Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

A COMPARISON OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN TURKEY AND EGYPT: MOTIVATIONS AND OBSTACLES

Year 2010, Volume: 29 Issue: 2, 153 - 172, 17.03.2015

Abstract

This paper compares the political economy of foreign direct investment
(FDI) in relation to economic development strategies and legal framework for
foreign firms in Egypt and Turkey. The paper briefly examines the FDI
performances of these countries starting from the end of the nineteenth century to
the first decades of the twenty first century. In addition, in this paper, the legal
framework for FDI is analyzed. Finally the paper put emphasis on the similarities
between the FDI performances and the obstacles that foreign investors face in these
countries.

References

  • DPT ('HYOHW3ODQODPD7HúNLODWÕ), First Five-Year Development Plan, 1963-1967 (Ankara: Turkish Republic Prime Ministry, 1963)
  • DUMLUDAG, Devrim, An Analysis of the Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Turkey: The Role of the Institutional Context, Journal of Business Economics and Management, 1/2009.
  • ERDEN, Deniz A Survey of Foreign Direct Investment Firms in Turkey øVWDQEXO%R÷D]LoLhQLYHUVLW\
  • HANDOUSSA, H and M. Louis “Brownfield Investment in Emerging Markets The Case of Egypt” in DRC Working Papers Foreign Direct Investment in Emerging Markets London: London Business School 2003
  • HANDOUSSA, H and N. El-Mikawy “Institutional Reform and Economic Development in Egypt.” Economic Research Forum, Egypt, 2001.
  • HANSEN, Bent The Political Economy of Poverty, Equity, and Growth Egypt and Turkey. World Bank:1991.
  • ISO (Istanbul Chamber of Industry Report), IstanbXO,62<D\ÕQODUÕ
  • KAPOOR, A. Foreign Investments and the New Middle East A Survey of Prospects, Problems and Planning Strategies, New Jersey:1975
  • LOUIS, Maryse and Alia El Mahdy, H. Handoussa “Foreign Direct Investment in Egypt” in Investment Strategies in Emerging Markets, London:2003.
  • ÖKÇÜN, A. Gündüz 1920- \ÕOODUÕ DUDVÕQGD NXUXODQ 7UN $QRQLP ùLUNHWOHULQGH <DEDQFÕ 6HUPD\H $QNDUD  6HUPD\H 3L\DVDVÕ .XUXOX  1997).
  • PAMUK ùHYNHW The Ottoman Empire and European Capitalism. 1820- 1913: Trade, Investment and Production (Cambridge: New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987),
  • SHAFIK, Nemat. “Private Investment and Public Policy: The Egyptian Case” in Reviving Private Investment in Developing Countries Empirical Studies and Policy Lessons ed. by A Chibber, M. Dailami and N. Shafik, Elsevier Science & Technology Books, 1992.
  • SPRINGBORG, Robert “Egypt” in Economic and Political Liberalization in the Middle East ed. by Tim Niblock and Emma Murphy London: I B Tauris & Co Ltd,1993.
  • T(.(/ø ø DQG 6 øONLQ 6DYDú 6RQUDVÕ 2UWDPÕQGD  7UNL\H øNWLVDGL .DONÕQPD3ODQÕ $QNDUD2UWD'R÷X7HNQLNhQLYHUVLWHVL
  • THE WORLD BANK, World Business Environment Survey, Washington: WB, 2010
  • UNCTAD Investment Policy Review, Egypt. Geneva, 1999.
  • UNCTAD. Report by the Secretariet of the UNCTAD. Geneva: UNCTAD, 2002.
  • UNCTAD, Handbook of Statistics, Geneva: UNCTAD, 2006
  • UNCTAD, Handbook of Statistics, Geneva: UNCTAD, 2010

TÜRKİYE VE MISIR'DA DOĞRUDAN YABANCI YATIRIMLAR: BELİRLEYİCİLER VE ENGELLER

Year 2010, Volume: 29 Issue: 2, 153 - 172, 17.03.2015

Abstract

%X oDOÕúPDGD 0ÕVÕU YH 7UNL\H¶GH 'R÷UXGDQ <DEDQFÕ <DWÕUÕPODUÕQ

HNRQRPLN NDONÕQPD VWUDWHMLOHUL YH KXNXNVDO oHUoHYH ED÷ODPÕQGD HNRQRPL SROLWL÷L

incelenmektedir. dDOÕúPDGD Rn GRNX]XQFX \]\ÕO VRQXQGDQ \LUPL ELULQFL \]\ÕO

baúÕQD NDGDU 7UNL\H YH 0ÕVÕU¶ÕQ 'R÷UXGDQ <DEDQFÕ <DWÕUÕP SHUIRUPDQVÕ

LQFHOHQPHNWH KXNXNVDO PHY]XDW YH XOXVODUDUDVÕ \DWÕUÕPFÕODUÕQ NDUúÕODúWÕNODUÕ

VRUXQODUNDUúÕODúWÕUÕOPDNWDGÕU

References

  • DPT ('HYOHW3ODQODPD7HúNLODWÕ), First Five-Year Development Plan, 1963-1967 (Ankara: Turkish Republic Prime Ministry, 1963)
  • DUMLUDAG, Devrim, An Analysis of the Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in Turkey: The Role of the Institutional Context, Journal of Business Economics and Management, 1/2009.
  • ERDEN, Deniz A Survey of Foreign Direct Investment Firms in Turkey øVWDQEXO%R÷D]LoLhQLYHUVLW\
  • HANDOUSSA, H and M. Louis “Brownfield Investment in Emerging Markets The Case of Egypt” in DRC Working Papers Foreign Direct Investment in Emerging Markets London: London Business School 2003
  • HANDOUSSA, H and N. El-Mikawy “Institutional Reform and Economic Development in Egypt.” Economic Research Forum, Egypt, 2001.
  • HANSEN, Bent The Political Economy of Poverty, Equity, and Growth Egypt and Turkey. World Bank:1991.
  • ISO (Istanbul Chamber of Industry Report), IstanbXO,62<D\ÕQODUÕ
  • KAPOOR, A. Foreign Investments and the New Middle East A Survey of Prospects, Problems and Planning Strategies, New Jersey:1975
  • LOUIS, Maryse and Alia El Mahdy, H. Handoussa “Foreign Direct Investment in Egypt” in Investment Strategies in Emerging Markets, London:2003.
  • ÖKÇÜN, A. Gündüz 1920- \ÕOODUÕ DUDVÕQGD NXUXODQ 7UN $QRQLP ùLUNHWOHULQGH <DEDQFÕ 6HUPD\H $QNDUD  6HUPD\H 3L\DVDVÕ .XUXOX  1997).
  • PAMUK ùHYNHW The Ottoman Empire and European Capitalism. 1820- 1913: Trade, Investment and Production (Cambridge: New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987),
  • SHAFIK, Nemat. “Private Investment and Public Policy: The Egyptian Case” in Reviving Private Investment in Developing Countries Empirical Studies and Policy Lessons ed. by A Chibber, M. Dailami and N. Shafik, Elsevier Science & Technology Books, 1992.
  • SPRINGBORG, Robert “Egypt” in Economic and Political Liberalization in the Middle East ed. by Tim Niblock and Emma Murphy London: I B Tauris & Co Ltd,1993.
  • T(.(/ø ø DQG 6 øONLQ 6DYDú 6RQUDVÕ 2UWDPÕQGD  7UNL\H øNWLVDGL .DONÕQPD3ODQÕ $QNDUD2UWD'R÷X7HNQLNhQLYHUVLWHVL
  • THE WORLD BANK, World Business Environment Survey, Washington: WB, 2010
  • UNCTAD Investment Policy Review, Egypt. Geneva, 1999.
  • UNCTAD. Report by the Secretariet of the UNCTAD. Geneva: UNCTAD, 2002.
  • UNCTAD, Handbook of Statistics, Geneva: UNCTAD, 2006
  • UNCTAD, Handbook of Statistics, Geneva: UNCTAD, 2010
There are 19 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Devrim Dumludağ

Publication Date March 17, 2015
Submission Date March 17, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2010 Volume: 29 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Dumludağ, D. (2015). A COMPARISON OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN TURKEY AND EGYPT: MOTIVATIONS AND OBSTACLES. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 29(2), 153-172.
AMA Dumludağ D. A COMPARISON OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN TURKEY AND EGYPT: MOTIVATIONS AND OBSTACLES. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi. March 2015;29(2):153-172.
Chicago Dumludağ, Devrim. “A COMPARISON OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN TURKEY AND EGYPT: MOTIVATIONS AND OBSTACLES”. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 29, no. 2 (March 2015): 153-72.
EndNote Dumludağ D (March 1, 2015) A COMPARISON OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN TURKEY AND EGYPT: MOTIVATIONS AND OBSTACLES. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 29 2 153–172.
IEEE D. Dumludağ, “A COMPARISON OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN TURKEY AND EGYPT: MOTIVATIONS AND OBSTACLES”, Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 153–172, 2015.
ISNAD Dumludağ, Devrim. “A COMPARISON OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN TURKEY AND EGYPT: MOTIVATIONS AND OBSTACLES”. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 29/2 (March 2015), 153-172.
JAMA Dumludağ D. A COMPARISON OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN TURKEY AND EGYPT: MOTIVATIONS AND OBSTACLES. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi. 2015;29:153–172.
MLA Dumludağ, Devrim. “A COMPARISON OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN TURKEY AND EGYPT: MOTIVATIONS AND OBSTACLES”. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 29, no. 2, 2015, pp. 153-72.
Vancouver Dumludağ D. A COMPARISON OF FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT IN TURKEY AND EGYPT: MOTIVATIONS AND OBSTACLES. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi. 2015;29(2):153-72.