
  • Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). Cambridge University Press.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., and Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. 4th Edition. Allyn and Bacon.
  • Tavakol, M. & Dennick, R. (2011) Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education. 2, 53-55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
  • Taylor, C. W. (1988). Various approaches to and definitions of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (p. 99–121). Cambridge University Press.
  • Thompson, B. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. American Psychological Association.
  • Torrance, E. P. (1974). Norms-technical manual: Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Ginn & Co.
  • Torrance, E. P. (1977). Creativity in the classroom. National Education Association.
  • Üstündağ, T. (2004). Yaratıcı drama öğretmenimin günlüğü. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık. Vernon, P. E. (1989). The nature-nurture problem in creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity: Perspectives on individual differences (pp. 93–110). Plenum Press.
  • Watkins, M. W. (2006). Determining parallel analysis criteria. Journal of modern applied statistical methods, 5(2), 344-346. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1162354020
  • Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). A new look at the creativity‐intelligence distinction. Journal of personality, 33(3), 348-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1965.tb01391.x
  • Webster, P. R. (2002). Creativity and music education: Creative thinking in music: Advancing a model. Creativity and music education, 1, 33. Retrieved from, http://www.peterrwebster.com/pubs/WillinghamBook.pdf
  • Wegerif, R. (2007). Dialogic education and technology: Expanding the space of learning (Vol. 7). Springer Science & Business Media. Retrieved from, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rupert-Wegerif/publication/316806471_Dialogic_Education_and_Technology/links/5db0a675a6fdccc99d9321a4/Dialogic-Education-and-Technology.pdf
  • Williams, F. E. (1980). Creativity Assessment Packet (CAP). DOK Publishers.
  • Wu, X., Yang, W., Tong, D., Sun, J., Chen, Q., Wei, D., ... & Qiu, J. (2015). A meta‐analysis of neuroimaging studies on divergent thinking using activation likelihood estimation. Human brain mapping, 36(7), 2703-2718. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22801

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Education, Special
Published Date June 2022
Journal Section Creativity
Authors

Cemre ERTEN TATLI (Primary Author)
Hasan Kalyoncu University
0000-0002-1838-2540
Türkiye


Müger ARTAR
KAPADOKYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, KAPADOKYA MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU
0000-0003-3993-2211
Türkiye

Early Pub Date June 21, 2022
Publication Date June 30, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022, Volume 10, Issue 2

Cite

Bibtex @research article { jegys1127472, journal = {Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists}, eissn = {2149-360X}, address = {editorjegys@gmail.com}, publisher = {Genç Bilge Yayıncılık}, year = {2022}, volume = {10}, number = {2}, pages = {313 - 333}, doi = {10.17478/jegys.1127472}, title = {Developing the Creative Thinking Task for Children}, key = {cite}, author = {Erten Tatlı, Cemre and Artar, Müger} }
APA Erten Tatlı, C. & Artar, M. (2022). Developing the Creative Thinking Task for Children . Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists , 10 (2) , 313-333 . DOI: 10.17478/jegys.1127472
MLA Erten Tatlı, C. , Artar, M. "Developing the Creative Thinking Task for Children" . Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists 10 (2022 ): 313-333 <https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jegys/issue/69363/1127472>
Chicago Erten Tatlı, C. , Artar, M. "Developing the Creative Thinking Task for Children". Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists 10 (2022 ): 313-333
RIS TY - JOUR T1 - Developing the Creative Thinking Task for Children AU - Cemre Erten Tatlı , Müger Artar Y1 - 2022 PY - 2022 N1 - doi: 10.17478/jegys.1127472 DO - 10.17478/jegys.1127472 T2 - Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists JF - Journal JO - JOR SP - 313 EP - 333 VL - 10 IS - 2 SN - -2149-360X M3 - doi: 10.17478/jegys.1127472 UR - https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.1127472 Y2 - 2022 ER -
EndNote %0 Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists Developing the Creative Thinking Task for Children %A Cemre Erten Tatlı , Müger Artar %T Developing the Creative Thinking Task for Children %D 2022 %J Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists %P -2149-360X %V 10 %N 2 %R doi: 10.17478/jegys.1127472 %U 10.17478/jegys.1127472
ISNAD Erten Tatlı, Cemre , Artar, Müger . "Developing the Creative Thinking Task for Children". Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists 10 / 2 (June 2022): 313-333 . https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.1127472
AMA Erten Tatlı C. , Artar M. Developing the Creative Thinking Task for Children. JEGYS. 2022; 10(2): 313-333.
Vancouver Erten Tatlı C. , Artar M. Developing the Creative Thinking Task for Children. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists. 2022; 10(2): 313-333.
IEEE C. Erten Tatlı and M. Artar , "Developing the Creative Thinking Task for Children", Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 313-333, Jun. 2022, doi:10.17478/jegys.1127472

Submitted Articles: 589   Rejected Articles: 268 Published Articles: 320  Acceptance Rate:  %54   (Updated at February 9, 2022)

Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists indexed from SCOPUS June 2018- December 2020. SOBIAD Impact Factor Score (1,171) Top One of Turkey at SOBIAD Index at 2019. Thanks for the contributions. 3rd International Congress on Gifted Youth and Sustainability of the Education (ICGYSE) 28-29 October 2022 (Please click for attendance).

Dergimiz "Education Full Text (H.W.Wilson) Database Coverage List" tarafından dizinlenmektedir. HTML  PDF   JEGYS'nin kapsamı;  eğitim bilimleri, alan eğitimi (tüm alan eğitimleri), üstün zekalılar eğitimi, interdisipliner eğitim çalışmaları, eğitimde sürdürülebilirlik çalışmaları, yetenek eğitimi gibi konulardır. Yazarların, araştırmalarında; yeni yöntem, model, yaklaşım, yetenek gelişimi, ileri (advanced) eğitim yenilikleri, karakter eğitimi, eğitimde sürdürülebilirlik gibi yönlerinden birini ya da birkaçını vurgulamaları JEGYS'nin yayın hedeflerini gerçekleştirmesi açısından önemlidir. 

JEGYS NOT INDEXED citefactor

    21871  17854      25126  20742           17865                   22217           21870       24093           SCImago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)25746

257472574825749




POPULARITY OF THE JEGYS OVER THE WORLD

                                                                 Free counters!

Note: Counter started on 28 February 2021

Giftedupoint.com Meeting point of the talent and giftedness

Young Wise Publishing/Genç Bilge Yayıncılık
Management-Publication Process-Office (Adress 1): 63 – 66 Hatton Garden, Fifth Floor, Suite 23, EC1N 8LE, London, UK
Web site: https://youngwisepub.com/ E-mail: info@youngwisepub.com

ISSN-Ownership-Office (Adress 2): Bahcelievler District 3015 St. No:9/1  Isparta, Turkey
Web site: http://gencbilgeyayincilik.com/ E-mail: gencbilgeyayincilik@gmail.com