<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN"
        "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.4/JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article         dtd-version="1.4">
            <front>

                <journal-meta>
                                    <journal-id></journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                                                                                    <journal-title>Milel ve Nihal</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
                            <issn pub-type="ppub">1304-5482</issn>
                                        <issn pub-type="epub">2564-6478</issn>
                                                                                            <publisher>
                    <publisher-name>Milel ve Nihal: Eğitim, Kültür ve Düşünce Platformu Derneği</publisher-name>
                </publisher>
                    </journal-meta>
                <article-meta>
                                        <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17131/milelnihal.03669</article-id>
                                                                                                                                                                                            <title-group>
                                                                                                                        <article-title>Cahiliye Kavramı Üzerine Felsefi Notlar</article-title>
                                                                                                    </title-group>
            
                                                    <contrib-group content-type="authors">
                                                                        <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Tatar</surname>
                                    <given-names>Burhanettin</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                                                </contrib-group>
                        
                                        <pub-date pub-type="pub" iso-8601-date="20160812">
                    <day>08</day>
                    <month>12</month>
                    <year>2016</year>
                </pub-date>
                                        <volume>13</volume>
                                        <issue>1</issue>
                                        <fpage>29</fpage>
                                        <lpage>42</lpage>
                        
                        <history>
                                    <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="20160812">
                        <day>08</day>
                        <month>12</month>
                        <year>2016</year>
                    </date>
                                            </history>
                                        <permissions>
                    <copyright-statement>Copyright © 2003, Milel ve Nihal</copyright-statement>
                    <copyright-year>2003</copyright-year>
                    <copyright-holder>Milel ve Nihal</copyright-holder>
                </permissions>
            
                                                                                                <abstract><p>Cahiliye kavramı ve onun içerdiği put kelimesi, Kur’an ve hadislerde belirli bir dönemi göstermekten çok olumsuzlanan inanış ve davranış biçimlerine atıf yapmaktadır. Ancak bu kavram modern zamanlarda özellikle İslam’ın siyasi projeleri içinde semantik alan açısından hayli esnetilmiştir. Bu kelimelere ilişkin fenomenolojik analiz yapıldığında Kur’an’ın eleştirdiği dü-şünme ve varolma biçimlerini daha iyi kavrama şansına sahip olabiliriz. Bu analizleri yaparken söz konusu kelimelerin modern seküler düşünme biçimlerinde hala işlevsel olduğunu dikkatten kaçırmamak gerekmektedir</p></abstract>
                                                            
            
                                                            <kwd-group>
                                                    <kwd>cahiliye</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  put</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Kur’an</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  seküler kurum</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  seküler sistem</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                            
                                                                                                                        </article-meta>
    </front>
    <back>
                            <ref-list>
                                    <ref id="ref1">
                        <label>1</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Batnitzky, Leora. Idolatry and Representation: The Philosophy of Franz Rosenzweig Reconsidered, Princeton University Press, Prince- ton, 2000.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref2">
                        <label>2</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Deary, Janice L. “A Picture Held Us Captive&quot;: Investigations Towards an Iconoclastic Praxeology University of St Andrews thesis. Uni- versity of St Andrews, 2007.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref3">
                        <label>3</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Demir, Ramazan Demir, “İbn Hazm’a Göre Dilin Menşei ve İlk Dil Problemi”, Usûl İslam Araştırmaları, Sayı 10, 2008, ss. 107-124. http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/usul/issue/view/5000015994 (31.01.2016)</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref4">
                        <label>4</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Grieve, Gregory Price, “Symbol, Idol And Murti: Hindu God-ima- ges and the Politics of Mediation,” Culture, Theory and Critique 44 (2003), ss. 57-72.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref5">
                        <label>5</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Halbertal, Moshe and Margalit, Avishai. Idolatry, trans. N. Goldb- lum (Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1992).</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref6">
                        <label>6</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Harlow, Daniel C. “Idolatry and Alterity:Israel and the Nations in the Apocalypse of Abraham”, in The “Other” in Second Temple Ju- daism. Essays in Honor of John J. Collins, ed. D. C. Harlow, M. Goff, K. M. Hogan, and J. S. Kaminsky, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2011.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref7">
                        <label>7</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Izutsu, Toshihiko. God And Man in The Qur’an, Islamic Book Trust, Second Reprint, Malaysia, 2008</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref8">
                        <label>8</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Khatab, Sayed. The Political Thought Of Sayyid Qutb: The Theory Of Jahiliyyah, (Routledge Studies in Political Islam) 1st Edition, Lon- don (2006), ss. 10-43.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref9">
                        <label>9</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Khatab, Sayyed. “Hakimiyyah and Jahiliyyah in the Thought of Say- yid Qutb”, Middle Eastern Studies, 38:3, (2002) 145-170.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref10">
                        <label>10</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kohara, Katsuhiro, “Discourses and Realpolitik on Monotheism and Polytheism”, Journal of the Interdisciplinary Study of Monotheis- tic Religions : JISMOR 2, 2006, ss. 1-16.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref11">
                        <label>11</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ludwig Wittgenstein, Th e Big Typescript, Manuscript 213 and 413, as quoted in Moshe Halbertal and Avishai Margalit, Idolatry, trans. N. Goldblum, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1992.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref12">
                        <label>12</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Rosner, Brian S. “The Concept of Idolatry,” Themelios 24.3 (May 1999): 21-30.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref13">
                        <label>13</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Shepard, William E. “Sayyid Qutb’s Doctrine of &quot;Jāhiliyya&quot;, Interna- tional Journal of Middle East Studies, Vol. 35, No. 4 (Nov., 2003), ss. 521-545</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref14">
                        <label>14</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Söylemez, Mehmet Mahfuz, “Cahiliye Arap İnancında Putların Yeri”, Milel ve Nihal, 11 (1), 2014, ss. 9-47.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                            </ref-list>
                    </back>
    </article>
