Research Article

Comparison of erector spinae plane block and serratus anterior plane block for pain management in thoracoscopic surgery

Volume: 8 Number: 4 July 30, 2025
EN TR

Comparison of erector spinae plane block and serratus anterior plane block for pain management in thoracoscopic surgery

Abstract

Aims: This study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of erector spinae plane block and serratus anterior plane block in VATS (video assisted thoracoscopic surgery) patients. Methods: This prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial included fifty patients aged 18 to 70 years, classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III, who were scheduled to undergo elective video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) between February 2022 and February 2023. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either an erector spinae plane block (ESPB) or a serratus anterior plane block (SAPB). In the ESPB group, a catheter was inserted at the T5 vertebral level, and 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine was administered. In the SAPB group, the catheter was placed into the superficial fascia overlying the serratus anterior muscle at the level of the fifth rib, and the same volume and concentration of local anesthetic was used. Postoperatively, when the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score was ≥3, a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device delivering 0.125% bupivacaine was connected to the catheter, and continuous infusion was initiated. Intraoperative fentanyl consumption, time to PCA connection, NRS scores, and postoperative morphine use were recorded. Data were analyzed using R version 4.0.0. Appropriate parametric or non-parametric tests were used based on data distribution. Repeated measures were evaluated with the Friedman test, and a p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Intraoperative fentanyl consumption was significantly lower in the ESPB group (p<0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups in time to PCA connection, NRS scores, or postoperative morphine use (p>0.05). NRS scores decreased over time in both groups. No complications occurred. Conclusion: ESPB is superior for intraoperative analgesia, while both blocks are equally effective for postoperative pain management.

Keywords

References

  1. Soto RG, Fu ES. Acute pain management for patients undergoing thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75(4):1349-1357. doi:10.1016/S0003-4975(02)04647-7
  2. Steinthorsdottir KJ, Wildgaard L, Hansen HJ, Petersen RH, Wildgaard K. Regional analgesia for video-assisted thoracic surgery: a systematic review. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;45(6):959-966. doi:10.1093/ejcts/ezt525
  3. Chin KJ. Thoracic wall blocks: from paravertebral to retrolaminar to serratus to erector spinae and back again-a review of evidence. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2019;33(1):67-77. doi:10.1016/j.bpa.2019.02.003
  4. Elsabeeny WY, Ibrahim MA, Shehab NN, Mohamed A, Wadod MA. Serratus anterior plane block and erector spinae plane block versus thoracic epidural analgesia for perioperative thoracotomy pain control: a randomized controlled study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021;35(10): 2928-2936. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2020.12.047
  5. Blanco R, Parras T, McDonnell JG, Prats-Galino A. Serratus plane block: a novel ultrasound-guided thoracic wall nerve block. Anaesthesia. 2013; 68(11):1107-1113. doi:10.1111/anae.12344
  6. Mayes J, Davison E, Panahi P, et al. An anatomical evaluation of the serratus anterior plane block. Anaesthesia. 2016;71(9):1064-1069. doi:10. 1111/anae.13549
  7. Qiu L, Bu X, Shen J, et al. Observation of the analgesic effect of superficial or deep anterior serratus plane block on patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy. Medicine. 2021;100(3):1-6. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000024352
  8. Zengin M, Sazak H, Baldemir R, Ulger G, Alagoz A. The effect of erector spinae plane block and combined deep and superficial serratus anterior plane block on acute pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022;36(8): 2991-2999. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2022.01.048

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Thoracic Surgery, Anaesthesiology

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

July 30, 2025

Submission Date

May 21, 2025

Acceptance Date

June 27, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 8 Number: 4

APA
Demirci, B., Akbudak, İ. H., İlhan, S., & Mete Yıldız, A. (2025). Comparison of erector spinae plane block and serratus anterior plane block for pain management in thoracoscopic surgery. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, 8(4), 629-634. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1703176
AMA
1.Demirci B, Akbudak İH, İlhan S, Mete Yıldız A. Comparison of erector spinae plane block and serratus anterior plane block for pain management in thoracoscopic surgery. J Health Sci Med / JHSM. 2025;8(4):629-634. doi:10.32322/jhsm.1703176
Chicago
Demirci, Barış, İlknur Hatice Akbudak, Seher İlhan, and Aslı Mete Yıldız. 2025. “Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Pain Management in Thoracoscopic Surgery”. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine 8 (4): 629-34. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1703176.
EndNote
Demirci B, Akbudak İH, İlhan S, Mete Yıldız A (July 1, 2025) Comparison of erector spinae plane block and serratus anterior plane block for pain management in thoracoscopic surgery. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine 8 4 629–634.
IEEE
[1]B. Demirci, İ. H. Akbudak, S. İlhan, and A. Mete Yıldız, “Comparison of erector spinae plane block and serratus anterior plane block for pain management in thoracoscopic surgery”, J Health Sci Med / JHSM, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 629–634, July 2025, doi: 10.32322/jhsm.1703176.
ISNAD
Demirci, Barış - Akbudak, İlknur Hatice - İlhan, Seher - Mete Yıldız, Aslı. “Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Pain Management in Thoracoscopic Surgery”. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine 8/4 (July 1, 2025): 629-634. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.1703176.
JAMA
1.Demirci B, Akbudak İH, İlhan S, Mete Yıldız A. Comparison of erector spinae plane block and serratus anterior plane block for pain management in thoracoscopic surgery. J Health Sci Med / JHSM. 2025;8:629–634.
MLA
Demirci, Barış, et al. “Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block and Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Pain Management in Thoracoscopic Surgery”. Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine, vol. 8, no. 4, July 2025, pp. 629-34, doi:10.32322/jhsm.1703176.
Vancouver
1.Barış Demirci, İlknur Hatice Akbudak, Seher İlhan, Aslı Mete Yıldız. Comparison of erector spinae plane block and serratus anterior plane block for pain management in thoracoscopic surgery. J Health Sci Med / JHSM. 2025 Jul. 1;8(4):629-34. doi:10.32322/jhsm.1703176

Cited By

Interuniversity Board (UAK) Equivalency: Article published in Ulakbim TR Index journal [10 POINTS], and Article published in other (excuding 1a, b, c) international indexed journal (1d) [5 POINTS].

The Directories (indexes) and Platforms we are included in are at the bottom of the page.

Note: Our journal is not WOS indexed and therefore is not classified as Q.

You can download Council of Higher Education (CoHG) [Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK)] Criteria) decisions about predatory/questionable journals and the author's clarification text and journal charge policy from your browser. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/journal/2316/file/4905/show







The indexes of the journal are ULAKBİM TR Dizin, ICI World of Journals, DOAJ, Directory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact Factor, ASOS Index, WorldCat (OCLC), MIAR, OpenAIRE, Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index, Scilit, etc.

       images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRB9r6zRLDl0Pz7om2DQkiTQXqDtuq64Eb1Qg&usqp=CAU

500px-WorldCat_logo.svg.png

atifdizini.png

logo_world_of_journals_no_margin.png

images?q=tbn%3AANd9GcTNpvUjQ4Ffc6uQBqMQrqYMR53c7bRqD9rohCINkko0Y1a_hPSn&usqp=CAU

doaj.png  

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSpOQFsFv3RdX0lIQJC3SwkFIA-CceHin_ujli_JrqBy3A32A_Tx_oMoIZn96EcrpLwTQg&usqp=CAU

ici2.png

asos-index.png

drji.png





The platforms of the journal are Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, Open Access, COPE, ICMJE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons, etc.

COPE-logo-300x199.jpgimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcQR6_qdgvxMP9owgnYzJ1M6CS_XzR_d7orTjA&usqp=CAU

icmje_1_orig.png

cc.logo.large.png

ncbi.pngimages?q=tbn:ANd9GcRBcJw8ia8S9TI4Fun5vj3HPzEcEKIvF_jtnw&usqp=CAU

ORCID_logo.png

1*mvsP194Golg0Dmo2rjJ-oQ.jpeg


Our Journal using the DergiPark system indexed are;

Ulakbim TR Dizin,  Index Copernicus, ICI World of JournalsDirectory of Research Journals Indexing (DRJI), General Impact FactorASOS Index, OpenAIRE, MIAR,  EuroPub, WorldCat (OCLC)DOAJ,  Türkiye Citation Index, Türk Medline Index, InfoBase Index


Our Journal using the DergiPark system platforms are;

Google, Google Scholar, CrossRef (DOI), ResearchBib, ICJME, COPE, NCBI, ORCID, Creative Commons, Open Access, and etc.


Journal articles are evaluated as "Double-Blind Peer Review". 

Our journal has adopted the Open Access Policy and articles in JHSM are Open Access and fully comply with Open Access instructions. All articles in the system can be accessed and read without a journal user.  https//dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jhsm/page/9535

Journal charge policy   https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jhsm/page/10912

Our journal has been indexed in DOAJ as of May 18, 2020.

Our journal has been indexed in TR-Dizin as of March 12, 2021.


17873

Articles published in Journal of Health Sciences and Medicine have open access and are licensed under the Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International License.