Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Ayak Arkus Açısı ve Ayak Uzunluğu Arasındaki İlişki

Year 2018, Volume: 8 Issue: 3, 172 - 177, 01.12.2018

Abstract

Amaç: Ayak morfolojisinin ve antropometrisinin ayağın biyomekanik
ölçümleri ile ilişkili olduğu bilinmektedir. Ayak morfolojisine katkıda bulunan
esas ark olan medial longitudinal ark (MLA), ön ayak ve arka ayak arasında
elastik bir bağlantı sağlar. Pes kavus ve pes planus gibi spesifik olarak
MLA'dan kaynaklanan problemler ve dizilim bozuklukları, sonuçta alt ekstremite
kaslarının ve eklemlerinin işlevini etkiler. Biz bu çalışmamızda radyografiler
üzerinden ölçümler yaparak MLA’nın ayak uzunluğuyla olan ilişkisini araştırmayı
amaçladık.



Materyal
ve metot:
18-80 yaş aralığındaki
(erkek:18-75, kadın:18-80) 106 kişiye (70 erkek, 36 kadın) ait 212 adet (106
sağ, 106 sol) basarak çekilmiş lateral ayak grafisi geriye dönük olarak
değerlendirildi. 18 yaşın altında ya da 80 yaşın üstünde olan, ayağında
geçirilmiş travma veya cerrahi bulgusu, yer kaplayan lezyon ya da ayak
kemiklerinde herhangi bir deformite bulunan kişilerin grafileri değerlendirme
dışında bırakıldı. Grafilerde ayağın kemik boyu ve MLA’yı değerlendirmek üzere
kalkaneal eğim açısı ve calcaneus-1. metatars açısı ölçüldü. Ölçümlerden elde
edilen sonuçlar istatistiksel olarak değerlendirildi.



Bulgular: Ortalama ayak kemik boyu kadınlarda 237.5 mm (216.5-256.7
mm), erkeklerde 264.1 mm (205.0-293.6 mm) olarak ölçüldü. Ortalama kalkaneal
eğim açısı 18.2o (2.7o-31.4o), calcaneus-1.
metatars açısı 140.2o (119.5o-159.8o) olarak
ölçüldü. Her iki cinste de ayak kemik boyu ve açılar arasında istatistiksel
olarak anlamlı korelasyon bulundu (hem kalkaneal eğim açısı hem calcaneus-1.
metatars açısı için p<0.01). Kalkaneal eğim açısı ve calcaneus-1. metatars
açısı arasında da anlamlı ilişki bulundu (p<0.01).



Sonuç: Ayak morfolojisiyle ilişkili olan denge, yürüyüş, tek veya
çift ayak üstünde durma, zıplama, çömelme gibi fonksiyonlar üzerinde etkili
olduğu bilinen MLA’nın her iki cinste de ayak uzunluğuyla ilişkili olduğu
bulundu. Bu durum büyük ayağa sahip kişilerde pes planus’a yatkınlığın daha çok
olacağının öngörülmesi sonucunu doğurur.

References

  • 1. Jankowicz-Szymanska A, Mikolajczyk E, Wardzala R. Arch of the foot and postural balance in young judokas and peers. J Pediatr Orthop B 2015; 24(5):456-60.
  • 2. Lin CJ, Lai KA, Kuan TS, Chou YL. Correlating factors and clinical significance of flexible flatfoot in preschool children. J Pediatr Orthop 2001; 21(3):378-82.
  • 3. Mootanah R, Song J, Lenhoff MW, Hafer JF, Backus SI, Gagnon D, et al. Foot type biomechanics part 2: are structure and anthropometrics related to function? Gait Posture 2013; 37(3):452-6.
  • 4. Arıncı K, Elhan A. Anatomi. Ankara: Güneş Kitabevi; 2014:71-128
  • 5. Franco AH. Pes cavus and pes planus. Analyses and treatment. Physical Therapy 1987; 67(5):688-94.
  • 6. Harris EJ, Vanore JV, Thomas JL, Kravitz SR, Mendelson SA, Mendicino RW, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of pediatric flatfoot. J Foot Ankle Surg 2004; 43(6):341-73.
  • 7. Deland JT Adult-acquired flatfoot deformity. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2008; 16(7):399-406.
  • 8. Wozniacka R, Bac A, Matusik S, Szczygiel E, Ciszek E. Body weight and the medial longitudinal foot arch: high-arched foot, a hidden problem? Eur J Pediatr 2013; 172(5):683-91.
  • 9. Menz HB. Alternative techniques for the clinical assessment of foot pronation. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association 1998; 88(3):119-29.
  • 10. Murley GS, Menz HB, Landorf KB. A protocol for classifying normal- and flat-arched foot posture for research studies using clinical and radiographic measurements. J Foot Ankle Res 2009; 2:22.
  • 11. Scholz T, Zech A, Wegscheider K, Lezius S, Braumann KM, Sehner S, et al. Reliability and correlation of static and dynamic foot arch measurement in a healthy pediatric population. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association 2017; 107(5):419-27.
  • 12. Muller S, Carlsohn A, Müller J, Baur H, Mayer F. Static and dynamic foot characteristics in children aged 1-13 years: a cross-sectional study. Gait Posture 2012; 35(3):389-94.
  • 13. Yalçın N, Esen E, Kanatlı U, Yetkin H. Medial longitudinal arkın değerlendirilmesi: dinamik plantar basınç ölçüm sistemi ile radyografik yöntemlerin karşılaştırılması. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2010; 44(3):241-5.
  • 14. Saltzman CL, Nawoczenski DA, Talbot KD. Measurement of the medial longitudinal arch. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76:45-9.
  • 15. Pfeiffer M, Kotz R, Ledl T, Hauser G, Sluga M. Prevalence of flat foot in preschool-aged children. Pediatrics 2006; 118(2):634-9.
  • 16. Chang JH, Wang SH, Kuo CL, Shen HC, Hong YW, Lin LC. Prevalence of flexible flatfoot in Taiwanese school-aged children in relation to obesity, gender, and age. Eur J Pediatr 2010; 169(4):447-52.
  • 17. Mauch M, Grau S, Maiwald C, Horstmann T. Foot morphology of normal, underweight and overweight children. Int J Obes (Lond) 2008; 32(7):1068-75.
  • 18. Tenenbaum S, Hershkovich O, Gordon B, Bruck N, Thein R, Darazne E, et al. Flexible pes planus in adolescents: body mass index, body height, and gender--an epidemiological study. Foot Ankle Int 2013; 34(6):811-7.
  • 19. Eleswarapu AS, Yamini B, Bielski RJ. Evaluating the Cavus Foot. Pediatr Ann 2016; 45(6):e218-22.
  • 20. Vanderwilde R, Staheli L, Chew DE, Malagon V. Measurements on radiographs of the foot in normal infants and children. The Journal of Bone and Joins Surgery 1988; 70-A(3):407-15.
  • 21. Uzuner MB, Geneci F, Ocak M, Bayram P, Sancak İT, Dolgun A, et al. Sex determination from the radiographic measurements of calcaneus. Anatomy 2016; 10(3):200-4.
  • 22. Redmond AC, Crane YZ, Menz HB. Normative values for the foot posture index. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2008; 1(1).

Relationship Between the Angle of the Foot Arch and the Length of the Foot

Year 2018, Volume: 8 Issue: 3, 172 - 177, 01.12.2018

Abstract

Aim: Foot
morphology and anthropometry are known to be associated with biomechanical
measurements of foot. The medial longitudinal arch (MLA), which is the main arch
contributing to the foot morphology, provides an elastic connection between the
forefoot and hindfoot. Problems and alignment disorders, specifically caused by
MLA, such as pes cavus and pes planus, ultimately affect the functions of the
muscles and joints of the lower extremity. In this study, we aimed to
investigate the relation between MLA and bony-length of foot by making
measurements on radiographs.

Material
and Method:
212 (106 right and 106 left sides) weightbearing
lateral x-ray images of 106 patients (36 females, 70 males) aged between 18-80
(m:18-75, f:18-80) were evaluated. Images of the patients aged under 18 or above
80, with any sign of trauma or surgery,  space-occupying
lesion of foot or deformity of foot bones were excluded. The maximal bony-length
of the foot and in order to evaluate the medial longitudinal arch (MLA) the angle
between the calcaneus and the 1st metatarsal bone and calcaneal inclination
angle were measured on the x-ray images. The results were evaluated
statistically.

Results:
The mean bony-length of the foot was measured as 237.5
mm (216.5-256.7 mm) in females and 264.1 mm (205.0-293.6 mm) in males. The mean
respective calcaneal inclination angle and the angle between the
calcaneus and the 1st metatarsal bone were measured
as 18.2o (2.7o-31.4o) and 140.2o
(119.5o-159.8o). In both gender there was a significant
correlation between the bony-length of foot and angles (p<0.01 for both
angles). There was also found a significant correlation between calcaneal
inclination angle and the angle between the calcaneus and the 1st
metatarsal bone (p<0.01).







Conclusion: MLA,
known to be effective on functions such as balance, walking, standing on one or
two feet, jumping and squatting, which are associated with foot morphology, was
found to be related to foot length in both gender. This results in a prediction
of predisposition to the pes planus in people with large feet.

References

  • 1. Jankowicz-Szymanska A, Mikolajczyk E, Wardzala R. Arch of the foot and postural balance in young judokas and peers. J Pediatr Orthop B 2015; 24(5):456-60.
  • 2. Lin CJ, Lai KA, Kuan TS, Chou YL. Correlating factors and clinical significance of flexible flatfoot in preschool children. J Pediatr Orthop 2001; 21(3):378-82.
  • 3. Mootanah R, Song J, Lenhoff MW, Hafer JF, Backus SI, Gagnon D, et al. Foot type biomechanics part 2: are structure and anthropometrics related to function? Gait Posture 2013; 37(3):452-6.
  • 4. Arıncı K, Elhan A. Anatomi. Ankara: Güneş Kitabevi; 2014:71-128
  • 5. Franco AH. Pes cavus and pes planus. Analyses and treatment. Physical Therapy 1987; 67(5):688-94.
  • 6. Harris EJ, Vanore JV, Thomas JL, Kravitz SR, Mendelson SA, Mendicino RW, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of pediatric flatfoot. J Foot Ankle Surg 2004; 43(6):341-73.
  • 7. Deland JT Adult-acquired flatfoot deformity. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 2008; 16(7):399-406.
  • 8. Wozniacka R, Bac A, Matusik S, Szczygiel E, Ciszek E. Body weight and the medial longitudinal foot arch: high-arched foot, a hidden problem? Eur J Pediatr 2013; 172(5):683-91.
  • 9. Menz HB. Alternative techniques for the clinical assessment of foot pronation. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association 1998; 88(3):119-29.
  • 10. Murley GS, Menz HB, Landorf KB. A protocol for classifying normal- and flat-arched foot posture for research studies using clinical and radiographic measurements. J Foot Ankle Res 2009; 2:22.
  • 11. Scholz T, Zech A, Wegscheider K, Lezius S, Braumann KM, Sehner S, et al. Reliability and correlation of static and dynamic foot arch measurement in a healthy pediatric population. Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association 2017; 107(5):419-27.
  • 12. Muller S, Carlsohn A, Müller J, Baur H, Mayer F. Static and dynamic foot characteristics in children aged 1-13 years: a cross-sectional study. Gait Posture 2012; 35(3):389-94.
  • 13. Yalçın N, Esen E, Kanatlı U, Yetkin H. Medial longitudinal arkın değerlendirilmesi: dinamik plantar basınç ölçüm sistemi ile radyografik yöntemlerin karşılaştırılması. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2010; 44(3):241-5.
  • 14. Saltzman CL, Nawoczenski DA, Talbot KD. Measurement of the medial longitudinal arch. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76:45-9.
  • 15. Pfeiffer M, Kotz R, Ledl T, Hauser G, Sluga M. Prevalence of flat foot in preschool-aged children. Pediatrics 2006; 118(2):634-9.
  • 16. Chang JH, Wang SH, Kuo CL, Shen HC, Hong YW, Lin LC. Prevalence of flexible flatfoot in Taiwanese school-aged children in relation to obesity, gender, and age. Eur J Pediatr 2010; 169(4):447-52.
  • 17. Mauch M, Grau S, Maiwald C, Horstmann T. Foot morphology of normal, underweight and overweight children. Int J Obes (Lond) 2008; 32(7):1068-75.
  • 18. Tenenbaum S, Hershkovich O, Gordon B, Bruck N, Thein R, Darazne E, et al. Flexible pes planus in adolescents: body mass index, body height, and gender--an epidemiological study. Foot Ankle Int 2013; 34(6):811-7.
  • 19. Eleswarapu AS, Yamini B, Bielski RJ. Evaluating the Cavus Foot. Pediatr Ann 2016; 45(6):e218-22.
  • 20. Vanderwilde R, Staheli L, Chew DE, Malagon V. Measurements on radiographs of the foot in normal infants and children. The Journal of Bone and Joins Surgery 1988; 70-A(3):407-15.
  • 21. Uzuner MB, Geneci F, Ocak M, Bayram P, Sancak İT, Dolgun A, et al. Sex determination from the radiographic measurements of calcaneus. Anatomy 2016; 10(3):200-4.
  • 22. Redmond AC, Crane YZ, Menz HB. Normative values for the foot posture index. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2008; 1(1).
There are 22 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Bile İpek Torun

Nurdan Çay This is me

Publication Date December 1, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 8 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Torun, B. İ., & Çay, N. (2018). Ayak Arkus Açısı ve Ayak Uzunluğu Arasındaki İlişki. Kafkas Journal of Medical Sciences, 8(3), 172-177.
AMA Torun Bİ, Çay N. Ayak Arkus Açısı ve Ayak Uzunluğu Arasındaki İlişki. KAFKAS TIP BİL DERG. December 2018;8(3):172-177.
Chicago Torun, Bile İpek, and Nurdan Çay. “Ayak Arkus Açısı Ve Ayak Uzunluğu Arasındaki İlişki”. Kafkas Journal of Medical Sciences 8, no. 3 (December 2018): 172-77.
EndNote Torun Bİ, Çay N (December 1, 2018) Ayak Arkus Açısı ve Ayak Uzunluğu Arasındaki İlişki. Kafkas Journal of Medical Sciences 8 3 172–177.
IEEE B. İ. Torun and N. Çay, “Ayak Arkus Açısı ve Ayak Uzunluğu Arasındaki İlişki”, KAFKAS TIP BİL DERG, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 172–177, 2018.
ISNAD Torun, Bile İpek - Çay, Nurdan. “Ayak Arkus Açısı Ve Ayak Uzunluğu Arasındaki İlişki”. Kafkas Journal of Medical Sciences 8/3 (December 2018), 172-177.
JAMA Torun Bİ, Çay N. Ayak Arkus Açısı ve Ayak Uzunluğu Arasındaki İlişki. KAFKAS TIP BİL DERG. 2018;8:172–177.
MLA Torun, Bile İpek and Nurdan Çay. “Ayak Arkus Açısı Ve Ayak Uzunluğu Arasındaki İlişki”. Kafkas Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 8, no. 3, 2018, pp. 172-7.
Vancouver Torun Bİ, Çay N. Ayak Arkus Açısı ve Ayak Uzunluğu Arasındaki İlişki. KAFKAS TIP BİL DERG. 2018;8(3):172-7.