Kinezyofobi Nedenleri Ölçeği’nin Türkçe Uyarlamasının Geçerlik ve Güvenirliği

Year 2020, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 64 - 73, 31.03.2020

Melis Çayır Neslihan Alkan Durutürk Mustafa Agah Tekindal

Abstract

Amaç: Yetişkinler için geliştirilmiş olan, Kinezyofobi Nedenleri Ölçeği (KNÖ), hareket korkusunun biyolojik ve psikolojik
sebeplerinin belirlenmesine imkân sağlayan bir ankettir. Çalışmada amacımız, Türkçe konuşan geriatrik bireylerde, KNÖ’nin
Türkçe uyarlaması ve kültürel adaptasyonunu sağlayarak, geçerlik ve güvenirliğini ölçmek idi.
Yöntem: Çalışmamıza, 65-80 yaş arası, kooperasyon ve anlamaya engel olabilecek herhangi bir mental problemi olmayan ve
araştırmaya gönüllü olarak katılan 103 geriatrik birey (yaş ortalaması: 71,09±4,45 yıl, vücut kütle indeksi: 27,08±4,4 kg/m2)
dahil edildi. Bireylere Türkçe çevirisi yapılan KNÖ ile kriter geçerliğini belirlemek için Tampa Kinezyofobi Ölçeği (TKÖ) uygulandı.
Ölçeğin güvenilirliğinin göstergesi olan zamana göre değişmezliği test etmek için 48 saat sonra, KNÖ ikinci kez uygulandı ve
sınıf-içi korelasyon katsayısı (ICC) değeri ile değerlendirildi.
Bulgular: Ankette yer alan tüm sorular arası iç tutarlılık değeri 0,863 olarak bulundu. Biyolojik alt boyutta yer alan sorular arası
ICC değeri 0,913, psikolojik alt boyutta 0.800 olarak bulundu. TKÖ ve KNÖ alt boyut puanları arasındaki korelasyonlar
incelendiğinde, TKÖ toplam puanı ile KNÖ toplam puanı (r=0,401, p=0,001), biyolojik (r=0,406, p=0,001), ve psikolojik
(r=0,274, p=0,005) alt boyutları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı, pozitif yönde korelasyon gözlendi. KNÖ’nün “toplam
puanı”, testte 2,54±0,55 iken tekrar testte 2,58±0,65 olarak bulundu.
Sonuç: Sonuç olarak, yetişkinde motor inaktivitenin ve hareket korkusunun sebeplerinin belirlenmesi amacıyla geliştirilmiş ve
şimdiye kadar başka herhangi bir dilde adaptasyonu yapılmamış olan KNÖ’nün, Türk geriatrik bireylerde geçerli ve güvenilir bir
anket olduğunu ayrıca farklı hastalıklarda ve yaş gruplarında incelenmesi gerektiğini düşünmekteyiz. 

Keywords

Geriatri, Hareket, Anket, Kinezyofobi Nedenleri Ölçeği

Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of Kinesiophopia Causes Scale

Abstract

Purpose: Kinesiophopia Causes Scale (KCS) which is developed for adults is a questionnaire that allows the determination of
biological and psychological causes of fear of movement. The aim of our study was to provide the Turkish adaptation and cultural
adaptation of KCS in Turkish-speaking geriatric individuals and to measure their reliability and validity.
Methods: Our study included 103 healthy geriatric individuals (average age: 71.09±4.45 years, body mass index: 27.08±4.4
kg/m2) the aged of 65-80 years, who had no mental problems that could interfere with cooperation and understanding and who
volunteered to participate in the study. The Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) was applied in order to determine the validity
of the criterion with KCS translated into Turkish. After 48 hours of testing for variability, which is an indicator of the reliability of
the scale, KCS was applied for second time and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) value assessed.
Results: The internal consistency value of the questionnaire was 0.863. The ICC value was 0.913 among the questions in the
biological sub-dimension and 0.800 in the psychological sub-dimension. When the correlations between TSK and KCS subscale
scores were examined, there was a statistically significant positive correlation between total score of TSK with total score of
KCS (r=0.401, p=0.001), biological (r=0.406, p=0.001) and psychological (r=0.274, p=0.005) subscales. Total score of KCS
were 2.54±0.55 in test and 2.58±0.65 in re-test.
Conclusion: As a result, we think that KCS, which has been developed in order to determine the causes of motor inactivity and
fear of movement in adults, is a valid and reliable survey in Turkish geriatric individuals and should be examined in different
diseases and age groups. 

Keywords

Geriatrics, Movement, Questionnaire, Kinesiophobia Causes Scale

References

• 1. Goswami N. Falls and fall-prevention in older persons: Geriatrics meets spaceflight. Front Physiol. 2017;8:603.
• 2. Erdem A, Güner GS. Impact of exercise on quality of life, body awareness, kinesiophobia and the risk of falling among young older adults. Cukurova Medical J. 2018;43:941-950.
• 3. Akyol Y, Durmuş D, Doğan C, et al. Quality of life and level of depressive symptoms in the geriatric population. Arch Rheumatol. 2010;25:165-173.
• 4. Burwinkle T, Robinson JP, Turk DC. Fear of movement: factor structure of the tampa scale of kinesiophobia in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. J Pain. 2005;6:384-391.
• 5. Knapik A, Saulicz E, Gnat R. Kinesiophobia-introducing a new diagnostic tool. Journal of Human Kinetics. 2011;28:25-31.
• 6. Shelby RA, Somers TJ, Keefe FJ, et al. Brief fear of movement scale for osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care & Research. 2012;64:862-871.
• 7. Ishak A, Zahari Z, Justine M. Kinesiophobia, Pain, Muscle Functions, and Functional Performances among Older Persons with Low Back Pain. Pain Res Treat. 2017;2017:3489617.
• 8. Saulicz E, Knapik A, Saulicz M, et al. Physical activity in youth and level of kinesiophobia in older adults. Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity. 2016;8:64-77.
• 9. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25:3186-3191.
• 10. Janusz K, Andrzej K. Barriers of physical activity (kinesiophobia) in patients subjected to cardiac rehabilitation. Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity. 2014;6:291-297.
• 11. Vlaeyen JW, Kole-Snijders AM, Boeren RG, et al. Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic low back pain and its relation to behavioral performance. Pain. 1995;62:363-372.
• 12. Weermeijer JD, Meulders A. Clinimetrics: Tampa scale for kinesiophobia. J Physiother. 2018;64:126.
• 13. Camicioli R, Wild K. Assessment of the Elderly with Dementia. In Herndon RM, ed. Handbook of Neurologic Rating Scales. New York, Demos Vermande. 1997;6:125-160.
• 14. Karasar N. Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: Kavramlar, ilkeler, teknikler. Ankara, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, 2012.
• 15. Durutürk N, Tonga E, Gabel PC, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Lower Limb Functional Index. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:2439-2444.
• 16. Harridge SD, Lazarus NR. Physical activity, aging, and physiological function. Physiology. 2017;32:152-161.
• 17. Kocjan J, Knapik A. Barriers of physical activity (kinesiophobia) in patients subjected to cardiac rehabilitation. Baltic J of Health and Physical Activity. 2014;6:291.
• 18. Swinkels-Meewisse EJCM, Swinkels RAHM, Verbeek ALM, et al. Psychometric properties of the Tampa Scale for kinesiophobia and the fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire in acute low back pain. Manual Therapy. 2003;8:29-36.
• 19. Korkmaz N, Akinci A, Yörükan S, et al. Validation and reliability of the Turkish version of the fear avoidance beliefs questionnaire in patients with low back pain. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2009;45:527-535.
• 20. Hayran M. Sağlık araştırmaları için temel istatistik: Omega Araştırma. 2011.
• 21. Larsson C, Hansson EE, Sundquist K, et al. Psychometric properties of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-11) among older people with chronic pain. Physiother Theory Pract. 2014;30:421-428.
• 22. Karasar N. Scientific research method. Ankara, Nobel Publishing, 2005.
• 23. Gozum S, Aksayan S. A guide for transcultural adaptation of the scale II: psychometric characteristics and cross-cultural comparison. The Turkish Journal of Research and Development in Nursing. 2003;5:3-14.