Çevresel Kuşkuculuk: Çözümü İmkansızlaştırmak?

Year 2023, Volume: 47 Issue: 3, 1087 - 1106, 15.06.2023

Hikmet Kuran

Abstract

Ekolojik sorunlarla mücadele edilmesi ve çözüm önerilerinin etkin bir şekilde hayata geçirilebilmesi için kamuoyu farkındalığı ve bilgi seviyesi kritik bir öneme sahiptir. Özellikle ulusal ölçekte çevre politikalarının oluşturulması ve teşvik, sınırlama, yaptırım, yasal düzenleme gibi politika araçlarının etkinliği kamuoyunun, tekil ya da birden fazla çevre sorununun seviyesi, yoğunluğu, ciddiyeti ve ‘gerçekliğine’ yönelik ikna düzeyiyle doğrudan bağlantılıdır. Bu bağlamda bireylerin ya da toplumun belirli bir kısmının söz konusu çevre sorunlarına kuşku duyması/şüpheyle yaklaşması, ilgili sorunun çözümü ve küresel ölçekte deneyimlediğimiz ekolojik krizle mücadele açısından bir açmaz yaratmaktadır. Bu doğrultuda, politik ve iktisadi amaçlar doğrultusunda, belirli aktörler tarafından sistematik ve planlı bir şekilde yürütülen, kuşku yaratma ve yayma odaklı etkinlikleri ifade eden çevresel kuşkuculuk yaklaşımı, bu çalışmanın konusunu oluşturmaktadır. Ekolojik krizle etkin mücadelenin önündeki en büyük engellerden birisi olan bu yaklaşımın aktörleri, argümanları, stratejileri ve etkileri çalışmada detaylı olarak ele alınmaktadır. Çalışmanın temel savı ise çevresel kuşkuculuğun kamuoyu üzerinde kritik etkiler yaratarak çözüm çabalarını baltaladığı ve bu yaklaşımla kapsamlı bir mücadele hayata geçirilmeksizin ekolojik krizden çıkışın mümkün olmayacağı yönündedir.

Keywords

Çevresel kuşkuculuk, ekolojik kriz, kamuoyu farkındalığı, çevre sorunları, iklim değişikliği

References

• Allen M P (1992). Elite Social Movement Organizations and the State: The Rise of the Conservative Policy-planning Network. Research in Politics and Policy, 4, 87-109.
• Antilla L (2005) Climate of Scepticism: US Newspaper Coverage of Climate Change. Global Environmental Change, 15, 338-352.
• Bensinger G (2021). Social Media is Polluted With Climate Denialism. The New York Times, 12 Kasım. Son erişim tarihi: 19/2/2022.
• Burnett H S (2015). How Many of World’s Poor Will Climate Alarmists Let Die? Investor’s 1104 Kuran H (2023). Çevresel Kuşkuculuk: Çözümü İmkânsızlaştırmak?. Mülkiye Dergisi, 47(3), 1087-1106.
• Business Daily. 5 Ocak. Son erişim tarihi: 19/2/2022.
• Capstick S B ve Pidgeon N F (2014). What is Climate Change Scepticism? Examination of the Concept Using a Mixed Methods Study of the UK Public, Global Environmental Change, 24, 389-401.
• Ciampaglia G L ve Menczer F (2019). Misinformation and Biases Affect Social Media, Intentionally and Accidentally. The Conversation, 10 Ocak. Son erişim tarihi: 19/2/2022.
• Cook J (2019). Understanding and Countering Misinformation About Climate Change. İçinde Chiluwa, I. ve Samoilenko S. (der.) Handbook of Research on Deception, Fake News and Misinformation Online, Hershey, PA: IGI-Global, 281-306.
• Cook J vd (2016). Consensus on Consensus: A Synthesis of Consensus Estimates on Humancaused Global Warming. Environmental Research Letters, 11(4), 1-7.
• Covington S (1997). Moving a Public Policy Agenda: The Strategic Philantrophy of Conservative Foundations. Washington DC: National Committee for Responsible Philantrophy.
• Crary J (2023). Yeryüzü Yakılıp Yıkılırken: Dijital Çağdan Kapitalizm-Sonrası Dünyaya, Metis: İstanbul.
• Dickson D (2003). The Case for Environmental Scepticism. Scidev.net, 25 Nisan, Son erişim tarihi: 5/8/2022.
• Dietz D ve Shwom R (2007). Support for climate change policy: Some psychological abd social structural influences. Rural Sociology, 72(2), 185-214.
• Douglas R (2021). The Commonplaces of Environmental Scepticism. The Jus Semper Global Alliance, Son erişim tarihi: 10/10/2022.
• Dryzek J S (2005). The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses, Oxford:Oxford University Press.
• Dunlap R E (1998). Lay Perceptions of Global Risk: Public Views of Global Warming in Crossnational Context. International Sociology, 13, 473-498.
• Fischer F (2019). Knowledge Politics and Post-Truth in Climate Denial: On the Social Construction of Alternative Facts. Critical Policy Studies, 13(2), 133-152.
• Habermas J (1987). The Theory of Communicative Action: Lifeworld and System, Çev. T McCarthy, Boston: Beacon.
• Harding E (11.1.2021a). The Rise and (Possible) Fall of Environmental Scepticism. https:// www.ideology-theory-practice.org/blog/the-rise-and-possible-fall-of-environmentalscepticism. Son erişim tarihi: 16/3/2022.
• Harding E (2019). A Conceptual Morphology of Environmental Scepticism. Journal ofPolitical Ideologies, 24(3), 295-313.
• Harding E (2021b). Three Possible Futures for Global Climate Scepticism. The Conversation, 5 Mart, Son erişim tarihi: 19/3/2022.
• Hsu C-H ve Lin J C-C (2008). Acceptance of Blog Usage: The Roles of Technology Acceptance, Social Influence and Knowledge Sharing Motivation. Information & Management, 45(1), 65-74.
• Huber R vd (2021). From Populism to Climate Scepticism: The Role of Institutional Trust and Attitudes towards Science. Environmental Politics, 31(7), 1115-1138.
• Jacques P (2008). Ecology, Distribution and Identity in the World Politics of Environmental Skepticism. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 19(3), 8-28.
• Jacques P vd (2008). The Organization of Denial: Conservative Think Tanks and Environmental Scepticism. Environmental Politics, 17 (3), 349-385.
• Johnston T ve Kaye B K (2004) Wag the Blog: How Reliance on Traditional Media and the Internet Influence Credibility Perceptions of Weblogs among Users. Journalism & Mass Communication, Vol. 81, 622-642.
• Kuran H (2021). İklim Değişikliği: İnkâr, Çarpıtma ve Hakikat. İçinde: B Özçelik (der), Hakikat Sonrası: Siyaset, Felsefe, Medya, Uluslararası İlişkiler, Nika Yayınevi: Ankara, 375-394.
• Leber R (17.6.2020). The Gas Industry is Paying Instagram Influencers to Gush Over Gas
• Stoves. https://www.motherjones.com/environment/2020/06/gas-industry-influencersstoves/ . Son erişim tarihi: 19/2/2022.
• Leiserowitz A vd (2017). Climate Change in the American Mind: May 2017. Yale University and George Mason University. New Haven, CT: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication.
• Lichter S R ve Lichter L S (1992). The Great Greenhouse Debate: Media Coverage and Expert Opinion on Global Warming. Media Monitor 6, 10, 1-6.
• Lockwood M (2018). Right-wing Populism and the Climate Change Agenda: Exploring the Linkages. Environmental Politics, 27(4), 712-732.
• Malakoff D (7.12.2016). Trump Picks Prominent Climate Skeptic as EPA Chief. https://www. science.org/content/article/trump-picks-prominent-climate-skeptic-epa-chief. Son erişim tarihi: 19.2.2021.
• McCright A M ve Dunlap R E (2000). Challenging Global Warming as a Social Problem: An Analysis of the Conservative Movement’s Counter-Claims. Social Problems, 47(4), 499-522.
• Mudde C ve Kaltwasser C R (2017). Populism: A Very Short Introduction Oxford University Press: Oxford.
• Nerenberg M (2001). Undue Influence: Conservative Think Tanks and the Bush Transition Team. Responsive Philantrophy: The NCRP Quarterly. 13-16.
• Pariser E (2012). The Filter Buble: What the Internet is Hiding from You, Penguin Books: New York.
• Poortinga W vd (2011). Uncertain Climate: An Investigation into Public Scepticism about Anthropogenic Climate Change. Global Environmental Change, 21, 1015-1024.
• Rahmstorff S (2004). The Climate Sceptics. Munich Re, Weather Catastrophes and Climate Change Raporu, http://www.pik-potsdam.de/~stefan/Publications/Other/rahmstorf_ climate_sceptics_2004.pdf Son erişim tarihi: 16/3/2020.
• Runciman D (2017). How Climate Scepticism Turned into Something More Dangerous. The Guardian, 7 Temmuz, Son erişim tarihi: 19/2/2022.
• Sharman A (2014). Mapping the Climate Sceptical Blogosphere. Global Environmental Change, 26, 159-170.
• Stop Funding Heat (2021). In Denial – Facebook’s Growing Friendship with Climate Misinformation”. https://stopfundingheat.info/facebook-in-denial/ Son erişim tarihi: 19/2/2022.
• Turrentine J (19.42022). Climate Misinformation on Social Media is Undermining Climate Action. https://www.nrdc.org/stories/climate-misinformation-social-media-underminingclimate- action. Son erişim tarihi: 19/2/2022.
• Vainio A ve Paloniemi R (2013). Does Belief Matter in Climate Change Action? Public Understanding of Science, 22(4), 382-395.
• Van Eck C W ve Feindt P H (2022). Parallel Routes form Copenhagen to Paris: Climate Discourse in Climate Sceptic and Climate Activist Blogs. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 24(2), 194-209.
• Whitmarsh L (2011). Scepticism and Uncertainty about Climate Change: Dimensions, Determinants and Change over Time. Global Environmental Change: Human and Policy Dimensions. 21(2), 690-700.
• Wise J (29.11.2022). How Many Blogs are There in the World in 2023? Earthweb, https:// earthweb.com/how-many-blogs-are-there-in-the-world/. Son erişim tarihi 19/12/2022.
• Yan P vd (2022). Is There a Link Between Climate Change Scepticism and Populism? An Analysis of Web Tracking and Survey Data from Europe and the US. Information, Communication & Society, 25(10), 1400-1439.
• Zhou M (2015). Public Environmental Skepticism: A Cross-national and Multilevel Analysis. International Sociology, 30(1), 61-85.