<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.4 20241031//EN"
        "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.4/JATS-journalpublishing1-4.dtd">
<article  article-type="research-article"        dtd-version="1.4">
            <front>

                <journal-meta>
                                    <journal-id></journal-id>
            <journal-title-group>
                                                                                    <journal-title>Milel ve Nihal</journal-title>
            </journal-title-group>
                            <issn pub-type="ppub">1304-5482</issn>
                                        <issn pub-type="epub">2564-6478</issn>
                                                                                            <publisher>
                    <publisher-name>Milel ve Nihal: Eğitim, Kültür ve Düşünce Platformu Derneği</publisher-name>
                </publisher>
                    </journal-meta>
                <article-meta>
                                        <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17131/milel.668371</article-id>
                                                                <article-categories>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="en">
                                                            <subject>Religious Studies</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                            <subj-group  xml:lang="tr">
                                                            <subject>Din Araştırmaları</subject>
                                                    </subj-group>
                                    </article-categories>
                                                                                                                                                        <title-group>
                                                                                                                        <article-title>Tarihsel Eleştiri Yöntemlerinin  İslami Rivayetlere Uygulanma İmkânına Dair Bazı Mülâhazalar</article-title>
                                                                                                                                                                                                <trans-title-group xml:lang="en">
                                    <trans-title>Some Remarks on the Application of Historical Criticism to Islamic Traditions</trans-title>
                                </trans-title-group>
                                                                                                    </title-group>
            
                                                    <contrib-group content-type="authors">
                                                                        <contrib contrib-type="author">
                                                                    <contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">
                                        https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9814-5472</contrib-id>
                                                                <name>
                                    <surname>Altıntaş</surname>
                                    <given-names>Fatma Betül</given-names>
                                </name>
                                                                    <aff>Erciyes Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi</aff>
                                                            </contrib>
                                                                                </contrib-group>
                        
                                        <pub-date pub-type="pub" iso-8601-date="20191231">
                    <day>12</day>
                    <month>31</month>
                    <year>2019</year>
                </pub-date>
                                        <volume>16</volume>
                                        <issue>2</issue>
                                        <fpage>279</fpage>
                                        <lpage>304</lpage>
                        
                        <history>
                                    <date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="20191025">
                        <day>10</day>
                        <month>25</month>
                        <year>2019</year>
                    </date>
                                                    <date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="20191128">
                        <day>11</day>
                        <month>28</month>
                        <year>2019</year>
                    </date>
                            </history>
                                        <permissions>
                    <copyright-statement>Copyright © 2003, Milel ve Nihal</copyright-statement>
                    <copyright-year>2003</copyright-year>
                    <copyright-holder>Milel ve Nihal</copyright-holder>
                </permissions>
            
                                                                                                <abstract><p>Tarihsel eleştiri yöntemleri, metinleri menşei, yazılış zamanı, yazılış mekânı ve kaynaklarını dikkate alarak değerlendirmeyi ve eleştirel bir biçimde an-lamayı amaçlayan yöntemler manzumesidir. Yunan-Roma ve Yahudi-Hıristiyan geleneklerin tesiri altındaki Batı geleneği içerisinden neşet eden tarihsel eleştiri yöntemleri, yorumcu ile araya giren zamansal ve mekânsal farklılık sebebiyle metinlere tarihsel perspektiften bakmayı önerir. Birçok olay ve sürecin neticesinde ortaya çıkmış olan ve zaman içinde değişikliklere uğrayan bu yöntemler, en yoğun ve en sistematik şekilde Kitab-ı Mukaddes metinleri üzerinde uygulanmıştır. Zamanla tarihsel eleştiri yöntemleri farklı dinlerin ve kültürlerin önemli metinleri üzerinde de denenmeye başlanmıştır. Bu uygulama denemeleri kimileri açısından çok değerli sonuçlara ulaştırabilecek özellikte iken kimilerine göre ise bu yöntemlerin yabancı din ve kül-türlerin metinlerine uygulanması asla düşünülemez. Bu çalışmada kaynak, form, redaksiyon ve gelenek/rivayet tenkidi gibi farklı türleri olan tarihsel eleştiri yöntemlerinin felsefî temelleri, temel özellikleri, ön kabulleri ve metinlere yaklaşımları göz önünde bulundurularak İslâmî rivayetler üzerinde uygulanmasının imkânı meselesi üzerinde durulacaktır.</p></abstract>
                                                                                                                                    <trans-abstract xml:lang="en">
                            <p>Historical Criticism is an umbrella term for methods which include source, form, redaction and tradition criticism aiming to evaluate and critically un-derstand the texts by considering its origins, sources, the time and the pla-ce in which the text was written. The historical criticism methods that emerge from the Western tradition under the influence of Greek-Roman and Jewish-Christian traditions suggest to look at the texts from historical perspective due to the temporal and spatial differences that interfere with the commentator. These methods which have emerged as an outcome of many processes and changes in many fields, have been applied in the most intense and most systematic way on Bible texts. In time, historical criticism began to be applied on other texts of different religions and cultures. While some of these applications are capable of achieving very valuable results for some, for others it is unthinkable to apply these methods to the texts of foreign religions and cultures. In this study -considering its philosophical foundations, basic features, pre-assumptions and approaches to texts- the possibility of applying historical critical methods on Islamic traditions will be emphasized</p></trans-abstract>
                                                            
            
                                                            <kwd-group>
                                                    <kwd>Tarihsel Eleştiri Yöntemleri</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  İslami Rivayetler</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Tarihsellik</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Kutsal Kitap Tenkidi</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                                                        
                                                                            <kwd-group xml:lang="en">
                                                    <kwd>Historical Critical Methods</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Islamic Traditions</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Historicism</kwd>
                                                    <kwd>  Biblical Criticism</kwd>
                                            </kwd-group>
                                                                                                            </article-meta>
    </front>
    <back>
                            <ref-list>
                                    <ref id="ref1">
                        <label>1</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Abdulvahab Messiri (ed.), Önyargı. İstanbul: Mahya, 2015.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref2">
                        <label>2</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Akarsu, Bedia. Felsefe Terimleri Sözlüğü. Türk Dil Kurumu Yayınları, 1998.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref3">
                        <label>3</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Aktay, Yasin. “Kur’an Tarihselciliğine Bir Soykütüğü (Geneology) De-nemesi”. Kur&#039;an ve Tarihselcilik Sempozyumu. 30-36. İstanbul: KU-RAV, 2000.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref4">
                        <label>4</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Altıntaş, Fatma Betül. Tarihsel Eleştiri Yöntemlerinin Tenkidi ve İslâmî Riva-yetlere Uygulanması Sorunu. Doktora Tezi, Erciyes Üniversitesi, 2019.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref5">
                        <label>5</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Arkoun, Mohammed. İslam Üzerine Düşünceler. Çev. Hakan Yücel. İstan-bul: Metis Yayınları, 1999.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref6">
                        <label>6</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Aune, David E. The Blackwell Companion to the New Testament. John Wiley &amp; Sons, 2010.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref7">
                        <label>7</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Avey, Albert E. Historical Method in Bible Study. New York: C. Scribner’s Sons, 1924.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref8">
                        <label>8</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Black, David Alan - Dockery, David (eds.), New Testament Criticism and Interpretation. Michigan: Zondervan Pub. House, 1991.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref9">
                        <label>9</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Brown, Daniel. İslam Düşüncesinde Sünneti Yeniden Düşünmek. Ankara: Ankara Okulu, 2009.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref10">
                        <label>10</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Cevizci, Ahmet. Felsefe Sözlüğü. İstanbul: Paradigma Yayınları, 2000.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref11">
                        <label>11</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Cuddon, John Anthony. Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory. John Wiley &amp; Sons, 2012.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref12">
                        <label>12</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Duran, Asım. Aydınlanma ve Kutsal Kitap. Samsun: Üniversite Yayınları, 2017.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref13">
                        <label>13</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Ehrman, Bart D. The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref14">
                        <label>14</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Evkuran, Mehmet. “İslam Düşüncesinde Nedensellik Problemi Doğa ve Tarih Algımız Üzerine”. Eskiyeni Anadolu İlahiyat Akademisi Araş-tırma Dergisi 21 (2011): 17–27.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref15">
                        <label>15</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Fazlıoğlu, Şükran. “Taha Hüseyin”. DİA 39. İstanbul: Türkiye Diyanet Vakfı, 2010, 377-379.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref16">
                        <label>16</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Fazlurrahman. Tarih Boyunca İslâmî Metodoloji Sorunu. Çev.: Salih Akde-mir. Ankara: Ankara Okulu Yayınları, 1997.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref17">
                        <label>17</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Geçit, Bekir. Erich Rothacker ve Karl R. Popper’de Tarihselcilik Problemi. Dok-tora Tezi, Mersin Üniversitesi, 2015.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref18">
                        <label>18</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Geisler, Normal L. “Beware of Philosophy: A Warning to Biblical Scho-lars”. Journal-Evangelical Theological Society  42 (1999): 3-20.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref19">
                        <label>19</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Görgün, Tahsin. “Yeni Anlama ve Yorumlama Yöntemlerinin Fıkıh Usu-lüne Göre Durumu”. İstanbul: 2013.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref20">
                        <label>20</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Griffiths, Paul. “Buddhist Jhāna: A Form-Critical Study”. Religion 13/1 (1983): 55–68.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref21">
                        <label>21</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Güler, İlhami. “Hasan Hanefî’nin Tecdid Projesi -Tanıtım ve Bir Değer-lendirme-”. İslâmî Araştırmalar  7/2 (1994).</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref22">
                        <label>22</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hanefi, Hasan. Gelenek ve Yenilenme. Çev. Emin Maşalı. Ankara: Otto Yayınları, 2011.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref23">
                        <label>23</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hayes, John H - Holladay, Carl R. Biblical Exegesis: A Beginner’s Handbook. Atlanta: John Knox Press, 1982.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref24">
                        <label>24</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Haynes, Stephen R. - McKenzie, Steven L. To Each Its Own Meaning: An Introduction to Biblical Criticisms and Their Application. Westminster John Knox Press, 1993.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref25">
                        <label>25</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Henderson, Ian. “Rudolf Bultmann”. Çev. Mehmet Dağ. Ankara Üniversi-tesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi. 29 (1987): 145-158.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref26">
                        <label>26</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Hıdır, Özcan. “Oryantalizme Karşı Oksidentalizm: Hadis Oksidentaliz-mi”. Hadis Tetkikleri Dergisi 5/1 (2007).</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref27">
                        <label>27</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">John Ziesler. “Historical Criticism and a Rational Faith”. The Expository Times 105/9 (1994): 270-274.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref28">
                        <label>28</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kaldis, Byron. Encyclopedia of Philosophy and the Social Sciences. Sage Publi-cations 2013.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref29">
                        <label>29</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kızıl, Fatma. “Avrupamerkezciliğin Bir Yansıması Olarak Oryantalist Söylem: Kültürel Ödünç Alma Kavramı”. İnsan ve Toplum  3/6 (2013).</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref30">
                        <label>30</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kotan, Şevket. “Kur’ân’ın Tarihselciliği Tartışması”. İslâmî İlimler Dergisi Yayınları, 2007.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref31">
                        <label>31</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Krentz, Edgar - Tucker, Gene M. The Historical-Critical Method. SPCK, 1975.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref32">
                        <label>32</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Kroner, Richard. “Tarih ve Tarihsicilik”. Tarih İncelemeleri Dergisi 25/2 (08 Ağustos 2015): 637-643.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref33">
                        <label>33</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Larousse, Büyük. “Büyük Larousse Sözlük ve Ansiklopedisi”. İstanbul: Gelişim Yayınları AŞ., 1986.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref34">
                        <label>34</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Law, David R. The Historical-Critical Method: A Guide for the Perplexed. Blo-omsbury Publishing, 2012.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref35">
                        <label>35</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Maier, Gerhard. The End of the Historical-Critical Method. Concordia Publis-hing House, 1977.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref36">
                        <label>36</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Marshall, I. Howard. New Testament Interpretation: Essays on Principles and Methods. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1977.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref37">
                        <label>37</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">McGrew, Timothy. “The argument from silence”. Acta Analytica 29/2 (2014): 215–228.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref38">
                        <label>38</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Özer, Salih. “Hadis Metninin Anlaşılmasında Diğer Metinlere Referans-ların Önemi ya da Hadiste Metinlerarasılık ve Metinlerarası Okuma”. Dinbilimleri Akademik Araştırma 
Dergisi 8/4 (2008): 305–350.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref39">
                        <label>39</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Özlem, Doğan. “Felsefî Hermeneutiğe Geçiş Yolu Olarak Tarihselcilik”. Ankara Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 1/40 (1999): 127-145.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref40">
                        <label>40</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Özsoy, Ömer. “Kur’an ve Tarihselcilik Tartışmasında Gözden Kaçırılan-lar”. Tezkira 11-12 (1997).</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref41">
                        <label>41</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Plantinga, Alvin. “Warranted Christian Belief: The Aquinas/Calvin Mo-del”. The Rationality of Theism. 125–143. Springer, 1999.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref42">
                        <label>42</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Popper, Karl R. “Sunuş”. Tarihselciliğin Sefaleti. Çeviren Sabri Orman. 7-17. 1998.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref43">
                        <label>43</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Pormann, Peter E. “Classics and Islam: From Homer to al-Qā&#039;ida”. Inter-national Journal of the Classical Tradition 16/2 (2009): 197.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref44">
                        <label>44</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Porter, Stanley E. Dictionary of Biblical Criticism and Interpretation. London; New York: Routledge, 2007.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref45">
                        <label>45</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Raymaekers, Bart. Lectures for the XXIst Century. Leuven University Press, 2008.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref46">
                        <label>46</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Rée, Jonathan - Urmson, James Opie. The Concise Encyclopedia of Western Philosophy and Philosophers. Routledge, 2005.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref47">
                        <label>47</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Riley, William Bell. The Finality of Higher Criticism: Or, the Theory of Evolu-tion and False Theology. Taylor &amp; Francis, 1988.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref48">
                        <label>48</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Rothra, John. “Critique of Higher Criticism”. John Rothra Ministries, 2006.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref49">
                        <label>49</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Soulen, Richard N. Handbook of Biblical Criticism. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2001.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref50">
                        <label>50</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Şenay, Bülent. “Yahudi-Hıristiyan İlişkileri Tarihi ve Antisemitizm-Oryantalizm İlişkisi”. Uludağ Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi 11/2 (2002): 117-146.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref51">
                        <label>51</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Tartı, Nevzat. Tarihsellik Düşüncesi ve Hadislerin Anlaşılması. Ankara: Otto, 2016.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref52">
                        <label>52</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Tatar, Burhaneddin. “Günümüz İlahiyat Fakültelerinde Tefsir, Hadis, Ahlak Felsefesi Ve Müzik Derslerinin Anlamı Üzerine Notlar”. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İlahiyat 
Fakültesi Dergisi 1/30 (2013).</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref53">
                        <label>53</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Tatar, Burhaneddin. “Temel İslam Bilimlerinde Paradoksal DüşünceTarzı Üzerine”. İslamiyat 6/4 (2003).</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref54">
                        <label>54</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Tatar, Burhanettin. İslam Düşüncesine Giriş, Dem yay. Istanbul, 2009.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref55">
                        <label>55</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Whybray, R. Norman. The Making of the Pentateuch: A Methodological Study. Bloomsbury Publishing, 1987.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref56">
                        <label>56</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Williams, Raymond B. “Historical Criticism of a Buddhist Scripture: ‘The Mahāparinibbāna Sutta’”. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 38/2 (01 Haziran 1970): 156-167.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref57">
                        <label>57</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Yücel, Ahmet. Oryantalist Hadis Literatürü. İstanbul: İfav, 2016.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                                    <ref id="ref58">
                        <label>58</label>
                        <mixed-citation publication-type="journal">Zenos, Andrew Constantinides. The Elements of the Higher Criticism. Funk &amp; Wagnalls Company, 1895.</mixed-citation>
                    </ref>
                            </ref-list>
                    </back>
    </article>
