Göreve ve İnsana Yönelik Liderlik Tarzlarının Örgütsel Bağlılık, İş Performansı ve İşten Ayrılma Niyeti Üzerindeki Etkileri

Year 2014, Issue: 28, 21 - 34, 01.12.2014

Hülya Gündüz Çekmecelioğlu

Abstract

Bu çalışma, liderlik tarzlarının çalışan tutumları üzerindeki etkisini incelemektedir. Bu kapsamda çalışmada, göreve yönelik liderlik ile insana yönelik liderliğin örgütsel bağlılık, iş performansı ve işten ayrılma niyeti üzerindeki etkileri incelenmektedir. Araştırma sonuçları liderin göreve yönelik ilgisinin çalışanların örgütsel bağlılığını pozitif yönde etkilediğini göstermektedir. Ayrıca sonuçlar insana yönelik liderlik tarzının duygusal bağlılık ile iş performansı üzerinde pozitif, işten ayrılma niyeti üzerinde negatif etkileri olduğunu göstermektedir. Çalışma liderlik davranışları ve çalışan tutumları adına önemli bulgular içermektedir

Keywords

Liderlik, Liderlik Tarzları, İş Performansı, Örgütsel Bağlılık

The Effects of Task Oriented Leadership and People Oriented Leadership Styles on Organizational Commitment, Job Performance and Intention to Leave

Abstract

The current study explores the effects of leadership style on employee attitudes. In this context the
study examines the effects of people oriented leadership and task oriented leadership on
organizational commitment, job performance and intention to leave. The results of this research
shows that task oriented leadership has a significant effect on organizational commitment.
Furthermore, results demonstrate that people oriented leadership has a significant effect on
organizational commitment, job performance and intention to leave. Findings of this study have
significant implications for leadership behaviours and employee attitudes at workplace.

Keywords

Leadership, leadership styles, job performance, organizational commitment

References

• Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J.P. (1990) “The Measurement And Antecendents Of Affective, Continuance And Normative Commitment To The Organization”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.
• Babin, B.J., Boles, J.S., 1996. The effects of perceived co-worker involvement and supervisor support on service prowider role stress, performance, and job satisfaction. Journal of Retailing 72 (1), 57-75.
• Benligiray, S., 2004. İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi. Eskişehir, Anadolu Üniversitesi
• Black J. S. ve Porter L. W. (2000). Management: Meeting New Challenges,Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
• Clark, D.R., 2004. Leadership Questionairre. < http: www. Skaqitwatershed.org.
• Clugston, M. (2000), “Does Cultural Socialization Predict Multiple Bases and Foci of Commitment”, Journal of Management, 26, 5-30.
• Cohen, S.G., Bailet, D.E., 1997. What makes teams work; group effectiveness research from the shop flor to the executive suite. Journal of Management 23, 239-290.
• Eren, E. (2007). Örgütsel Davranış ve Yönetim Psikolojisi, Beta Basım Yayım, İstanbul.
• Eren, Erol. (2001). Yönetim ve Organizasyon (Çağdaş ve Küresel Yaklaşımlar), Gen. 5. Bası, İstanbul: Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım A.Ş.
• Hellriegel D. ve Slocum, J. W. (1992). Management. Addison Wesley Publising Company, New York.
• Katzenbach, J.R., Smith, D.K., 1993. The Wisdom of Teams. Harvard Business School Press. Boston.
• Koçel, T. (2005). İşletme Yöneticiliği, Beta Basım Yayım, İstanbul, 10. Baskı.
• Marchiori, D.& Henkin, A. (2004), “Organizational Commitment Of Health Profession Faculty: Dimensions, Correlates And Conditions”, Medical Teacher, Vol.26, no.4 pp. 353-358.
• Meyer, J.P., & Allen N.J. (1991), “A Three Component Conceptualization Of Organizational Commitment”, Human Resource Management Review, 1 ,ss. 61-89.
• Meyer, J., Becker, T.& Vandenberghe C. (2004), “Employee Commitment and Motivation: A Conceptual Analysis And Integrative Model”, Journal of Applied Pschology, 991-1007.
• Meyer, J., Allen, N. & Topolnytsky, L. (1998), ”Commitment In a Changing World of Work”, Canadian Psychology, Vol.39, Iss.1\2.
• Meyer, J., Stanley, D., Herscovitch, L. & Topolnytsky, L. (2001),”Affective, Continuance, And Normative Commitment To The Organization: Meta Analysis Of Antecedents,Correlates, And Consequences”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 20-52.
• Mowday, R.t. (1983), “Equity Theory Predictions of Behavior in Organizations”. In R.M. Steers and L.W. Porter (EDS.), Motivation and Work Behavior (3. Ed.). New York: Mc Graw- Hill: 91- 113.
• Mowday, R.T., Steers, R. M. & Porter, L.W. (1979). “The measurement of organizational commitment”, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224-247.
• Mullıns, L.J. (1996), Management and Organizational Behavior, Sixth Edition, Prentice Hall, s.651.
• Malone, T. W., 1997. Is empowerment just on fad? Control, decision making and IT. Sloan Management Review 38, 23- 29.
• Nauman, S., Igbal, S., 2005. Challenges of Virtual Project Management in Developing Countries ublished in IEEE International Engeneering Management Conference. New Founland, Canada.
• Northcraft, G. B. ve Neale, M. A. (1990). Organizational Behavior-A Management Challenge, The Dryden Pres, ABD.
• O’reilly, C. (1989), “Corporations, Culture, And Commitment: Motivation And Social Control In Organizations”, California Management Review,Vol. 31, No. 4.
• Porter, L., Steers, R., Mowday, R., Boulian, P. (1974), “Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover amnong Psychıatric Technicians”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.59, No 5, 603-609
• Slevin, D.P., Pinto, J. K., 1988. Leadership motivation and the Project manager. In: Cleland, D.I., King, W.R. (Eds.), Project Handbook. New York, pp. 739- 770.
• Robbins, S. (2000). Essentials of Organizational Behavior, Prentice Hall; International 2 Revised edition.
• Robbins, S. (1998). Organisational Behaviour: Concepts, Controversies and Applications. 8th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
• Rusbelt, Farrell, Rogers & Mainous (1988), “Impact Of Exchange Variables On Exit, Voice, Loyalty And Neglect: An İntegrative Model Of Responses To Decline Job Satisfaction”, Academy Of Management Journal, 31(3), 599-627.
• Scanlan, Burt K., Keys, Bernard (1987). Management and Organizational behavior, 2nd edition, Krieger (Malibar, Fla.)
• Steers, Richard M. (1991). Introduction to Organizational Behavior. 4th edition, HarperCollins Publishers (New York, NY).
• Steers, R.M. (1977), “Antecedents And Outcomes Of Organizational Commitment”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 22, 46-56.
• Theodore, Herbert (1981). Dimensions of Organizational Behavior. Macmillan Publishing Co., Second Edition, USA.
• Tett And Meyer, J.P. (1993). Job Satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention and turnover: Path analyses based on meta- analytic findings. Personnel Psychology. 46, 259- 293.
• Turner, S.g., Utley, D.R., Westbrook, J.D., 1988. Project managers and functional managers: case study of job satisfaction in a matri organization. Project Management Journal. 29, 11-19.
• Wagner, John A. ve Hollenbeck, John R. (1992). Management of Organizational Behavior, First Ed.
• Zimmerer, T.W., Yasin, M.M., 1998. A leadership profile of American project managers. Project Management Journal. 29, 31- 38.
• KOSBED, 2014, 28: 21 - 34
• THE EFFECTS OF TASK ORIENTED LEADERSHIP AND PEOPLE ORIENTED
• LEADERSHIP STYLES ON ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT, JOB
• PERFORMANCE AND INTENTION TO LEAVE
• Hülya Gündüz ÇEKMECELİOĞLU •