BibTex RIS Cite

-

Year 2014, Volume: 36 Issue: 1, 89 - 101, 12.03.2015

Ünal Arslan

Abstract

This study investigates the relationship between culture proximity and international trade in Asia, covering the period 1970-2009 using Pedroni and Johansen and Fisher Panel Data cointegration tests. The result of the cointegration analysis indicates that there is a long-run relationship between culture and and international trade. This means cultural proximity/similarity effects the international trade in long run

Keywords

Cultural Similarity International Trade Panel Data Analysis

References

  • Axelrod, R. (1984), The Evolution of Cooperation, New York: Basic Books. Balaam David N., Bradford Dillman (2013). Introduction to International Political Economy, 6th Edition,
  • Beckerman, W. “Distance and The Pattern of Intra-European Trade”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 1956, 38:31-40.
  • Boyd, Robert and Richerson, P. (1985) Culture and the Evolutionary Process, Chicago: Univesity of Chicago Press.
  • Breitung J., “The local power of some unit root tests for panel data”, Advances in Econometrics, 2000, 15, 161-177.
  • Coase, Ronald , “The Nature of The Firm”, Economica, 1937 Vol. 4, No. 16, 386-405.
  • Combes, Pierre-Philippe, Miren Lafourcade Thierry Mayer, “The trade-creating effects of business and social networks: evidence from France”, Journal of International Economics, 2004 66, pp.1 –29.
  • Cyrus, Teresa L., “Cultural Distance and Bilateral Trade”, Global Economy Journal. 2011, Volume 12, Issue 4. Dreher, A “Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization”. Applied Economics, 2007 ,vol. 38, No.10, pp. 1091-1110.
  • Dreher, Axel, Martin Gassebner, Lars-H. R. Siemers, “Globalization, Economic Freedom, and Human Rights” 2012 The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 56, No. 3 (June 2012), pp. 516-546.
  • Felbermayr, Gabriel J., Toubal F., “Cultural proximity and trade”, European Economic Review, 2010 Volume 54, Issue 2, 279–293.
  • Frankel, J., Stein, E., Wei, S.-J., Regional Trading Blocs in the World Economic System. Institute for International Economics, 1997, Washington DC.
  • Gert-Jan M. Linders Arjen Slangen Henri L.F. de Groot Sjoerd Beugelsdijk “Cultural and Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Flows”, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, 2005, No. 05-074/3
  • Glaeser, Edward, David Laibson, and Bruce Sacerdote (2002), “An Economic Approach to Social Capital,” Economic Journal, 2002, 112: 437-458.
  • Granger, C.W.J., ve Newbold, P., “Spurious Regression in Economics”, Journal of Econometrics, 1974, vol. 2, Issue 2, 111-120
  • Greif, Avner , Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy, 2006, Cambridge.
  • Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., Zingales, L., “Does culture affect economic outcomes”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2006, 20 (2), 23–48.
  • Guiso, Luigi, Paola Sapienza, and Luigi Zingales, “Cultural Biases in Economic Exchange,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 2009, 124 (3), 1095-1131.
  • Guo, Rongxing, ”How culture influences foreign trade: evidence from the U.S. and China”, The Journal of Socio-Economics, 2004, 33, 785–812.
  • Hadri, K., “Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data”, Econometrics Journal, 2000, 3, 148-161.
  • Helliwell, J. F. “National borders, trade and migration”, NBER Working Paper, 1997, 6027, NBER.
  • Henrich, Joseph, “Does Culture Matter in Economic Behavior? Ultimatum Game Bargaining Among the Machiguenga of the Peruvian Amazon”, American Economic Review, 2000, Vol. 90, No. 4 pp. 973-979.
  • Henrich, Joseph Robert Boyd, Samuel Bowles, Colın Camerer, Ernst Fehr, Herbert Gıntıs, And Rıchard Mcelreath (2001), “In Search of Homo Economicus: Behavioral Experiments in 15 Small-Scale Societies”, The American Economic Review, 2001, 91 (2), 73-78.
  • Hofstede, G. (2001) Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations, Across Nations, 2nd edn, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Hou, Liyan, Explaining trade flows and determinants of bilaterial trade. Ph.D. thesis, 2010, University of Birmingham.
  • Im, K.S., Pesaran, M.H., Shın, Y., “Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels”, Journal of Econometrics, 2003, 115, 53-74.
  • Jones, Eric L. (2006) Cultures Merging: A Historical and Economic Critique of Culture, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Kunovich Robert M., “The Sources and Consequences of National Identification”, American Sociological Review, 2009, Vol. 74, No. 4, pp. 573-593.
  • Levin, A., Lin, C-F., Chu, C-S. J., “Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finitesample properties”, Journal of Econometrics, 2002, 108, 1-24.
  • Linder, Staffan Burenstam (1961), An Essay on Trade and Transformation, John Wiley& Sons, New York.
  • Linders, Gert-Jon, Argen Slangen, Henri L.F. De. Groot , “Cultural and Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Flows”, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, 2005, No. 05-074.
  • Pedroni P., “Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Special Issue, 1999, 0305-9049.
  • Pejovich, Svetozar, “Economic Analysis of Institutions and Systems”, International Studies in Economics and Econometrics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998,
  • Putnam, R., Leonardi, R. ve Nanetti, R., (1993), Making Democracy Work Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
  • Rauch James E. ve Trindade, Vitor, “Ethnic Chinese Network in International Trade”, NBER Working Paper, 2002, No. w7189.
  • Rauch, J. E., “Networks versus markets in international trade”, Journal of International Economics, 1999, 48: 7–35.
  • Rauch, J., “Business and social networks in international trade”. Journal of Economic Literature, 2001, 39, 1177– 1203.
  • Smith, Adam, (1997 [1776]), Ulusların Zenginliği, çev. Ayse Yunus ve Mehmet Bakırcı, Alan yayıncılık, Istanbul.
  • Tadesse, Bedassa and Roger White, “Cultural distance as a determinant of bilateral trade flows: do immigrants counter the effect of cultural differences?” Applied Economics Letters, 2010, 17, 147–152.
  • UNCTAD (2011), UNCTADstat, http://unctadstat.unctad.org.University Press.
  • World Trade Organisation (2011), International Trade Statistics.

ULUSLARARASI TİCARET VE KÜLTÜREL YAKINLIK: ASYA ÖRNEĞİ

Year 2014, Volume: 36 Issue: 1, 89 - 101, 12.03.2015

Ünal Arslan

Abstract

Bu çalışma, 1970-2009 yılları arası, Pedroni ve Johansen ve Fisher panel veri
eş bütünleşme analizi kullanılarak Asya ülkelerinde kültürel benzerlik ve uluslararası
ticaret arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmıştır. Eş bütünleşme analizi, Asya ülkelerinde, kültü-
rel benzerlik ve uluslararası ticaret arasında, uzun dönemli bir ilişkinin var olduğunu
göstermektedir. Bu durum, uzun dönemde kültürel yakınlığın uluslararası ticareti etkilediği
anlamına gelmektedir.

Keywords

Kültürel Benzerlik Uluslararası Ticaret Panel Data Analizi

References

  • Axelrod, R. (1984), The Evolution of Cooperation, New York: Basic Books. Balaam David N., Bradford Dillman (2013). Introduction to International Political Economy, 6th Edition,
  • Beckerman, W. “Distance and The Pattern of Intra-European Trade”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 1956, 38:31-40.
  • Boyd, Robert and Richerson, P. (1985) Culture and the Evolutionary Process, Chicago: Univesity of Chicago Press.
  • Breitung J., “The local power of some unit root tests for panel data”, Advances in Econometrics, 2000, 15, 161-177.
  • Coase, Ronald , “The Nature of The Firm”, Economica, 1937 Vol. 4, No. 16, 386-405.
  • Combes, Pierre-Philippe, Miren Lafourcade Thierry Mayer, “The trade-creating effects of business and social networks: evidence from France”, Journal of International Economics, 2004 66, pp.1 –29.
  • Cyrus, Teresa L., “Cultural Distance and Bilateral Trade”, Global Economy Journal. 2011, Volume 12, Issue 4. Dreher, A “Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization”. Applied Economics, 2007 ,vol. 38, No.10, pp. 1091-1110.
  • Dreher, Axel, Martin Gassebner, Lars-H. R. Siemers, “Globalization, Economic Freedom, and Human Rights” 2012 The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 56, No. 3 (June 2012), pp. 516-546.
  • Felbermayr, Gabriel J., Toubal F., “Cultural proximity and trade”, European Economic Review, 2010 Volume 54, Issue 2, 279–293.
  • Frankel, J., Stein, E., Wei, S.-J., Regional Trading Blocs in the World Economic System. Institute for International Economics, 1997, Washington DC.
  • Gert-Jan M. Linders Arjen Slangen Henri L.F. de Groot Sjoerd Beugelsdijk “Cultural and Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Flows”, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, 2005, No. 05-074/3
  • Glaeser, Edward, David Laibson, and Bruce Sacerdote (2002), “An Economic Approach to Social Capital,” Economic Journal, 2002, 112: 437-458.
  • Granger, C.W.J., ve Newbold, P., “Spurious Regression in Economics”, Journal of Econometrics, 1974, vol. 2, Issue 2, 111-120
  • Greif, Avner , Institutions and the Path to the Modern Economy, 2006, Cambridge.
  • Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., Zingales, L., “Does culture affect economic outcomes”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2006, 20 (2), 23–48.
  • Guiso, Luigi, Paola Sapienza, and Luigi Zingales, “Cultural Biases in Economic Exchange,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 2009, 124 (3), 1095-1131.
  • Guo, Rongxing, ”How culture influences foreign trade: evidence from the U.S. and China”, The Journal of Socio-Economics, 2004, 33, 785–812.
  • Hadri, K., “Testing for stationarity in heterogeneous panel data”, Econometrics Journal, 2000, 3, 148-161.
  • Helliwell, J. F. “National borders, trade and migration”, NBER Working Paper, 1997, 6027, NBER.
  • Henrich, Joseph, “Does Culture Matter in Economic Behavior? Ultimatum Game Bargaining Among the Machiguenga of the Peruvian Amazon”, American Economic Review, 2000, Vol. 90, No. 4 pp. 973-979.
  • Henrich, Joseph Robert Boyd, Samuel Bowles, Colın Camerer, Ernst Fehr, Herbert Gıntıs, And Rıchard Mcelreath (2001), “In Search of Homo Economicus: Behavioral Experiments in 15 Small-Scale Societies”, The American Economic Review, 2001, 91 (2), 73-78.
  • Hofstede, G. (2001) Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations, Across Nations, 2nd edn, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Hou, Liyan, Explaining trade flows and determinants of bilaterial trade. Ph.D. thesis, 2010, University of Birmingham.
  • Im, K.S., Pesaran, M.H., Shın, Y., “Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels”, Journal of Econometrics, 2003, 115, 53-74.
  • Jones, Eric L. (2006) Cultures Merging: A Historical and Economic Critique of Culture, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Kunovich Robert M., “The Sources and Consequences of National Identification”, American Sociological Review, 2009, Vol. 74, No. 4, pp. 573-593.
  • Levin, A., Lin, C-F., Chu, C-S. J., “Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finitesample properties”, Journal of Econometrics, 2002, 108, 1-24.
  • Linder, Staffan Burenstam (1961), An Essay on Trade and Transformation, John Wiley& Sons, New York.
  • Linders, Gert-Jon, Argen Slangen, Henri L.F. De. Groot , “Cultural and Institutional Determinants of Bilateral Trade Flows”, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, 2005, No. 05-074.
  • Pedroni P., “Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Special Issue, 1999, 0305-9049.
  • Pejovich, Svetozar, “Economic Analysis of Institutions and Systems”, International Studies in Economics and Econometrics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998,
  • Putnam, R., Leonardi, R. ve Nanetti, R., (1993), Making Democracy Work Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
  • Rauch James E. ve Trindade, Vitor, “Ethnic Chinese Network in International Trade”, NBER Working Paper, 2002, No. w7189.
  • Rauch, J. E., “Networks versus markets in international trade”, Journal of International Economics, 1999, 48: 7–35.
  • Rauch, J., “Business and social networks in international trade”. Journal of Economic Literature, 2001, 39, 1177– 1203.
  • Smith, Adam, (1997 [1776]), Ulusların Zenginliği, çev. Ayse Yunus ve Mehmet Bakırcı, Alan yayıncılık, Istanbul.
  • Tadesse, Bedassa and Roger White, “Cultural distance as a determinant of bilateral trade flows: do immigrants counter the effect of cultural differences?” Applied Economics Letters, 2010, 17, 147–152.
  • UNCTAD (2011), UNCTADstat, http://unctadstat.unctad.org.University Press.
  • World Trade Organisation (2011), International Trade Statistics.
There are 39 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Ünal Arslan

Publication Date March 12, 2015
Submission Date March 12, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2014 Volume: 36 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Arslan, Ü. (2015). ULUSLARARASI TİCARET VE KÜLTÜREL YAKINLIK: ASYA ÖRNEĞİ. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 36(1), 89-101.
AMA Arslan Ü. ULUSLARARASI TİCARET VE KÜLTÜREL YAKINLIK: ASYA ÖRNEĞİ. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi. March 2015;36(1):89-101.
Chicago Arslan, Ünal. “ULUSLARARASI TİCARET VE KÜLTÜREL YAKINLIK: ASYA ÖRNEĞİ”. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 36, no. 1 (March 2015): 89-101.
EndNote Arslan Ü (March 1, 2015) ULUSLARARASI TİCARET VE KÜLTÜREL YAKINLIK: ASYA ÖRNEĞİ. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 36 1 89–101.
IEEE Ü. Arslan, “ULUSLARARASI TİCARET VE KÜLTÜREL YAKINLIK: ASYA ÖRNEĞİ”, Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 89–101, 2015.
ISNAD Arslan, Ünal. “ULUSLARARASI TİCARET VE KÜLTÜREL YAKINLIK: ASYA ÖRNEĞİ”. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 36/1 (March 2015), 89-101.
JAMA Arslan Ü. ULUSLARARASI TİCARET VE KÜLTÜREL YAKINLIK: ASYA ÖRNEĞİ. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi. 2015;36:89–101.
MLA Arslan, Ünal. “ULUSLARARASI TİCARET VE KÜLTÜREL YAKINLIK: ASYA ÖRNEĞİ”. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 36, no. 1, 2015, pp. 89-101.
Vancouver Arslan Ü. ULUSLARARASI TİCARET VE KÜLTÜREL YAKINLIK: ASYA ÖRNEĞİ. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi. 2015;36(1):89-101.

Bu web sitesi Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı ile lisanslanmıştır.

by-nc.png