Case Report
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2021, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 125 - 135, 20.07.2021
https://doi.org/10.46474/jds.935436

Abstract

References

  • Corazzo, J. (2019). Materialising the Studio. A systematic review of the role of the material space of the studio in Art, Design and Architecture Education, The Design Journal, 22:sup1, 1249-1265, DOI: 10.1080/14606925.2019.1594953
  • Schön, D. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
  • Yorgancioglu, D., (2020), Critical Reflections on the Surface, Pedagogical and Epistemological Features of the Design Studio under the “New Normal” Conditions, Journal of Design Studio, V.2, N.1, pp 25-36.

Adaptation of First-Year Architectural Design Studio Over Accessible Resources

Year 2021, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 125 - 135, 20.07.2021
https://doi.org/10.46474/jds.935436

Abstract

This paper aims to discuss possible adaptations of the essential resources of the second term of the first-year architectural design studio under COVID-19 lockdown regulations through MEF University First Year Design Studio experiences. Design Studio fundamentals, such as accessibility and materiality, needed to be changed since actors participated from their hometowns due to the lockdown restrictions. The second term of the first-year design studio at MEF University particularly, is built onto the basic knowledge gained from the first term by improving it with material aspects such as structure, material, and site. Projects aim to form direct relationships with resources through analysis and experimentation. Adaptation of the second term program to remote studios poses more significant difficulties with its intense tactile and material state compared to the first period. Several resources contribute to the development of the projects, but three of them stand out in adaptation to the remote studio: Curriculum, studio as a workspace and site. There are still irreplaceable resources of the pre-covid term project but, online adaptations uncover new resources and achievements. The paper searches the possibility of overcoming challenges of architectural design studio during remote teaching through the reassessment of the resources through accessibility.

References

  • Corazzo, J. (2019). Materialising the Studio. A systematic review of the role of the material space of the studio in Art, Design and Architecture Education, The Design Journal, 22:sup1, 1249-1265, DOI: 10.1080/14606925.2019.1594953
  • Schön, D. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass
  • Yorgancioglu, D., (2020), Critical Reflections on the Surface, Pedagogical and Epistemological Features of the Design Studio under the “New Normal” Conditions, Journal of Design Studio, V.2, N.1, pp 25-36.
There are 3 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Other Fields of Education
Journal Section Design Studio Cases
Authors

Derya Uzal 0000-0002-1516-592X

Başak Eren This is me 0000-0003-4680-5886

Publication Date July 20, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021 Volume: 3 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Uzal, D., & Eren, B. (2021). Adaptation of First-Year Architectural Design Studio Over Accessible Resources. Journal of Design Studio, 3(1), 125-135. https://doi.org/10.46474/jds.935436

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

The articles published in Journal of Design Studio had been similarity checked by intihal.net 

QmgB3Bhm.jpg




CALL FOR ARTICLES

Journal of Design Studio call for research papers on studios in all disciplines. Please submit your article by using Dergipark online submission system.