Journal of Academic Tourism Analysis (Journal ATA) is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access scholarly journal dedicated to advancing original scientific knowledge in tourism and its related disciplines. All submitted manuscripts are expected to meet high academic standards in terms of scientific originality, research ethics, methodological rigor, and theoretical contribution.
Submitted manuscripts must be original works that have not been previously published, are not under consideration for publication elsewhere, and have been approved by all listed authors.
Submission of a manuscript to Journal ATA implies that all authors have approved the content of the manuscript and accepted the journal's editorial policies and publication requirements.
Studies Prioritized by the Journal
Journal ATA gives priority to manuscripts that:
- make original theoretical contributions to tourism literature;
- develop new conceptual models or critically re-evaluate existing theories;
- demonstrate strong research design;
- employ quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method approaches in accordance with internationally accepted scientific standards;
- adopt interdisciplinary perspectives;
- provide scientific solutions to contemporary tourism issues;
- have the potential to contribute to international scholarship; and
- offer practical implications for tourism policy, management, and industry.
Studies Not Prioritized by the Journal
The following types of manuscripts have a high probability of receiving a Desk Rejection before peer review:
- purely descriptive studies lacking theoretical contribution;
- studies with insufficient literature review;
- manuscripts with inadequately described research methods;
- studies presenting findings without analytical interpretation;
- descriptive reports lacking scientific discussion;
- studies based on insufficient sample size or inadequate data;
- research requiring ethical approval but lacking ethics committee authorization;
- manuscripts that do not comply with academic writing standards;
- manuscripts with unacceptable similarity levels; and
- studies falling outside the journal's aims and scope.
Types of Manuscripts
Journal ATA accepts the following categories of manuscripts.
Research Articles
Empirical studies presenting original data, original analyses, and significant scholarly contributions.
Review Articles
Studies systematically or critically reviewing existing literature on a specific topic.
Conceptual Papers
Studies proposing new conceptual frameworks or critically discussing existing theories.
Methodological Papers
Studies introducing innovations in research methodology, analytical techniques, measurement instruments, or research design.
Manuscript Preparation
Manuscripts submitted to Journal ATA should normally include the following sections:
- Title,
- Abstract,
- Keywords,
- Introduction,
- Literature Review,
- Method,
- Findings,
- Discussion,
- Conclusion,
- References.
The editorial office may approve alternative structures depending on the nature of the manuscript.
Title
The title should be:
- clear;
- original;
- concise; and
- representative of the main contribution of the study.
The use of abbreviations in the title is discouraged.
Abstract
The abstract should clearly summarize:
- the purpose of the study;
- the research methodology;
- the principal findings;
- the scholarly contribution; and
- the main conclusions.
The abstract should not exceed 200 words.
References should not be cited in the abstract.
Keywords
Each manuscript should include three to five keywords.
Keywords should preferably correspond to internationally recognized terminology used in the relevant academic literature.
Academic Writing Style
Manuscripts should be written in a style that is:
- clear;
- coherent;
- academic; and
- objective.
Authors should avoid unnecessary repetition, subjective statements, colloquial language, and non-scientific expressions.
Literature Review
The literature review should demonstrate:
- current knowledge;
- international scholarly coverage;
- critical evaluation; and
- theoretical depth.
Merely listing previous studies is insufficient.
Authors are expected to synthesize existing knowledge and clearly identify the research gap addressed by their study.
Method
The method section should clearly describe:
- research design;
- population and sample;
- data collection procedures;
- data analysis methods; and
- validity and reliability (or trustworthiness where applicable).
Sufficient methodological detail should be provided to ensure the reproducibility of the research.
Findings
The findings section should present only the research results.
Interpretations should be reserved for the discussion section.
Tables and figures should be used effectively without unnecessary duplication.
Discussion
The discussion section should:
- compare findings with existing literature;
- explain theoretical contributions;
- discuss similarities and differences with previous research; and
- clearly demonstrate the originality and scholarly contribution of the study.
Conclusion
The conclusion should separately address:
- principal findings;
- theoretical implications;
- practical implications;
- study limitations and recommendations for future research.
References
References must be prepared in full compliance with the APA 7th Edition citation style.
Every in-text citation must appear in the reference list, and every reference listed must be cited within the manuscript.
Authors are encouraged to use recent and internationally recognized scholarly sources whenever appropriate.
Research Ethics
Studies involving human participants must obtain all necessary ethical approvals before data collection.
Information regarding ethical approval should be clearly stated in the manuscript.
Authors are responsible for ensuring that their research complies with all relevant national and international ethical standards.
Authorship Statement
All listed authors must have made substantial scholarly contributions to the research.
Honorary authorship, ghost authorship, and purchased authorship are strictly prohibited.
Authors are encouraged to report their individual contributions using the CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy).
Conflict of Interest
All authors must disclose any financial, institutional, professional, or personal conflicts of interest that may influence the research or publication process.
If no conflict of interest exists, this should also be explicitly stated.
Funding Statement
If the research has received financial support from any institution or funding body, complete funding information must be provided.
Data Availability
Authors are expected to securely retain the research data supporting their findings.
Where ethically and legally appropriate, authors are encouraged to make research data accessible in order to facilitate scientific transparency and reproducibility.
Artificial Intelligence Policy
Artificial intelligence tools may be used solely as supportive tools during manuscript preparation and cannot be credited as authors.
Where generative artificial intelligence technologies have been used substantially, authors must clearly disclose such use within the manuscript.
Authors remain fully responsible for the scientific content, originality, ethical compliance, and accuracy of their work.
Editorial Screening (Desk Review)
Before peer review, the Editor-in-Chief or the Associate Editor may reject manuscripts that fail to satisfy one or more of the following criteria:
- relevance to the journal's aims and scope;
- scientific originality;
- theoretical contribution;
- methodological adequacy;
- ethical compliance;
- conformity with the journal's writing guidelines;
- language quality; and
- similarity assessment.
Submission Checklist
Before submitting your manuscript, please ensure that:
☐ The manuscript is original.
☐ The manuscript is not under consideration elsewhere.
☐ All authors have approved the submission.
☐ Ethics approval information has been included where applicable.
☐ A Conflict of Interest Statement has been provided.
☐ Funding information has been declared where applicable.
☐ Author contributions have been prepared.
☐ A Data Availability Statement has been included.
☐ An Artificial Intelligence Disclosure Statement has been provided where applicable.
☐ The manuscript complies with the journal's writing guidelines.
☐ References have been carefully checked.
☐ A similarity check has been completed.
☐ The manuscript is fully consistent with the aims and scope of Journal ATA.