maku sobed Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 1309-1387 Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University From The Dynamic Infrastructure of Mind to the Multiple Intelligences Profile: A Challenge for Curriculum Design Zihnin Dinamik Altyapısından Çoklu Zeka Profiline: Müfredat Tasarımı !çin Bir Meydan Okuma Sınger Florence 12 30 2010 0 3 139 147 12 23 2009 Copyright © 2009, Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Social Sciences Institute 2009 Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Social Sciences Institute

The dynamic infrastructure of mind (DIM) consists of several clusters of operations that are foundational for learning. DIM acts as a cognitive processing mechanism that is domain-general. Howdoes a domain general mechanism allow the development of multiple intelligences? This article presents two kinds of connections between Multiple Intelligences Theory (MI) and DIM: one refers to cognitive development, and the other to applications in teaching and learning. To deal with the environmental factors, the DIM crosses a combined process of modularization and specialization along development, during which some components specialize for specific inputs. In this process, DIM engages the available strengths and weaknesses that constitute the neural constraints specific to an individual and develops a network of properties that allows the MI profile. Using multiple learning contexts and a curriculum design that stresses on the DIM operations, domain specific learning is enhanced.

Zihnin Dinamik Altyapısı (ZDA) ö!renme için bazı operasyonlar demetini içerir. ZDA genel bilgi alanı olan bili"sel bir süreç mekanizması olarak hareket eder. Bir genel bilgi alanı mekanizması çoklu zekaların geli"imine nasıl izin verir? Bu makale Çoklu Zeka Teorisi (MI) ve ZDA arasında iki tür ba!ı sunar: birisi bili"sel geli"imine di!eri ö!renme ö!retme ve ö!renmedeki uygulamalarına atıfta bulunur.Çevresel faktörlerle ba"a çıkmak için ZDA, bazı bile"enlerin özel girdiler için uzmanla"tı!ı geli"imboyunca birimlere ayrı"tırma ve uzmanla"ma boyutlarını kesi"tiren bir i"lev görür. Bu süreçte, ZDA birbireye özgü sinirsel kısıtlamaları olu"turan ve MI profiline izin veren özellikler a!ını geli"tiren mevcutgüç ve zayıflıkları birbirine ba!lar. Çoklu ö!renme ba!lamlarını ve ZDA operasyonlarını vurgulayan birö!retim programı tasarımını kullanma yoluyla özel bilgi alanının ö!renilmesi geli"tirilmi" olur

 Cognition Curriculum Domain specificity Dynamic infrastructure of mind Operation Bili"sel Müfredat Bilgi alanı özgüllü!ü Zihnin dinamik altyapısı Operasyon Barrett, H. C., & Kurzban, R. (2006). Modularity in cognition: Framing the debate. Psy. Review, 113, 628–647. Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic books. Gardner, H. (2006). Multiple intelligences. New horizons. New York: Basic books. Gentner, D., Holyoak, K. J., & Kokinov, B. (Eds.) (2001). The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Palmeri, T. J. (2002). Automaticity. In L. Nadel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cognitive science (488). London: N.P.G. Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. New York: Norton. Singer, F. M. (1995). Structures et capacités mentales dans l’apprentisage des mathémathiques. Bulletin d’Information CORDEE, No. 1/1995, 27-30, Paris: Unesco. Singer, F. M. (2004). The dynamic structural learning: from theory to practice. In M. Niss & E. Emborg (Eds.) 10th International Congress on Math Education Proceedings, Copenhagen, Denmark: IMFUFA, 1-17. Singer, F. M. (2007). Beyond conceptual change: Using representations to Integrate domain-specific structural models in learning mathematics. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(2), 84-97. Singer, F. M. (2009). The Dynamic infrastructure of mind - a hypothesis and some of its applications. New Ideas in Psychology, 27, 48–74. Singer, F. M., & Moscovici, H. (2008). Teaching and learning cycles in a constructivist approach to instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(6), 1613-1634. Singer, F. M., & Radu, N. (1994 – 1997). Teacher’s guide in mathematics - Grades: 1, 2, 3, 4. Bucharest, RO: Sigma (in Romanian and Russian). Spelke, E. (2003). What makes us smart? Core knowledge and natural language. In D. Gentner, & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in mind (pp. 277–311). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.