BRIC Ülkelerinde Kamu Yönetimi’nde Büyük Veri Politikaları

Year 2019, Volume: 1 Issue: 1, 43 - 61, 15.12.2019

Aras Okuyucu

Abstract

Veri halk tarafından üretilmekte, özel
sektöre ve devletler tarafından toplanmaktadır. Devletler, veri toplama
açısından oldukça eski geleneğe sahiptir. Bu sebeple vatandaşlara ilişkin en
yüksek oranda veri toplamış oluşumlardır. Tüm bunlar ele alındığında, 21. Yüzyılda
değişen teknolojik koşullarla bu çevrim dışı verinin, gelişen analiz metotlarıyla
işlenebilmesinin önü açılmış, aynı zamanda önceden işlenmesi imkansız görünen
bu çok büyük hacimli, yüksek akış hızına sahip ve çok çeşitli verinin
işlenebilmesi olanaklı kılınmıştır. Bunlara büyük veri denmektedir. BRIC
ülkeleri küresel koşullarda 2050’de en büyük ekonomilerinde üst sıralara oturacağı
öngörülmektedir. Türkiye de, bu süreçte üst sıralara tırmanması beklenmektedir.
Tüm bunlar ele alındığında, Türkiye’nin ekonomik olarak mukayese edildiği bu
ülkelerin aynı zamanda kamu yönetiminde büyük veri politikaları açısından hangi
noktada bulunduğu, Türkiye için de bir politika transferine olanak
sağlayabilecek ve aynı zamanda konumlandırmasına olanak tanıyacaktır. Bu
sebeple, bu metinde ülkelere ilişkin bir araştırma yapılarak politikalarına
ilişkin çıkarım ve tartışma gerçekleştirilmiştir.

Keywords

büyük veri, kamu yönetimi, e-devlet, bric, türkiye

Big Data Policies in Public Administration in BRIC Countries

Abstract

Data is created
by the public and collected by the private sector and governments. Governments
have long lasting tradition with data collection. Historically, governments
were the highest collectors of data on their citizens. In this era, it is possible
to process this off-line data with the newly developed analysis methods. It is
also possible to process this very large volume, high velocity, and different
variety of data which was impossible to process and have meaningful results in
the past. These kind of data is called as big data. BRIC countries are predicted
to be at the top of the biggest economies in 2050. Turkey is also expected to
climb on this graphic. In this paper, the big data policies of BRIC countries
and policy transfer possibilities to Turkey are discussed to develop ongoing
e-government process in Turkey’s public administration.

Keywords

big data, public administration, e-government, BRIC, Turkey

References

• Akıncı, A. N. (2019) Büyük Veri Uygulamalarında Kișisel Veri Mahremiyeti, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi
• Bauer, H., Patel, M., & Veira, J. (2014). The Internet of Things: Sizing up the opportunity. Retrieved from: McKinsey at http://www. mckinsey. com/insights/high_tech_telecoms_internet/the_internet_of_t hings_sizing_up_the_opportunity. Buchholz, S., Bukowski, M., & Sniegocki, A. (2014). Big and Open Data in Europe: A growth engine or a missed opportunity?, 116. Chen, C.L., & Zhang, C. (2014). Data-intensive applications, challenges, techniques and technologies: A survey on Big Data. Inf. Sci., 275, 314-347. Chandan, H. C. (2016). Corruption, organisations and culture in contemporary India. In Indian Culture and Work Organisations in Transition (pp. 145-161). Routledge India. da Mota Ueti, R., Espinosa, D. F., Rafferty, L., & Hung, P. C. (2016). Case studies of government use of big data in Latin America: Brazil and Mexico. In Big Data Applications and Use Cases (pp. 197-214). Springer, Cham. Desouza, K. C., & Jacob, B. (2017). Big data in the public sector: Lessons for practitioners and scholars. Administration & Society, 49(7), 1043-1064. El-Darwiche, B., Koch, V., Meer, D., Shehadi, R. T., & Tohme, W. (2014). Big data maturity: An action plan for policymakers and executives. The global information technology report, 43, 51.
• Ericsson, A. B. (2014). Ericsson mobility report. Ericsson, Sweden, Tech. Rep. EAB-17, 5964.
• FICCI, K. (2015). Indian Media and Entertainment Industry Report.(2014). The stage is set. Gamage, P. (2016). New development: Leveraging ‘big data’analytics in the public
• Gnanasambandam, C., Madgavkar, A., Kaka, N., Manyika, J., Chui, M., Bughin, J., & Gomes, M. (2012). Online and upcoming: The Internet’s impact on India. Technology, Media and Telecom Practice, Mc Kinsey and Company.
• Kitchin, R. (2014). The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and Their Consequences, 1–192. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473909472
• Kuraeva A. & Nikolay, K. (2015). Survey on big data analytics in public sector of russian federation. Procedia Computer Science, 55, 905-911.
• Kaushik, A. D., & Sharma, V. K. (2012). Flood Management in India. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 58(1), 119-136.
• Kuraeva, A (2016). Big Data Analysis Influence on Public Administration Processes (Master’s thesis). Retrieved from https://www.hse.ru/en/edu/vkr/182647584 Maciejewski, M. (2017). To do more, better, faster and more cheaply: using big data in public administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 83(1_suppl), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852316640058
• Malhado, A. C., & Ladle, R. J. (2010). New data system to galvanize Brazil's conservation efforts. Nature, 465(7300), 869
• Manyika, J., Chui, M., Brown, B., Bughin, J., Dobbs, R., Roxburgh, C., & Byers, A. H. (2011). Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. Mergel, I. (2017). Building holistic evidence for social media impact. Public Administration Review, 77(4), 489-495.
• Mills, S., Lucas, S., Irakliotis, L., Rappa, M., Carlson, T., & Perlowitz, B. (2012). Demystifying big data: a practical guide to transforming the business of government. TechAmerica Foundation, Washington.
• O'neill, J. (2001). Building better global economic BRICs.
• Pries, K. H., & Dunnigan, R. (2015). Big Data Analytics: A practical guide for managers. Auerbach Publications.
• SaCHS, G. (2003). Dreaming with BRICs: the path to 2050. http://www2. goldmansachs. com/ideas/brics/book/99-dreaming. pdf.
• Thussu, D. K. (2015). Digital BRICS: building a NWICO 2.0?. Mapping BRICS media, 242-263.
• Zheng, Y. (2017). Explaining Citizens’ E-Participation Usage: Functionality of E- Participation Applications. Administration & Society, 49(3), 423-442.