Kurumsal Yönetimin Faaliyet Raporlarının Yayınlanma Zamanı Üzerindeki Etkisi: Borsa İstanbul’da Bir Uygulama

Year 2024, Volume: 13 Issue: 3, 1036 - 1047, 08.07.2024

Abdullah Kürşat Merter , Yavuz Selim Balcıoğlu , Sedat Çerez , Gökhan Özer

https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.1411741

Abstract

Faaliyet raporları hissedarlar, potansiyel yatırımcılar veya düzenleyiciler gibi çeşitli kullanıcılara bir işletmenin mali performansını ve gelecek beklentileri hakkında genel bir bakış sağlayarak kurumsal bilgilendirme amacı taşıyan önemli araçlar olarak hizmet etmektedir. Kullanıcıların karar alımlarında önemli yardımı olan faaliyet raporları özellikle gelişmekte olan ülkelerde temel bilgi kaynağı olarak kabul edilmektedir. Bu çalışma işletmelerin kurumsal yönetim özelliklerinin faaliyet raporu yayınlanma zamanlaması üzerindeki etkisini incelemektedir. Bu amaçla 2009 ile 2019 yılları arasında Borsa İstanbul’da faaliyet gösteren 259 işletme örneklem olarak seçilmiş ve ilgili örnekleme lojistik regresyon analizi uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen ampirik bulgulara göre, yönetim kurulu üye sayısı ve yönetim kurulu bağımsızlığını temsil eden değişkenlerin işletmelerin faaliyet raporu yayınlama zamanlaması üzerinde anlamlı etkileri olduğu görülmüştür. Sonuçlar, yönetim kurulu toplam üye sayısı ve yönetim kurulu bağımsızlığının artması işletmenin faaliyet raporunu piyasa ilgisinin yoğun olduğu dönemlerde (hafta içi) yayınlama ihtimalini artırdığını göstermektedir.

Keywords

Faaliyet Raporları, Kurumsal Yönetim, BİST, Lojistik Regresyon

The Effect of Corporate Governance on the Timing of Annual Reports: Evidence from Borsa Istanbul

Abstract

Annual reports serve as significant corporate informational tools by providing an overview of a business's financial performance and future prospects for various users, such as shareholders, potential investors, or regulators. Annual reports, which help users make decisions, are considered the primary source of information, especially in developing countries. This study examines the effects of corporate governance characteristics of enterprises on the timing of annual report publication. For this purpose, 259 companies operating in Borsa Istanbul were selected as a sample, and logistic regression analysis was applied to the relevant sample. According to the empirical findings, it was observed that the variables representing the number of board members and the independence of the board of directors had significant effects on the timing of publishing the annual report of the enterprises. The results showed that the increase in the number of members of the board of directors and the independence of the board of directors increased the probability of publishing the annual report of the enterprise during periods of high market interest (weekdays).

Keywords

Annual Reports, Corporate Governance, BIST, Logistics Regression

References

• Afify, H. A. E. (2009). Determinants of audit report lag. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 10(1), 56–86
• Akçay, A. Ö. (2022). Denetim raporu gecikmesi ve denetim firması rotasyonu: Borsa İstanbul üzerine bir inceleme. Journal of Management and Economics Research, 20(3), 18-34.
• Aldamen, H., Duncan, K., Kelly, S., Mcnamara, R., ve Nagel, S. (2012), Audit committee characteristics and firm performance during the global financial crisis, Accounting & Finance, 52, 971-1000.
• Al-Ajmi, J. (2008). Audit and reporting delays: evidence from an emerging market. Advances in Accounting, 24(2), 217-226.
• Alfraih, M. M., ve Almutawa, A. M. (2017). Voluntary disclosure and corporate governance: empirical evidence from Kuwait. International Journal of Law and Management, 59(2), 217-236.
• Alsmady, A. A. (2018). The effect of board of directors’ characteristics and ownership type on the timeliness of financial reports. International Journal of Business and Management, 13(6), 276-287.
• Ashbaugh, H., ve Warfield, T. (2003). Governance mechanism: evidence from the German market. Journal of International Accounting Research, 2(1), 1-21.
• Begley, J., ve Fischer, P. E. (1998). Is there information in an earnings announcement delay? Review of Accounting Studies, 3(4), 347-363.
• Chen, G., Cheng, L. T., ve Gao, N. (2005). Information content and timing of earnings announcements. Journal of Business Finance ve Accounting, 32(2), 65-95.
• Çelik, B., Özer, G., ve Merter, A. K. (2023). The effect of ownership structure on financial reporting timeliness: an implementation on Borsa Istanbul. SAGE Open, 13(4), 21582440231207458.
• DeAngelo, L. (1981). Auditor size and auditor quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183-199.
• DellaVigna, S., ve Pollet, J. M. (2005). Strategic release of information on Friday: evidence from earnings announcements. Available at SSRN 586702.
• Dimitropoulos, P. E., ve Asteriou, D. (2010). The effect of board composition on the informativeness and quality of annual earnings: empirical evidence from Greece. Research in International Business and Finance, 24(2), 190-205.
• Doyle, J. T., ve Magilke, M. J. (2009). The timing of earnings announcements: An examination of the strategic disclosure hypothesis. The Accounting Review, 84(1), 157-182.
• Elshandidy, T., ve Neri, L. (2015). Corporate governance, risk disclosure practices, and market liquidity: comparative evidence from the UK and Italy. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(4), 331-356.
• Errunza, V. R., ve Losq, E. (1985). The behaviour of stock prices on LDC markets. Journal of Banking and Finance, 9(4), 561-575.
• Ghani, E. K., ve Che Azmi, A. F. (2022). The role of board structure and audit committee structure on financial reporting timeliness: evidence from public listed companies in Malaysia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 9(5), 443-453.
• Hair, J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., ve Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7. Baskı). New Jersey: Pearson Educational International.
• Hassan, Y. M. (2016). Determinants of audit report lag: evidence from Palestine. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 6(1), 13-32.
• Hassan Y., Hijazi R. ve Naser K. (2017). Does audit committee substitute or complement other corporate governance mechanisms: evidence from an emerging economy. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(7), 658-681
• Haw, I.-M., Qi, D., ve Wu, W. (2000). Timeliness of annual report releases and market reaction to earnings announcements in an emerging capital market: the case of China. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 11(2), 108-131.
• Jensen, M. C., ve Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 305-360.
• Kanadli, S. B., Torchia, M., ve Gabaldon, P. (2018). Increasing women’s contribution on board decision making: the importance of chairperson leadership efficacy and board openness. European Management Journal, 36(1), 91–104.
• Krishnan, G. V. (2005). The association between big 6 auditor industry expertise and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Accounting, Auditing ve Finance, 20(3), 209-228.
• Krishnan, G. V. ve Parsons, L. M. (2008). Getting to the bottom line: an exploration of gender and earnings quality. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 65-76.
• Lajmi, A., ve Yab, M. (2022). The impact of internal corporate governance mechanisms on audit report lag: evidence from Tunisian listed companies. EuroMed Journal of Business, 17(4), 619-633.
• Latif, R. A., Mohd, K. T., ve Kamardin, H. (2022). Risk disclosure, corporate governance and firm value in an emerging country. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 12(6), 420-437.
• Leuz, C., ve Verrecchia, R. (2000). The economic consequences of increased disclosure. Journal of Accounting Research, 38, 91-124.
• Li, T., Xiang, C., Liu, Z., ve Cai, W. (2020). Annual report disclosure timing and stock price crash risk. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 62.
• Liao, L. Luo, L., ve Tang, Q. (2015). Gender diversity, board independence, environmental committee and greenhouse gas disclosure. The British Accounting Review, 47(4), 409-424.
• Lukason, O., ve Camacho-Miñano, M. D. (2020). Corporate governance characteristics of private SMEs’ annual report submission violations. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(10), 1-19.
• Marston, C., ve Shrives, P. J. (1991). The use of disclosure indices in accounting research: a review article. The British Accounting Review, 23(3), 195-210.
• Mathuva, D. M., Tauringana, V., ve Owino, F. J. O. (2019). Corporate governance and the timeliness of audited financial statements: the case of Kenyan listed firms. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 9(4), 473-501.
• Michaely, R., Rubin, A., ve Vedrashko, A. (2016). Further evidence on the strategic timing of earnings news: Joint analysis of weekdays and times of day. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 62(1), 24-45.
• Nielsen, S., ve Huse, M. (2010). Women directors’ contribution to board decision-making and strategic involvement: the role of equality perception. European Management Review, 7, 16–29.
• Ocak, M., Özden, E. (2018). Signing auditor-specific characteristics and audit report lag: A research from Turkey. Journal of Applied Business Research, 34(2), 277–294.
• Owusu-Ansah, S., ve Leventis, S. (2006). Timeliness of corporate annual financial reporting in Greece. European Accounting Review, 15(2), 273- 287.
• Shockley, R. (1981). Perceptions of auditor independence: an empirical analysis. Accounting Review, 56, 785-800.
• Shohaieb, D., Elmarzouky, M., ve Albitar, K. (2022). Corporate governance and diversity management: evidence from a disclosure perspective. International Journal of Accounting ve Information Management, 30(4), 502-525.
• Sinclair, N. A., ve Young, J. C. (1991). The timeliness of half yearly earnings announcements and stock returns. Accounting ve Finance, 31(2), 31-52.
• Song, F., ve Zhou, J. (2021). Principles-Based accounting standards and the timeliness of annual reports: Evidence from China. Asian Review of Accounting, 29(3), 399-442.
• Syofyan, E., Septiari, D., Dwita, S. ve Rahmi, M. (2021). The characteristics of the audit committee affecting timeliness of the audit report in Indonesia. Cogent Business & Management, 8, 1935183
• Tauringana, V., Kyeyune, M. F., ve Opio, P. J. (2008). Corporate governance, dual language reporting and the timeliness of annual reports on the nairobi stock exchange. Corporate Governance in Less Developed and Emerging Economies, 8, 13-37.
• Tran, M. D., ve Ha, H. H. (2023). Corporate governance disclosure and annual reports quality: An investigation in Vietnam context. Cogent Economics and Finance, 11(1), 2173125.
• Turley, S., ve Zaman, M. (2004). The corporate governance effects of audit committees. Journal of Management and Governance, 8(3), 305– 332.
• Türel, A. (2010). Timeliness of financial reporting in emerging capital markets: Evidence from Turkey. Journal of the School of Business Administration, 39(2), 227–240.