Desıgnıng AHP Based Decısıon Support System: E-Commerce Sıte Selectıon

Year 2024, , 31 - 40, 29.06.2024

Fatih Topaloğlu Esra Bozbay Korkmaz

https://doi.org/10.46572/naturengs.1478408

Abstract

Today, commercial companies can compete with their rivals by creating useful and reliable e-commerce sites and adapting to online platforms. E-commerce sites are preferred to the extent that they are designed to respond to user needs and demands. In the study, a decision support system based on Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), one of the multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods, was designed to select the best e-commerce site according to user preferences. For this purpose, 4 e-commerce sites with high demand from users and high site traffic were analyzed based on 5 main criteria and 27 sub-criteria obtained through literature review and determined by experts. As a result of the evaluation made with the designed decision support system, the preference rankings of alternative e-commerce sites were found. As a result of the study, EC1 site was determined as the optimum e-commerce site. It has been observed that technical features and user-friendly features are more decisive on the basis of main criteria, and on the basis of sub-criteria, users care about the page opening quickly, having an SSL certificate, the website being responsive and having an application option.

Keywords

Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), E-Commerce Site, Decision Support System

References

• Laudon, K. C., and Travel, C. G. (2018). E-Commerce 2018 (14. Global Edition b.). Harlow: Pearson.
• Cui, Y., Niu, J. and Tang, L. (2017), Effect of the Online Shopping Value on E-Satisfaction and ELoyalty, Economic Management Journal, 6 (1), 9-20.
• Sin, S.S., Nor, K. M., and Al-Agaga, A. M. (2012), Factors Affecting Malaysian Young Consumers’ Online Purchase İntention in Social Media Websites, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 326-333.
• Zentes, J., Morschett, D., and Schramm-Klein, H. (2017). Strategic Retail Management (3.b.). Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.
• Turban, E., Whiteside, J., King, D., and Outland, J. (2017). Introduction to Electronic Commerce and Social Commerce (4. b.). Cham, İsviçre: Springer.
• Phua, M. H., and Minowa, M. (2005). A GIS Based Multi Criteria Decision Making Approach to Forest Conservtaion Planning and a Landscape Scale: A Case Study In the Kinabalu Area, Sabah, Malaysia. Landscape and Urban Planning, 71, 207-222.
• Chena M., and Wang S.-C. (2010), The Critical Factors Of Success For Information Market: Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Approach, Expert Systems With Applications, 37(1), 694-704.
• Ömürbek, N., and Şimşek, A. (2014). Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci ve Analitik Ağ Süreci Yöntemi ile Online Alışveriş Site Seçimi. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi (22).
• Arora, M. (2016). Selection of parameters of E-commerce websites using AHP. In Proceeding of 2nd Conference on Innovative Practices in Information Technology & Operations Management (pp. 22-27).
• Kahraman, C., Onar, S. Ç., and Öztayşi, B. (2018). B2C marketplace prioritization using hesitant fuzzy linguistic AHP. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 20(7), 2202- 2215.
• Roy, S., Pattnaik, P. K., and Mall, R. (2017). Quality assurance of academic websites using usability testing: an experimental study with AHP. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 8(1), 1-11.
• Özkan, N. F., and Yavuz, F. G. (2019). Using Fuzzy Topsıs And Regression Based Weights To Rank Ecommerce Websites. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 27(2), 116-124.
• Aziz, U. A., Wibisono, A., and Nisafani, A. S. (2019). Measuring the quality of e-commerce websites using analytical hierarchy process. Telkomnika, 17(3), 1202-1208.
• Erdebilli, B., Topuz, K., Dag, A., and Oztekin, A. (2019). An AHP-IFT integrated model for performance evaluation of Ecommerce web sites. Information Systems Frontiers, 21(2), 1345-1355.
• Adepoju, S. A., Oyefolahan, I. O., Abdullahi, M. B., and Mohammed, A. A. (2020). Multı-Crıterıa Decısıonmakıng Based Approaches in Websıte Qualıty and Usabılıty Evaluatıon: A Systematıc Revıew. Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 19(3), 399-436.
• Şimşek Yağlı, B., and Yalçın, N. (2020). ISO 25010 kalite modeli çerçevesinde teknoloji mağazalarının internet sitelerinin çok kriterli analizi: Türkiye örneği. International Journal of Economic and Administrative Studies, 57-76.
• Lai, I., Huang, Y. F., Sıang, J. H., and Weng, M. W. (2020). Evaluation of Key Success Factors for Web Design in Taiwan's Bike Case Study. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics, and Business, 7(11), 927-937.
• Bayır, T. (2020). B2C Online Alışveriş Sitelerinin Seçim Kriterlerinin AHP Yöntemi ile Belirlenmesi. Kesit Akademi Dergisi (25), 641-653.
• Kulak, H. (2023). Covid-19 Pandemisinin E-Ticaret Üzerindeki Etkisinin İncelenmesi. İmgelem 7(12), 333-362.
• Chen, T. Y., Chang, C. H., and Lu, J. F. R. (2013). The extended QUALIFLEX method for multiple criteria decision analysis based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets and applications to medical decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 226(3), 615-625.
• Lee, A. H. I., Chen, W. C., and Chang, C. J. (2008). A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan, Expert Systems with Applications, 34, 96-107.
• Taha, H.A. (2003). Yöneylem Araştırması, Pearson Education Inc., Fayetteville.
• Saaty, T.L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98.
• Saaty, T. L., and Vargas, L. G. (2013). The logic of priorities: Applications of business, energy, health and transportation. Springer Science Business Media.
• Aktaş, R., Doğanay, M. M., Gökmen, Y., Gazibey, Y., and Türen, U. (2015). Sayısal Karar Verme Yöntemleri, Betayayınevi: İstanbul.
• Winston, W. L. (2004). Operations Research: Applications and Algorithms, (4th Edition). Thomson Brooks/Cole: Belmont.