Doerfer, G. (1967). Turkische und Mongolische Elemente im Neupersischen. Unter besonderer Beriicksichtigung alterer neupersischer Geschichtsquellen, vor allem der Mongolen und Timuridenzeit. Bd III: Turkische Elemente im Neupersischen. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag GMBH.
Donuk, A. (1988). Eski Türk Devletlerinde idari-askeri ünvan ve terimler. İstanbul.
Drompp, M. R. (1999). Breaking the Orkhon Tradition: Kirghiz Adherence to the Yenisei Region after A. D. 840. Journal of the American Oriental Society. 119 (3), 390-403.
Gabain, A. V. (1988). Eski Türkçenin Grameri, çev. M. Akalın, Ankara: TDK Yayınları.
Malov, S.E. (1952). Eniseyskaya Pis’mennost’ Tyurkov. Tekstı i Perevodı. Moskova-Leningrad: İzdatel’stvo AN SSSR, 115.
Malyavkin, A.G. (1974). Materialı po İstorii Uygurov v IX-XII vv. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 210.
Menges, K.H. (1951). Altaic Elements in the Proto-Bulgarian Inscriptions. Byzantion, 21, 85-118.
Orhon-Enisey Teksteri. (1982). Frunze: İlim, 245.
Pulleyblank, E.G. (1991). A Lexicon of Reconstructed Pronunciation in Early Middle Chinese, Late Middle Chinese, and Early Mandarin. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Tekin, T. (1988). Orhon Yazıtları, Ankara: TDK Yayınları.
For the first time, the article attempts to study state titles and positions in the state of the Yenisei Kyrgyz in Southern Siberia, among them the titles of Ichreki and Öge. The state of the Yenisei Kyrgyz in the Middle Ages had a centralized government, state administrative management. Bureaucracy, government, and titles were largely the same as in other neighboring medieval Central Asian states. The Yenisei Kyrgyz had their own characteristics and differences, they are reflected in the names and functions of some state titles and positions. Analysis of state titles, positions and epithets to them, reflect a very complex and developed system of public administration among the ancient and medieval Kyrgyz. In addition, an attempt to systematize titles reflects the lexical (linguistic) basis of the origin and the area of distribution of these title.
Doerfer, G. (1967). Turkische und Mongolische Elemente im Neupersischen. Unter besonderer Beriicksichtigung alterer neupersischer Geschichtsquellen, vor allem der Mongolen und Timuridenzeit. Bd III: Turkische Elemente im Neupersischen. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag GMBH.
Donuk, A. (1988). Eski Türk Devletlerinde idari-askeri ünvan ve terimler. İstanbul.
Drompp, M. R. (1999). Breaking the Orkhon Tradition: Kirghiz Adherence to the Yenisei Region after A. D. 840. Journal of the American Oriental Society. 119 (3), 390-403.
Gabain, A. V. (1988). Eski Türkçenin Grameri, çev. M. Akalın, Ankara: TDK Yayınları.
Malov, S.E. (1952). Eniseyskaya Pis’mennost’ Tyurkov. Tekstı i Perevodı. Moskova-Leningrad: İzdatel’stvo AN SSSR, 115.
Malyavkin, A.G. (1974). Materialı po İstorii Uygurov v IX-XII vv. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 210.
Menges, K.H. (1951). Altaic Elements in the Proto-Bulgarian Inscriptions. Byzantion, 21, 85-118.
Orhon-Enisey Teksteri. (1982). Frunze: İlim, 245.
Pulleyblank, E.G. (1991). A Lexicon of Reconstructed Pronunciation in Early Middle Chinese, Late Middle Chinese, and Early Mandarin. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Tekin, T. (1988). Orhon Yazıtları, Ankara: TDK Yayınları.
В статье впервые делаются попытка изучения государственных титулов и должностей в государстве енисейских кыргызов в Южной Сибири, среди них титулы Ичреки (İçreki) и Өге (Öge). Государство енисейских кыргызов в период средневековья имела централизованное органы власти, государственно-административные управления. Бюрократия, система управления государством и названия титулов в основном совпадали с другими соседними средневековыми государствами Центральной Азии. Енисейские кыргызы имели свои особенности и различия, они отражаются в названиях и функциях некоторых государственных титулов и должностей. Анализ государственных титулов, должностей и эпитетов к ним, отражают весьма сложную и развитую систему государственного управления у древних и средневековых кыргызов. Кроме того, попытка систематизации титулов отражают лексическую (языковую) основу происхождения и ареал распространения данных титулов.
Doerfer, G. (1967). Turkische und Mongolische Elemente im Neupersischen. Unter besonderer Beriicksichtigung alterer neupersischer Geschichtsquellen, vor allem der Mongolen und Timuridenzeit. Bd III: Turkische Elemente im Neupersischen. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag GMBH.
Donuk, A. (1988). Eski Türk Devletlerinde idari-askeri ünvan ve terimler. İstanbul.
Drompp, M. R. (1999). Breaking the Orkhon Tradition: Kirghiz Adherence to the Yenisei Region after A. D. 840. Journal of the American Oriental Society. 119 (3), 390-403.
Gabain, A. V. (1988). Eski Türkçenin Grameri, çev. M. Akalın, Ankara: TDK Yayınları.
Malov, S.E. (1952). Eniseyskaya Pis’mennost’ Tyurkov. Tekstı i Perevodı. Moskova-Leningrad: İzdatel’stvo AN SSSR, 115.
Malyavkin, A.G. (1974). Materialı po İstorii Uygurov v IX-XII vv. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 210.
Menges, K.H. (1951). Altaic Elements in the Proto-Bulgarian Inscriptions. Byzantion, 21, 85-118.
Orhon-Enisey Teksteri. (1982). Frunze: İlim, 245.
Pulleyblank, E.G. (1991). A Lexicon of Reconstructed Pronunciation in Early Middle Chinese, Late Middle Chinese, and Early Mandarin. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Tekin, T. (1988). Orhon Yazıtları, Ankara: TDK Yayınları.
For the first time, the article attempts to study state titles and positions in the state of the Yenisei Kyrgyz in Southern Siberia, among them the titles of Ichreki and Öge. The state of the Yenisei Kyrgyz in the Middle Ages had a centralized government, state administrative management. Bureaucracy, government, and titles were largely the same as in other neighboring medieval Central Asian states. The Yenisei Kyrgyz had their own characteristics and differences, they are reflected in the names and functions of some state titles and positions. Analysis of state titles, positions and epithets to them, reflect a very complex and developed system of public administration among the ancient and medieval Kyrgyz. In addition, an attempt to systematize titles reflects the lexical (linguistic) basis of the origin and the area of distribution of these title.
Doerfer, G. (1967). Turkische und Mongolische Elemente im Neupersischen. Unter besonderer Beriicksichtigung alterer neupersischer Geschichtsquellen, vor allem der Mongolen und Timuridenzeit. Bd III: Turkische Elemente im Neupersischen. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag GMBH.
Donuk, A. (1988). Eski Türk Devletlerinde idari-askeri ünvan ve terimler. İstanbul.
Drompp, M. R. (1999). Breaking the Orkhon Tradition: Kirghiz Adherence to the Yenisei Region after A. D. 840. Journal of the American Oriental Society. 119 (3), 390-403.
Gabain, A. V. (1988). Eski Türkçenin Grameri, çev. M. Akalın, Ankara: TDK Yayınları.
Malov, S.E. (1952). Eniseyskaya Pis’mennost’ Tyurkov. Tekstı i Perevodı. Moskova-Leningrad: İzdatel’stvo AN SSSR, 115.
Malyavkin, A.G. (1974). Materialı po İstorii Uygurov v IX-XII vv. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 210.
Menges, K.H. (1951). Altaic Elements in the Proto-Bulgarian Inscriptions. Byzantion, 21, 85-118.
Orhon-Enisey Teksteri. (1982). Frunze: İlim, 245.
Pulleyblank, E.G. (1991). A Lexicon of Reconstructed Pronunciation in Early Middle Chinese, Late Middle Chinese, and Early Mandarin. Vancouver: UBC Press.
Tekin, T. (1988). Orhon Yazıtları, Ankara: TDK Yayınları.