Research Article

Can systemic inflammation markers obtained from complete blood count in the first trimester play a role in predicting early pregnancy loss?

Volume: 4 Number: 12 December 1, 2020
EN TR

Can systemic inflammation markers obtained from complete blood count in the first trimester play a role in predicting early pregnancy loss?

Abstract

Aim: Ten percent of pregnancies result in early pregnancy loss, and in 40%, the cause is unknown. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between first trimester hematological inflammatory markers and early pregnancy loss. Methods: This retrospective case-control study was conducted at Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at The Private Nisa Hospital between 1 January 2015 and 1 October 2020. A total of 611 patients were evaluated, including 310 patients with early pregnancy loss, and 301 patients, who were included in the study as the healthy control group. Sociodemographic data and complete blood count results of the groups were obtained by scanning hospital files and computer registration systems. Results: No statistically significant differences were detected between the two groups in terms of Red Cell Distribution Width (RDW), plateletcrit (PCT), Eosinophil and NLR (Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio) values (P>0.05 for all). In the early pregnancy loss group, PLT(P=0.004), MPV(P<0.001), PDW(P=0.005), PLR (platelet lymphocyte ratio) (P<0.001), ELR (eosinophil lymphocyte ratio) (P<0.001), and ENR (eosinophil neutrophil ratio) (P=0.004) values were higher, while WCB (P<0.001), Hemoglobin (P=0.007), Neutrophil (P<0.001), and Lymphocyte (P<0.001) values were lower, compared to the healthy control group. Conclusions: PLT, MPV, PDW, PLR, ELR and ENR were related with early pregnancy loss. Inflammation markers, thrombocyte activation markers and allergy markers obtained from Complete Blood Count (CBC) in the first trimester pregnancy constitute a cost-effective, and easy method to predict early pregnancy loss.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

bulunmamaktadır

Project Number

Reference number: 10840098-772.02-E.58403 Date: 16/10/2020

References

  1. 1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletin Gynecology ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 200. Early Pregnancy Loss. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;132(5):197–207.
  2. 2. Kolte AM, Bernardi LA, Christiansen OB, Quenbay S, Farquharson RG, Goddijn M et al. Terminology for pregnancy loss prior to viability: a consensus statement from the ESHRE early pregnancy special interest group. ESHRE Special Interest Group, Early Pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2015;30(3):495-8.
  3. 3. Shorter JM, Atrio JM, Schreiber CA. Management of early pregnancy loss, with a focus on patient centered care. Semin Perinatol. 2019;43(2):84-94.
  4. 4. Pinar MH, Gibbins k, He M, Kostadinov S, Silver R. Early Pregnancy Losses: Review of Nomenclature, Histopathology, and Possible Etiologies. Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2018;37(3):191–209.
  5. 5. Calleja-Agius J, Jauniaux E, Pizzey AR, Muttikrishna S et al. Investigation of systemic inflammatory response in first trimester pregnancy failure. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(2): 349–57.
  6. 6. Oğlak SC, Aydın MF. Are neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and platelet to lymphocyte ratio clinically useful for the prediction of early pregnancy loss? Ginekologia Polska. 2020;30(9):524–27.
  7. 7. Ata N, Kulhan M, Kulhan NG, Turkler C. Can neutrophil-lymphocyte and platelet-lymphocyte ratios predict threatened abortion and early pregnancy loss? Ginekologia Polska. 2020;91(4): 210–15.
  8. 8. Ethier JL, Desautels DN, Templeton AJ, Oza A, Amir E, Lheureux S. Is the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio prognostic of survival outcomes in gynecologic cancers? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;145(3): 584–94.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 1, 2020

Submission Date

November 28, 2020

Acceptance Date

January 5, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 4 Number: 12

APA
Kanza Gül, D. (2020). Can systemic inflammation markers obtained from complete blood count in the first trimester play a role in predicting early pregnancy loss? Journal of Surgery and Medicine, 4(12), 1120-1123. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.833018
AMA
1.Kanza Gül D. Can systemic inflammation markers obtained from complete blood count in the first trimester play a role in predicting early pregnancy loss? J Surg Med. 2020;4(12):1120-1123. doi:10.28982/josam.833018
Chicago
Kanza Gül, Derya. 2020. “Can Systemic Inflammation Markers Obtained from Complete Blood Count in the First Trimester Play a Role in Predicting Early Pregnancy Loss?”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 4 (12): 1120-23. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.833018.
EndNote
Kanza Gül D (December 1, 2020) Can systemic inflammation markers obtained from complete blood count in the first trimester play a role in predicting early pregnancy loss? Journal of Surgery and Medicine 4 12 1120–1123.
IEEE
[1]D. Kanza Gül, “Can systemic inflammation markers obtained from complete blood count in the first trimester play a role in predicting early pregnancy loss?”, J Surg Med, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. 1120–1123, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.28982/josam.833018.
ISNAD
Kanza Gül, Derya. “Can Systemic Inflammation Markers Obtained from Complete Blood Count in the First Trimester Play a Role in Predicting Early Pregnancy Loss?”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine 4/12 (December 1, 2020): 1120-1123. https://doi.org/10.28982/josam.833018.
JAMA
1.Kanza Gül D. Can systemic inflammation markers obtained from complete blood count in the first trimester play a role in predicting early pregnancy loss? J Surg Med. 2020;4:1120–1123.
MLA
Kanza Gül, Derya. “Can Systemic Inflammation Markers Obtained from Complete Blood Count in the First Trimester Play a Role in Predicting Early Pregnancy Loss?”. Journal of Surgery and Medicine, vol. 4, no. 12, Dec. 2020, pp. 1120-3, doi:10.28982/josam.833018.
Vancouver
1.Derya Kanza Gül. Can systemic inflammation markers obtained from complete blood count in the first trimester play a role in predicting early pregnancy loss? J Surg Med. 2020 Dec. 1;4(12):1120-3. doi:10.28982/josam.833018