Alternative Barn Design Applicable in Different Environmental Condition for Goat Breeding

Year 2015, Volume: 10 Issue: 4, 421 - 428, 30.10.2015

Selda Uzal Seyfi , Hasan Aslan

Abstract

In this study, the design of alternative open front
barn with lot practicable for goat farm with different capacity was carried
out. In the barn design, animal behaviour, barn area preference, and animal
welfare were paid attention. To provide fresh air and sun to the animals was
considered principal factors of the planning of barn. Portable walls were
mounted to resting area having a frontage on courtyard to protect animals from
adverse effects of the season in winter or cold regions. Goats were planned to
be in group paddock. In this project based on calm paddock, using different
areas were provided to goats in different seasons. The goat barn areas were
designed as 2.1 m²/ goat, 3.2 m²/ goat and 0.4 m²/
goat in the resting, courtyard and feeding area respectively. It can be said
that higher productivity rates will be achieved using developed barn design in
goat breeding.

Keywords

Goat Barn Design, Barn Design, Goat Housing, Goat Breeding

References

• Anonymous (2014a) faostat.fao.org, date of access: 07.01.2015.
• Anonymous (2014b) www.tuik.com, date of access: 07.01.2015.
• Anonymous (2014c) www.tuik.com, date of access: 07.01.2015.
• Balaban A, Şen E, (1988) Tarımsal Yapılar, Agricultural Faculty Lecturer Publication No: 845, Ankara University, Ankara, Türkiye.
• Dağ B,(2015) Animal Behaviour, Selcuk University Agricultural Faculty, Lecture Notes (Unpublished), Konya.
• Demir Y, (1990) Orta Karadeniz Bölgesi Besi Sığırcılığı İşletmelerinin Yapısal Durumu, ÖzellikleriveBölgeİklimKoşullarınaUygunBarınakPlanlarınınGeliştirilmesiÜzerineBirAraştırma, PhD Thesis. Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Farm Structure and Irrigation, Çukurova University, Adana, Türkiye.
• Ekmekyapar T, (1991)Hayvan Barınaklarında Çevre Koşullarının Düzenlenmesi, Agricultural Faculty Lecturer Publication No: 698, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Türkiye.
• Ekmekyapar T, (2001) Tarımsal Yapılar, Agricultural Faculty Lecturer Publication No: 204, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Türkiye.
• Hirning HJ, Faller TC, Hoppe KJ, Nudell DJ, Ricketts GE, (1994) Sheep Housing and Equipment Handbook, Midwest Plan Service, Iowa State University, Ames Iowa.
• Okuroğlu M, Yağanoğlu AV, (1993) Kültür teknik, Agricultural Faculty Lecturer Publication No: 157, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Türkiye.
• Olgun M, (2011)Tarımsal Yapılar, Agricultural Faculty Lecturer Publication No: 1577, Ankara University, Ankara, Türkiye.
• Uğurlu N, Uzal S, (2004)Süt sığırı barınaklarının tasarımında mevsimsel etkiler. Selçuk J. Agric. Food Sci., 18 (33), 72-79.
• Uğurlu N,Uzal S, (2009) The model research on constitution of draught free area for suitable environmental condition in dairy cattle housing. J. Int. Environmental Application & Science, 4 (2): 136-145.
• Uğurlu N, Uzal S, (2007) Besi Sığırcılığında Açık Sistem Mikro Yapı Tasarımı, Selçuk J. Agric. Food Sci.,(21) 43,61-67.
• Uzal S,(2008)Serbest ve Serbest Duraklı Süt Sığırı Barınaklarında Hayvanların Alan Kullanımı ve Zaman Bütçesine Mevsimlerin Etkisi. PhD Thesis. Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Farm Structure and Irrigation, Selçuk University, Konya,Türkiye.
• Uzal S, Uğurlu N, (2009) Serbest ve serbest duraklı süt sığırı barınaklarında sığırların zaman bütçesi ve barınak alan kullanımları. Selçuk J. Agric. Food Sci., (23) 47, 27-37.
• Yüksel A, Şişman C, (2003)Tarımsal İnşaat, Tekirdağ Agricultural Faculty Lecturer Publication No: 278, Trakya University, Türkiye.