Örgütsel Adalet ve Örgütsel Bağlılık Arasındaki İlişkilerde İçsel ve Dışsal İş Tatmininin Aracılık Rolü: Bankacılık Sektöründe Bir Araştırma

Year 2011, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 245 - 270, 01.04.2011

Ahmet Erkuş Ömer Turunç Recep Yücel

Abstract

Bu çalışmada örgütsel adaletle ile örgütsel bağlılık arasındaki ilişkiler incelenirken, bu ilişkide içsel ve dışsal iş tatmininin aracılık rolü araştırılmıştır. Bu kapsamda bankacılık sektöründe iş yaşamlarına devam eden 269 çalışan üzerinde bir araştırma yapılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre örgütsel adalet boyutlarından etkileşim adaleti boyutunun çalışanların örgütsel bağlılığını içsel ve dışsal iş tatmini aracılığı ile etkilediği tespit edilmiştir. Dağıtım adaleti ile süreç adaletinin örgütsel bağlılık üzerinde doğrudan veya dolaylı olarak etkilerinin bulunmadığı görülmüştür. Dağıtım adaleti ve etkileşim adaleti boyutlarının ise dışsal iş tatmini, etkileşim adaleti boyutunun ise içsel iş tatmini üzerinde pozitif ve anlam etkileri olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Keywords

Örgütsel adalet, iş tatmini, örgütsel bağlılık, aracılık etkisi.

The Mediating Effect of Internal and External Job Satisfaction on Relationships Between Organizational Justice and Organizational Commitment: A Study on the Banking Sector

Abstract

In the present study, we examine the relation‐ ship between organizational justice and organi‐ zational commitment; in the meantime we researched the mediating role of internal and external job satisfaction in this relationship. Data collected from 269 employees in banking sector are evaluated. Results shows that the interac‐ tional justice dimension of organizational justice has an effect on organizational commitment with the mediation of intrinsic and extrinsic job satisfaction. Results also indicate that neither distributive justice nor procedural justice has an effect directly or indirectly on organizational commitment. As another finding of the study was that distributive justice and interactional justice dimensions have positive and significant effects on extrinsic job satisfaction; whereas interactional justice have positive and significant effects on intrinsic job satisfaction.

Keywords

Organizational justice, job satisfac‐tion, organizational commitment, mediating effect.

References

• Adam, J. S. (1965), “Inequity in Social Exchange”, Ed. L. Berkowitz, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Academic Press, New York , 2, 267‐299.
• Alexander, P. ve M. Ruderman (1987), “The Role of Procedural and Distributive Justice in Organizational Behavior”, Social Justice Research, 1, 177‐198.
• Baron, R. M. ve D. A. Kenny (1986), “The Moderator Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173‐1182.
• Bateman, T. S. ve A. Strasser (1984), “Longitudinal Analysis of The Antecedents of Organizational Commitment”, Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), 95‐112.
• Bies, R. J. ve D. L. Shapiro (1988), “Voice and Justification: Their Influence on Procedural Fairness Judgments”, Academy of Management Journal, 31, 676–685.
• Bies, R. J. ve J. S. Moag (1986), “Interactional Justice; Communication Criteria of Fairness”. Ed. R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, ve B. H. Bazerman, Research on Negotiation in Organizations, Greenwich, Ct: Jai Pres,1, 43–55.
• Blau, P. (1964), Exchange and Power in Social Life, New York: Wiley.
• Brown, S. (1996), “A Meta‐Analysis and Review of Organizational Research on Job Involvement”, Psychological Bulletin, 120(2), 235‐255.
• Chang E. (2002), “Distributive Justice and Organizational Commitment Revisited: Moderation By Layoff in The Case of Korean Employees”, Human Resource Management, 41(2), 261‐270.
• Cohen‐Charash‐Charash, Y. ve P. E. Spector (2001), “The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta‐Analysis”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278–321.
• Colquitt, J. A., D. E. Conlon, M. J. Wesson, C. O. L. H. Porter ve K. Y. Ng (2001), “Justice At The Millennium: A Meta‐Analytic Review of 25 Years of Organizational Justice Research”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425–445.
• Cropanzano, R. ve J. Greenberg (1997), ”Progress in Organizational Justice: Tunneling Through The Maze”, Ed. C. L. Cooper ve I. T. Robertson, International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Wiley, New York, 317–372.
• Decotis, T. A. ve T. P. Summer (1987), “A Path Analysis of A Model of The Antecedents and Consequences of Organizational Commitment”, Human Relations, 40(7), 445‐470.
• Deutsch, M. (1975), “Equity, Equality and Need: What Determines Which Value Will Be Used As The Basis of Distributive Justice?”, Journal of Social Issues, 31,137‐ 149.
• Efeoğlu, İ. E. (2006), “İş‐Aile Yaşam Çatışmasının İş Stresi, İş Doyumu ve Örgütsel Bağlılık Üzerindeki Etkileri: İlaç Sektöründe Bir Araştırma”, (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi), Çukurova Üniversitesi. Eroğlu, F. (2006), Davranış Bilimleri, 7.Basım, İstanbul .
• Folger, R. ve M. A. Konovsky (1989), “Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions”, Academy of Management Journal , 32(1), 115‐145.
• Folger, R. ve R. Cropanzano (1998), Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management Beverly Hills, Ca: Sage.
• Folger, R. ve C. L. Martin (1989), “Relative Deprivation and Referent Cognition: Distributive and Procedural Justice Effect”, Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 22, 531‐546.
• Folger, R. ve J. Greenberg (1985), “Procedural Justice: An Interpretive Analysis of Personel Systems”, Ed. K. Rowland ve G. Ferris., Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Greenwich, Ct; Jai Press, 3, 141‐183.
• Folger, R. ve M. Konovsky (1989), “Effect of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to Pay Raise Decisions”, Academy of Management Journal, 32, 115–130.
• Fryxell, G. E. ve M. E. Gordon (1989), “Workplace Justice and Job Satisfaction As Predictors of Satisfaction with Union and Management”, Academy of Management Journal, 32, 851‐866.
• Geenberg, J. (1996), “Organizational Performance Appraisal Procedures: What Makes Them Fairs?”, Ed. R.J. Lewicki, B.H. Sheppard, M.H. Bazerman, Research on Negotiation in Organization Greenwich, CT: Jai Pres, 1, 25‐41.
• Gordon, M. E. ve G. E. Fryxell (1993), “The Role of Interpersonal Justice in Organizational Grievance Systems”, Ed. R. Cropanzano,. Justice in Tiie Workplace: Approaching Fairness in Human Resources Management. Hillsdale, Nj: Lawrence Eribaum, 231‐255.
• Greenberg, J. (1987), “A Taxonomy of Organizational Justice Theories” Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 9‐22.
• Greenberg, J. (1996), The Quest For Justice: Essays and Experiment Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage.
• Greenberg, J. ve R. Folger (1983), “Procedural Justice, Participation and The Fair Process Effect in Groups and Organization”, Ed. P.B. Paulus, Basic Group Processe New York: Springer‐Verlag, 235‐256.
• Greenberg, J. ve T. R. Tyler (1987), “Why Procedural Justice in Organizations?” Social Justice Research, 1, 127‐142.
• Greenherg, J. (1987), “Reactions to Procedural Injustice in Payment Distributions; Do The Means Justify The Ends?”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 55‐61.
• Gürpınar G. (2006), “An Empirical Study of Relationships Among Organizational Justice, Organizational Commitment, Leader‐Member Exchange and Turnover Intention”, (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Yeditepe Üniversitesi.
• Homans, G. C. (1961), Social Behavior: Its Elementary Form New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
• Hums M.A., P. Chelladurai (1994), “Distributive Justice in Intercollegiate Athletics: The Views of NCAA Coaches and Administrators”, Journal of Sport Managemnet, 8(3), 200‐217.
• Huselid, M. A. ve N. E. Day (1991), “Organizational Commitment Commitment, Job Involvement, and Turnover: A Substantive and Methodological Analysis”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(3), 380‐391.
• Koçel, T. (2003), İşletme Yöneticiliği, Beta Basım Yayım Dağıtım, İstanbul.
• Koopman, R. (2003), “The Relationship Between Perceived Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Review of The Literature,” Master’s Project, University of Wisconsin Stout, (http://www.uwstout.edu/rs/uwsjsr/koopmann.pdf: (Erişim Tarihi:20 Ağustos 2009).
• Lee, R., Wilbur, E. R. (1985), “Age, Education, Job Tenure, Salary, Job Characteristics, and Job Satisfaction: A Multivariate Analysis”, Human Relations, 38(8), 781‐791.
• Leventhal, G. S. (1976), “Fairness in Social Relationships” Ed. J. Thibaut, W, Spence, J. T. ve R. C. Carson, Contejvorary Topics in Social Psychology Morristown, Nj: General Learning Press, 211‐239.
• Leventhal, G. S. (1980), “What Should Be Done With Equity Theory? New Approaches to The Study of Fairness in Social Relationships”, Ed. K.S. Gergen, M.S. Greenberg ve R.H. Willis, Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research. New York: Plenum Pres, 1‐52.
• Lind, E. A. ve T. R. Tyler (1998), The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, New York: Plenum Pres.
• Loher, B. T. ve R. A. Noe, N. L. Moeller ve M. P. Fitzgerald (1985), “A Meta Analysis of The Relation of Job Characteristics to Job Satisfaction”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 70(2), 280‐289.
• Loi, R., N. Hang‐Yue ve S. Foley (2006), “Linking Employees’ Justice PerceptionsTo Organizational Commitment and Intention to Leave: The Mediating Role of Perceived Organizational Support”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79, 101–120.
• Lowe, R. H. ve J. Vodanovich (1995), “A Field Study of Distributive and Procedural Justice As Predictors of Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment”, Journal of Business and Psychology, 10, 99‐114.
• Luthans, F. (1995), Organizational Behavior (7. Ed.), New York Mc Graw – Hill, USA, 158‐199.
• Marchiori, D. ve A. Henkin (2004), “Organizational Commitment of Health Profession Faculty: Dimensions, Correlates and Conditions”, Medical Teacher, 26(4), 353‐358.
• Martin, C. L. ve N. Bennett (1996), “The Role of Justice Judgments in Explaining The Relationship Between Job Satisfaction and Organization Commitment”, Group and Organization Management, 21(1), 84‐104.
• Mcfarlin, D. ve Sweeney, P. (1992), “Distributive and Procedural Justice As Predictors of Satisfaction With Personal and Organizational Outcomes”, Academy of Management Journal, 35, 626–637.
• Meyer, J. P. ve N. J. Allen (1997), Commitment in The Workplace: Theory, Research, and Application.
• Moore, B. (1978), Injustice: The Social Bases of Obedience and Revolt. Whaite Plains, N.Y:M.E. Sharpe.
• Moorman, R. H. (1991), “Relationship Between Organizational Justice and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: Do Fairness Perceptions Influence Employee Citizenship?”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6) , 845‐855.
• Moorman, R. H. (1993), “The Influence of Cognitive and Affective Based Job Satisfaction Measures on The Relationship Between Satisfaction and Organizational Citizenship Behavior”, Human Relations, 46(6),759‐776.
• Mowday, R. T., L. W. Porter ve R. M. Steers (1982), Employee‐ Organization Linkages, The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism and Turnover, Academic Press, Inc.: New York.
• Mowday, R. T., R. M. Steers ve L. W. Porter (1979), “The Measurement of Organizational Commitment,” Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14(2), 224‐247.
• Mowday, R. T. (1987), “Equity Theory Predictions of Behavior in Organizations”, Ed. M.R., Steers, L.W. Porter, Motivation and Work Behavior (4. Ed), Mcgraw‐Hill, New York, 89‐110.
• Nadiri H. ve C. Tanova (2009), “An Investigation of The Role of Justice in Turnover Intentions, Job Satisfaction, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Hospitality Industry”, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(1), 33‐41.
• Nasurdin, A. M., T. Ramayah, ve S. Kumaresan (2005), “Organizational Stressors and Job Stress Among Managers: The Moderating Role of Neuroticism”, Singapore Management Review, 27(2), 63–79.
• Niehoff, R. T. ve R. H. Moorman (1993), “Justice As A Mediator of The Relationship Betweenmethods of Monitoring and Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 527‐556.
• Okun, A. M. (1975), Equality and Efficiency: The Big Traideoff, The Brookings Institution, Washington DC.
• Oran, B. N. (1989), “Job Satisfaction of a Group of Academical Staff in Marmara University” (Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Marmara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
• Özdevecioğlu, M. (2003), “Algılanan Örgütsel Adaletin Bireyler Arası Saldırgan Davranışlar Üzerindeki Etkilerinin Belirlenmesine Yönelik Bir Araştırma”, Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 21, 77‐96.
• Price, J. L. ve C. W. Muller (1986), Handbook of Organizational Measurement, Marshfield, Ma: Pittman.
• Price, J. L., C. W, Muller (1977), Handbook of Organizational Mesurement, Marshfield, Ma: Pittman.
• Randall, C. ve C. W. Mueller (1995), “Extensions of Justice Theory: Justice Evaluations and Employees’ Reactions in A Natural Setting”, Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 178–194.
• Rifai, H. A. (2005), A Test of the Relationships Among Perceptions of Justice, Job Satisfaction, Affective Commitment and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 7(2), 131‐154.
• Robbins, S. (2001), Organizational Behavior, Prentice‐ Hall, 9.Edition, New Jersey. Roberts J. A, K. R. Coulson ve L. B. Chonoko (1999), “Salesperson Perceptions of Equity and Justice and Their Impact on Organizational Commitment and Turnover”, J. Mark. Theory Pract, 7(Winter), 1‐16.
• Savery, L. K. ve P. D. Syme (1996), “Organizational Commitment and Hospital Pharmacists”, Journal of Management Development, 15(1), 14‐22.
• Scarpello, V. ve F. F. Jones (1996), “Why Justice Matters in Compensation Decision Making”, Journal of Organizational Behavior , 17(3), 285‐299.
• Sekaran, U. (1992), Research Methods For Business, Canada: John Wiley ve Sons, Inc. Summers, T. P. Hendrix W. H. (1991), Modeling The Role of Pay Equity Perceptions: A Field Study, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 64, 145‐157.
• Sweeney, P. D. ve D. B. Mcfarlin (1997), “Process and Outcome: Gender Differences in The Assessment of Justice”, Journal of Organizational Behavior 18(1), 83‐98.
• Taylor, M., K. B. Tracy, M. K. Renard, J. K. Harrison ve J. Carroll (1995), “Due Process in Performance Appraisal: A Quasi‐Experiment in Procedural Justice”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 495‐523.
• Thibaut, J. ve L. Walker (1975), Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysi Hillsdale, Nj: Erlbaum.
• Thompson, M. ve P. Heron (2005),“The Difference A Manager Can Make: Organizational Justice and Knowledge Worker Commitment”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16, 383‐404.
• Tornblom, K. Y (1990), “The Social Psychology of Distributive Justice” Ed. K. Scherer, The Nature and Administration of Justice: Interdiciplinary Approache Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Pres.
• Weiss, D. J., R. V. Dawis, G. W. England ve L. H. Lofquist (1967), Manual For The Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (Minnesota Studies in Vocational Rehabilitation, No. 22, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
• Williams, L. J. ve J. T. Hazer (1986), “Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction and Commitment in Turnover Models: A Reanalysis Using Latest Variables Structural Equation Methods”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(2), 219‐231.
• Yazıcıoğlu, Y. ve S. Erdoğan (2004), SPSS Uygulamalı Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri, Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
• Yıldırım, F. (1996), “Banka Çalışanlarında Algılanan Rol Çatışması ve Belirsizliği ve İş Doyumu İle Tükenmişlik Arasındaki İlişki”, (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
• Yoon, J. (1996), “Fairness Issues and Job Satisfaction Among Korean Employees: The Significance of Status Value and Procedural Justice in Work Orientation”, Social Justice Research, 9(2), 121‐143.