<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN"
        "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.4/JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article  article-type="reviewer-report"        dtd-version="1.4">
            <front>

                <journal-meta>
                                                                <journal-id>tlt</journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                                                                                    <journal-title>The Literacy Trek</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
                                        <issn pub-type="epub">2602-3768</issn>
                                                                                            <publisher>
                    <publisher-name>Leyla HARPUTLU</publisher-name>
                </publisher>
                    </journal-meta>
                <article-meta>
                                        <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.47216/literacytrek.1669804</article-id>
                                                                <article-categories>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="en">
                                                            <subject>Linguistics (Other)</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="tr">
                                                            <subject>Dilbilim (Diğer)</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                    </article-categories>
                                                                                                                                                        <title-group>
                                                                                                                                                            <article-title>EFL students’ perceptions of AI-assisted writing tools:  A systematic narrative hybrid review</article-title>
                                                                                                    </title-group>
            
                                                    <contrib-group content-type="authors">
                                                                        <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">
                                        https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4503-2156</contrib-id>
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Sarıca</surname>
                                    <given-names>Tolga</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                                    <aff>TRAKYA UNIVERSITY, INSTITUTE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES</aff>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                    <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">
                                        https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7408-1163</contrib-id>
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Deneme Gençoğlu</surname>
                                    <given-names>Selma</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                                    <aff>TRAKYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ</aff>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                                                </contrib-group>
                        
                                        <pub-date pub-type="pub" iso-8601-date="20250630">
                    <day>06</day>
                    <month>30</month>
                    <year>2025</year>
                </pub-date>
                                        <volume>11</volume>
                                        <issue>1</issue>
                                        <fpage>1</fpage>
                                        <lpage>31</lpage>
                        
                        <history>
                                    <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="20250403">
                        <day>04</day>
                        <month>03</month>
                        <year>2025</year>
                    </date>
                                                    <date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="20250522">
                        <day>05</day>
                        <month>22</month>
                        <year>2025</year>
                    </date>
                            </history>
                                        <permissions>
                    <copyright-statement>Copyright © 2015, The Literacy Trek</copyright-statement>
                    <copyright-year>2015</copyright-year>
                    <copyright-holder>The Literacy Trek</copyright-holder>
                </permissions>
            
                                                                                                                        <abstract><p>This study explores EFL students&#039; perceptions of AI-assisted writing tools through a systematic narrative hybrid review of 19 open-access studies published between 2020 and 2025 by employing a structured selection process presented via a PRISMA flow chart. As AI tools like ChatGPT, Grammarly, and Turnitin become more prevalent, understanding their impact on students&#039; writing skills, self-directed learning, and academic integrity is essential. Data were collected from ERIC, ULAKBİM, Google Scholar, and ResearchGate, using a multi-stage search. Using SWOT and descriptive content analysis, the study examines AI tools&#039; benefits, challenges, and pedagogical implications in EFL writing. Findings suggest that AI improves efficiency, accuracy, idea generation, and personalized learning, yet concerns include over-reliance, plagiarism risks, and ethical issues. By addressing these factors, the study suggests the need for best practices in AI integration into ELT curricula. It emphasizes the need for teacher training, AI literacy programs, and ethical guidelines to ensure responsible AI use while maximizing its benefits.</p></abstract>
                                                            
            
                                                                                        <kwd-group>
                                                    <kwd>AI-assisted writing tools</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  AI literacy</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  EFL students’ perceptions</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  ethical guidelines</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  SWOT and descriptive content analysis.</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                            
                                                                                                                                                    </article-meta>
    </front>
    <back>
                            <ref-list>
                                    <ref id="ref1">
                        <label>1</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Alkamel, M.A.A., &amp; Alwagieh, N.A.S. (2024). Utilizing an adaptable artificial intelligence writing tool (ChatGPT) to enhance academic writing skills among Yemeni university EFL students. Social Sciences &amp; Humanities Open, 10, 101095.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref2">
                        <label>2</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Anani, G. E., Nyamekye, E., &amp; Bafour-Koduah, D. (2025). Using artificial intelligence for academic writing in higher education: The perspectives of university students in Ghana. Discover Education, 4(1), 46.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref3">
                        <label>3</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Anderson, T., &amp; White, P. (2023). Human-AI collaboration in academic writing: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Educational Technology, 35(2), 120–135.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref4">
                        <label>4</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Artiana, N., &amp; Fakhrurriana, R. (2024). EFL undergraduate students’ perspective on using AI-based ChatGPT in academic writing. Language and Education Journal, 9(1), 1–11.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref5">
                        <label>5</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Aue, A., &amp; Lee, J. (2023). The impact of AI on academic writing: Benefits and challenges. Academic Press.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref6">
                        <label>6</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bai, X., &amp; Wang, Y. (2023). The impact of AI-based writing assistants on EFL learners&#039; writing performance. Language Learning &amp; Technology, 27(2), 45–62.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref7">
                        <label>7</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Baker, R., &amp; Kim, H. (2023). AI literacy in higher education: Teaching responsible use of generative AI tools. Educational Technology Review, 40(3), 98–112.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref8">
                        <label>8</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Booth, A., Sutton, A., &amp; Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref9">
                        <label>9</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Bozkurt, A. (2020). Educational technology research patterns in the realm of the digital knowledge age. Educational Technology &amp; Society, 23(4), 21–37.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref10">
                        <label>10</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Brown, C. (2023). The impact of AI-based grammar checkers on student writing performance. Language Learning &amp; Technology, 27(1), 45–67.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref11">
                        <label>11</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Chen, X., Xie, H., Zou, D., &amp; Hwang, G. J. (2020). Application and theory of artificial intelligence in education: A systematic review. Educational Technology &amp; Society, 23(4), 45–60.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref12">
                        <label>12</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Davis, L., &amp; Chen, R. (2021). AI-generated text and academic integrity: A growing concern in higher education. Ethics in Education Journal, 15(4), 210–225.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref13">
                        <label>13</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Dixon-Woods, M., Agarwal, S., Jones, D., Young, B., &amp; Sutton, A. (2006). Synthesizing qualitative and quantitative evidence: A review of possible methods. Journal of Health Services Research &amp; Policy, 10(1), 45–53.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref14">
                        <label>14</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Duong, T.-N.-A., &amp; Chen, H.-L. (2025). An AI chatbot for EFL writing: Students’ usage tendencies, writing performance, and perceptions. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 63(2), 406–430.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref15">
                        <label>15</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Elo, S., &amp; Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref16">
                        <label>16</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Friatin, L.Y. (2025). Revolutionizing writing: The impact of technology on enhancing students&#039; writing skills. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Literacy, 9(1). Available at https://jurnal.unigal.ac.id/index.php/jall/article/view/17963</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref17">
                        <label>17</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Grant, M.J., &amp; Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information &amp; Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref18">
                        <label>18</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Gasaymeh, A.-M. M., Beirat, M. A., &amp; Abu Qbeita, A. A. (2024). University students&#039; insights of generative artificial intelligence (AI) writing tools. Education Sciences, 14(10), 1062.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref19">
                        <label>19</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Gayed, J. M., Carlon, M. K. J., Oriola, A. M., &amp; Cross, J. S. (2022). Exploring an AI-based writing assistant’s impact on English language learners. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100055.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref20">
                        <label>20</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Godwin-Jones, R. (2019). Emerging technologies: AI and language learning. Language Learning &amp; Technology, 23(2), 5–14.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref21">
                        <label>21</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Gürel, E., &amp; Tat, M. (2017). SWOT analysis: A theoretical review. Journal of International Social Research, 10(51), 994–1006.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref22">
                        <label>22</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hague, C., &amp; Payton, S. (2010). Digital literacy across the curriculum. Futurelab.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref23">
                        <label>23</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hao, J., &amp; Wang, Y. (2021). AI-assisted writing tools in EFL classrooms: Opportunities and challenges. Journal of Second Language Writing, 54, 100787.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref24">
                        <label>24</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Holmes, W., Bialik, M., &amp; Fadel, C. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Routledge.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref25">
                        <label>25</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Jones, M., &amp; Patel, S. (2022). The role of AI in academic writing: Supportive tool or threat to critical thinking? Writing and Pedagogy, 14(2), 87–103.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref26">
                        <label>26</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kessler, G. (2020). Technology and the future of language education. Language Learning &amp; Technology, 24(1), 5–15.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref27">
                        <label>27</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kim, J., Yu, S., Detrick, R., &amp; Li, N. (2024). Exploring students’ perspectives on generative AI-assisted academic writing. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 1265–1300.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref28">
                        <label>28</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kramar, N., et al. (2024). Ukrainian PhD students&#039; attitudes toward AI language processing tools in the context of English for academic purposes. Advanced Education, 24, 41–57.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref29">
                        <label>29</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Launonen, P., Talalakina, E., &amp; Dubova, G. (2024). Students&#039; perceptions of using ChatGPT for academic writing in English: Insights from a Finnish university. Tertium Linguistic Journal, 9(1), 219-249.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref30">
                        <label>30</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Lee, J. (2021). Bridging AI and student writing skills: A pedagogical perspective. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22(3), 56–74.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref31">
                        <label>31</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Liang, J., Huang, F., &amp; Teo, T. (2024). Understanding Chinese university EFL learners’ perceptions of AI in English writing. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 14(1), 1-16.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref32">
                        <label>32</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Lincoln, Y.S., &amp; Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publications.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref33">
                        <label>33</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., &amp; Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref34">
                        <label>34</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Malik, A. R., Pratiwi, Y., Andajani, K., Numertayasa, I. W., Suharti, S., Darwis, A., &amp; Marzuki, M. (2023). Exploring artificial intelligence in academic essay: Higher education student’s perspective. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5, 100296.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref35">
                        <label>35</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Miller, D., &amp; Garcia, P. (2023). Student perceptions of AI-assisted writing tools: Benefits, limitations, and ethical considerations. Computers &amp; Education, 180, 104587.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref36">
                        <label>36</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Nadhifah, A. S., Syukur, H. N., Haryanto, M. F., Luthfiyyah, R., &amp; Rozak, D. R. (2024). Pre-service English teacher perceptions of AI in writing skills. Journal of World Englishes and Educational Practices, 6(2), 26–32.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref37">
                        <label>37</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers &amp; Education, 59(3), 1065–1078.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref38">
                        <label>38</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Nilsson, N. J. (2010). The quest for artificial intelligence: A history of ideas and achievements. Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref39">
                        <label>39</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ozfidan, B., El-Dakhs, D. A. S., &amp; Alsalim, L. A. (2024). The use of AI tools in English academic writing by Saudi undergraduates. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(4), ep527.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref40">
                        <label>40</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Polakova, P., &amp; Ivenz, P. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT feedback on the development of EFL students’ writing skills. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2410101.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref41">
                        <label>41</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Pope, C., Ziebland, S., &amp; Mays, N. (2007). Qualitative research in health care: An introduction to research methods. BMJ Publishing Group.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref42">
                        <label>42</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ranalli, J. (2021). AI and feedback in language learning: A pedagogical perspective. ReCALL, 33(1), 37–54.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref43">
                        <label>43</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Roberts, K. (2023). Plagiarism in the age of AI: Rethinking originality and authorship in student writing. Journal of Academic Integrity, 12(1), 35–49.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref44">
                        <label>44</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Russell, S. J., &amp; Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (3rd ed.). Pearson.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref45">
                        <label>45</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? Learning, Media and Technology, 44(1), 2–5.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref46">
                        <label>46</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Smith, A., &amp; Johnson, B. (2022). Developing AI literacy: A framework for responsible AI usage in education. Journal of Digital Education, 29(3), 112–128.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref47">
                        <label>47</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Smith, D. (2022). Developing AI literacy in higher education. Journal of Digital Learning, 16(2), 120–135.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref48">
                        <label>48</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Snilstveit, B., Vojtkova, M., Bhavsar, A., Stevenson, J., &amp; Gaarder, M. (2016). Evidence &amp; Gap Maps: A tool for promoting evidence informed policy and strategic research agendas. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 79, 120-129.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref49">
                        <label>49</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref50">
                        <label>50</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Teng, M. F. (2024). “ChatGPT is the companion, not enemies”: EFL learners’ perceptions and experiences in using ChatGPT for feedback in writing. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100270.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref51">
                        <label>51</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Thangthong, P., Phiromsombut, J., &amp; Imsa-ard, P. (2024). Navigating AI writing assistance tools: Unveiling the insights of Thai EFL learners. THAITESOL Journal, 37(1), 111-131.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref52">
                        <label>52</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Tran, H. N., &amp; Nguyen, L. T. (2024). Factors influencing the perceptions of English major students in using ChatGPT to improve writing skills. International Journal of Research in Engineering, Science and Management, 7(8), 101-107. Available here: https://journal.ijresm.com/index.php/ijresm/article/view/3164</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref53">
                        <label>53</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Wilson, L. (2022). AI-powered writing assistants: Can they enhance student creativity? Educational Innovations Journal, 19(2), 76–93.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref54">
                        <label>54</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Xu, Y., Wang, X., &amp; Li, Y. (2022). The application of AI in language learning: Trends and challenges. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(4), 987–1004.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref55">
                        <label>55</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Yelliza, Siska, M. K. Ikhsan, &amp; Satria, W. (2024). Students’ writing ability by using AI generative tools: Diffit, Brisk, Mendeley. Jurnal JILP (Jurnal Ilmiah Langue and Parole), 8(1), 58. Available here: https://e-journal.sastra-unes.com/index.php/JILP</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref56">
                        <label>56</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., &amp; Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–27.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref57">
                        <label>57</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Zhang, W., &amp; Yu, S. (2021). Enhancing EFL writing proficiency with AI tools: An empirical investigation. System, 103, 1026.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                            </ref-list>
                    </back>
    </article>
