Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Türkiye - AB ilişkileri: Çıkmaz yol ya da ilerleme umudu? Genişleme politikası çerçevesinde bir analiz-kavramlar, araçlar, ihtimaller

Year 2024, Volume: 51 Issue: 2, 149 - 171, 27.12.2024

Abstract

Bu çalışma Avrupa Birliğinin son genişleme dalgasının, söz konusu politikanın oluşturulması ve uygulanmasında temel teşkil eden politika belgeleri çerçevesinde temel yaklaşımları, kavramları ve araçları incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Genişleme politikasının temel unsurları ve AB’yi “entegrasyon kapasitesi” kavramının gerektirdiği reformlar yoluyla genişlemeye hazırlama çabalarının analizi, bir yandan Birliğin derinleşme ve genişlemesinin geleceği ve birbiri içine geçmiş niteliğine dair bazı ön değerlendirmeler yapmaya, öte yandan da Türkiye-AB ilişkilerinin geleceğini bir perspektife oturtmaya yardımcı olabilecektir.

References

  • ANGHEL, V. and DŽANKİĆ, J. (2023), Wartime EU: Consequences of the Russia - Ukraine War on the Enlargement Process, Journal of European Integration, 45(3), 487-501.
  • AMTENBRINK, F. (2007), On the European Union’s Institutional Capacity to Cope with Further Enlargement, in Blockmans, S. and Prechal, S. (eds), Reconciling the Deepening and Widening of the European Union, The Hague, TMC Asser Institute.
  • BLOCKMANS, S. (2007), Consolidating the Enlargement Agenda for South Eastern Europe, in Blockmans, S. and Prechal, S. (eds), Reconciling the Deepening and Widening of the European Union, The Hague, TMC Asser Institute.
  • BÖRZEL, T. (2023), European integration and the war in Ukraine: Just another crisis?, Journal of Common Market Studies, 61(S1), 14–30.
  • BÖRZEL, T., DIMITROVA, A. and SCHIMMELFENNIG, F. (2017), European Union enlargement and integration capacity: Concepts, findings, and policy implications, Journal of European Public Policy, 24(2), 157–176.
  • BÖRZEL, T. and SCHIMMELFENNIG, F. (2017), Coming together or drifting apart? The EU’s political integration capacity in Eastern Europe, Journal of European Public Policy, 24(2), 278–296.
  • BURAS P. and MORINA E. (2023), Catch-27, The contradictory thinking about enlargement in the EU, ECFR Policy Brief, 23 November 2023.
  • COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (2006) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council-Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges-Including Annexed Special Report on the EU’s Capacity to Integrate New Members, COM (2006) 649 final, Brussels, 8 November 2006.
  • COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (2004), Commission staff working document-Issues arising from Turkey’s membership perspective, COM(2004) 656 final Brussels, 6.10.2004
  • COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (2011-2012), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council-Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2011-2012, COM(2011) 666 final, Brussels, 12 October 2011.
  • COMMISSION (2018), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions, A credible enlargement perspective for and enhanced EU engagement with the Western Balkans and Action Plan, Strasbourg, COM(2018) 65 final, 6.2.2018
  • COMMISSION (2020), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions, Enhancing the accession process - A credible EU perspective for the Western Balkans, Brussels, COM(2020) 57 final, 5.2.2020
  • COMMISSION (2022) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions, Brussels, Communication on EU enlargement policy, Brussels, COM(2022) 528 final, 12.10.2022
  • COMMISSION (2023) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions, Brussels, Communication on EU enlargement policy, Brussels, 8.11.2023 COM(2023) 690 final
  • COMMISSION (2024 (a)) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council on pre-enlargement reforms and policy reviews, Brussels, COM(2024) 146 final, 20.3.2024.
  • COMMISSION (2024 (b)) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions, Brussels, Communication on EU enlargement policy COM(2024) 690 final, Brussels, 30.10.2024.
  • COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (2005), Accession negotiations with Turkey: General EU Position: EU Opening Statement, Negotiating Framework, External Arrangements, Brussels, 5 October 2005.
  • COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (2012), Accession Negotiations with Montenegro: General EU Position, Negotiating Framework, Luxembourg, 26 June 2012 (First Negotiating Framework).
  • COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (2020), Council conclusions on enlargement and stabilisation and association process - Albania and the Republic of North Macedonia, 25 March 2020.
  • COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (2024), Conference on Accession to the European Union-Ukraine, General EU Position, Ministerial meeting opening the Integovernmental Conference on the Accession of Ukraine to the European Union (Luxembourg, 25 June 2024).
  • EISL, A. (2020), How would the EU accession procedure really improve? Comparing the Proposals on Paper, Notre Europe Jacques Delors Institute, Paris, 4 March 2020.
  • EISL, A. (2019), France’s Questionable Arguments Against European Union Enlargement, Notre Europe Jacques Delors Institute, 12 December 2019.
  • EUROPEAN COUNCIL (2004), Conclusions, 16-17 December 2004.
  • EUROPEAN COUNCIL (2006), Conclusions, 14– 15 December 2006.
  • EUROPEAN COUNCIL (1993), Conclusions, June 1993, Copenhagen.
  • FRENCH GOVERNMENT (2019), Non-Paper on Reforming the European Union Accession Process, November 2019.
  • HEADS OF STATE AND GOVERNMENT OF EU MEMBER STATES (2023), Granada Conclusions, 6 October 2023.
  • HILLION, C. (2007), Negotiating Turkey’s Membership to the European Union-Can the Member States Do as They Please?’ 3(2), European Constitutional Law Review, 269-284.
  • HILLION, C. (2010), The Creeping Nationalisation of the EU Enlargement Policy, Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies, (6) 1.
  • HOUSE OF LORDS (2013), European Union Committee, 10th Report of Session 2012-2013, The Future of EU Enlargement, HL Paper 129, 6 March 2013.
  • INGLIS K. (2006), EU Enlargement: Membership Conditions Applied to Future and Potential Member States in Blockmans S. and Lazowski A. (eds), The European Union and Its Neighbours, The Hague, TMC Asser Institute.
  • KOCHENOV D. (2008), EU Enlargement and the Failure of Conditionality, The Netherlands, Kluwer Law International.
  • LAFFAN, B. (2022), Can collective power Europe emerge from Putin’s war?, Asser Press.
  • MILENKOVIĆ, M. (2020), EU Enlargement Strategy 2020 – Paving the Way for Differentiated Integration?, SIOI, December 2020.
  • MIREL, P. (2019), European Union-Western Balkans: For a revised membership negotiation framework, Robert Schuman Foundation Policy Paper Policy Paper: European Issues, no. 529.
  • MIREL, P. (2022), In support of a new approach with the Western Balkans: Staged accession with a consolidation phase, Robert Schuman Foundation Policy Paper: European Issues, no 633.
  • OTT, A. (2024), Editorial, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, forthcoming.
  • PETROV, R. and HILLION, C. (2022), “Accession through war” – Ukraine’s road to the EU, Common Market Law Review, 59 (5), 1289–1300.
  • POLITICO, (2019), 9 EU countries push back on French enlargement revamp, November 2019.
  • FRANCO-GERMAN WORKING GROUP ON EU INSTITUTIONAL REFORM (2023), Sailing on High Seas: Reforming and Enlarging the EU for the 21st Century, Paris-Berlin, 18 September 2023.
  • SCHIMMELFENNIG, F. and SEDELMEIER, U. (2002), Theorizing EU enlargement: Research focus, hypotheses, and the state of research, Journal of European Public Policy, 9(4), 500–528.
  • SCHIMMELFENNIG, F. and SEDELMEIER, U. (eds.), (2005), The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe, Cornell University Press.
  • SCHIMMELFENNIG, F. and WINZEN, T. (2020), Ever looser union? Differentiated European integration, Oxford University Press.
  • SJURSEN, H. (2002), Why expand? The question of legitimacy and justification in the EU’s enlargement policy, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(3), 491–513.
  • SJURSEN, H. (2006), Questioning EU enlargement. Europe in search of identity, Routledge.
  • STUBB, A. (2006), Report on the institutional aspects of the European Union’s capacity to integrate new Member States, A6-0393/2006,16 November 2006.
  • TCHERNEVA, V. (2019), French connections: How to revitalise the EU enlargement process: The new French EU enlargement reform proposal is a reasonable attempt to overcome the debate about Macron’s recent veto, European Council on Foreign Relations, 11 December 2019.

Turkey-EU relations: Road to nowhere or hope for progress? An analysis in light of the enlargement policy-concepts, tools and prospects

Year 2024, Volume: 51 Issue: 2, 149 - 171, 27.12.2024

Abstract

This study aims at analysing main approaches, concepts and tools of the recent enlargement wave of the European Union on the basis of the policy documents specific to the design and implementation of such policy. Analysis of the main elements of the enlargement policy and the necessary reforms for preparing the EU for enlargement as per the concept of “integration capacity” pave the way for certain initial assessments regarding the future of EU’s deepening and widening and their intertwined nature, as well as putting into perspective the future prospects of Turkey-EU relations

References

  • ANGHEL, V. and DŽANKİĆ, J. (2023), Wartime EU: Consequences of the Russia - Ukraine War on the Enlargement Process, Journal of European Integration, 45(3), 487-501.
  • AMTENBRINK, F. (2007), On the European Union’s Institutional Capacity to Cope with Further Enlargement, in Blockmans, S. and Prechal, S. (eds), Reconciling the Deepening and Widening of the European Union, The Hague, TMC Asser Institute.
  • BLOCKMANS, S. (2007), Consolidating the Enlargement Agenda for South Eastern Europe, in Blockmans, S. and Prechal, S. (eds), Reconciling the Deepening and Widening of the European Union, The Hague, TMC Asser Institute.
  • BÖRZEL, T. (2023), European integration and the war in Ukraine: Just another crisis?, Journal of Common Market Studies, 61(S1), 14–30.
  • BÖRZEL, T., DIMITROVA, A. and SCHIMMELFENNIG, F. (2017), European Union enlargement and integration capacity: Concepts, findings, and policy implications, Journal of European Public Policy, 24(2), 157–176.
  • BÖRZEL, T. and SCHIMMELFENNIG, F. (2017), Coming together or drifting apart? The EU’s political integration capacity in Eastern Europe, Journal of European Public Policy, 24(2), 278–296.
  • BURAS P. and MORINA E. (2023), Catch-27, The contradictory thinking about enlargement in the EU, ECFR Policy Brief, 23 November 2023.
  • COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (2006) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council-Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges-Including Annexed Special Report on the EU’s Capacity to Integrate New Members, COM (2006) 649 final, Brussels, 8 November 2006.
  • COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (2004), Commission staff working document-Issues arising from Turkey’s membership perspective, COM(2004) 656 final Brussels, 6.10.2004
  • COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (2011-2012), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council-Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2011-2012, COM(2011) 666 final, Brussels, 12 October 2011.
  • COMMISSION (2018), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions, A credible enlargement perspective for and enhanced EU engagement with the Western Balkans and Action Plan, Strasbourg, COM(2018) 65 final, 6.2.2018
  • COMMISSION (2020), Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions, Enhancing the accession process - A credible EU perspective for the Western Balkans, Brussels, COM(2020) 57 final, 5.2.2020
  • COMMISSION (2022) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions, Brussels, Communication on EU enlargement policy, Brussels, COM(2022) 528 final, 12.10.2022
  • COMMISSION (2023) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions, Brussels, Communication on EU enlargement policy, Brussels, 8.11.2023 COM(2023) 690 final
  • COMMISSION (2024 (a)) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council on pre-enlargement reforms and policy reviews, Brussels, COM(2024) 146 final, 20.3.2024.
  • COMMISSION (2024 (b)) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions, Brussels, Communication on EU enlargement policy COM(2024) 690 final, Brussels, 30.10.2024.
  • COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (2005), Accession negotiations with Turkey: General EU Position: EU Opening Statement, Negotiating Framework, External Arrangements, Brussels, 5 October 2005.
  • COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (2012), Accession Negotiations with Montenegro: General EU Position, Negotiating Framework, Luxembourg, 26 June 2012 (First Negotiating Framework).
  • COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (2020), Council conclusions on enlargement and stabilisation and association process - Albania and the Republic of North Macedonia, 25 March 2020.
  • COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (2024), Conference on Accession to the European Union-Ukraine, General EU Position, Ministerial meeting opening the Integovernmental Conference on the Accession of Ukraine to the European Union (Luxembourg, 25 June 2024).
  • EISL, A. (2020), How would the EU accession procedure really improve? Comparing the Proposals on Paper, Notre Europe Jacques Delors Institute, Paris, 4 March 2020.
  • EISL, A. (2019), France’s Questionable Arguments Against European Union Enlargement, Notre Europe Jacques Delors Institute, 12 December 2019.
  • EUROPEAN COUNCIL (2004), Conclusions, 16-17 December 2004.
  • EUROPEAN COUNCIL (2006), Conclusions, 14– 15 December 2006.
  • EUROPEAN COUNCIL (1993), Conclusions, June 1993, Copenhagen.
  • FRENCH GOVERNMENT (2019), Non-Paper on Reforming the European Union Accession Process, November 2019.
  • HEADS OF STATE AND GOVERNMENT OF EU MEMBER STATES (2023), Granada Conclusions, 6 October 2023.
  • HILLION, C. (2007), Negotiating Turkey’s Membership to the European Union-Can the Member States Do as They Please?’ 3(2), European Constitutional Law Review, 269-284.
  • HILLION, C. (2010), The Creeping Nationalisation of the EU Enlargement Policy, Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies, (6) 1.
  • HOUSE OF LORDS (2013), European Union Committee, 10th Report of Session 2012-2013, The Future of EU Enlargement, HL Paper 129, 6 March 2013.
  • INGLIS K. (2006), EU Enlargement: Membership Conditions Applied to Future and Potential Member States in Blockmans S. and Lazowski A. (eds), The European Union and Its Neighbours, The Hague, TMC Asser Institute.
  • KOCHENOV D. (2008), EU Enlargement and the Failure of Conditionality, The Netherlands, Kluwer Law International.
  • LAFFAN, B. (2022), Can collective power Europe emerge from Putin’s war?, Asser Press.
  • MILENKOVIĆ, M. (2020), EU Enlargement Strategy 2020 – Paving the Way for Differentiated Integration?, SIOI, December 2020.
  • MIREL, P. (2019), European Union-Western Balkans: For a revised membership negotiation framework, Robert Schuman Foundation Policy Paper Policy Paper: European Issues, no. 529.
  • MIREL, P. (2022), In support of a new approach with the Western Balkans: Staged accession with a consolidation phase, Robert Schuman Foundation Policy Paper: European Issues, no 633.
  • OTT, A. (2024), Editorial, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, forthcoming.
  • PETROV, R. and HILLION, C. (2022), “Accession through war” – Ukraine’s road to the EU, Common Market Law Review, 59 (5), 1289–1300.
  • POLITICO, (2019), 9 EU countries push back on French enlargement revamp, November 2019.
  • FRANCO-GERMAN WORKING GROUP ON EU INSTITUTIONAL REFORM (2023), Sailing on High Seas: Reforming and Enlarging the EU for the 21st Century, Paris-Berlin, 18 September 2023.
  • SCHIMMELFENNIG, F. and SEDELMEIER, U. (2002), Theorizing EU enlargement: Research focus, hypotheses, and the state of research, Journal of European Public Policy, 9(4), 500–528.
  • SCHIMMELFENNIG, F. and SEDELMEIER, U. (eds.), (2005), The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe, Cornell University Press.
  • SCHIMMELFENNIG, F. and WINZEN, T. (2020), Ever looser union? Differentiated European integration, Oxford University Press.
  • SJURSEN, H. (2002), Why expand? The question of legitimacy and justification in the EU’s enlargement policy, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(3), 491–513.
  • SJURSEN, H. (2006), Questioning EU enlargement. Europe in search of identity, Routledge.
  • STUBB, A. (2006), Report on the institutional aspects of the European Union’s capacity to integrate new Member States, A6-0393/2006,16 November 2006.
  • TCHERNEVA, V. (2019), French connections: How to revitalise the EU enlargement process: The new French EU enlargement reform proposal is a reasonable attempt to overcome the debate about Macron’s recent veto, European Council on Foreign Relations, 11 December 2019.
There are 47 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Eu Regional Policy
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Sanem Baykal 0000-0001-9492-3954

Publication Date December 27, 2024
Submission Date December 2, 2024
Acceptance Date December 19, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 51 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Baykal, S. (2024). Turkey-EU relations: Road to nowhere or hope for progress? An analysis in light of the enlargement policy-concepts, tools and prospects. Middle East Technical University Studies in Development, 51(2), 149-171.