Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2024, Volume: 11 Issue: 4, 635 - 654
https://doi.org/10.30900/kafkasegt.1470131

Abstract

References

  • Altay, S. and Lakhlifi, C. (2020). Are science festivals a good place to discuss heated topics?. JCOM 19(01), A07. doi: 10.22323/2.19010207
  • Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.
  • Arnone, S., Bellini, F., Faccini, M., Maselli, D., Mazzitelli, G., Paximadas, I., & Spagnoli, F. (2016). Results from impact assessment on society and scientists of Frascati Scienza European researchers’ nights in years 2006–2015. In ICERI2016 Proceedings, 3356-3365.
  • Bencze, J. L. & Bowen, G. M. (2009). A national science fair: Exhibiting support for the knowledge economy, International Journal of Science Education, 31(18), 2459-2483. doi:10.1080/09500690802398127
  • Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. (2010). A critical appraisal of models of public understanding of science: Using practice to inform theory. International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 353-370. doi:10.1080/09500690701494010
  • Bultitude, K. (2014). Science festivals: Do they succeed in reaching beyond the ‘already engaged’? Journal of Science Communication, 13(4), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.13040301
  • Bunderson, E. D. & Anderson, T. (1996). Preservice elementary teachers' attitudes toward their experience with science fairs, School Science And Mathematics, 96(7), 371-377. doi;10.1111/j.1949-8594.1996.tb15855.x
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı[Data analysis handbook for social sciences]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • CORDIS (2022). European researchers' night 2022-2023. Retrieved from https://cordis.europa.eu/programme/id/HORIZON_HORIZON-MSCA-2022-CITIZENS-01-01
  • CORDIS (2024a). Results for Life is Science, Science is Life: LET'S DO THE SCIENCE! ID 633256. Retrieved from https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/633256/reporting
  • CORDIS (2024b). Results for Science Unites ALL ID 722956. Retrieved from https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/722956/results
  • Creswell, J. W. (2016). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Qualitative research methods]. M. Bütün & SB Demir, Trans.(Eds.). İstanbul: Siyasal Kitapevi.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2017). Karma Yöntem Araştırmalarına Giriş. [A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods] (Sözbilir, S. Çelik, İ. H. Acar and Y. Göktaş Trans. M.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Publications.
  • Creswell, J. W. ve Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Karma Yöntem Araştırmaları Tasarımı ve Yürütülmesi [Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research] (Y. Dede & S. B. Demir Ed. & Trans). Ankara: Anı Publishing.
  • Davies, S., McCallie, E., Simonsson, E., Lehr, J. L., & Duensing, S. (2009). Discussing dialogue: Perspectives on the value of science dialogue events that do not inform policy. Public Understanding of Science, 18(3), 338–353. doi:10.1177/0963662507079760
  • Enserink, M. (2004). Europe clones U.S. science festival. Science, 305(5689), 1387. ERNEst21 (2021). ERNEst21 Impact assessment. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e5e740a82c&appId=PPGMS
  • EXPLORATHON (2021). Impact assessment. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e5eb970651&appId=PPGMS
  • G9NIGHT (2021). Impact assessment. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e5edc4306c&appId=PPGMS
  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. ECTJ, 30(4), 233-252nd. doi:10.1007/BF02765185
  • Gülgün, C., Yılmaz, A., Avan, Ç., Ertuğrul Akyol, B. & Doğanay, K. (2019). TÜBİTAK tarafından desteklenen bilim şenliklerine (4007) yönelik ilkokul/ortaokul öğrencilerinin ve atölye liderlerinin görüşlerinin belirlenmesi [Determination of the views of primary, secondary school students’ and workshops leaders’ for the science fairs supported by TUBITAK (4007)], Journal of STEAM Education (Bilim, Teknoloji, Mühendislik, Matematik ve Sanat Eğitimi Dergisi), 2(1), 52-67.
  • Jensen, E., & Buckley, N. (2014). Why people attend science festivals: Interests, motivations and self-reported benefits of public engagement with research. Public Understanding of Science, 23(5), 557-573. doi:10.1177/0963662512458624
  • Jensen, A. M., Jensen, E. A., Duca, E., & Roche, J. (2021). Investigating diversity in European audiences for public engagement with research: Who attends European Researchers’ Night in Ireland, the UK and Malta? PLoS ONE, 16(7), 1-12. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0252854
  • Martini, M., Della Ceca, A., Burzachechi, G., Donghia, R., Ciocca, G., Pierangeli, S., Diociaiuti, E. & Guglielmotti, V. (2022). Leaf project: science communication in covid era, EDULEARN22 proceedings,1030-1039. doi:10.21125/edulearn.2022.0284
  • Mazzitelli G., Arnone S., Bramato M., Capra I., Ciocca G., Ceca A. D., et al. (2018, 5-7 March). 12 years of data, results and experiences in the European Researchers’ Night project, Proceedings of INTED, Valencia, Spain. doi:10.21125/inted.2018.0031
  • Merriam, S. B. (2013). Nitel araştırma desen ve uygulama için bir rehber, (S. Turan, Trans). Ankara: Nobel. Miller, J. D., & Edwards, S. (2017). Climate literacy: The role of science festivals in promoting public understanding of climate change. Science Communication, 39(6), 733-761. doi:10.1177/1075547017738012 Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage Publication.
  • Özdamar, K. (1997). Paket Programlar ile İstatistiksel Veri Analizi I. [Statistical Data Analysis with Software Packages I.] Eskişehir: Anadolu University Faculty of Science Publications.
  • Pallant, J. (2001). SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows (Version 10 and 11). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  • Pellegrini, G. (2021). Evaluating science communication: Concepts and tools for realistic assessment. In M. Bucchi & B. Trench (Eds.), Routledge handbook of public communication of science and technology (pp. 305–322). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003039242
  • Roche, J., Davis, N., O’Boyle, S., Courtney, C., & O’Farrelly, C. (2018). European Researchers’ Night: Enhancing public recognition of researchers and their work. Public Understanding of Science, 27(5), 593-609. doi:10.1177/0963662517750055
  • Roche, J., Davis, N., O’Boyle, S., Courtney, C., & O’Farrelly, C. (2017). Public perceptions of European research: an evaluation of European Researchers’ Night in Ireland. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 7(4), 374-391. doi:10.1080/21548455. 2017.1371354
  • Tabachnick. B. G., & Fidell. L. S. (2014). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson. Tavşancıl, E. (2010). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve veri analizi [Measuring attitudes and data analysis with SPSS]. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • TÜBİTAK (2021). European Researchers’ Night presentation. Ufuk Avrupa. Retrieved from https://ufukavrupa.org.tr/sites/default/files/2021-06/night_tubitak_sunum_1.pdf
  • Yıldırım, A., ve Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (8. Baskı). Ankara:Seçkin Yayıncılık.

Public Opinion about European Researchers’ Night on Climate Change and Polar Science in Türkiye

Year 2024, Volume: 11 Issue: 4, 635 - 654
https://doi.org/10.30900/kafkasegt.1470131

Abstract

The European Researchers' Night is an annual event held across Europe on the last Friday of September, with the primary goal of promoting public recognition of scientists, disseminating information about the real-world impact of their research, inspiring young people to pursue careers in science, and raising awareness about research and innovation activities. In 2022, European Researcher’s Night focused on climate change and polar science in Istanbul and Gaziantep provinces. The central aim was to enhance public awareness of polar regions and global climate change, as well as to facilitate the acknowledgment of researchers and their work by the general public. This study examined the opinions of participants who attended these events, including 221 primary school students, 687 secondary school students, 525 high school students, and 319 adults. Utilizing a mixed-method approach, participant opinions were collected through both quantitative questionnaires and qualitative interviews conducted concurrently during the events. The results revealed overwhelmingly positive feedback from all participants regarding the events, with unanimous support for the continuation of such engaging public outreach initiatives. In conclusion, these events serve as effective channels for communicating scientific research with the public and underscore the importance of research extending beyond the confines of research communities.

Ethical Statement

In this study, we declare that the rules stated in the "Higher Education Institutions Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Directive" are complied with and that we do not take any of the actions based on "Actions Against Scientific Research and Publication Ethics". At the same time, we declare that there is no conflict of interest between the authors, which all authors contribute to the study, and that all the responsibility belongs to the article authors in case of all ethical violations.

Supporting Institution

European Researchers' Night in Türkiye in 2022 was funded by the European Commission's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme through its coordination and support action: HORIZON-MSCA-2022-CITIZENS-01 (Grant agreement no. 101061630). This research would not have been possible without the support of TUBITAK MAM Polar Research Institute. The events themselves would not have happened without the support of the staff of Tuzla District Municipality and Gaziantep Metropolitan Municipality, vol

Thanks

The authors extend their gratitude to the instutions of the EDUCATE project, which fosters harmonious collaboration and facilitating partnerships, including the project coordinator TUBITAK MAM Polar Research Institute, and the partners Tuzla District Municipality, Gaziantep Metropolitan Municipality, Istanbul Technical University, Ankara University, Yaşar University, and Istanbul Provincial Directorate of National Education.

References

  • Altay, S. and Lakhlifi, C. (2020). Are science festivals a good place to discuss heated topics?. JCOM 19(01), A07. doi: 10.22323/2.19010207
  • Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.
  • Arnone, S., Bellini, F., Faccini, M., Maselli, D., Mazzitelli, G., Paximadas, I., & Spagnoli, F. (2016). Results from impact assessment on society and scientists of Frascati Scienza European researchers’ nights in years 2006–2015. In ICERI2016 Proceedings, 3356-3365.
  • Bencze, J. L. & Bowen, G. M. (2009). A national science fair: Exhibiting support for the knowledge economy, International Journal of Science Education, 31(18), 2459-2483. doi:10.1080/09500690802398127
  • Brossard, D., & Lewenstein, B. (2010). A critical appraisal of models of public understanding of science: Using practice to inform theory. International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 353-370. doi:10.1080/09500690701494010
  • Bultitude, K. (2014). Science festivals: Do they succeed in reaching beyond the ‘already engaged’? Journal of Science Communication, 13(4), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.13040301
  • Bunderson, E. D. & Anderson, T. (1996). Preservice elementary teachers' attitudes toward their experience with science fairs, School Science And Mathematics, 96(7), 371-377. doi;10.1111/j.1949-8594.1996.tb15855.x
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2014). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı[Data analysis handbook for social sciences]. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • CORDIS (2022). European researchers' night 2022-2023. Retrieved from https://cordis.europa.eu/programme/id/HORIZON_HORIZON-MSCA-2022-CITIZENS-01-01
  • CORDIS (2024a). Results for Life is Science, Science is Life: LET'S DO THE SCIENCE! ID 633256. Retrieved from https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/633256/reporting
  • CORDIS (2024b). Results for Science Unites ALL ID 722956. Retrieved from https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/722956/results
  • Creswell, J. W. (2016). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Qualitative research methods]. M. Bütün & SB Demir, Trans.(Eds.). İstanbul: Siyasal Kitapevi.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2017). Karma Yöntem Araştırmalarına Giriş. [A Concise Introduction to Mixed Methods] (Sözbilir, S. Çelik, İ. H. Acar and Y. Göktaş Trans. M.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Publications.
  • Creswell, J. W. ve Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Karma Yöntem Araştırmaları Tasarımı ve Yürütülmesi [Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research] (Y. Dede & S. B. Demir Ed. & Trans). Ankara: Anı Publishing.
  • Davies, S., McCallie, E., Simonsson, E., Lehr, J. L., & Duensing, S. (2009). Discussing dialogue: Perspectives on the value of science dialogue events that do not inform policy. Public Understanding of Science, 18(3), 338–353. doi:10.1177/0963662507079760
  • Enserink, M. (2004). Europe clones U.S. science festival. Science, 305(5689), 1387. ERNEst21 (2021). ERNEst21 Impact assessment. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e5e740a82c&appId=PPGMS
  • EXPLORATHON (2021). Impact assessment. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e5eb970651&appId=PPGMS
  • G9NIGHT (2021). Impact assessment. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e5edc4306c&appId=PPGMS
  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. ECTJ, 30(4), 233-252nd. doi:10.1007/BF02765185
  • Gülgün, C., Yılmaz, A., Avan, Ç., Ertuğrul Akyol, B. & Doğanay, K. (2019). TÜBİTAK tarafından desteklenen bilim şenliklerine (4007) yönelik ilkokul/ortaokul öğrencilerinin ve atölye liderlerinin görüşlerinin belirlenmesi [Determination of the views of primary, secondary school students’ and workshops leaders’ for the science fairs supported by TUBITAK (4007)], Journal of STEAM Education (Bilim, Teknoloji, Mühendislik, Matematik ve Sanat Eğitimi Dergisi), 2(1), 52-67.
  • Jensen, E., & Buckley, N. (2014). Why people attend science festivals: Interests, motivations and self-reported benefits of public engagement with research. Public Understanding of Science, 23(5), 557-573. doi:10.1177/0963662512458624
  • Jensen, A. M., Jensen, E. A., Duca, E., & Roche, J. (2021). Investigating diversity in European audiences for public engagement with research: Who attends European Researchers’ Night in Ireland, the UK and Malta? PLoS ONE, 16(7), 1-12. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0252854
  • Martini, M., Della Ceca, A., Burzachechi, G., Donghia, R., Ciocca, G., Pierangeli, S., Diociaiuti, E. & Guglielmotti, V. (2022). Leaf project: science communication in covid era, EDULEARN22 proceedings,1030-1039. doi:10.21125/edulearn.2022.0284
  • Mazzitelli G., Arnone S., Bramato M., Capra I., Ciocca G., Ceca A. D., et al. (2018, 5-7 March). 12 years of data, results and experiences in the European Researchers’ Night project, Proceedings of INTED, Valencia, Spain. doi:10.21125/inted.2018.0031
  • Merriam, S. B. (2013). Nitel araştırma desen ve uygulama için bir rehber, (S. Turan, Trans). Ankara: Nobel. Miller, J. D., & Edwards, S. (2017). Climate literacy: The role of science festivals in promoting public understanding of climate change. Science Communication, 39(6), 733-761. doi:10.1177/1075547017738012 Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage Publication.
  • Özdamar, K. (1997). Paket Programlar ile İstatistiksel Veri Analizi I. [Statistical Data Analysis with Software Packages I.] Eskişehir: Anadolu University Faculty of Science Publications.
  • Pallant, J. (2001). SPSS survival manual: A step-by-step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows (Version 10 and 11). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
  • Pellegrini, G. (2021). Evaluating science communication: Concepts and tools for realistic assessment. In M. Bucchi & B. Trench (Eds.), Routledge handbook of public communication of science and technology (pp. 305–322). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781003039242
  • Roche, J., Davis, N., O’Boyle, S., Courtney, C., & O’Farrelly, C. (2018). European Researchers’ Night: Enhancing public recognition of researchers and their work. Public Understanding of Science, 27(5), 593-609. doi:10.1177/0963662517750055
  • Roche, J., Davis, N., O’Boyle, S., Courtney, C., & O’Farrelly, C. (2017). Public perceptions of European research: an evaluation of European Researchers’ Night in Ireland. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 7(4), 374-391. doi:10.1080/21548455. 2017.1371354
  • Tabachnick. B. G., & Fidell. L. S. (2014). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson. Tavşancıl, E. (2010). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve veri analizi [Measuring attitudes and data analysis with SPSS]. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  • TÜBİTAK (2021). European Researchers’ Night presentation. Ufuk Avrupa. Retrieved from https://ufukavrupa.org.tr/sites/default/files/2021-06/night_tubitak_sunum_1.pdf
  • Yıldırım, A., ve Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (8. Baskı). Ankara:Seçkin Yayıncılık.
There are 33 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Out-of-School Learning
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Tuğba Güner Demir 0000-0003-2653-2673

Pelin Taşkın 0000-0001-8860-579X

Fatma Mızıkacı 0000-0003-2780-2495

Nasıh Sarp Ergüven 0000-0003-4610-2515

Early Pub Date December 9, 2024
Publication Date
Submission Date April 20, 2024
Acceptance Date December 9, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 11 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Güner Demir, T., Taşkın, P., Mızıkacı, F., Ergüven, N. S. (2024). Public Opinion about European Researchers’ Night on Climate Change and Polar Science in Türkiye. E-Kafkas Journal of Educational Research, 11(4), 635-654. https://doi.org/10.30900/kafkasegt.1470131

19190       23681     19386        19387