Embeddedness in Social Entrepreneurship: The Role of Geographic Diffusion and Cultural Values

Year 2017, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 173 - 196, 01.06.2017

Deniz Kantur

Abstract

While there is still debate in the literature regarding the definition of social entrepreneurship, this paper attempts to understand the role of cultural values in social entrepreneurship with different levels of geographic diffusion and embeddedness. With this aim, finalist social entrepreneurship projects of two culturally different award platforms are content analyzed. Results show that, embeddedness changes with different levels of geographic diffusion and cultural values stand-out with increased embeddedness. Moreover, in collectivist cultures, others-related values are dominant in social entrepreneurship. Overall, it is suggested that a single definition for social entrepreneurship is hard to achieve and propositions are developed suggesting that embeddedness increase the dominance of cultural values in social entrepreneurship and others-related values will be common in collectivist cultures.

Keywords

Social Entrepreneurship, Embeddedness, Geographic Diffusion, Cultural Values, Content Analysis

Sosyal Girişimcilikte Yerleşiklik: Coğrafi Yayılım ve Kültürel Değerlerin Rolü

Abstract

Bu çalışma, sosyal girişimcilik kavramının tanımlanmasıyla ile ilgili yazında süregelen tartışmaları netleştirmek amacıyla, farklı coğrafi yayılım ve yerleşiklikteki sosyal girişimlerde kültürel değerlerin rolünü anlamlandırmayı hedeflemektedir. Bu amaçla, kültürel açıdan birbirlerinden farklı iki ayrı ulusal platformdaki sosyal girişimcilik ödülüne sunulan finalist proje tanımları içerik analizi yöntemi ile incelenmiştir. Sonuçlar, farklı seviyelerdeki coğrafik yayılımla birlikte projelerdeki yerleşikliğin de farklılık gösterdiğini destekler niteliktedir. Değerlendirmeler, sosyal girişimcilik projelerinde yerleşikliğin artmasıyla kültürel değerlerin sıkça vurgulandığını göstermektedir. Ayrıca, toplumculuk değerlerinin yüksek seviyede olduğu kültürlerde, başkaları-ilintili değerlerin sosyal girişimcilik proje tanımlarında sıkça görüldüğü gözlemlenmiştir. Özetle, tek bir sosyal girişimcilik tanımının geliştirilmesinin mümkün olamayacağı sonucuna varılmış ve sosyal girişimcilikte yerleşiklikle birlikte kültürel değerlerin artacağı ve toplumculuk değerlerinin yüksek olduğu kültürlerde başkaları-ilintili değerlerin öne çıkacağı yönünde önermeler geliştirilmiştir.

Keywords

Sosyal Girişimcilik, Yerleşiklik, Coğrafi Yayılım, Kültürel Değerler, İçerik Analizi

References

• Albert, M. (1991), Capitalism contre capitalism.Paris: Editions du Seuil.
• Aldrich HE and Zimmer C (1986) Entrepreneurship through social networks. In: Sexton D and Smilor R (eds) The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship. New York: Ballinger, 3–23.
• Austin J, Stevenson H, ve Wei-Skillern J. (2006), ‘Social And Commercial Entrepreneurship: Same, Different, Or Both?’ Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 30(1): 1–22.
• Bacq, S. c-ve Jansen, F. (2011), ‘The multiple faces of social entrepreneurship; A review of definitional issues based on geographical and thematic criteria’, Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 23, 5-6, 373-403.
• Bosma, N., Schott T., Terjesen, S. Ve Kew, P. (2015) Special Topic Report Social Entrepreneurship, http://gemconsortium.org/report/49542.
• Carroll, A.B. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance,’Academy of Management Review, 4, 4, 497-505.
• Carroll, A. B. (1991) The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders, Business Horizons, 34, 4, 39-48.
• Carroll, A. B. (1999) Corporate Social Responsibility Evolution of a Definitional Construct, 38,3, 268-295.
• Choi, N. ve Majumdar, S. (2004) Social entrepreneurship as an essentially contested concept: Opening a new avenue for systematic future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 29, 363-376.
• Cukier, W., Trenholm, S., Carl, D. ve Gekas, G. (2011), ‘Social Entrepreneurship; A Content Analysis’, Journal for Strategic Innovation and Sustainability, 7, 1, 99-119.
• Dacin, P. A., Dacin, M. T. ve Matear, M. (2010), ‘Social Entrepreneurship: Why We Don’t Need a New Theory and How We Move Forward From Here’, Academy of Management Perspectives, 24, 3, 37-57.
• Dess, J. G. (2001), ‘The meaning of social entrepreneurship’: http://www. caseatduke.org/documents/dees_sedef.pdf.
• Dikmener, G. ve Sanje, G. (ed.). Büyüyen Kapsayıcı Piyasalar: Türkiye’de Sosyal Girişimcilik Vakaları, İstanbul Bilgi Yayınları, İstanbul, 37-60.
• Özeren, E. ve Saatçioğlu, Ö.Y. (2016), “Sosyal Girişimcilikte İnovasyon ve Farklılıkları Yönetmek: Çöp(m)adam Örneği”, Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, Cilt/Volume: 5, Sayı/Issue: 1.
• Granovetter, M. (1985), ‘Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness’ American Journal of Sociology, 91, 3, 481-510.
• Hayek, F.A., 1945. The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review 35, 519–530.
• Hofstede, G. (2001) Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. 2nd Edition, Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.
• Jack, S.L. ve Anderson, A.al. (2002), “The effects of embededdness on the entrepreneurial process”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 467-487.
• Jones, T. M., Felps, W. ve Bigley, G. A. (2007) ‘Ethical Theory and stakeholderrelated decisions: The role of stakeholder culture’ Academy of Management Review, 32, 1, 137-155.
• Kabasakal, H. ve Bodur, M. (2002) ‘Arabic cluster: A bridge between east and west. Journal of World Business, 37, 40–54.
• Kerlin, J. (2006) “Social Enterprise in the United States and Europe: Understanding and learning from the differences”, Voluntas, Vol. 17, No.3, pp. 247- 263.
• Kirzner, I., 1973. Competition and entrepreneurship. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
• Kistruck, G.M. ve Beamish, P.W. (2010) The Interplay of Form, Structure, and Embeddedness in Social Intrapreneurship, Entrepreneurship Theory And Practice, 735-761.
• Küresel Girişimcilik İzleyicisinin Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Report (2013): http://www.gemconsortium.org/docs/download/3106.
• Lepoutre, J., Justo, R., Terjesen, S. and Bosma, N.S. (2011). Designing a Global Standardized Methodology for Measuring Social Entrepreneurship Activity: The Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Social Entrepreneurship Study, Small Business Economics.
• Mair J, ve Marti I. (2006), ‘Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Source Of Explanation, Prediction, And Delight’, Journal Of World Business 41(1): 36–44.
• Peng, M. (2003), ‘Institutional transitions and strategic choices’, Academy of Management Review, 28, 272-296.
• Peredo A.M, ve Chrisman J, J.. (2006), ‘Toward A Theory Of Community- Based Enterprise. Academy Of Management Review 31(2): 309–328.
• Polanyi K (1957) The economy as institute process. In: Dalton G (ed.) (1968) Primitive, Archaic and Modern Economies: Essays of Karl Polanyi. Boston, MA: Beacon, 139–174.
• Santos, F. M. (2012), ‘A Positive Theory of Social Entrepreneurship’, Journal of Business Ethics, 111, 335-351.
• Schumpeter, J.A., 1942. Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. Harper and Brothers, New York.
• Seelos, C., Mair, J., Battilana, J. ve Dacin, T. M. (2011), The Embeddedness of Social Entrepreneurship: Understanding Variation across Local Communities, in Marquis, C., Lounsbury, M. Greenwood, R. (ed.) Communities and Organizations (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Volume 33) Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp.333 – 363.
• Short, J.C. Moss, T. W. ve Lumpkin, G.T. (2009), ‘Research in Social Entrepreneurship: Past Contributions and Future Opportunities’, Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3, 161-194.
• Smith, B. R. ve Steven, C. E. (2010), ‘Different types of social entrepreneurship: The role of geography and embeddedness on the measurement and scaling of social value’, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22, 6, 575-598.
• Ulhoi, J.P. (2005), ‘The social dimensions of entrepreneurship’, Technovation, 25, 939-946.
• Uzzi B (1997) Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(1): 35–68.
• Wang. C.L. ve Altinay, L. (2010) “Social embeddedness, entrepreneurial orientation and firm growth in ethnic minority small businesses in the UK” International Small Business Journal, 30(1) 3–23.
• Weerawardena J, ve Mort G. (2006), ‘Investigating Social Entrepreneurship: A Multidimensional Model’, Journal Of World Business 41(1): 21–35.
• Yin, R. (2014), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 5th Editin, Sage Publishing, Newbury Park, CA.
• Zahra, S A, Gedajlovic, E, Neubaum, D O, & Shulman, J M (2009) ‘A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges’, Journal of Business Venturing, 24: 519-532.
• Zimmer, Mary R. and Linda L. Golden (1988), “Impressions of Retail. Stores: A Content Analysis of Consumer Images,” Journal of. Retailing, 64 (3), 265-293.