Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

-

Year 2008, Volume: 25 Issue: 2, 9 - 32, 11.03.2015

Ahmet Çakmak Nesrin Sungur

Abstract

-

Keywords

-

References

  • ALBUQUERQUE, E.M. (2007) “Inadequacy of Technology” and Innovation systems at the periphery: notes on Celso Furtado‟s contributions for a dialogue between evolutionists and structralists”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, cilt 31, no 5, s.669-690.
  • ARUNDEL, A. vd.(2006) “Rethinking science and technology indicators for innovation policy in the twenty-first century” National Innovation, Indicators and Policy, Cheltenham, Edwar Elgar, s. 167-198.
  • BASALLA, G. (1996) Teknolojinin Evrimi, (çev. Cem Soydemir), Tübitak yayınları, Ankara.
  • BERNARDES, A.T.- Albuquerque E.M. (2003), “Cross-over, thresholds, and interactions between science and technology: lessons for less-developed countries”, Research Policy, cilt 32, no 5, s.865-885.
  • BRYNJOLFSSON, E. and Hitt, L. (1996) “Paradox Lost? Firm-level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spending,” Management Science, cilt 42, no. 4, s. 541-558.
  • CARLSSON, B. (2006) “Internationalization of innovation systems: A survey of the literature”, Research Policy, cilt 35, no 1, s.56-67.
  • CHANG, H. J. (2008), Bad Samaritans, Bloomsburry Press, New York.
  • CHAVES C.V. - Moro S. (2007) “Investigating the interaction and mutual dependence between science and technology” Research Policy cilt 36, no 8, s. 1204–1220.
  • FORAY, D. (2007) “Knowledge, intellectual property and development in LDCs: Toward innovative policy initiatives” . UNCTAD LDCs Report 2007 Background Papers, www.unctad.org.
  • FORERO-Pineda,C. (2006) “The impact of stronger intellectual property rights on science and technology in developing countries”, Research Policy, cilt 35, no 6, s.808-824.
  • FORERO-Pineda.,C.-Jaramillo-Salazar, H. (2002) “ The access of researchers from developing countries to international science and technology” International Social Science Journal, cilt 54, no 171, s. 129–140.
  • FREEMAN, C. ve Soete, L. (2007). Developing science, technology and innovation indicators: what we can learn from the past, UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series 001, United Nations University, Maastricht Economic and Social Research and Training Centre on Innovation and Technology.
  • GRILICHES Z. ve Mairesse, J. (1984).”Productivity and R&D at Firm Level‟, R&D, Patents and Productivity , Der. Griliches,Z. , University of Chicago Press, Chicago.,s.339-374.
  • ITO B.- Wakasugi R. (2007), “What factors determine the mode of overseas R&D by multinationals? Empirical evidence”, Research Policy, cilt 36, no 8, s.1275-1287.
  • KAFOUROS, M. (2005) “R&D and Productivity Growth: Evidence From UK”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, cilt 14, no 6, s.479-497.
  • KIM, L. (1997) Immitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea’s Technological Learning, Harvard Business School Press, Massachusetts.
  • KIM, L. -Yi, G. (1997) “The Dynamics of R&D in Industrial Development. Lessons from the Korean Experience”, Industry and Innovation, cilt 4, no 2, s. 167-182.
  • MAYER, J vd. (2002), Dynamic Products in World Export, UNCTAD Discussion Paper, no. 159.
  • MEISTER C. - Verspagen, B. (2005) , European Productivity Gaps: Is R&D the Solution?, DRUID Working Papers 05-06, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy.
  • NELSON, R.R.(2007), “The changing institutional requirements for technological and economic catch up” International Journal of Technological Learning”, Innovation and Development, cilt 1, no 1, s.4-12.
  • PAVIT, K. (1991) “What makes basic research economically useful?” Research Policy, cilt 20, no 2, s.109-119. Posta, 27 Mayıs 2008
  • PYO H. ve Ha, B. (2005) Technology and Long-run Economic Growth in Korea, Hitotsubashi University Research Unit for Statistical Analysis in Social Sciences, Discussion Paper Series, no. 120.
  • SOETE, L.- Turner, R. (1984). "Technology Diffusion and the Rate of Technical Change," Economic Journal, cilt 94, no 375, s. 612-623.
  • UNCTAD (2002), Trade and Development Report 2002, New York.
  • VEUGELER, R. (2007) “Developments in EU Statistics on Science, Technology and Innovation: Taking Stock and Moving Closer to Evidence-based Policy Analysis” , Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators in a Changing World: Responding to Policy Needs, OECD, (2007),Paris, s.33.47.
  • VINODRAI, T. vd. (2007) “Capturing Design: Lessons from the United Kingdom and Canada”, Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators in a Changing World: Responding to Policy Needs, OECD (2007), Paris, s.65-86.
  • World Bank (2008), Global Economic Prospects, Washington D.C.
  • YUN, M. (2007) “China‟s innovation system reform and growing industry and science linkages”, Research Policy, cilt 36, no.8, s 1251-1260.

Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerin Yakınsama Sürecinde AR&GE' nin Rolü

Year 2008, Volume: 25 Issue: 2, 9 - 32, 11.03.2015

Ahmet Çakmak Nesrin Sungur

Abstract

-

Keywords

xx

References

  • ALBUQUERQUE, E.M. (2007) “Inadequacy of Technology” and Innovation systems at the periphery: notes on Celso Furtado‟s contributions for a dialogue between evolutionists and structralists”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, cilt 31, no 5, s.669-690.
  • ARUNDEL, A. vd.(2006) “Rethinking science and technology indicators for innovation policy in the twenty-first century” National Innovation, Indicators and Policy, Cheltenham, Edwar Elgar, s. 167-198.
  • BASALLA, G. (1996) Teknolojinin Evrimi, (çev. Cem Soydemir), Tübitak yayınları, Ankara.
  • BERNARDES, A.T.- Albuquerque E.M. (2003), “Cross-over, thresholds, and interactions between science and technology: lessons for less-developed countries”, Research Policy, cilt 32, no 5, s.865-885.
  • BRYNJOLFSSON, E. and Hitt, L. (1996) “Paradox Lost? Firm-level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spending,” Management Science, cilt 42, no. 4, s. 541-558.
  • CARLSSON, B. (2006) “Internationalization of innovation systems: A survey of the literature”, Research Policy, cilt 35, no 1, s.56-67.
  • CHANG, H. J. (2008), Bad Samaritans, Bloomsburry Press, New York.
  • CHAVES C.V. - Moro S. (2007) “Investigating the interaction and mutual dependence between science and technology” Research Policy cilt 36, no 8, s. 1204–1220.
  • FORAY, D. (2007) “Knowledge, intellectual property and development in LDCs: Toward innovative policy initiatives” . UNCTAD LDCs Report 2007 Background Papers, www.unctad.org.
  • FORERO-Pineda,C. (2006) “The impact of stronger intellectual property rights on science and technology in developing countries”, Research Policy, cilt 35, no 6, s.808-824.
  • FORERO-Pineda.,C.-Jaramillo-Salazar, H. (2002) “ The access of researchers from developing countries to international science and technology” International Social Science Journal, cilt 54, no 171, s. 129–140.
  • FREEMAN, C. ve Soete, L. (2007). Developing science, technology and innovation indicators: what we can learn from the past, UNU-MERIT Working Paper Series 001, United Nations University, Maastricht Economic and Social Research and Training Centre on Innovation and Technology.
  • GRILICHES Z. ve Mairesse, J. (1984).”Productivity and R&D at Firm Level‟, R&D, Patents and Productivity , Der. Griliches,Z. , University of Chicago Press, Chicago.,s.339-374.
  • ITO B.- Wakasugi R. (2007), “What factors determine the mode of overseas R&D by multinationals? Empirical evidence”, Research Policy, cilt 36, no 8, s.1275-1287.
  • KAFOUROS, M. (2005) “R&D and Productivity Growth: Evidence From UK”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, cilt 14, no 6, s.479-497.
  • KIM, L. (1997) Immitation to Innovation: The Dynamics of Korea’s Technological Learning, Harvard Business School Press, Massachusetts.
  • KIM, L. -Yi, G. (1997) “The Dynamics of R&D in Industrial Development. Lessons from the Korean Experience”, Industry and Innovation, cilt 4, no 2, s. 167-182.
  • MAYER, J vd. (2002), Dynamic Products in World Export, UNCTAD Discussion Paper, no. 159.
  • MEISTER C. - Verspagen, B. (2005) , European Productivity Gaps: Is R&D the Solution?, DRUID Working Papers 05-06, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy.
  • NELSON, R.R.(2007), “The changing institutional requirements for technological and economic catch up” International Journal of Technological Learning”, Innovation and Development, cilt 1, no 1, s.4-12.
  • PAVIT, K. (1991) “What makes basic research economically useful?” Research Policy, cilt 20, no 2, s.109-119. Posta, 27 Mayıs 2008
  • PYO H. ve Ha, B. (2005) Technology and Long-run Economic Growth in Korea, Hitotsubashi University Research Unit for Statistical Analysis in Social Sciences, Discussion Paper Series, no. 120.
  • SOETE, L.- Turner, R. (1984). "Technology Diffusion and the Rate of Technical Change," Economic Journal, cilt 94, no 375, s. 612-623.
  • UNCTAD (2002), Trade and Development Report 2002, New York.
  • VEUGELER, R. (2007) “Developments in EU Statistics on Science, Technology and Innovation: Taking Stock and Moving Closer to Evidence-based Policy Analysis” , Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators in a Changing World: Responding to Policy Needs, OECD, (2007),Paris, s.33.47.
  • VINODRAI, T. vd. (2007) “Capturing Design: Lessons from the United Kingdom and Canada”, Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators in a Changing World: Responding to Policy Needs, OECD (2007), Paris, s.65-86.
  • World Bank (2008), Global Economic Prospects, Washington D.C.
  • YUN, M. (2007) “China‟s innovation system reform and growing industry and science linkages”, Research Policy, cilt 36, no.8, s 1251-1260.
There are 28 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Ahmet Çakmak This is me

Nesrin Sungur This is me

Publication Date March 11, 2015
Submission Date March 5, 2014
Published in Issue Year 2008 Volume: 25 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Çakmak, A., & Sungur, N. (2015). Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerin Yakınsama Sürecinde AR&GE’ nin Rolü. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 25(2), 9-32.
AMA Çakmak A, Sungur N. Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerin Yakınsama Sürecinde AR&GE’ nin Rolü. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi. March 2015;25(2):9-32.
Chicago Çakmak, Ahmet, and Nesrin Sungur. “Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerin Yakınsama Sürecinde AR&GE’ Nin Rolü”. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 25, no. 2 (March 2015): 9-32.
EndNote Çakmak A, Sungur N (March 1, 2015) Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerin Yakınsama Sürecinde AR&GE’ nin Rolü. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 25 2 9–32.
IEEE A. Çakmak and N. Sungur, “Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerin Yakınsama Sürecinde AR&GE’ nin Rolü”, Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 9–32, 2015.
ISNAD Çakmak, Ahmet - Sungur, Nesrin. “Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerin Yakınsama Sürecinde AR&GE’ Nin Rolü”. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 25/2 (March 2015), 9-32.
JAMA Çakmak A, Sungur N. Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerin Yakınsama Sürecinde AR&GE’ nin Rolü. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi. 2015;25:9–32.
MLA Çakmak, Ahmet and Nesrin Sungur. “Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerin Yakınsama Sürecinde AR&GE’ Nin Rolü”. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 25, no. 2, 2015, pp. 9-32.
Vancouver Çakmak A, Sungur N. Gelişmekte Olan Ülkelerin Yakınsama Sürecinde AR&GE’ nin Rolü. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi. 2015;25(2):9-32.

Marmara University Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences is licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

by-nc.png