Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

TÜRKİYE'DE SICAK PARA HAREKETLERİ İLE BORSA GETİRİSİ VE LİKİDİTESİ ARASINDA ASİMETRİK VE NEDENSELLİK İLİŞKİNİN ANALİZİ

Year 2023, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 530 - 559, 29.03.2023
https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.1218997

Abstract

Makalede, kısa vadede daha iyi bir getiri arayan "sıcak para" veya spekülatif sermaye akışı ile Türkiye'nin borsa getirisi ve likiditesi arasındaki ilişkinin boyutu araştırılmıştır. Çalışmanın verileri NARDL ve Granger nedensellik testleri ile analiz edilmiştir. Elde edilen bulgularda, borsa getirisi ve likiditesi ile sıcak para bileşenleri arasında eşbütünleşik ve asimetirk bir ilişkinin olduğu görülmüştür. Granger nedensellik testinde ise, borsa likiditesi ile portföy yatırımları arasında iki yönlü nedenselliğin var olduğu görülmüştür.

References

  • Adebayo, T. S., Akinsola, G. D., Bekun, F. V., Osemeahon, O. S., ve Sarkodie, S. A. (2021). Mitigating human-induced emissions in Argentina: role of renewables, income, globalization, and financial development. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(47), 67764-67778.
  • Akaike, H. (1969). Fitting autoregressive models for prediction. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 21(1), 243-247.
  • Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716-723.
  • Akyüz, Y. (1993). Financial liberalization: the key issues. Finance and the real economy. (Ed. Akyüz, Y., Held, G.). Santiago: S.R.V. Impresos S.A.
  • Allen, F., ve Gale, D. (1991). Arbitrage, short sales, and financial innovation. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 59(4), 1041-1068.
  • Altun, O., ve Mutan, O. C. (2007), Küresel fon akımlarının gelişmekte olan ekonomilere ve Türkiye ekonomisine etkisi: Türkiye’ye yönelik sermaye akımlarına ilişkin ampirik çalışma. Sermaye Piyasası Araştırma Raporu, OA/3, OCM/2.
  • Amihud, Y., ve Mendelson, H. (1980). Dealership market: Market-making with inventory. Journal of Financial Economics, 8(1), 31-53.
  • Amihud, Y. (2002). Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects. Journal of Financial Markets, 5(1), 31-56.
  • Aslantaş, M. F., ve Bulut. Ö. U. (2022). Bir vergi geliri türü olarak kurumlar vergisi ile ekonomik büyüme göstergesi sanayi üretim endeksi arasındaki asimetrik etkileşim. Mali Çözüm, 32(174), 109-137.
  • Bagwati, J. (1998). The capital myth. Foreign Affairs, 77(3), 7-12.
  • Benigno, G., Converse, N. ve Fornaro, L. (2015). Large capital inflows, sectoral allocation, and economic performance. Journal of International Money and Finance, 55, 60-87.
  • Bohn, H., ve Tesar, L. L. (1996). US equity investment in foreign markets: portfolio rebalancing or return chasing?. The American Economic Review, 86(2), 77-81.
  • Brown, R. L., Durbin, J., ve Evans, J. M. (1975). Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relationships over time. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 37(2), 149-163.
  • Bulut, Ö. U. (2016). Finansal liberalizasyon ve kriz öncü göstergelerinin analizi. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Eskişehir Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Eskişehir.
  • Chari, V. V., ve Kehoe, P. J. (2003). Hot money. Journal of Political Economy, 111(6), 1262-1292.
  • Clark, J., ve Berko, E. (1997). Foreign investment fluctuations and emerging market stock returns: the case of Mexico. FRB of New York Staff Report, (24), 1-54.
  • Corbo, V., ve Hernandez, L. (1996). Macroeconomic adjustment to capital inflows: lessons from recent Latin American and East Asian experience. The World Bank Research Observer, 11(1), 61-85.
  • Dickey, D. A., ve Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366a), 427-431.
  • Doğukanlı, H., ve Çetenak, H. (2008). Yabancı portföy yatırımları ile hisse senedi getirisi arasındaki ilişki: İMKB’de Sınama. Çukurova Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(2), 37-57.
  • Domowitz, I., Glen, J., ve Madhavan, A. (1997). Market segmentation and stock prices: Evidence from an emerging market. The Journal of Finance, 52(3), 1059-1085.
  • Errunza, V., ve Losq, E. (1985). International asset pricing under mild segmentation: theory and test. The Journal of Finance, 40(1), 105-124.
  • Froot, K. A., O’connell, P. G., ve Seasholes, M. S. (2001). The portfolio flows of international investors. Journal of financial Economics, 59(2), 151-193.
  • Fuertes, A. M., Phylaktis, K., ve Yan, C. (2016). Hot money in bank credit flows to emerging markets during the banking globalization era. Journal of International Money and Finance, 60, 29-52.
  • Glosten, L. R., ve Milgrom, P. R. (1985). Bid, ask and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), 71-100.
  • Granger, C. W. (1969), Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 37(3), 424-438.
  • Granger, C. W., ve Newbold, P. (1974). Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 2(2), 111-120.
  • Granger, C. W. (1988). Causality, cointegration, and control. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2-3), 551-559.
  • Granger, C. W., ve Yoon, G. (2002). Hidden cointegration. University of California, Discussion Paper (2002-02), 1-48. (Erişim adresi, https://escholarship.org/content/qt9qn5f61j/qt9qn5f61j.pdf)
  • Guo, F., ve Huang, Y. S. (2010). Does “hot money” drive China's real estate and stock markets?. International Review of Economics & Finance, 19(3), 452-466.
  • Habermeier, K., Kokenyne, A., ve Baba, C. (2011). The effectiveness of capital controls and prudential policies in managing large inflows. International Monetary Fund, Staff Discussion Notes, 2011(014), 1-35.
  • Hannan, E. J., ve Quinn, B. G. (1979). The determination of the order of an autoregression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 41(2), 190-195.
  • Has, H. (2007). Spekülatif sermaye hareketlerinin kontrolü ve Türkiye için politika önerileri. Sermaye Piyasası Kurulu Denetleme Dairesi Yeterlilik Etüdü, İstanbul.
  • Henry, P. B. (2003). Capital-account liberalization, the cost of capital, and economic growth. American Economic Review, 93(2), 91-96.
  • Henry, P. B. (2007). Capital account liberalization: Theory, evidence, and speculation. Journal of Economic Literature, 45(4), 887-935.
  • İnandım, Ş. (2005). Kısa vadeli sermaye hareketleri ile reel döviz kuru etkileşimi: Türkiye örneği. (Yayınlanmamış Uzmanlık Yeterlilik Tezi). Türkiye Cumhuriyet Merkez Bankası Piyasalar Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara.
  • İskenderoğlu, Ö., ve Karadeniz, E. (2011). İMKB 100 endeksi getirisi ile yabancı portföy yatırımları arasındaki ilişkinin analizi. Çağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(1), 123-133.
  • Kim, D., ve Iwasawa, S. (2017). Hot money and cross-section of stock returns during the global financial crisis. International Review of Economics & Finance, 50, 8-22.
  • Koç Aytekin, G. (2018). Uluslararası sermaye hareketleri kapsamında sıcak para akımlarının ekonomik etkileri ve spekülasyon. Uluslararası Beşeri Bilimler ve Eğitim Dergisi, 4(7), 191-214.
  • Korinek, A. (2011). Hot money and serial financial crises. IMF Economic Review, 59(2), 306-339.
  • Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P. C., Schmidt, P., ve Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?. Journal of Econometrics, 54(1-3), 159-178.
  • MacKinnon, J. G. (1996). Numerical distribution functions for unit root and cointegration tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(6), 601-618.
  • Martin, M. F., ve Morrison, W. M. (2008). China’s “hot money” problems. CRS Report for Congress Order Code RS22921, 1-6. (Erişim adresi, https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RS22921.pdf).
  • McKinnon, R. I. (1973). Money and capital in economic development. Washington: the Brooking Institution.
  • Merton, R. C. (1987). A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information. Journal of Finance, 1869(87), 1-56.
  • Miranda Tabak, B. (2003). The random walk hypothesis and the behaviour of foreign capital portfolio flows: The Brazilian stock market case. Applied Financial Economics, 13(5), 369-378.
  • Mollaahmetoğlu, E., ve Topak, M. S. (2017). The impact of global capital flows on firms’ performance: evidence from Turkey. IGU J. Soc. Sci./Spec.Iss.of ICEFM 2017, 4(2), 1-16.
  • Neumann, R. M., Penl, R., ve Tanku, A. (2009). Volatility of capital flows and financial liberalization: Do specific flows respond differently?. International Review of Economics & Finance, 18(3), 488-501.
  • Newey, W. K., ve West, K. D. (1994). Automatic lag selection in covariance matrix estimation. The Review of Economic Studies, 61(4), 631-653.
  • Ni, Y. S., ve Huang, P. Y. (2014). Are investors’ portfolios enhanced by incorporating CTA index funds?. Applied Economics Letters, 21(1), 43-46.
  • Nier, E., Sedik, T. S., ve Mondino, T. (2014). Gross private capital flows to emerging markets: can the global financial cycle be tamed?. IMF Working Papers, 14(196), 1-35.
  • Ostry, J. D., Ghosh, A. R., Habermeier, K., Chamon, M., Qureshi, M. S., ve Reinhardt, D. (2010). Capital inflows: the role of controls. Revista de Economia Institucional, 12(23), 135-164.
  • Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. ve Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326.
  • Phillips, P. C. ve Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335-346.
  • Polat, M., ve Kılıç, E. (2019). Yurtdışı yerleşiklerinin hisse senedi yatırımlarının Borsa İstanbul’a etkisi. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19(2), 389-399.
  • Rodrik, D. (1998). Who needs capital-account convertibility?. Princeton Essays in International Finance, 1-16.
  • Rossi, B., ve Wang, Y. (2019). Vector autoregressive-based Granger causality test in the presence of instabilities. The Stata Journal, 19(4), 883-899.
  • Santoso, W., Harun, C. A., Hidayat, T., ve Wonida, H. (2010). Market liquidity risk as an indicator of financial stability: The case of Indonesia. Bank of Indonesia, 1-22.
  • Sarno, L., ve Taylor, M. P. (1999). Hot money, accounting labels and the permanence of capital flows to developing countries: an empirical investigation. Journal of Development Economics, 59(2), 337-364.
  • Schmukler, S. L., Zoido, P., ve Halac, M. (2003). Financial globalization, crises, and contagion. Globalization World Bank Policy Research Report, 1-30.
  • Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The annals of statistics, 6(2), 461-464.
  • Shahbaz, M., Van Hoang, T. H., Mahalik, M. K., ve Roubaud, D. (2017). Energy consumption, financial development and economic growth in India: New evidence from a nonlinear and asymmetric analysis. Energy Economics, 63, 199-212.
  • Shahzad, S. J. H., Nor, S. M., Ferrer, R., ve Hammoudeh, S. (2017). Asymmetric determinants of CDS spreads: US industry-level evidence through the NARDL approach. Economic Modelling, 60, 211-230.
  • Shaw, E. S. (1973). Financial deepening in economic development. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Shin, Y., Yu, B. ve Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014). Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In festschrift in honor of peter schmidt (pp. 281-314). New York: Springer.
  • Sims, C. A. (1980). Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1(48), 1-48.
  • Sohinger, J., ve Horvatin, D. (2006). International capital flows and financial marketsin transition economies: The case of croatia. Working Paper Series No. 154067, Institute of European Studies, UC Berkeley, 1-28. (Erişim adresi, https://escholarship.org/uc/item/74t7b43f).
  • Stiglitz, J., ve Pike, R. M. (2004). Globalization and its discontents. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 29(2), 321-324.
  • Summers, L. H. (2000). International financial crises: causes, prevention, and cures. American Economic Review, 90(2), 1-16.
  • Şekeroğlu, G., ve Acar, M. (2020). The effect of hot money on stock exchange index exchange rates and interest rates: the case of Turkey. CES Working Papers, 12(3), 213-227.
  • Şenol, Z., ve Selahattin, K. (2018). Yabancı portföy yatırımları, borsa ve makroekonomik değişkenler arası ilişkilerin var yöntemiyle analizi: Türkiye örneği. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, (21), 1-20.
  • Şit, A., Telek, C., ve Danacı, M. C. (2020). Yabancı portföy yatırımlarının borsa üzerine etkisi: Türkiye örneği. Kilis 7 Aralık Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(19), 164-178.
  • Thakur, M. (2021). Hot Money, https://www.educba.com/hot-money/ (Erişim adresi, 01.06.2021).
  • Tong, H., ve Wei, S. J. (2011). The composition matters: capital inflows and liquidity crunch during a global economic crisis. The Review of Financial Studies, 24(6), 2023-2052.
  • Tu, C. A., Farid, S., Naeem, M. A., Younas, K., ve Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2022). Causal links between hot money and investment markets: evidence from small-scale economy. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 1-20.
  • Van Hoang, T. H., Lahiani, A., ve Heller, D. (2016). Is gold a hedge against inflation? New evidence from a nonlinear ARDL approach. Economic Modelling, 54, 54-66.
  • WEO, (2011). World economic outlook. IMF Occasional Papers. (Erişim adresi, http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2011/01/)
  • Yen-Hsien, L., Ya-Ling, H., ve Tsu-Hui, C. (2017). Does hot money impact stock and exchange rate markets on China?. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting & Finance, 13(2), 95-108.
  • Yii, K. J., Tan, C. T., Tan, N. M., Teng, X. W., Khor, T. E., ve Fan, S. H. (2021). Hot money and stock market in China: Empirical evidence from ARDL and NARDL approaches. International Journal of Business and Society, 22(2), 713-733.
  • Zhang, Y., Chen, F., Huang, J. ve Shenoy, C. (2019). Hot money flows and production uncertainty: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 57, 1-16.

ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HOT MONEY MOVEMENTS AND STOCK RETURNS AND LIQUIDITY IN TURKEY

Year 2023, Volume: 10 Issue: 1, 530 - 559, 29.03.2023
https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.1218997

Abstract

The degree of the connection between "hot money", speculative capital flow looking for a faster returns in the near term, and the performance and liquidity of Turkey's stock market have been looked into in this article. NARDL and Granger causality tests were used to assess the study's data. The results showed that the stock market return and the liquidity and hot money components are related in a cointegrated and asymmetrical way. It was found through the Granger causality test that there is a bidirectional causal relationship between stock market liquidity and portfolio investments.

References

  • Adebayo, T. S., Akinsola, G. D., Bekun, F. V., Osemeahon, O. S., ve Sarkodie, S. A. (2021). Mitigating human-induced emissions in Argentina: role of renewables, income, globalization, and financial development. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(47), 67764-67778.
  • Akaike, H. (1969). Fitting autoregressive models for prediction. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 21(1), 243-247.
  • Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716-723.
  • Akyüz, Y. (1993). Financial liberalization: the key issues. Finance and the real economy. (Ed. Akyüz, Y., Held, G.). Santiago: S.R.V. Impresos S.A.
  • Allen, F., ve Gale, D. (1991). Arbitrage, short sales, and financial innovation. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 59(4), 1041-1068.
  • Altun, O., ve Mutan, O. C. (2007), Küresel fon akımlarının gelişmekte olan ekonomilere ve Türkiye ekonomisine etkisi: Türkiye’ye yönelik sermaye akımlarına ilişkin ampirik çalışma. Sermaye Piyasası Araştırma Raporu, OA/3, OCM/2.
  • Amihud, Y., ve Mendelson, H. (1980). Dealership market: Market-making with inventory. Journal of Financial Economics, 8(1), 31-53.
  • Amihud, Y. (2002). Illiquidity and stock returns: cross-section and time-series effects. Journal of Financial Markets, 5(1), 31-56.
  • Aslantaş, M. F., ve Bulut. Ö. U. (2022). Bir vergi geliri türü olarak kurumlar vergisi ile ekonomik büyüme göstergesi sanayi üretim endeksi arasındaki asimetrik etkileşim. Mali Çözüm, 32(174), 109-137.
  • Bagwati, J. (1998). The capital myth. Foreign Affairs, 77(3), 7-12.
  • Benigno, G., Converse, N. ve Fornaro, L. (2015). Large capital inflows, sectoral allocation, and economic performance. Journal of International Money and Finance, 55, 60-87.
  • Bohn, H., ve Tesar, L. L. (1996). US equity investment in foreign markets: portfolio rebalancing or return chasing?. The American Economic Review, 86(2), 77-81.
  • Brown, R. L., Durbin, J., ve Evans, J. M. (1975). Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relationships over time. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 37(2), 149-163.
  • Bulut, Ö. U. (2016). Finansal liberalizasyon ve kriz öncü göstergelerinin analizi. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Eskişehir Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Eskişehir.
  • Chari, V. V., ve Kehoe, P. J. (2003). Hot money. Journal of Political Economy, 111(6), 1262-1292.
  • Clark, J., ve Berko, E. (1997). Foreign investment fluctuations and emerging market stock returns: the case of Mexico. FRB of New York Staff Report, (24), 1-54.
  • Corbo, V., ve Hernandez, L. (1996). Macroeconomic adjustment to capital inflows: lessons from recent Latin American and East Asian experience. The World Bank Research Observer, 11(1), 61-85.
  • Dickey, D. A., ve Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366a), 427-431.
  • Doğukanlı, H., ve Çetenak, H. (2008). Yabancı portföy yatırımları ile hisse senedi getirisi arasındaki ilişki: İMKB’de Sınama. Çukurova Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(2), 37-57.
  • Domowitz, I., Glen, J., ve Madhavan, A. (1997). Market segmentation and stock prices: Evidence from an emerging market. The Journal of Finance, 52(3), 1059-1085.
  • Errunza, V., ve Losq, E. (1985). International asset pricing under mild segmentation: theory and test. The Journal of Finance, 40(1), 105-124.
  • Froot, K. A., O’connell, P. G., ve Seasholes, M. S. (2001). The portfolio flows of international investors. Journal of financial Economics, 59(2), 151-193.
  • Fuertes, A. M., Phylaktis, K., ve Yan, C. (2016). Hot money in bank credit flows to emerging markets during the banking globalization era. Journal of International Money and Finance, 60, 29-52.
  • Glosten, L. R., ve Milgrom, P. R. (1985). Bid, ask and transaction prices in a specialist market with heterogeneously informed traders. Journal of Financial Economics, 14(1), 71-100.
  • Granger, C. W. (1969), Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 37(3), 424-438.
  • Granger, C. W., ve Newbold, P. (1974). Spurious regressions in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics, 2(2), 111-120.
  • Granger, C. W. (1988). Causality, cointegration, and control. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2-3), 551-559.
  • Granger, C. W., ve Yoon, G. (2002). Hidden cointegration. University of California, Discussion Paper (2002-02), 1-48. (Erişim adresi, https://escholarship.org/content/qt9qn5f61j/qt9qn5f61j.pdf)
  • Guo, F., ve Huang, Y. S. (2010). Does “hot money” drive China's real estate and stock markets?. International Review of Economics & Finance, 19(3), 452-466.
  • Habermeier, K., Kokenyne, A., ve Baba, C. (2011). The effectiveness of capital controls and prudential policies in managing large inflows. International Monetary Fund, Staff Discussion Notes, 2011(014), 1-35.
  • Hannan, E. J., ve Quinn, B. G. (1979). The determination of the order of an autoregression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 41(2), 190-195.
  • Has, H. (2007). Spekülatif sermaye hareketlerinin kontrolü ve Türkiye için politika önerileri. Sermaye Piyasası Kurulu Denetleme Dairesi Yeterlilik Etüdü, İstanbul.
  • Henry, P. B. (2003). Capital-account liberalization, the cost of capital, and economic growth. American Economic Review, 93(2), 91-96.
  • Henry, P. B. (2007). Capital account liberalization: Theory, evidence, and speculation. Journal of Economic Literature, 45(4), 887-935.
  • İnandım, Ş. (2005). Kısa vadeli sermaye hareketleri ile reel döviz kuru etkileşimi: Türkiye örneği. (Yayınlanmamış Uzmanlık Yeterlilik Tezi). Türkiye Cumhuriyet Merkez Bankası Piyasalar Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara.
  • İskenderoğlu, Ö., ve Karadeniz, E. (2011). İMKB 100 endeksi getirisi ile yabancı portföy yatırımları arasındaki ilişkinin analizi. Çağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(1), 123-133.
  • Kim, D., ve Iwasawa, S. (2017). Hot money and cross-section of stock returns during the global financial crisis. International Review of Economics & Finance, 50, 8-22.
  • Koç Aytekin, G. (2018). Uluslararası sermaye hareketleri kapsamında sıcak para akımlarının ekonomik etkileri ve spekülasyon. Uluslararası Beşeri Bilimler ve Eğitim Dergisi, 4(7), 191-214.
  • Korinek, A. (2011). Hot money and serial financial crises. IMF Economic Review, 59(2), 306-339.
  • Kwiatkowski, D., Phillips, P. C., Schmidt, P., ve Shin, Y. (1992). Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?. Journal of Econometrics, 54(1-3), 159-178.
  • MacKinnon, J. G. (1996). Numerical distribution functions for unit root and cointegration tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(6), 601-618.
  • Martin, M. F., ve Morrison, W. M. (2008). China’s “hot money” problems. CRS Report for Congress Order Code RS22921, 1-6. (Erişim adresi, https://fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RS22921.pdf).
  • McKinnon, R. I. (1973). Money and capital in economic development. Washington: the Brooking Institution.
  • Merton, R. C. (1987). A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information. Journal of Finance, 1869(87), 1-56.
  • Miranda Tabak, B. (2003). The random walk hypothesis and the behaviour of foreign capital portfolio flows: The Brazilian stock market case. Applied Financial Economics, 13(5), 369-378.
  • Mollaahmetoğlu, E., ve Topak, M. S. (2017). The impact of global capital flows on firms’ performance: evidence from Turkey. IGU J. Soc. Sci./Spec.Iss.of ICEFM 2017, 4(2), 1-16.
  • Neumann, R. M., Penl, R., ve Tanku, A. (2009). Volatility of capital flows and financial liberalization: Do specific flows respond differently?. International Review of Economics & Finance, 18(3), 488-501.
  • Newey, W. K., ve West, K. D. (1994). Automatic lag selection in covariance matrix estimation. The Review of Economic Studies, 61(4), 631-653.
  • Ni, Y. S., ve Huang, P. Y. (2014). Are investors’ portfolios enhanced by incorporating CTA index funds?. Applied Economics Letters, 21(1), 43-46.
  • Nier, E., Sedik, T. S., ve Mondino, T. (2014). Gross private capital flows to emerging markets: can the global financial cycle be tamed?. IMF Working Papers, 14(196), 1-35.
  • Ostry, J. D., Ghosh, A. R., Habermeier, K., Chamon, M., Qureshi, M. S., ve Reinhardt, D. (2010). Capital inflows: the role of controls. Revista de Economia Institucional, 12(23), 135-164.
  • Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. ve Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326.
  • Phillips, P. C. ve Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335-346.
  • Polat, M., ve Kılıç, E. (2019). Yurtdışı yerleşiklerinin hisse senedi yatırımlarının Borsa İstanbul’a etkisi. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19(2), 389-399.
  • Rodrik, D. (1998). Who needs capital-account convertibility?. Princeton Essays in International Finance, 1-16.
  • Rossi, B., ve Wang, Y. (2019). Vector autoregressive-based Granger causality test in the presence of instabilities. The Stata Journal, 19(4), 883-899.
  • Santoso, W., Harun, C. A., Hidayat, T., ve Wonida, H. (2010). Market liquidity risk as an indicator of financial stability: The case of Indonesia. Bank of Indonesia, 1-22.
  • Sarno, L., ve Taylor, M. P. (1999). Hot money, accounting labels and the permanence of capital flows to developing countries: an empirical investigation. Journal of Development Economics, 59(2), 337-364.
  • Schmukler, S. L., Zoido, P., ve Halac, M. (2003). Financial globalization, crises, and contagion. Globalization World Bank Policy Research Report, 1-30.
  • Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The annals of statistics, 6(2), 461-464.
  • Shahbaz, M., Van Hoang, T. H., Mahalik, M. K., ve Roubaud, D. (2017). Energy consumption, financial development and economic growth in India: New evidence from a nonlinear and asymmetric analysis. Energy Economics, 63, 199-212.
  • Shahzad, S. J. H., Nor, S. M., Ferrer, R., ve Hammoudeh, S. (2017). Asymmetric determinants of CDS spreads: US industry-level evidence through the NARDL approach. Economic Modelling, 60, 211-230.
  • Shaw, E. S. (1973). Financial deepening in economic development. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Shin, Y., Yu, B. ve Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014). Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In festschrift in honor of peter schmidt (pp. 281-314). New York: Springer.
  • Sims, C. A. (1980). Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1(48), 1-48.
  • Sohinger, J., ve Horvatin, D. (2006). International capital flows and financial marketsin transition economies: The case of croatia. Working Paper Series No. 154067, Institute of European Studies, UC Berkeley, 1-28. (Erişim adresi, https://escholarship.org/uc/item/74t7b43f).
  • Stiglitz, J., ve Pike, R. M. (2004). Globalization and its discontents. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 29(2), 321-324.
  • Summers, L. H. (2000). International financial crises: causes, prevention, and cures. American Economic Review, 90(2), 1-16.
  • Şekeroğlu, G., ve Acar, M. (2020). The effect of hot money on stock exchange index exchange rates and interest rates: the case of Turkey. CES Working Papers, 12(3), 213-227.
  • Şenol, Z., ve Selahattin, K. (2018). Yabancı portföy yatırımları, borsa ve makroekonomik değişkenler arası ilişkilerin var yöntemiyle analizi: Türkiye örneği. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, (21), 1-20.
  • Şit, A., Telek, C., ve Danacı, M. C. (2020). Yabancı portföy yatırımlarının borsa üzerine etkisi: Türkiye örneği. Kilis 7 Aralık Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(19), 164-178.
  • Thakur, M. (2021). Hot Money, https://www.educba.com/hot-money/ (Erişim adresi, 01.06.2021).
  • Tong, H., ve Wei, S. J. (2011). The composition matters: capital inflows and liquidity crunch during a global economic crisis. The Review of Financial Studies, 24(6), 2023-2052.
  • Tu, C. A., Farid, S., Naeem, M. A., Younas, K., ve Taghizadeh-Hesary, F. (2022). Causal links between hot money and investment markets: evidence from small-scale economy. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 1-20.
  • Van Hoang, T. H., Lahiani, A., ve Heller, D. (2016). Is gold a hedge against inflation? New evidence from a nonlinear ARDL approach. Economic Modelling, 54, 54-66.
  • WEO, (2011). World economic outlook. IMF Occasional Papers. (Erişim adresi, http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2011/01/)
  • Yen-Hsien, L., Ya-Ling, H., ve Tsu-Hui, C. (2017). Does hot money impact stock and exchange rate markets on China?. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting & Finance, 13(2), 95-108.
  • Yii, K. J., Tan, C. T., Tan, N. M., Teng, X. W., Khor, T. E., ve Fan, S. H. (2021). Hot money and stock market in China: Empirical evidence from ARDL and NARDL approaches. International Journal of Business and Society, 22(2), 713-733.
  • Zhang, Y., Chen, F., Huang, J. ve Shenoy, C. (2019). Hot money flows and production uncertainty: Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 57, 1-16.
There are 79 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Tuncer Yılmaz 0000-0001-8956-5814

Publication Date March 29, 2023
Submission Date December 14, 2022
Published in Issue Year 2023 Volume: 10 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Yılmaz, T. (2023). TÜRKİYE’DE SICAK PARA HAREKETLERİ İLE BORSA GETİRİSİ VE LİKİDİTESİ ARASINDA ASİMETRİK VE NEDENSELLİK İLİŞKİNİN ANALİZİ. Journal of Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, 10(1), 530-559. https://doi.org/10.30798/makuiibf.1218997

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The author(s) bear full responsibility for the ideas and arguments presented in their articles. All scientific and legal accountability concerning the language, style, adherence to scientific ethics, and content of the published work rests solely with the author(s). Neither the journal nor the institution(s) affiliated with the author(s) assume any liability in this regard.