The inclusion of gifted children and talent as a geode of amethyst

Year 2022, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 165 - 180, 30.06.2022

Martina Brazzolotto

Abstract

The studies of Becchi (1962; 1963), Frabboni (1998), Cairo (20 01), Mormando (2011), Renati and Zanetti (2012) show that gifted children are excluded from the school context and therefore it would be necessary to promote inclusion in all field, such as during language learning (Novello, 2021). In our study we investigated the inclusion of pupils with giftedness at school, through the perceptions of some teachers, parents, and head teachers.
The sample consisted of 37 primary school teachers, 3 principals, 11 mothers and 4 fathers of 19 children with giftedness, with an average age of 9 years.
To gather the voice of the teachers we used the focus group technique, while for the leaders and parents we preferred the individual interview. In total we audio-recorded 67 hours of interview that we transcribed obtaining 107.643 words. The data was analyzed using NVivo software (Edhlund & McDougall, 2019).
The non-inclusion at school of some gifted children demonstrates the dominance of the medical model both in teachers and principals, whereas parents confirm the malaise that gifted children experience at school, as their talents would neither be identified, nor recognized nor valued. To promote the inclusion of gifted children it is urgent to introduce a pedagogical vision of talent through the metaphor of the amethyst geode.

Keywords

gifted education, Talent as an Amethyst geode, talent education, inclusion, gifted children

References

• Altintaş, E., & Sukru, I. (2016). The term “gifted child” from teachers‟ view. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(10), 957-965. DOI: 10.5897/ERR2016.2762
• Baldacci, M. (2002). Una scuola a misura di alunno. Qualità dell’istruzione e successo formativo [A school tailored to the student. Quality of education and educational success]. Turin: UTET.
• Baudson, T., Preckel, F. (2013). Teachers’ implicit personality theories about the gifted: an experimental approach. School Psychology Quarterly, 28(1), 37-46. DOI: 10.1037/spq0000011
• Becchi, E. (1962). L’identificazione e l’educazione dei superdotati [The identification and education of the super-gifted]. Scuola e città, 1, 125-129 and 510-516.
• Becchi, E. (1963a). L’eredità del genio [The heritage of genius]. Scuola e città, 1-2, 180-186.
• Becchi, E. (1963b). Il “ritratto composito” del superdotato nelle indagini di Lewis Terman [The "composite portrait" of the super-gifted in Lewis Terman's investigations]. Scuola e città, 1-2, 414-422.
• Bloom, B.S. (Ed.). (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine Books.
• Bocci, F. (2015). Dalla didattica speciale per l’inclusione alla didattica inclusiva. L’approccio cooperativo e metacognitivo [From Special Education for Inclusion to Inclusive Teaching. The cooperative and metacognitive approach]. In D'Alonzo, L., Bocci, F., & Pinnelli, S., Didattica speciale per l'inclusione [Special teaching for inclusion] (pp. 87-168). Brescia: Editrice La scuola.
• Borland, J. H. (1989). Planning and implementing programs for the gifted. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
• Brazzolotto, M., & Phelps, C. (2021). Global Principles for Professional Learning in Gifted Education and Italian Primary Teachers. International Journal for Talent Development and Creativity, International Journal for Talent Development and Creativity, 9(1), and 9(2), 123- 141.
• Brazzolotto, M. (2020). La plusdotazione in classe: le percezioni di alcuni insegnanti, genitori e dirigenti veneti [Giftedness in the classroom: Venetian teachers, parents and principals’ perspectives]. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Bologna]. Retrived from http://amsdottorato.unibo.it/9507/3/Brazzolotto_TESI%20DOTTORATO_AMS.pdf
• Cairo, M. T. (2001). Superdotati e dotati. Itinerari educativi e didattici [Super-gifted and gifted. Educational and didactic itineraries]. Milan: Vita e Pensiero.
• Callahan, C.M., Moon, T.R., Oh, S., Azano, A. P., & Hailey, E.P. (2015). What works in gifted education: Documenting the effects of an integrated curricular/instructional model for gifted students. American Educational Research Journal, 52, 137-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0002831214549448.
• Chessman, A. M. (2010). Teacher Attitudes and Effective Teaching Practices for Gifted Students at Stage 6 (Doctoral dissertation /online/).
• Chiappetta Cajola, L., & Ciraci, A.M., (2013). Didattica inclusiva. Quali competenze per gli insegnanti? [Inclusive teaching. What skills for teachers?]. Rome: Armando Editore.
• Cinque, M. (2019). Terminologie e dibattito scientifico sulla giftedness [Terminologies and scientific debate on giftedness]. In L. Sartori, & M. Cinque (eds.). Gifted. Conoscere e valorizzare I giovani plusdotati e di talento dentro e fuori la scuola [Gifted. Knowing and valuing gifted and talented young people inside and outside the school] (pp. 43-59). Rome: Magi.
• Cornoldi, C. (2019). Bambini eccezionali. Superdotati, talentosi, creativi o geni [Exceptional children. Super-gifted, talented, creative or geniuses]. Bologna: il Mulino.
• Dai, D. Y. (2018). A History of Giftedness: A Century of Quest for Identity. In S. I Pfeiffer (Eds.) APA Handbook of Giftedness and Talent (pp. 3-25). Washington, DC: APA.
• Dai, D. Y., & Chen, F. (2013). Three paradigms of gifted education: In search of conceptual clarity in research and practice. Gifted Child Quartely, 57, 151-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0016986213490020
• Dai, D. Y., & Chen, F. (2014). Paradigms of gifted education: A guide to theory-based, practice-focused research. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
• D'Alonzo, L. (2015). La didattica speciale e le sue problematiche [Special education and its problems]. In L. D'Alonzo, F. Bocci, & S. Pinnelli, Didattica speciale per l'inclusione [Special teaching for inclusion] (pp. 87-168). Brescia: Editrice La Scuola.
• De Angelis, B. (2017). Inclusione e didattica della plusdotazione: le rappresentazioni degli educatori e degli insegnanti in formazione iniziale e in servizio [Inclusion and gifted education: pre-service and service educators’ and teachers’ perspectives]. Journal of Educational, Cultural and Psychological Studies, 16, 177-205.
• Decroly, O., Boon, G. (1921). Vers l'École rénovée. Paris: Fernand Nathan. Trad. it. M. Valeri (1955). Towards the renewed school. A first stop. Florence: The New Italy.
• Delisle, J. R. (2002). Barefoot irreverence: A collection of writings on gifted education. Waco, TX: Pufrock Press.
• Delisle, J. R. (2014). Dumbing down America: The war on our nation’s brightest young minds (and what we can co to fight back). Waco, TX: Pufrock Press.
• Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education. New York: The Macmillan Company. Trad it. E. E. Agnoletti e P. Paduano (1988). Democrazia e educazione. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
• Dovigo, F. (2014) (eds.). Tony Booth, Mel Ainscow. Nuovo Index per l’inclusione. Percorsi di apprendimento e partecipazione a scuola [Tony Booth, Mel Ainscow. New Index for Inclusion. Learning paths and participation in school]. Rome: Carocci Faber.
• Edhlund, B., & McDougall, A. (2019). NVivo 12 essentials. Form & Kunskap AB.
• Eris, B., Seyfi, R., & Hanoz, S. (2008). Perceptions of Parents with Gifted Children about Gifted Education in Turkey. Gifted and Talented International, 23(2), 55-66.
• European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education (2012). Teacher Education for Inclusion. Profile of inclusive teachers. Retrieved from https://www.european-agency.org/sites/default/files/Profile-of-Inclusive-Teachers.pdf
• Eyre, D., & Geake, J. (2002). Trends in research into gifted and talented education in England. Gifted and talented International, 17(1), 13-21.
• Falaschi, E. (2019). The epistemological challenge of the “pedagogy of talents”: educating for resilience in order not to waste social capital. Studi Sulla Formazione/Open Journal of Education, 22(2), 197-214.
• Feldhusen, J. F. (1992). TIDE: Talent identification and development in education. Sarasota, FL: Center for Creative Learning.
• Feldman, D. H. (1992). Has there been a paradigm shift in gifted education: Some thoughts on a changing national scene. In N. Colangelo, S. G. Assouline, D. L. Ambrose (Eds.), Talent development: Proceedings from the 1991 Henry and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (pp. 89- 94). Unionville, NY: Trillium.
• Frabboni, F. (1998). Superdotati a scuola. Bambini in quarantena [Super-gifted at school. Children in quarantine]. Innovazione educativa, 3(2), 2/5.
• Gagné, F. (1985). Gifted and talent: Reexamining a reexamination of the definitions. Gifted Child Quartely, 29, 103-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001698628502900302
• Gagné, F. (1999). My convictions about the nature of abilities, gifts, and talents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 22, 109-136.
• Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York, NY: Basic Books.
• Hollingworth, L. S. (1942). Children above IQ 180: Their origin and development. New York: World Books.
• Hollingworth, L.S. (1931). The child of very superior intelligence as a special problem in social adjustment. Mental Hygiene, 15(1), 3–16.
• Hoogeveen L., Hell, J. V., & Verhoeven, L. (2012). Social-emotional characteristics of gifted accelerated and non-accelerated students in the Netherlands. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 585- 605. DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02047.x
• Ianes, D. (2005). Bisogni educativi speciali e inclusione. Valutare le reali necessità e attivare tutte le risorse [Special educational needs and inclusion: assess real needs and activate all resources]. Trento: Erickson Editions.
• Kadioglu Ates, H. (2018). Gifted Children Metaphor From The Perspective Of Teachers And Parents. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 6(2), 30-41.
• Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
• Kutlu, N., Akkanat, Ç., & Murat, G. (2017). Teachers' Views about the Education of Gifted Student in Regular Classrooms. Turkish Journal of Giftedness and Education, 7(2), 87-109.
• Laine, S., Kuusisto, E., & Tirri K. (2016). Finnish Teachers’ Conceptions of Giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 39(2), 151-167.
• Little, C. A. (2018). Teaching Strategies to Support the Education of Gifted Learners. In S. Pfeiffer, E. Shaunessy-Dedrick, M. Foley-Nicpon (Eds), APA Handbook of Giftedness and Talent. Washington: American Psychological Association.
• Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (1992). Gender differences in abilities and preferences among the gifted. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 61-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep11509746
• Maker, C. J. (1996). Identification of gifted minority students: A national problem, needed changes and a promising solution. Gifted Child Quartely, 40, 41-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001698629604000106
• Mangione, G. R., & Maffei, F. (2013). Didattica e Gifted Children. Approcci consolidati e prassi emergenti [Didactics and Gifted Children. Established approaches and emerging practices]. Italian Journal of Educational Research, 11, 140-156.
• Margiotta, U. (2018). La formazione dei talenti. Tutti I bambini sono un dono, il talento non è un dono [The training of talents. All children are a gift, talent is not a gift]. Milan: FrancoAngeli.
• Marsili, F., Morganti A., & Signorelli A., (2020). Intelligenza emotiva e plusdotazione. Una riflessione pedagogica [Emotional intelligence and giftedness. A pedagogical reflection]. Psicologia dell’educazione, 3, 19-35.
• Montessori, M. (1943). Education for a new world. India: Kalakshetra. Trad. it.M. Attardo Magrini (1970), Educazione per un mondo nuovo. Milan: Garzanti.
• Mormando, F. (2011). Bambini con altissimo potenziale intellettivo [Children with very high intellectual potential]. Trento: Erickson.
• Novello, A. (2021). La progettazione inclusiva per gli studenti gifted nella classe di lingua [The inclusive design for gifted students in the language class]. In M. Daloiso, M. Mezzadri (eds.) Educazione linguistica inclusiva [Linguistic Inclusive Education], Sail17. Retrived from https://edizionicafoscari.unive.it/libri/978-88-6969-477-6/
• Olivieri, D. (2019). I mille volti del talento. Oltre Gardner. Per una pedagogia dell’eccellenza [The thousand faces of talent. Beyond Gardner. For a pedagogy of excellence]. Rome: Armando.
• Ozcan, D., & Kotek, A. (2015). What Do The Teachers Think About Gifted Students? Procedia –Social and Behavioral Sciences, 190, 569–573. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.05.044
• Passow, A. H. (1981). The nature of giftedness and talent. Gifted Child Quartely, 25, 5-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001698628102500102
• Pavone, M. (2014). Educazione inclusiva. Indicazioni pedagogiche per la disabilità [Educational inclusion. Pedagogical indications for disability]. Milan: Mondadori Education.
• Persson, R. (1998). Paragons of virtue: teachers’ conceptual understanding of high ability in an egalitarian school system. High Ability Studies, 9(2), 181-196. doi: 10.1080/1359813980090204
• Piirto, J. (1994). Talented children and adults: Their development and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
• Pinnelli, S. (2019) (ed.). Plusdotazione e scuola inclusiva. Modelli, percorsi e strategie di intervento [Giftedness and inclusive school. Models, paths and strategies of intervention]. Lecce: PensaMultimedia.
• Renati, R., & Zanetti, M.A. (2012). L’universo poco conosciuto della plusdotazione [The little-known universe of giftedness]. Psicologia e scuola, 23, 18-24.
• Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R.J. Sternberg, J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53-92). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
• Roeper, A. (2006). The “I” of the beholder: A guide to an essence of a child. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
• Sandri, P., Brazzolotto, M., (2017). Quando la plusdotazione non porta al successo scolastico [When giftedness does not lead to academic success]. L'integrazione scolastica e sociale, 16(1), 66-71.
• Sartori, L. & Cinque, M. (2019) (eds.). Gifted. Conoscere e valorizzare i giovani plusdotati e di talento dentro e fuori la scuola [Gifted. Knowing and valuing gifted and talented young people inside and outside the school]. Rome: Magi.
• Silverman, L. K. (1997). The construct of asynchronous development. Peabody Journal of Education, 72, 36-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.1997.9681865
• Stanley, J. C. (1996). In the beginning: The study of mathematically precocious youth. In C. P. Bendow, D. Lubinski (Eds.), Intellectual talent (pp. 225-235). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
• Sternberg, R.J., Spear- Swerling, L. (1996). Teaching for thinking. Washington: American Psychological Association. Trad. it. P. Lopane (1997). The three intelligences. How to enhance analytical, creative and practical skills. Trento: Erickson.
• Subotnik, R. F., & Coleman, L. J. (1997). Establishing the foundations for a talent development school: Applying principles to creating an ideal. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 175-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016235329602000202
• Subotnik, R. F., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P., (1998). Distinctions between children’s and adults’ experiences of giftedness. Peabody Journal of Education, 72, 101-116.
• Tannenbaum, A. J. (1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. New York, NY: Macmillan.
• Tannenbaum, A. J. (1983). Gifted children: Psychological and educational perspectives. New York, NY: Macmillan.
• Terman, L. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius: Vol. 1, Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• Ward, V. (1961). Educating the gifted: An axiomatic approach. Columbus, OH: Charles C. Merrill.
• World Health Organization (2001). ICF (International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health).
• Young, M. H., & Balli, S. J. (2014). Gifted and Talented Education (GATE). Student and Parent Perspectives. Gifted Child Today, 37(4), 236-246.