Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Tekrarlı Yük Etkisinde Kil Zeminlerin Lineer Olmayan Elastik Davranışı

Year 2009, Volume: 22 Issue: 1, 169 - 185, 30.06.2009

Abstract

Zemin tabakaların dinamik yükler altındaki davranışı, tekrarlı yükleme genliğine bağlı


olarak farklılıklar göstermektedir. Bu çalışmada, İstanbul Avcılar Bölgesinden alınan


örselenmemiş kil zemin numuneler üzerinde, gerilme kontrollü dinamik üç eksenli deneyler


yapılmıştır. Normal konsolide olarak hazırlanan numuneler 0,1 Hz frekansında, farklı tekrarlı


gerilme genliklerinde yüklenmiştir. Yükleme sonucu maksimum kayma modülü, sönüm oranı


değerleri belirlenmiştir. Lineer olmayan elastik davranış sınırı kayma modülü oranının yaklaşık


% 90 değerine denk gelmektedir. Bu sınır aşıldıktan sonra malzemenin tekrarlı yük altında


davranışı, özellikle plastisite indisinden büyük oranda etkilenmektedir. Deney sonuçlarından,


maksimum kayma modülünü belirlemeye yönelik pratik amaçlar için kullanılabilecek bağıntılar


önerilmiştir. Ayrıca arazi deneylerinden elde edilen kayma dalgası hızından yola çıkarak


laboratuar ve arazi kayma modülü ve sönüm oranı arasındaki ilişki belirlenmiştir.

References

  • [1] K. Ishihara, “Soil Behavior in Earthquake Geotechnics”, Clarendon Press, 1996, Oxford.
  • [2] B.O. Hardin, W.L. Black, “Vibration Modulus of Normally Consolidated Clay, Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations”, ASCE, Vol. 94, pp. 353-369, 1968.
  • [3] T. Kagawa, “Moduli and damping factors of soft marine clays”, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 118, pp. 1360-1375, 1992.
  • [4] W.F. Marcuson, H.E. Wahls, “Time Effects on Dynamic Shear Modulus of Clays”, Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations, ASCE, Vol. 98, pp. 1359-1379, 1972.
  • [5] K. Zen, Y. Umehara, K. Hamada, “Laboratory tests and in-situ seismic survey on vibration shear modulus of clayey soils with various plasticities”, Proceedings of the 5th Japanase Earthquake Engineering Symposium, Japan, pp. 721-728, June 1978.
  • [6] T. Kokusho, Y. Yoshida, Y. Esashi, “Dynamic properties of soft clay for wide strain range, Soils and Foundations”, Vol. 22, pp. 1-18, 1982.
  • [7] A.M. Ansal, H. Yıldırım, “Killerin tekrarlı yükler altında kayma mukavemeti”, II. Ulusal Kil Sempozyomu, Haccettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara, 24-27 Eylül 1985 , s. 329-341.
  • [8] G. Viggiani, J.H. Atkinson, "Stiffness of fine-grained soil at very small strains”, Geotechnique, Vol. 45, pp. 249-265, 1995.
  • [9] H.B. Seed, I.M. Idriss, “Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analyses”, College of Engineering, University of California Technical Report, EERC 70-10, Berkeley, California, 1970.
  • [10] F. Tatsuoka, S. Shibuya, “Deformation characteristics of soils and rocks from field and laboratory tests”, Proceedings of the 9th Asian Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics, Bangkok, 9-13 December, Thailand pp.101-170, 1992.
  • [11] M. Jamiolkowski, R. Lancellotta, D.C.F. Presti, “Remarks on the stiffness at small strains of six Italian clays”, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Pre-Failure Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials, Sapparo, 12-14 September, Japan, pp. 135-144, 1994.
  • [12] D.W. Hight, V.N. Georgiannou, “Effects of sampling on the undrained behavior of clayey sands”, Geotechnique, Vol. 45, pp. 237-247, 1995.
  • [13] S. Guha, V.P. Drenevich, J.D. Bray, “Dynamic characteristics of Old Bay Clay”, Geotechnical Testing Journal, ASTM, Vol. 20, pp. 383-393, 1997.
  • [14] R.W. Cunny, Z.B. Fry, “Vibratory in-situ and laboratory soil moduli compared”, Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 99, pp. 1022-1076, 1973.
  • [15] J.D. Bray, M.E. Riemer, W.B. Gookin, “On the dynamic characterization of soils”, Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Lisbon, 21-25 June, Portugal, pp. 847-856, 1999.
  • [16] K. Ishihara, “Approximate forms of wave equations for water-saturated porous materials and related dynamic modulus”, Soils and Foundations, Vol. 10, pp. 10-38, 1970.
  • [17] C.C. Ladd, R. Foott, “New design procedure for stability of soft clays”, Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, GT7, pp.763-786, 1974.
  • [18] P. Kallioglou, T.H. Tika, K. Pitilakis, Dynamic characteristics of natural cohesive soils, Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 17, pp. 113-117, 1999.
  • [19] T.J. Larkin, P.W. Taylor, “Comparison of down hole and laboratory shear wave velocities”, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 16, pp. 152-162, 1979.
  • [20] K.H. Stokoe, F.E. Richart, “In-situ and laboratory shear wave velocities”, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Moscow, June 1973, Russia, pp. 403-409, 1973.
  • [21] Y. Ohta, N. Goto, “Empirical shear wave velocity equations in terms of characteristic soil indexes”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 6, pp. 123-135, 1978.
  • [22] K. Yokota, M. Konno, “Comparison of soil constants obtained from laboratory tests and insitu tests”, Proceedings of Symposium on Evaluation of Deformation and Strength of Sandy Grounds, Special Publication of Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, pp. 145-162, 1985.
  • [23] R. İyisan, “Geoteknik özelliklerin belirlenmesinde sismik ve penetrasyon deneylerin karşılaştırılması”, Doktora Tezi, İ.T.Ü. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul, 1994.

Non-Linear Elastic Response Of Clay Soils Under Cyclic Loadings

Year 2009, Volume: 22 Issue: 1, 169 - 185, 30.06.2009

Abstract

Response of soil deposits under dynamic loadings differs with the cyclic loading


amplitudes. In this study, stress controlled cyclic triaxial tests were conducted on the specimens


taken from the Istanbul Avcilar District. Normally consolidated specimens were cyclically


loaded under different stress amplitudes at a frequency of 0.1 Hz. Maximum shear modulus and


damping ratio values determined. Loading cycles showed that the non-linear elastic shear


modulus is approximately equal to 90% of shear modulus ratio. After this threshold it’s


observed that the material response under cyclic loading is greatly influenced from plasticity


index of the soil. From the test results empirical relationships proposed for determining the


maximum shear modulus for practical purposes. Furthermore, a correlation for field conditions


is also presented by using in situ shear wave velocities between laboratory and in-situ shear


modulus and damping ratio values.


References

  • [1] K. Ishihara, “Soil Behavior in Earthquake Geotechnics”, Clarendon Press, 1996, Oxford.
  • [2] B.O. Hardin, W.L. Black, “Vibration Modulus of Normally Consolidated Clay, Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations”, ASCE, Vol. 94, pp. 353-369, 1968.
  • [3] T. Kagawa, “Moduli and damping factors of soft marine clays”, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 118, pp. 1360-1375, 1992.
  • [4] W.F. Marcuson, H.E. Wahls, “Time Effects on Dynamic Shear Modulus of Clays”, Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations, ASCE, Vol. 98, pp. 1359-1379, 1972.
  • [5] K. Zen, Y. Umehara, K. Hamada, “Laboratory tests and in-situ seismic survey on vibration shear modulus of clayey soils with various plasticities”, Proceedings of the 5th Japanase Earthquake Engineering Symposium, Japan, pp. 721-728, June 1978.
  • [6] T. Kokusho, Y. Yoshida, Y. Esashi, “Dynamic properties of soft clay for wide strain range, Soils and Foundations”, Vol. 22, pp. 1-18, 1982.
  • [7] A.M. Ansal, H. Yıldırım, “Killerin tekrarlı yükler altında kayma mukavemeti”, II. Ulusal Kil Sempozyomu, Haccettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara, 24-27 Eylül 1985 , s. 329-341.
  • [8] G. Viggiani, J.H. Atkinson, "Stiffness of fine-grained soil at very small strains”, Geotechnique, Vol. 45, pp. 249-265, 1995.
  • [9] H.B. Seed, I.M. Idriss, “Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analyses”, College of Engineering, University of California Technical Report, EERC 70-10, Berkeley, California, 1970.
  • [10] F. Tatsuoka, S. Shibuya, “Deformation characteristics of soils and rocks from field and laboratory tests”, Proceedings of the 9th Asian Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics, Bangkok, 9-13 December, Thailand pp.101-170, 1992.
  • [11] M. Jamiolkowski, R. Lancellotta, D.C.F. Presti, “Remarks on the stiffness at small strains of six Italian clays”, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Pre-Failure Deformation Characteristics of Geomaterials, Sapparo, 12-14 September, Japan, pp. 135-144, 1994.
  • [12] D.W. Hight, V.N. Georgiannou, “Effects of sampling on the undrained behavior of clayey sands”, Geotechnique, Vol. 45, pp. 237-247, 1995.
  • [13] S. Guha, V.P. Drenevich, J.D. Bray, “Dynamic characteristics of Old Bay Clay”, Geotechnical Testing Journal, ASTM, Vol. 20, pp. 383-393, 1997.
  • [14] R.W. Cunny, Z.B. Fry, “Vibratory in-situ and laboratory soil moduli compared”, Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 99, pp. 1022-1076, 1973.
  • [15] J.D. Bray, M.E. Riemer, W.B. Gookin, “On the dynamic characterization of soils”, Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Lisbon, 21-25 June, Portugal, pp. 847-856, 1999.
  • [16] K. Ishihara, “Approximate forms of wave equations for water-saturated porous materials and related dynamic modulus”, Soils and Foundations, Vol. 10, pp. 10-38, 1970.
  • [17] C.C. Ladd, R. Foott, “New design procedure for stability of soft clays”, Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, GT7, pp.763-786, 1974.
  • [18] P. Kallioglou, T.H. Tika, K. Pitilakis, Dynamic characteristics of natural cohesive soils, Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 17, pp. 113-117, 1999.
  • [19] T.J. Larkin, P.W. Taylor, “Comparison of down hole and laboratory shear wave velocities”, Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 16, pp. 152-162, 1979.
  • [20] K.H. Stokoe, F.E. Richart, “In-situ and laboratory shear wave velocities”, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Moscow, June 1973, Russia, pp. 403-409, 1973.
  • [21] Y. Ohta, N. Goto, “Empirical shear wave velocity equations in terms of characteristic soil indexes”, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 6, pp. 123-135, 1978.
  • [22] K. Yokota, M. Konno, “Comparison of soil constants obtained from laboratory tests and insitu tests”, Proceedings of Symposium on Evaluation of Deformation and Strength of Sandy Grounds, Special Publication of Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, pp. 145-162, 1985.
  • [23] R. İyisan, “Geoteknik özelliklerin belirlenmesinde sismik ve penetrasyon deneylerin karşılaştırılması”, Doktora Tezi, İ.T.Ü. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul, 1994.
There are 23 citations in total.

Details

Subjects Civil Engineering
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Volkan Okur

Atilla Ansal

Publication Date June 30, 2009
Published in Issue Year 2009 Volume: 22 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Okur, V., & Ansal, A. (2009). Tekrarlı Yük Etkisinde Kil Zeminlerin Lineer Olmayan Elastik Davranışı. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 22(1), 169-185.
AMA Okur V, Ansal A. Tekrarlı Yük Etkisinde Kil Zeminlerin Lineer Olmayan Elastik Davranışı. ESOGÜ Müh Mim Fak Derg. June 2009;22(1):169-185.
Chicago Okur, Volkan, and Atilla Ansal. “Tekrarlı Yük Etkisinde Kil Zeminlerin Lineer Olmayan Elastik Davranışı”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 22, no. 1 (June 2009): 169-85.
EndNote Okur V, Ansal A (June 1, 2009) Tekrarlı Yük Etkisinde Kil Zeminlerin Lineer Olmayan Elastik Davranışı. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 22 1 169–185.
IEEE V. Okur and A. Ansal, “Tekrarlı Yük Etkisinde Kil Zeminlerin Lineer Olmayan Elastik Davranışı”, ESOGÜ Müh Mim Fak Derg, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 169–185, 2009.
ISNAD Okur, Volkan - Ansal, Atilla. “Tekrarlı Yük Etkisinde Kil Zeminlerin Lineer Olmayan Elastik Davranışı”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi 22/1 (June 2009), 169-185.
JAMA Okur V, Ansal A. Tekrarlı Yük Etkisinde Kil Zeminlerin Lineer Olmayan Elastik Davranışı. ESOGÜ Müh Mim Fak Derg. 2009;22:169–185.
MLA Okur, Volkan and Atilla Ansal. “Tekrarlı Yük Etkisinde Kil Zeminlerin Lineer Olmayan Elastik Davranışı”. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik Ve Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 22, no. 1, 2009, pp. 169-85.
Vancouver Okur V, Ansal A. Tekrarlı Yük Etkisinde Kil Zeminlerin Lineer Olmayan Elastik Davranışı. ESOGÜ Müh Mim Fak Derg. 2009;22(1):169-85.

20873  13565  13566 15461  13568    14913