Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri Konusunda Devlet Deneyimleri: Güney Kore’de e-Devlet ve Geleceği

Year 2020, Volume: 2 Issue: 1, 41 - 60, 15.07.2020

Uğur Sadioğlu , Rahmi Erkut Erdinçler

Abstract

Türkiye’de ve dünyada e-Devlet uygulamaları ve eriştiği hizmet alanı her geçen gün artmakta, gelecekte de daha etkin olacağı beklenmektedir. Bu alanda öncü bir ülke deneyimi sunan Kore Cumhuriyeti (Türkiye ve dünyada kabul gören adıyla Güney Kore) diğer ülkelerin bu deneyimi paylaşması için önemli bir ülkedir. Özellikle Türkiye’de vatandaşın önüne sunulan ve sunulacak e-Devlet uygulamaları için örnek alınması gereken bir ülke olan Güney Kore bu çalışmanın konusunu oluşturmuştur. Son 20 yılda ülkenin bilişim ve teknolojik altyapısını etkin şekilde yenileyen Güney Kore, kamu hizmetlerinin ifasını da bu yola entegre edebilmiştir. Bu çalışmada özellikle Güney Kore’nin devlet olarak bu teknoloji altyapısı analiz edilmiş, bunun sonucunda e-Devlet uygulamaları ulusal ve yerel düzeyde nasıl ve hangi yöntemlerle uygulamaya geçirildiği incelenmeye çalışılmıştır. Bu konuda 12-14 Mayıs 2017 tarihlerinde Antalya-Alanya’da gerçekleştirilmiş olan 1. Kamu Yönetimi ve Teknoloji Çalıştayı’nda ortaya çıkan bulgulardan da yararlanılmıştır.

Keywords

e-devlet, Güney Kore, Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri

Government Experiences in Information and Communication Technologies: e-Government and its Future in South Korea

Abstract

e-Government applications and access to the service area in the world and Turkey increasing every day, the future is expected to be more effective. The Republic of Korea presents a pioneering experience in this area of the country (South Korea as Turkey and global acceptance of the state’s name) is an important country to share this experience of other countries. Especially when presented in front of the citizens in Turkey and will be available for e-government applications in South Korea, a country that should be emulated are the subject of this study. South Korea, which has effectively renewed the country's IT and technological infrastructure in the last 20 years, has been able to integrate the performance of public services into this path. In this study, especially the technology infrastructure of South Korea as a state has been analysed, and as a result, it has been tried to examine how and by which methods e-Government applications are implemented at national and local level. The findings of the 1st Public Management and Technology Workshop held in Antalya-Alanya on 12-14 May 2017 were also utilized.

References

• Ahn, Michael J. & Bretschneider (2011). Politics of E-Government: E-Government and the Political Control of Bureaucracy. Public Administration Review, May/June 2011, 414-424.
• Berman, E. M., Moon, M.J. & Choi, H. (2010). Public Administration in East Asia. Chapter 22: E-Government in South Korea, 473-493.
• Central Intelligence Agency The World Factbook (2019), East Asia/Southeast Asia: Korea, South, https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ks.html , Erişim Tarihi/Access Date: 30.12.2019.
• Cho, Y.H. & Choi, B. (2004). E-Government to Combat Corruption: The Case of Seoul Metropolitan Government, International Journal of Public Administration, 27 (10), 719-735.
• Chung, C. (2015). The Introduction of E-Government in Korea: Development Journey, Outcomes and Future. Gestion et management public, 2015/2, 3 (2), 107-122.
• D’agostino, M. J., Schwester, R., Carrizales, T. ve Melitski, J. (2011). A Study of E-Government and E-Governance: An Empirical Examination of Municipal Websites, Public Administration Quarterly, 35 (1), 3-25.
• Kabullah, M. I. & Wahab, S. (2016). The Curbing of Corruption by Formal and Informal Accountability at the Indonesian Local Governments: Learning from Yogyakarta City, içinde U. Sadioglu & K. Dede (ed.), Theoretical Foundations and Discussions on the Reformation Process in Local Governments, Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global, 441-461.
• Khan, G. F., Yoon, H. Y., Kim, J. & Park, H. W. (2014). From e-government to social government: Twitter use by Koreas’s central government, Online Information Review, 38 (1), 95-113.
• Kim, H.J., Pan, G & Pan, S.L (2007). Managing IT-enabled Transformation in the Public Sector: A Case Study on E-Government in South Korea. Government Information Quarterly, 24, 338-352.
• Kim, S. & Lee, J. (2012). E-Participation, Transparency, and Trust in Local Government. Public Administration Review, 72 (6), 819-828.
• Kim, S., Kim, H.J. & Lee, H (2009). An Institutional Analysis of an e-government System for Anti-Corruption: The Case of OPEN. Governmnet Information Quarterly, 26, 42-50.
• Lee S.M, & Tan, X. & Trimi, S. (2005). Current Practices of Leading E-Government Countries. Communications of the ACM, 48 (10), 99-104.
• Sobacı, M. Z. (2012). E-Devlet: Kuramsal Bir Bakış, içinde M. Z. Sobacı & M. Yıldız (ed.), E-Devlet: Kamu Yönetimi ve Teknoloji İlişkisinde Güncel Gelişmeler, Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık, 3-37.
• UN (2018). United Nations E-Government Survey 2018 – Gearing e-government to support transformation towards sustainable and resilient societies, New York, UN.
• UNCTAD (2019). Digital Economy Report 2019 - Value Creation and Capture: Implications for Developing Countries, New York: UN.
• UNDP (2016). Human Development Report 2016: Human Development for Everyone, New York: UNDP.
• UNDP (2019). Human Development Index and Its Components, New York: UNDP.
• United Nations (2016). United Nations E-Government Survey 2016 – E-Government in Support of Sustainable Development, New York: UN.
• Yoon, J. (2016). “Chapter 3 Korean Digital Government Infrastructure Building and Implementation: Capacity Dimensions” iç. Bringing Government Into the 21th Century, (Ed.) Tina George Karippacheril, Soonhee Kim, Robert P. Beschel Jr., and Changyong Choi, Ed., World Bank Group, s. 41-59.