Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

İngilizce’yi Yabancı Dil olarak Öğreten Öğretmenlerin Pandemi Sırasındaki Yansıtıcı Öğretim Uygulamaları

Year 2022, Volume: 30 Issue: 4, 705 - 716, 28.10.2022
https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1194038

Abstract

References

  • Al-Issa, A. & Al-Bulushi, A. (2010). Training English Language Student Teachers to Become Reflective Teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education,35(4), 41-64.
  • Akbari, R., (2007). Reflections on Reflection: A Critical Appraisal of Reflective Practice in L2 Teacher Education. System 35, 192-207.
  • Akbari,R. Bahzadpoor, F. & Dadvand B. (2010). Development of English Language Teaching Reflection Inventory. System, 38(2), 211-227.
  • Boud, D. (2001). Using Journal Writing to Enhance Reflective Practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education,90, 9-17.
  • Brandt, C. (2008). Integrating Feedback and Reflection in Teacher Preparation. ELT Journal, 62(1), 37-46.
  • Bryman, A. (1988). Quality and Quantity in Social Research. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Collier, S. T. (1999). Characteristics of Reflective Thought during the Students Teaching Experience. Journal of Teacher Education,50(3), 173-181.

EFL Teachers' Reflective Teaching Practices amid the Covid-19 Pandemic

Year 2022, Volume: 30 Issue: 4, 705 - 716, 28.10.2022
https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1194038

Abstract

Purpose: The current survey portrays English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers’ familiarity with the concept of reflective teaching and the extentthat they carry out reflective teaching practices especially during their first experience with online teaching amid the Covid-19 Pandemic.
Design/Methodology/Approach:In the current descriptive study, a varied sample of Turkish EFL teachers (N=117) filled out the online survey at the end of the first academic semester with an emergency online education period induced by the Covid-19 pandemic.
Findings: The study indicated that nearly forty per cent of the participants were unfamiliar with the concept of reflective teaching. While metacognitive and affective practices were more commonly performed by the participants, the critical, practical and cognitive practices were rather less preferred. The participants hardly ever think of writing articles regarding their experiences, asking their colleagues to observe their teaching and also, relatively less contemplate on the socio-political sides of their teaching and their influences.
Highlights: The notion of reflection and the reflective teaching strategies should be revisited, and accordingly, the scales or inventories should be reformulated by taking the premises of online education into consideration.

References

  • Al-Issa, A. & Al-Bulushi, A. (2010). Training English Language Student Teachers to Become Reflective Teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education,35(4), 41-64.
  • Akbari, R., (2007). Reflections on Reflection: A Critical Appraisal of Reflective Practice in L2 Teacher Education. System 35, 192-207.
  • Akbari,R. Bahzadpoor, F. & Dadvand B. (2010). Development of English Language Teaching Reflection Inventory. System, 38(2), 211-227.
  • Boud, D. (2001). Using Journal Writing to Enhance Reflective Practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education,90, 9-17.
  • Brandt, C. (2008). Integrating Feedback and Reflection in Teacher Preparation. ELT Journal, 62(1), 37-46.
  • Bryman, A. (1988). Quality and Quantity in Social Research. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Collier, S. T. (1999). Characteristics of Reflective Thought during the Students Teaching Experience. Journal of Teacher Education,50(3), 173-181.
There are 7 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Studies on Education
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Raşide Dağ Akbaş 0000-0001-5109-675X

Publication Date October 28, 2022
Acceptance Date September 22, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2022 Volume: 30 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Dağ Akbaş, R. (2022). EFL Teachers’ Reflective Teaching Practices amid the Covid-19 Pandemic. Kastamonu Education Journal, 30(4), 705-716. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.1194038

10037