This article examines the conjunction of nationalism and laicism in the making of the Turkish Republic through Leon Trotsky’s theory of Uneven and Combined Development (UCD), as reformulated by Kamran Matin. The analysis situates Kemalist Turkish nationalism within the broader pressures of global capitalism, arguing that the formation of the modern Turkish nation-state was not a linear process of modernization but a combined outcome of international geopolitical competition and domestic transformation. Drawing on historical sociological analysis, the study demonstrates how the “whip of external necessity” and the “privilege of historic backwardness” compelled Turkish elites to merge nationalism and laicism to construct a secular, capitalist-oriented state. This synthesis was not a derivative of European secularism but a coercive amalgam shaped by late Ottoman backwardness, ethnic purification, and the dissolution of religious authority. The findings reveal that, in Turkey, nationalism and laicism preceded capitalist development and acted as ideological and institutional mechanisms to produce the conditions for it. Thus, the Kemalist experience inverts modernist theories of nationalism by showing how ideological transformation can function as a precondition rather than a byproduct of capitalist modernization within an uneven international order.
I would like to express my sincere thanks to Jan Yasin Sunca for his helpful comments and guidance in developing this paper from a research placement on nationalism beyond Europe at Bielefeld University.
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Subjects | Turkish Political Life, Political Sociology |
| Journal Section | Research Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | November 17, 2025 |
| Submission Date | August 18, 2025 |
| Acceptance Date | October 29, 2025 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2025 Volume: 9 Issue: 1 |
Lectio Socialis is a prestigious, international, and peer-reviewed journal that aims to provide a platform for scholars and researchers to share their work and ideas on policy-relevant topics related to social sciences. The journal welcomes high-quality articles from a wide range of disciplines, including economics, political science, public administration, business administration, international relations, urban planning, sociology, psychology, history, jurisprudence, and philosophy. The primary objective of Lectio Socialis is to maintain a vibrant, independent, and unbiased environment for scholars and researchers from different parts of the world to present their research, exchange ideas, and contribute to the advancement of knowledge in their respective fields.