BibTex RIS Cite

ALT ÇENENİN OKLÜZYON VE İSTİRAHAT KONUMLARINDA TWEED ÜÇGENİNDEKİ RÖNTGENOSEFALOMETRİK FARKLAR (*)-The Roentgenocephalometric Differences Between Occlusion and Rest Position of the Mandible in Tweed Triangle.

Year 1974, Volume: 8 Issue: 3, 275 - 283, 08.07.2013

Abstract

ÖZET

Bu araştırmada; alt çene oklüzyon ve istirahat konumundayken elde edilmiş filmlere uygulanan Tweed Analizi'nin tanı ve tedavi planlamasında önemli bir ayrıcalık yaratıp yaratmayacağı araştırılmıştır.

Araştırmaya dişhekimliği öğrencisi olan 16 erkek birey alınmıştır.

Oklüzyon ve istirahat konumlarında Tweed Analizi'ndeki değer farklarının biyometrik olarak önemsiz olduğu bulunmuştur.

SUMMARY

In this study, it has been investigated in Tweed Analysis, if there are any significant differences between occlusion and rest position of the mandible in diagnosis and treatment planning; which applied to the cephalometric films obtained from, school of dentistry.

Sixteen male students in different ages from school of dentisry were used.

Differences between occlusion and rest position of the mandible in Tweet Analysis, which effects the diagnosis and treatment planning have been found  statistically insignificant.

 

 

Year 1974, Volume: 8 Issue: 3, 275 - 283, 08.07.2013

Abstract

There are 0 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Original Research Articles
Authors

Oktay Üner This is me

Publication Date July 8, 2013
Published in Issue Year 1974 Volume: 8 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Üner, O. (2013). ALT ÇENENİN OKLÜZYON VE İSTİRAHAT KONUMLARINDA TWEED ÜÇGENİNDEKİ RÖNTGENOSEFALOMETRİK FARKLAR (*)-The Roentgenocephalometric Differences Between Occlusion and Rest Position of the Mandible in Tweed Triangle. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry, 8(3), 275-283.
AMA Üner O. ALT ÇENENİN OKLÜZYON VE İSTİRAHAT KONUMLARINDA TWEED ÜÇGENİNDEKİ RÖNTGENOSEFALOMETRİK FARKLAR (*)-The Roentgenocephalometric Differences Between Occlusion and Rest Position of the Mandible in Tweed Triangle. J Istanbul Univ Fac Dent. July 2013;8(3):275-283.
Chicago Üner, Oktay. “ALT ÇENENİN OKLÜZYON VE İSTİRAHAT KONUMLARINDA TWEED ÜÇGENİNDEKİ RÖNTGENOSEFALOMETRİK FARKLAR (*)-The Roentgenocephalometric Differences Between Occlusion and Rest Position of the Mandible in Tweed Triangle”. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry 8, no. 3 (July 2013): 275-83.
EndNote Üner O (July 1, 2013) ALT ÇENENİN OKLÜZYON VE İSTİRAHAT KONUMLARINDA TWEED ÜÇGENİNDEKİ RÖNTGENOSEFALOMETRİK FARKLAR (*)-The Roentgenocephalometric Differences Between Occlusion and Rest Position of the Mandible in Tweed Triangle. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry 8 3 275–283.
IEEE O. Üner, “ALT ÇENENİN OKLÜZYON VE İSTİRAHAT KONUMLARINDA TWEED ÜÇGENİNDEKİ RÖNTGENOSEFALOMETRİK FARKLAR (*)-The Roentgenocephalometric Differences Between Occlusion and Rest Position of the Mandible in Tweed Triangle”., J Istanbul Univ Fac Dent, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 275–283, 2013.
ISNAD Üner, Oktay. “ALT ÇENENİN OKLÜZYON VE İSTİRAHAT KONUMLARINDA TWEED ÜÇGENİNDEKİ RÖNTGENOSEFALOMETRİK FARKLAR (*)-The Roentgenocephalometric Differences Between Occlusion and Rest Position of the Mandible in Tweed Triangle”. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry 8/3 (July 2013), 275-283.
JAMA Üner O. ALT ÇENENİN OKLÜZYON VE İSTİRAHAT KONUMLARINDA TWEED ÜÇGENİNDEKİ RÖNTGENOSEFALOMETRİK FARKLAR (*)-The Roentgenocephalometric Differences Between Occlusion and Rest Position of the Mandible in Tweed Triangle. J Istanbul Univ Fac Dent. 2013;8:275–283.
MLA Üner, Oktay. “ALT ÇENENİN OKLÜZYON VE İSTİRAHAT KONUMLARINDA TWEED ÜÇGENİNDEKİ RÖNTGENOSEFALOMETRİK FARKLAR (*)-The Roentgenocephalometric Differences Between Occlusion and Rest Position of the Mandible in Tweed Triangle”. Journal of Istanbul University Faculty of Dentistry, vol. 8, no. 3, 2013, pp. 275-83.
Vancouver Üner O. ALT ÇENENİN OKLÜZYON VE İSTİRAHAT KONUMLARINDA TWEED ÜÇGENİNDEKİ RÖNTGENOSEFALOMETRİK FARKLAR (*)-The Roentgenocephalometric Differences Between Occlusion and Rest Position of the Mandible in Tweed Triangle. J Istanbul Univ Fac Dent. 2013;8(3):275-83.