Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

The Effect of Tiered Insruction on Students’ Achiviments, Learning Retainment

Year 2016, Volume: 24 Issue: 4, 1589 - 1602, 15.09.2016

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of tiered instruction of differenciated instruction
on students’ achiviements, learning approaches and learning retainment. The research was
applied on the 5th grade students using pre, post and delayed test model. Both the experiment
and the control group composed of 84 students. An academic achievement test was tested in
terms of validity and reliability. The test was applied before, after and eight weeks later than
the instruction.To determine the students’ approaches, Learning Approaches Inventory was
applied. As a result of the research, in terms of academic achievement post-test and in terms
of academic achievement delayed-test significant difference is detected in favor of the group
on which Tiered techniques are applied. The third thypothesis was formulated to determine the
differences between the experiment and the control group. 

References

  • Anderson, K., M. (2007). Differentiating instruction to include all students. Preventing school Failure,51 (3), 49-54
  • Chen, Y.H. (2007). Exploring the assessment aspect of differentiated instruction: college EFL learners’ perspectives on tiered performance tasks. Yayınlanmış doktora tez The University of New Orleans. (UMI No: 3292290).
  • Çoban, G., Ergin,Ö. (2008). İlköğretim Öğrencilerinin Feni Öğrenme Yaklaşımları. Uludağ Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi XXI (2), 271-293
  • Daniels, H. VE Bizar, M. (1998). Methods that matter. Siz structures for best practice classrooms. York, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
  • Dreeszen, J. L. (2009). The impact of differentiation on the critical thinking of gifted readers and the evolving perspective of the fifth grade classroom teacher. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. College of Education Kansas State Universiy. http://krex.k-state.edu/dspace/handle/2097/2063 ( 09.02.2013)
  • Erden, M. ve Altun, S. (2006). Öğrenme Stilleri. İstanbul:Morpa Kültür Yayınları.
  • Geisler, J. L, Hessler, T. Gardner,. Temple. S. (2009). Differentiated Writing İnterventions for High-Achieving Urban African American Elementary Students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20 (2), pp. 214-247.
  • Gregory, Gayle H, Carolyn Chapman. (2002). Differentiated Instructional Strategies: One Size Doesn’t Fit All. ABD: Corwin Press, Inc.
  • Ham,J.A.(2001). The impact of differentiated instructional practices upon South Korean elementary students. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. University of Bridgeport.
  • Heacox, Diane. (2002). Differentiating Instruction in the Regular Classroom: How to Reach and Teach All Learners, Grades 3-12. ABD: Free Spirit Publishing.
  • Kapusnick, R.A. ve Hauslein, C.M. (2001). The silver cup of differentiated instruction. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 37 (4), 156-159
  • Keck, S. Ve Kinney, S. C. (2005). Creating a differentiated classroom. Learning & Leading with Technology, 33 (1), 12-15
  • McCartney, K. Scarr, S., Rocheleau, A. Philiphs, D., Abbout-Shim, M.,Keefe, N.Rosenthal,S. Ve Ruh,J. (1997). Teacher-child interaction and chil-care auspices as predictors of social outcomes in infants, toddlers, and preschoolers. Merril-Palmer Quarterly, 43.
  • Morgil, İ.-Yılmaz, A.Yörük, N. (2002). Fen Eğitimde İstasyonlarla İlgili Bir Uygulama. http://www.fedu.metu.edu.tr/ufbmek-5/ozetler/pdf [26.05.2011].
  • Nunley, K.F. (2004). Layered curriculum: The practical solution for teachers with more than one student in their classroom (2nd ed.)Kearney, NE:Morris
  • Oliva, Peter F. (2005). Devoloping The Curriculum. 6. Basım. ABD: Pearson
  • Pierce, R.L., Adams, C.M. (2004). Tiered lessons: One way to differentiate mathematics instruction. Gifted Child Today, 27(2), p58-65.
  • Richards M.R.E., Stuart N Omdal. (2007). Effects of Tiered Instruction on Academic Performance in a Secondary Science Course. Journal of Advanced Academics. c. 18. s. 3: 424-456
  • Smutny,J.F.(2003).Differentated instruction. Phi Delta Kappa Fastbacks, 506,7-47
  • Sondergeld, T.A., Schultz R. (2008). Science, Standards, and Differentiation:It realy can be fun!. Gifted child today. 31(1), 34-40.
  • Suarez D. (2007). Differentiation By Challange: Using a tiered program of instruction in mathmatics. Making The difference: Differentitation in international schools. Eds: William Powel. Ochan Kusuma Powel. Kuala Lumpur.
  • Stager, Allison. (2007). Differentiated Instruction in Mathematics. Yüksek Lisans Tezi.Caldwell College.
  • Tieso, C. (2005). The effects of grouping practices and curricular adjustments on achievement. Journal for he Education of the Gifted, 29, 60-89
  • Tomlinson, C. (1995). Deciding to differentiate instruction in middle school: One school's journey . Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 77-87
  • Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). Mapping A Route Toward Differentiated Instruction Educational Leadership, 37-1, 12-16
  • Tomlinson, Carol Ann.. (2005). The Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of AlL Learners. ABD: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
  • Tomlinson, Carol Ann, Jay McTighe. (2006). Integrating Differentiated Instruction and Understanding by Design. ABD: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Turville, J., Allen L., Nickelsen L. (2010). Differentiating by readiness: Strategies and lesson plans for tiered instruction grades K-8. NY: Eye On Education Larchmont

Katlı Öğretim Yönteminin Öğrencilerin Akademik Başarı Puanları, Öğrenme Yaklaşımları ve Öğrenmenin Kalıcılığı Üzerindeki Etkisi

Year 2016, Volume: 24 Issue: 4, 1589 - 1602, 15.09.2016

Abstract

Bu araştırma farklılaştırılmış öğretim yöntemlerinden Katlı Öğretim yönteminin
uygulanmasının öğrencilerin akademik başarı puanları, öğrenme yaklaşımları ve öğrenmenin
kalıcılığı değişkenleri üzerindeki etkisini belirlemeyi hedeflemiştir. Kontrol gruplu öntestsontest-tekrartest
modeline göre gerçekleştirilen araştırma Beşiktaş Cumhuriyet İlköğretim
Okulu 5.sınıf öğrencileri üzerinde yürütülmüştür. Deney ve kontrol grupları toplam 84
öğrenciden oluşmaktadır. Çalışmada, geçerlik ve güvenilirlik çalışmaları yapılmış akademik
başarı testi ve öğrenme yaklaşımı envanteri, uygulamadan önce, uygulamadan hemen sonra
ve öğrenmenin kalıcılığını belirlemek amacıyla da akademik başarı iki ay sonra tekrar
uygulanmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda, “Katlı Öğretim ve geleneksel öğretim yöntemleri
uygulanan öğrencilerin akademik başarı sontest puanları, kalıcılık testi puanları ve derin
öğrenme puanları arasında anlamlı bir fark tespit edilmiştir.  

References

  • Anderson, K., M. (2007). Differentiating instruction to include all students. Preventing school Failure,51 (3), 49-54
  • Chen, Y.H. (2007). Exploring the assessment aspect of differentiated instruction: college EFL learners’ perspectives on tiered performance tasks. Yayınlanmış doktora tez The University of New Orleans. (UMI No: 3292290).
  • Çoban, G., Ergin,Ö. (2008). İlköğretim Öğrencilerinin Feni Öğrenme Yaklaşımları. Uludağ Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi XXI (2), 271-293
  • Daniels, H. VE Bizar, M. (1998). Methods that matter. Siz structures for best practice classrooms. York, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
  • Dreeszen, J. L. (2009). The impact of differentiation on the critical thinking of gifted readers and the evolving perspective of the fifth grade classroom teacher. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. College of Education Kansas State Universiy. http://krex.k-state.edu/dspace/handle/2097/2063 ( 09.02.2013)
  • Erden, M. ve Altun, S. (2006). Öğrenme Stilleri. İstanbul:Morpa Kültür Yayınları.
  • Geisler, J. L, Hessler, T. Gardner,. Temple. S. (2009). Differentiated Writing İnterventions for High-Achieving Urban African American Elementary Students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20 (2), pp. 214-247.
  • Gregory, Gayle H, Carolyn Chapman. (2002). Differentiated Instructional Strategies: One Size Doesn’t Fit All. ABD: Corwin Press, Inc.
  • Ham,J.A.(2001). The impact of differentiated instructional practices upon South Korean elementary students. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi. University of Bridgeport.
  • Heacox, Diane. (2002). Differentiating Instruction in the Regular Classroom: How to Reach and Teach All Learners, Grades 3-12. ABD: Free Spirit Publishing.
  • Kapusnick, R.A. ve Hauslein, C.M. (2001). The silver cup of differentiated instruction. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 37 (4), 156-159
  • Keck, S. Ve Kinney, S. C. (2005). Creating a differentiated classroom. Learning & Leading with Technology, 33 (1), 12-15
  • McCartney, K. Scarr, S., Rocheleau, A. Philiphs, D., Abbout-Shim, M.,Keefe, N.Rosenthal,S. Ve Ruh,J. (1997). Teacher-child interaction and chil-care auspices as predictors of social outcomes in infants, toddlers, and preschoolers. Merril-Palmer Quarterly, 43.
  • Morgil, İ.-Yılmaz, A.Yörük, N. (2002). Fen Eğitimde İstasyonlarla İlgili Bir Uygulama. http://www.fedu.metu.edu.tr/ufbmek-5/ozetler/pdf [26.05.2011].
  • Nunley, K.F. (2004). Layered curriculum: The practical solution for teachers with more than one student in their classroom (2nd ed.)Kearney, NE:Morris
  • Oliva, Peter F. (2005). Devoloping The Curriculum. 6. Basım. ABD: Pearson
  • Pierce, R.L., Adams, C.M. (2004). Tiered lessons: One way to differentiate mathematics instruction. Gifted Child Today, 27(2), p58-65.
  • Richards M.R.E., Stuart N Omdal. (2007). Effects of Tiered Instruction on Academic Performance in a Secondary Science Course. Journal of Advanced Academics. c. 18. s. 3: 424-456
  • Smutny,J.F.(2003).Differentated instruction. Phi Delta Kappa Fastbacks, 506,7-47
  • Sondergeld, T.A., Schultz R. (2008). Science, Standards, and Differentiation:It realy can be fun!. Gifted child today. 31(1), 34-40.
  • Suarez D. (2007). Differentiation By Challange: Using a tiered program of instruction in mathmatics. Making The difference: Differentitation in international schools. Eds: William Powel. Ochan Kusuma Powel. Kuala Lumpur.
  • Stager, Allison. (2007). Differentiated Instruction in Mathematics. Yüksek Lisans Tezi.Caldwell College.
  • Tieso, C. (2005). The effects of grouping practices and curricular adjustments on achievement. Journal for he Education of the Gifted, 29, 60-89
  • Tomlinson, C. (1995). Deciding to differentiate instruction in middle school: One school's journey . Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 77-87
  • Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). Mapping A Route Toward Differentiated Instruction Educational Leadership, 37-1, 12-16
  • Tomlinson, Carol Ann.. (2005). The Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of AlL Learners. ABD: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
  • Tomlinson, Carol Ann, Jay McTighe. (2006). Integrating Differentiated Instruction and Understanding by Design. ABD: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  • Turville, J., Allen L., Nickelsen L. (2010). Differentiating by readiness: Strategies and lesson plans for tiered instruction grades K-8. NY: Eye On Education Larchmont
There are 28 citations in total.

Details

Subjects Studies on Education
Journal Section Review Article
Authors

Serkan Demir This is me

Publication Date September 15, 2016
Acceptance Date November 9, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2016 Volume: 24 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Demir, S. (2016). The Effect of Tiered Insruction on Students’ Achiviments, Learning Retainment. Kastamonu Education Journal, 24(4), 1589-1602.

10037