Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

İncirli Köyü Martyrium Mozaikleri ve Hatay Mozaikleri Arasındaki Yeri

Year 2021, Issue: 14, 53 - 77, 30.11.2021
https://doi.org/10.26658/jmr.1012070

Abstract

İncirli Köyü Martyrium Mozaikleri, Hatay İli, Kırıkhan İlçesi, İncirli Köyünde’dir. Martyrium da üç mekân tespit edilmiştir. Plan vermeyen mimari, düzensiz dere taşları ve kalker bloklarla yapılmıştır. Mekânlarda açığa çıkarılan mozaikler üç panodan meydana gelmiştir. Hatay genelinde kilise, bazilika veya martyrium kazılarında ortaya çıkarılan mozaiklerde cennet tasvirli konular sık işlendiği gibi dini olaylar, portreler, hayvan, bitki ve geometrik motifler de işlenmiştir. Hatay’da çıkarılan mozaiklerin kompozisyonlarının İncirli Köyü Martyrium Mozaikleri ile benzer yanları olduğu gibi farklılıkları da bulunmaktadır. Hatay’da bulunan sivil ve dini mekânlarda yapılan mozaik döşemelerindeki konu, kompozisyon, figür, motif ve bordürler incelendiğinde, İS 2. yüzyılda başlayan sanatsal süreç, Antakya’da bulunan diğer Doğu Roma mozaiklerinde ifade edildiği gibi İncirli Köyü Martyrium Mozaiği’nde de İS 6. yüzyıla kadar izlenmektedir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Antakya, İncirli, mozaik, martyrium.

References

  • Barsanti 2012 C. Barsanti, “The Fate of the Antioch Mosaic Pavements: Some Reflection”, JMR 5, 25-42.
  • Campbell 1934 W. A. Campbell, “Excavation at Antioch on the Orontes” AJA 38, 2, 201-206.
  • Campbell 1938a S. Campbell, The Mosaics of Antioch, Toronto.
  • Campbell 1938b W. A. Campbell, “The Fourth and Fifth Seasons of Excavation at Antioch-on-the-Orontes: 1935–1936”, AJA 42, 2, 205-217.
  • Campbell 1940 W. A. Campbell, “The Sixth Season of Excavation at Antioch on the Orontes”, AJA 44, 4, 417-427.
  • Çelik 2013 Ö. Çelik, “İncirli Köyü – I Mozaikleri”, JMR 6, 1-7.
  • Çelik 2018 Ö. Çelik, “Hatay, Arsuz, Kutsal Havariler Kilisesi”, 27. MKKS, 265-276.
  • Décor I C. Balmelle - M. Blanchard Lemée - J. Christophe - J.-P. Darmon - A.-M. Guimier Sorbets - H. Lavagne - R. Prudhomme - H. Stern, Le Décor géométrique de la mosaïque romaine I, Paris, 1985.
  • Décor II C. Balmelle - M. Blanchard-Lemée - J.- P. Darmon - S. Gozlan - M. P. Raynaud, Le Décor géométrique de la mosaïque romaine II, Paris, 2002.
  • Downey 1973 G. Downey, Ancient Antioch, New Jersey.
  • Dunbabin 1999 K. M. D. Dunbabin, Mosaics of the Greek and Roman World, Cambridge.
  • Jones 1981 F. F. Jones, “Antioch Mosaics in Princeton”, Record of the Art Museum, Princeton University, 40, 2, 2-26.
  • Kondoleon 2000 C. Kondoleon, Antioch The Lost Anciet City, New Jersey.
  • Lavin 1963 I. Lavin, “The Hunting Mosaics of Antiochand Their Sources. A Study of Compositional Principles in the Development of Early Mediaeval Style”, DOP 17, 179-286.
  • Levi 1945 D. Levi, Antioch Mosaic Pavement, Volume I-II, Princeton.
  • Morey 1935 C. R. Morey, “The Excavation of Antioch on the Orontes”, Parnassus 7, 4, 9-12.
  • Morey 1938 C. R. Morey, The Mosaics of Antioch, London.

İncirli Village Martyrium Mosaics and the Place of These Mosaics in Hatay Mosaics

Year 2021, Issue: 14, 53 - 77, 30.11.2021
https://doi.org/10.26658/jmr.1012070

Abstract

İncirli Martyrium Mosaics were found in the village of İncirli at Kırıkhan, Hatay. Three room spaces are defined in the martyrium. Riverbed stones and calcareous blocks were used in the architecture, although its plan is incomplete. The mosaics found in the rooms are composed of three panels. In the Hatay region, mosaics found in church, basilica or martyrium contexts are generally depicting scenes of heaven as well as religious events, portraits, animals, plants and geometric motifs. Hatay mosaics share similarities and differences in composition to İncirli Village Martyrium Mosaics. When the subjects, composition, figures, motifs and borders of the mosaic floors made in civil and religious building in Hatay are examined, the artistic process that started in the 2nd century AD is expressed in the other Eastern Roman mosaics in Antakya, as well as in the İncirli Village Martyrium Mosaics. It is traced back to the 6th century AD.

References

  • Barsanti 2012 C. Barsanti, “The Fate of the Antioch Mosaic Pavements: Some Reflection”, JMR 5, 25-42.
  • Campbell 1934 W. A. Campbell, “Excavation at Antioch on the Orontes” AJA 38, 2, 201-206.
  • Campbell 1938a S. Campbell, The Mosaics of Antioch, Toronto.
  • Campbell 1938b W. A. Campbell, “The Fourth and Fifth Seasons of Excavation at Antioch-on-the-Orontes: 1935–1936”, AJA 42, 2, 205-217.
  • Campbell 1940 W. A. Campbell, “The Sixth Season of Excavation at Antioch on the Orontes”, AJA 44, 4, 417-427.
  • Çelik 2013 Ö. Çelik, “İncirli Köyü – I Mozaikleri”, JMR 6, 1-7.
  • Çelik 2018 Ö. Çelik, “Hatay, Arsuz, Kutsal Havariler Kilisesi”, 27. MKKS, 265-276.
  • Décor I C. Balmelle - M. Blanchard Lemée - J. Christophe - J.-P. Darmon - A.-M. Guimier Sorbets - H. Lavagne - R. Prudhomme - H. Stern, Le Décor géométrique de la mosaïque romaine I, Paris, 1985.
  • Décor II C. Balmelle - M. Blanchard-Lemée - J.- P. Darmon - S. Gozlan - M. P. Raynaud, Le Décor géométrique de la mosaïque romaine II, Paris, 2002.
  • Downey 1973 G. Downey, Ancient Antioch, New Jersey.
  • Dunbabin 1999 K. M. D. Dunbabin, Mosaics of the Greek and Roman World, Cambridge.
  • Jones 1981 F. F. Jones, “Antioch Mosaics in Princeton”, Record of the Art Museum, Princeton University, 40, 2, 2-26.
  • Kondoleon 2000 C. Kondoleon, Antioch The Lost Anciet City, New Jersey.
  • Lavin 1963 I. Lavin, “The Hunting Mosaics of Antiochand Their Sources. A Study of Compositional Principles in the Development of Early Mediaeval Style”, DOP 17, 179-286.
  • Levi 1945 D. Levi, Antioch Mosaic Pavement, Volume I-II, Princeton.
  • Morey 1935 C. R. Morey, “The Excavation of Antioch on the Orontes”, Parnassus 7, 4, 9-12.
  • Morey 1938 C. R. Morey, The Mosaics of Antioch, London.
There are 17 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Archaeology
Journal Section Article
Authors

Ömer Çelik This is me 0000-0002-3072-4742

Publication Date November 30, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021 Issue: 14

Cite

APA Çelik, Ö. (2021). İncirli Köyü Martyrium Mozaikleri ve Hatay Mozaikleri Arasındaki Yeri. Journal of Mosaic Research(14), 53-77. https://doi.org/10.26658/jmr.1012070
AMA Çelik Ö. İncirli Köyü Martyrium Mozaikleri ve Hatay Mozaikleri Arasındaki Yeri. JMR. November 2021;(14):53-77. doi:10.26658/jmr.1012070
Chicago Çelik, Ömer. “İncirli Köyü Martyrium Mozaikleri Ve Hatay Mozaikleri Arasındaki Yeri”. Journal of Mosaic Research, no. 14 (November 2021): 53-77. https://doi.org/10.26658/jmr.1012070.
EndNote Çelik Ö (November 1, 2021) İncirli Köyü Martyrium Mozaikleri ve Hatay Mozaikleri Arasındaki Yeri. Journal of Mosaic Research 14 53–77.
IEEE Ö. Çelik, “İncirli Köyü Martyrium Mozaikleri ve Hatay Mozaikleri Arasındaki Yeri”, JMR, no. 14, pp. 53–77, November 2021, doi: 10.26658/jmr.1012070.
ISNAD Çelik, Ömer. “İncirli Köyü Martyrium Mozaikleri Ve Hatay Mozaikleri Arasındaki Yeri”. Journal of Mosaic Research 14 (November 2021), 53-77. https://doi.org/10.26658/jmr.1012070.
JAMA Çelik Ö. İncirli Köyü Martyrium Mozaikleri ve Hatay Mozaikleri Arasındaki Yeri. JMR. 2021;:53–77.
MLA Çelik, Ömer. “İncirli Köyü Martyrium Mozaikleri Ve Hatay Mozaikleri Arasındaki Yeri”. Journal of Mosaic Research, no. 14, 2021, pp. 53-77, doi:10.26658/jmr.1012070.
Vancouver Çelik Ö. İncirli Köyü Martyrium Mozaikleri ve Hatay Mozaikleri Arasındaki Yeri. JMR. 2021(14):53-77.

21079                 16193




22516          16207



                                                   16208                          16209



22362