Classroom Research: What do ELT Teacher Trainees Experience When Performing Collaborative Group-Work Tasks?

Year 2017, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 31 - 52, 01.06.2017

Şule Çelik Korkmaz

Abstract

This classroom research firstly examines strengths and weaknesses of performing cooperative group work tasks within the context of “Teaching English to Young Learners” course by dwelling on the most exigent problems to offer solutions to provide learners more qualified educational experiences and have more empowered pre-service learners. This study was conducted with 75 teacher trainees enrolled in Uludag University Faculty of Education ELT Department in Turkey. The data were collected via both quantitative and qualitative instruments such as open-ended and semi-structured questionnaires in addition to semi-structured interviews. The results revealed that the problems were mostly related to equal work sharing, and conflict among group members. Finally, suggested solutions were offered in the light of the interview results

Keywords

Teacher education, teacher trainees, teaching English to young learners, group work, cooperative tasks

References

• Askell-Williams, H., Murray-Harvey, R. & Lawson, M. J. (2005). Extending teacher education students’ mental models of teaching and learning through problem- based learning. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian Asso- ciation for Research in Education, Parramatta, NSW, 28 November.
• Bruton, A. (2002) Point and counterpoint: From tasking purposes to purposing tasks. ELT Journal, 56(3), 280-288.
• Bruton, A. (2005). Task-based language teaching: for the state secondary FL class- room? Language Learning Journal, 31(2), 55-68.
• Chamberlin-Quinlisk, C. (2010). Cooperative learning as method and model in sec- ond-language teacher education. Intercultural Education, 21 (3), 243–255.
• Craig, C. (2010). Coming full circle: From teacher reflection to classroom action and places in-between. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 16(4), 423–435.
• Crandall, J. (2000). Language teacher education. Annual review of applied linguistics, 20, 34-58.
• Creswell, J. V. & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• de Jong, T. A., Cullity, M., Haig, Y., Sharp, S., Spiers, S., & Wren, J. (2011). Enabling group-based learning in teacher education: A case study of student experience. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(5), 93-106.
• Dikici, A. & Yavuzer, Y. (2006). The effects of cooperative learning on the abilities of pre-service art teacher candidates to lesson planning in Turkey. Australian Jour- nal of Teacher Education, 31(2), 36-44.
• Ellis, R. (2000). Task-based research and language pedagogy. Language Teaching Re- search, 4(3), 193–200.
• Freman, D. & Richards, J. C. (1996). Teacher Learning in Language Teaching. Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Gabriel, R & Peiria , J. D. & Allignton, R. (2011). Exemplary Teacher Voices on their own development, Phi Delta Kappan, 92 (8), 37-41
• Gillies, R. M. (2007). Cooperative Learning: Integrating Theory and Practice. Thou- sand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Gillies, R. M. & Boyle, M. (2010). Teachers’ reflections on cooperative learning: Is- sues of implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26 (4), 933-940.
• Gordon, M. (2007). Introduction. In M. Gordon & T. V. O’Brien (eds.), Bridging theo- ry and practice in teacher education, Sense Publisher: Rotterdam/Taipei.
• Gürsoy, E. , Çelik Korkmaz, Ş. & Atak Damar, E. (2013). Foreign language teaching within 4+4+4 education system in Turkey: language teachers’ voices. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 53(A), 59-74
• Greene, J.C. (2008). Is mixed methods social inquiry a distinctive methodology? Jour- nal of Mixed Methods Research. 2(1), 7-22.
• Hamano, T. (2008). Educational reform and teacher education in Vietnam, Journal of Education for Teaching, 34(4), 397–410.
• Haznedar, B. & Uysal, H.H. (2010) Embracing theory and practice in teaching lan- guages to young learners. In B. Haznedar & H.H. Uysal (eds.). Handbook for Teaching Foreign Languages To Young Learners In Primary Schools (pp.1-20). Ankara: Anı Publications.
• Jadidi, E., & Bagheri, M. S. (2014). ELT pre-service teacher education: Major trends and shifts. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 7(4), 181-190.
• Johnson, D. & Johnson, R.T. (1999). Learning Together and Alone. Fifth ed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
• Johnson, D., Johnson, R. & Holubec, E. (1998). Cooperation in the Classroom, Bos- ton, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
• Jacops, J. (2002). Cooperative Learning: Theory, Principles, and Techniques, JF New Paradigm Education.
• Krashen, S. & Terrel, T. (1983). The Natural Approach: Language Acquisition in the Classroom. Oxford, Pergamon.
• Klapper, J. (2003). Taking communication to task? A critical review of recent trends in language teaching. Language Learning Journal. 27(1), 33-42.
• Erdamar, G. K., & Demirel, H. (2010). Öğretmen adaylarının grup çalışmalarına ilişkin algıları. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(3), 205-223.
• Kriflik, L., & Mullan, J. (2007). Strategies to improve student reaction to group work. Journal of University Teaching and Practice, 4(1), 13-27.
• Killich, S.; Luczak, H.; Schlick, C.; Weissenbach, M.; Wiendemaier, S. & Ziegler, J. (1999). Task modeling for cooperative work. Behaviour and Information Technol- ogy, 18(5), 325-338
• Kutnick, P., Sebba, J., Blatchford, P., Galton, M. & Thorp, J. (2005). The Effects of Pupil Grouping: Literature Review. Research Report RR688. The University of Brighton.
• Kutnick, P., Blarchford, P. & Baines, E. (2002). Pupils grouping in primary school classrooms: Sites for learning and social pedagogy? British Educational Research Journal, 28(2), 187-206.
• Lotan, R. A. (2004). Stepping into Groupwork. In E. G. Cohen, C. M. Brody, & M. Sapon-Shevin (eds.), Teaching cooperative learning: The challenge for teacher education (pp.167-182). State University of New York press: Albany.
• Lynch, T. & Maclean, J. (2000). Exploring the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning. Language Teaching Research. 4(3), 221–250.
• Maaranen, K. & Krokfors, L. (2008) Researching pupils, schools and oneself. Teach- ers as integrators of theory and practice in initial teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 34(3), 207–222.
• Macaro, E. (1997). Target Language Collaborative Learning and Autonomy, Clev- edon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
• Mercendetti, D. (2010). Connecting Social Skills and Cooperative Learning. Unpub- lished Master Thesis, State University of New York, New York.
• MoNE (1997). Turkish Ministry of National Education English language curricu- lum for grades 4 and 5 at elementary education. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı 4. ve 5. Sınıflar İngilizce dersi programı. Tebliğler Dergisi. No: 2481, p.606. Ankara: MEB Yayımlar Dairesi Başkanlığı
• Moon, J. (2000). Children Learning English. Oxford: MacMillan Heinemann.
• Nunan, D., & Bailey, K. M. (2009). Exploring Second Language Classroom Research: A Comprehensive Guide. Boston, MA: Heinle
• Odhiambo, E. (2010). Classroom research: a tool for preparing TTs to become reflec- tive practitioners. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 4(1), 1-14.
• Özen Baykent, U. (2015). Philosophical investigations for a holistic approach to edu- cation: Towards the welfare of mankind. In Irina Koleva, Recep Efe, Zdravka Blagoeva Kostova, Emin Atasoy (eds.). Education at the Beginning of the 21st Century (pp. 524-535). Sofia: St Kliment Ohridski University Press.
• Pierce, J. V. & Kalkman, D. L. (2003). Applying learner-centered principles in teacher education. Theory into Practice, 42(2), 127-132.
• Roseth, C. J., Johnson, D. V.& Johnson, R. T. (2008). Promoting early adolescents’ achievement and peer relationships: The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 223-246.
• Rossin, D. & Hyland, T. (2003). Group work-based learning within higher education: An integral ingredient for the personal and social development of students. Men- toring and Tutoring, 11(2), 153-162.
• Sharan, Y. (2002). Essential features of a teacher education programme for cooperative learning. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 22(1), 68-74.
• Sancar, I. (2001). Learner autonomy: A profile of teacher trainees in pre-service teach- er education. (Unpublished MA thesis). Bursa, Turkey: Uludag University.
• Sarwar, M. & Hussain, S. (2010). Teacher training in Pakistan: Problems and solu- tions for student teaching preparatory programs. European Journal of Scientific Research, 46 (2), 179-185.
• Schellens, T., Van Keer, H., Valcke, M & De Wever, B. (2007). Learning in asyn- chronous discussion groups: A multilevel approach to study the influence of stu- dent, group and task characteristics. Behaviour & Information Technology, 26(1), 55–71.
• Spriggs, M. (2010). Understanding consent in research involving children: The ethical issues. A Handbook for Human Research Ethics Committees and Researchers. Melbourne: Children’s Bioethics Centre, The Royal Children’s Hospital, Mel- bourne.
• Watson, S. B. (1992). The essential elements of cooperative learning. The American Biology Teacher, 54(2), 84-86.
• Woolfolk, A. E. (1998). Educational Psychology. Seventh ed. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
• Veenman, S.,van Benthum, N., Bootsma, D., Van Dieren, J. & van Der Kemp, N. (2002). Cooperative learning and teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Edu- cation, 18(1), 87–103.
• Virjo, I. & Holmberg-Marttila, D. & Mattila, K. (2001). Task-based learning (TBL) in undergraduate medical education. Medical Teacher, 23(1), 55-58.