Yenidoğan İşitme Taraması Sonuçları Rize;Türkiye

Year 2017, Volume: 9 Issue: 1, 41 - 45, 23.03.2017

Cüneyt Ardıç

https://doi.org/10.18521/ktd.292877

Cited By: 2

Abstract

Amaç: Çalışmamızda Rize ilindeki 2010 ile 2015 yılları arasındaki ulusal yenidoğan işitme programına alınan hastaların sonuçlarının literatürle karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır.

Materyal ve Metod: Çalışmaya Rize ilinde 2010 Ocak ayı ile 2015 Aralık ayı arsında doğmuş 25373 yenidoğan dahil edilmiştir. TEOAE (Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission) ve ABR (Auditory Brainstem Response) testleri kullanılmıştır. TEOAE den kalan bebeklere 15 gün sonra yeniden TEOAE uygulandı testten kalan bebeklere aynı gün ABR uygulanarak testi geçemeyen bebekler klinik ABR için referans merkeze yönlendirildi.

Bulgular: Test uygulanan 25373 bebekten 1562 si (6,15%) birinci ve ikinci testi geçemeyerek klinik ABR için referans merkeze yönlendirildi. Yönlendirilen bebeklerin 1 inde tektaraflı 15 inde çifttaraflı işitme kaybı saptandı.İşitme kaybı saptanan 16 bebekten 7 sinde risk faktörü tespit edildi.

Sonuç: İşitme kayıpları yenidoğanlarda sosyal, duygusal ve zihinsel gelişimi olumsuz yönde etkilemektedir. Yenidoğan işitme taraması işitme kayıplı bebeklerin erken tanınmasına ve erken tedavilerine olanak sağlamaktadır.

Keywords

Yenidoğan işitme taraması, İşitme kaybı, İşitme tarama testleri

Hearıng Screenıng Outcomes From Newborn Rıze;Turkey

Abstract

Objective

The
aim of the present study was to compare the patients included into national
newborn hearing program in Rize Province,Turkey, between 2010 and 2015 with
literature outcomes.

Material & Method

Totally
25,373 newborns born within Rize province between January 2010 and December
2015 were enrolled into the study. Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emission
(TEOAE) and Auditory Brainstem Response (ARB) tests were used. The infants
failed from TEOAE were subjected to ABR on the same day; infants who also
failed from ABR were referred to a reference centre for clinical ABR.

Results

Among
25,373 infants enrolled into the study, 1,562 (6.15%) infants failed from first
and second tests and were referred to a reference centre for clinical ABR.
Unilateral hearing loss was detected in 1 infant whereas bilateral hearing loss
was detected in 15 infants. A risk factor was determined in 7 of 16 infants
with hearing loss.

Conclusion

Hearing
loss affects newborns in terms of social, emotional and mental development negatively.
. Newborn hearing screening allows to diagnose and treat the infants with
hearing loss.

Keywords

Newborn hearing screening, Hearing loss, Hearing screening tests

References

• 1. Hahn M, Lamprecht-Dinnesen A, Heinecke A et al. Hearing screening in healthy newborns: feasibility of different methods with regard to test time. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1999; 51: 83-9.
• 2. Thompson DC, McPhillips H, Davis RL et al. Universal newborn hearing screening: summary of evidence. Jama 2001; 286: 2000-10.
• 3. Eisenberg LS. Current state of knowledge: speech recognition and production in children with hearing impairment. Ear Hear 2007; 28: 766-72.
• 4. Pimperton H, Kennedy CR. The impact of early identification of permanent childhood hearing impairment on speech and language outcomes. Arch Dis Child 2012; 97: 648-53.
• 5. Yoshinaga-Itano C, Sedey AL, et al. Language of early- and later-identified children with hearing loss. Pediatr 1998; 102: 1161-71.
• 6. Connor CM, Craig HK, Raudenbush SW,et al. The age at which young deaf children receive cochlear implants and their vocabulary and speech-production growth: is there an added value for early implantation? Ear Hear 2006; 27: 628-44.
• 7. Downs MP. Universal newborn hearing screeningthe Colorado story. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1995;32:257-9.
• 8. Yoon PJ, Price M, Gallagher et al. The need for long-term audiologic follow-up of neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) graduates. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2003;67:353-7.
• 9. Kemp DT, Ryan S, Bray P. A guide to effective use of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1990;11:93-105.
• 10. Thorton AR, Kimm L, Kennedy CR. Methodological factors involved in neonatal screening using transientevoked otoacoustic emissions and automated auditory brainstem response testing. Hear Res 2003;182:65-76.
• 11. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing 1994 Position Statement.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1995;32:265-74.
• 12. Lin CY, Huang CY, Lin CY, et al. Community-based newborn hearing screening program in Taiwan. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2004; 68:185-9.
• 13. Paul AK. Early identification of hearing loss and centralized newborn hearing screening facility-the cochin experience. Indian Pediatr 2011; 48:355-9.
• 14. Cox LC, Toro MR. Evolution of a universal infant hearing screening program in an inner city hospital. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2001; 59:99-104.
• 15. American Academy of Pediatrics, Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Year 2007 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics 2007; 120:898-921.
• 16. Tajudeen BA, Waltzman SB, Jethanamest D, et al. Speech perception in congenitally deaf children receiving cochlear implants in the first year of life. Otol Neurotol 2010; 31:1254-60.
• 17. Bielecki I, Horbulewicz A, Wolan T. Risk factors associated with hearing loss in infants: An analysis of 5282 referred neonates. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2011; 75:925-30.
• 18.American Academiy of Pediatrics.Newborn and infant hearing loss:detection and intervention.Pediatrics 103(1999) 527-30.
• 19. Ant A, Karamert R, Bayazıt YA. Genetics of Hearing Loss and Current Status in Turkey.
• 20. Ahmad A, Mohamad İ, Mansor S, et al. Outcome of a newborn hearing screening program in a tertiary hospital in Malaysia: the first five years.Ann Saudi Med 2011;31:24-28.
• 21. Kucur C, Kini V, Ozdem S,et al. Newborn hearing screening results at Zeynep Kamil Women and Children Diseases Education and Research Hospital. The Turkısh J of Ear Nose and Throat.2012;22:38-42.
• 22. Alaerts J, Luts H, Wouters J. Evaluation of middle ear function in young children: clinical guidelines for the use of 226- and 1,000-Hz tympanometry. Otol Neurotol 2007;28:727-32
• 23. Johnson Jl, White Kr, Widen Je, et al. A multicenter evaluation of how many infants with permanent hearing loss pass a two-stage otoacoustic emissions/automated auditory brainstem response newborn hearing screening protocol. Pediatrics 2005;116:663-72.
• 24. Genç GA, Başar F, Kayıkçı ME, et al. Newborn hearing screening outcomes in Hacettepe University. J Pediatr.(in Turkısh)2005;48:119-24.
• 25. Başar F, Aygün C, Güven AG. The First year Results of Ondokuz Mayis University Newborn Hearing Screening Program Newborn hearing screening J of Experiment and clinic Med 2007;24:43-51
• 26. Tatli MM, Bulent Serbetcioglu M,et al. Feasibility of neonatal hearing screening program with two-stage transient otoacoustic emissions in Turkey. Pediatr Int 2007;49:161-6.
• 27. Övet G, Balcı YI, Canural R, et al. The results of newborn hearing screening. Meandros Medical and Dental Journal 2010;11:27-29.