Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Comparison of Hole Quality of Polyamide Materials Produced by Traditional and Additive Manufacturing

Year 2020, Volume: 32 Issue: 1, 1 - 7, 31.03.2020
https://doi.org/10.7240/jeps.555453

Abstract

Polyamide,
commonly used in engineering plastics, has wear resistance and high strength.
Hybrid manufacturing, using a combination of more than one production technique
to benefit from the superiority of the manufacturing. In this study, polyamide,
which is produced with casting and three-dimensional printer, has been drilled
and reamed in numerical controlled machine. Thus, the effect of production
technique, machining allowance and tool feed rate on hole surface and size
quality was investigated. In general, the surface quality of the holes in the
polyamide material produced by the two production techniques was directly
affected by the machining allowance and the increased feed rate. In addition,
the size of the holes created with the three-dimensional printer has reached
the desired level after reaming process.

References

  • ASTM F2792-12. Standard terminology for additive manufacturing Technologies, ASTM International, 2012.
  • Guo N, Leu MC. Additive manufacturing: technology, applications and research needs. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, ; 8(3): 215-243.
  • Wohlers T. Wohler’s Report 2016, Wohlers Associates, Inc., 2016.
  • Petrick IJ, Simpson TW, 3D printing disrupts manufacturing: how economies of one create new rules of competition. Research-Technology Management, 2013, 56(6): 12-16.
  • Amanullah ANM, Murshiduzzamana, Saleha T, Khana R. Design and Development of a Hybrid Machine combining Rapid Prototyping and CNC Milling Operation. Procedia Engineering, 2017, 184: 163 – 170.
  • Sealy MP, Madireddy G, Williams RE, RAO P, Toursangsaraki M. Hybrid processes in additive manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, 2018, 140, 6.
  • Deopura BL, Lagirusamy R, Joshi M, Gupta B. Polyesters and polyamides. Cambridge, England, 2008.
  • Kuram E. Micro-machinability of injection molded polyamide 6 polymer and glass-fiber reinforced polyamide 6 composite. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2016, 88 : 85-100.
  • Rubio JCC, Dasilva LJ, Leite WDO, Panzera TH, Filho SLM, Davim JP. Investigations on the drilling process of unreinforced and reinforced polyamides using Taguchi method. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2013, 55 :338-344.
  • Bozdemir M. The Effects of Humidity on Cast PA6G during Turning and Milling Machining. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2017.
  • Davim JP, Silva LR, Festas A, Abrão AM. Machinability study on precision turning of PA66 polyamide with and without glass fiber reinforcing. Materials & Design, 2009, 30 (2): 228-234.
  • Bozdemir M, Aykut Ş. Optimization of surface roughness in end milling Castamide. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2012, 62 (5): 495–503.
  • Zhu Z, Dhokia VG, Nassehi A, Newman ST. A review of hybrid manufacturing processes state of the art and future perspectives. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 2013, 26 (7): 596–615.
  • Lauwers B, Klocke F, Klink A, Tekkaya AE, Neugebauer R, Mcintosh D. Hybrid Processes In Manufacturing. CIRP Annual. Manufacturing Technology, 2014, 63, 2: 561–583.
  • Lorenz KA, Jones JB, Wimpenny DI, Jackson MR. A Review Of Hybrid Manufacturing, Solid Freeform Fabrication Conference Proceedings, 2015, 53.
  • Flynn JM, Shokrani A, Newman ST, Dhokia V. Hybrid Additive And Subtractive Machine Tools- Research And Industrial Developments. International Journal Of Machine Tools And Manufacture, 2016, 79-101.

Geleneksel ve Eklemeli İmalat ile Üretilen Poliamid Malzemelerin Delik Kalitesinin Karşılaştırılması

Year 2020, Volume: 32 Issue: 1, 1 - 7, 31.03.2020
https://doi.org/10.7240/jeps.555453

Abstract

Yaygın
olarak kullanılan mühendislik plastiklerinden polyamid, yüksek aşınma direnci
ve yüksek mukavemete sahiptir. Hibrit imalat ise birden fazla üretim tekniğinin
bir arada kullanılarak her bir üretim tekniğinin üstünlüklerinden faydalanmayı
sağlar. Bu çalışmada, döküm ve üç boyutlu yazıcı ile üretilen polyamide
malzemeye, nümerik kontrollü tezgahta delik delme ve raybalama işlemi
yapılmıştır. Böylelikle, üretim tekniğinin, işleme payının ve takım ilerleme
hızının delik yüzeyi ve boyut kalitesine etkisi incelenmiştir. Genel olarak her
iki üretim tekniğiyle üretilen polyamid malzemedeki deliklerin yüzey kalitesi,
işleme payından ve artan ilerleme hızından doğrudan etkilenmektedir. Ayrıca üç
boyutlu yazıcı ile oluşturulan deliklerin boyut kalitesi raybalama işlemi
sonrası istenilen seviyeye ulaşmıştır.

References

  • ASTM F2792-12. Standard terminology for additive manufacturing Technologies, ASTM International, 2012.
  • Guo N, Leu MC. Additive manufacturing: technology, applications and research needs. Frontiers of Mechanical Engineering, ; 8(3): 215-243.
  • Wohlers T. Wohler’s Report 2016, Wohlers Associates, Inc., 2016.
  • Petrick IJ, Simpson TW, 3D printing disrupts manufacturing: how economies of one create new rules of competition. Research-Technology Management, 2013, 56(6): 12-16.
  • Amanullah ANM, Murshiduzzamana, Saleha T, Khana R. Design and Development of a Hybrid Machine combining Rapid Prototyping and CNC Milling Operation. Procedia Engineering, 2017, 184: 163 – 170.
  • Sealy MP, Madireddy G, Williams RE, RAO P, Toursangsaraki M. Hybrid processes in additive manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, Transactions of the ASME, 2018, 140, 6.
  • Deopura BL, Lagirusamy R, Joshi M, Gupta B. Polyesters and polyamides. Cambridge, England, 2008.
  • Kuram E. Micro-machinability of injection molded polyamide 6 polymer and glass-fiber reinforced polyamide 6 composite. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2016, 88 : 85-100.
  • Rubio JCC, Dasilva LJ, Leite WDO, Panzera TH, Filho SLM, Davim JP. Investigations on the drilling process of unreinforced and reinforced polyamides using Taguchi method. Composites Part B: Engineering, 2013, 55 :338-344.
  • Bozdemir M. The Effects of Humidity on Cast PA6G during Turning and Milling Machining. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2017.
  • Davim JP, Silva LR, Festas A, Abrão AM. Machinability study on precision turning of PA66 polyamide with and without glass fiber reinforcing. Materials & Design, 2009, 30 (2): 228-234.
  • Bozdemir M, Aykut Ş. Optimization of surface roughness in end milling Castamide. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2012, 62 (5): 495–503.
  • Zhu Z, Dhokia VG, Nassehi A, Newman ST. A review of hybrid manufacturing processes state of the art and future perspectives. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 2013, 26 (7): 596–615.
  • Lauwers B, Klocke F, Klink A, Tekkaya AE, Neugebauer R, Mcintosh D. Hybrid Processes In Manufacturing. CIRP Annual. Manufacturing Technology, 2014, 63, 2: 561–583.
  • Lorenz KA, Jones JB, Wimpenny DI, Jackson MR. A Review Of Hybrid Manufacturing, Solid Freeform Fabrication Conference Proceedings, 2015, 53.
  • Flynn JM, Shokrani A, Newman ST, Dhokia V. Hybrid Additive And Subtractive Machine Tools- Research And Industrial Developments. International Journal Of Machine Tools And Manufacture, 2016, 79-101.
There are 16 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Engineering
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Tuğçe Tezel 0000-0003-0139-442X

Publication Date March 31, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 32 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Tezel, T. (2020). Comparison of Hole Quality of Polyamide Materials Produced by Traditional and Additive Manufacturing. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences, 32(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.7240/jeps.555453
AMA Tezel T. Comparison of Hole Quality of Polyamide Materials Produced by Traditional and Additive Manufacturing. JEPS. March 2020;32(1):1-7. doi:10.7240/jeps.555453
Chicago Tezel, Tuğçe. “Comparison of Hole Quality of Polyamide Materials Produced by Traditional and Additive Manufacturing”. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences 32, no. 1 (March 2020): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.7240/jeps.555453.
EndNote Tezel T (March 1, 2020) Comparison of Hole Quality of Polyamide Materials Produced by Traditional and Additive Manufacturing. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences 32 1 1–7.
IEEE T. Tezel, “Comparison of Hole Quality of Polyamide Materials Produced by Traditional and Additive Manufacturing”, JEPS, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2020, doi: 10.7240/jeps.555453.
ISNAD Tezel, Tuğçe. “Comparison of Hole Quality of Polyamide Materials Produced by Traditional and Additive Manufacturing”. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences 32/1 (March 2020), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.7240/jeps.555453.
JAMA Tezel T. Comparison of Hole Quality of Polyamide Materials Produced by Traditional and Additive Manufacturing. JEPS. 2020;32:1–7.
MLA Tezel, Tuğçe. “Comparison of Hole Quality of Polyamide Materials Produced by Traditional and Additive Manufacturing”. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Pure Sciences, vol. 32, no. 1, 2020, pp. 1-7, doi:10.7240/jeps.555453.
Vancouver Tezel T. Comparison of Hole Quality of Polyamide Materials Produced by Traditional and Additive Manufacturing. JEPS. 2020;32(1):1-7.