Makyavelist Kişilik Eğilimlerinin Belirlenmesi Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Year 2013, Volume: 14 Issue: 1, 103 - 121, 01.03.2013

Altan Ayan Sinan Ünsar Güner Kahraman

Abstract

Bu çalışmada ilk olarak makyavelcilik kavramı ifade edilmiştir.
İkinci olarak yüksek ve düşük makyavelist kişilik konusuna
değinilmiştir. Üçüncü olarak, Trakya üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari
Bilimler Fakültesinde öğrenim gören 370 öğrencinin demografik
özelliklerinin makyavelist kişilik eğilimlerini etkileyip etkilemediği
araştırılmıştır. Çalışmanın temel amacı makyavelist kişilik eğilimlerinin
katılımcıların demografik özelliklerine göre farklılık
gösterip göstermediğini belirlemektir. Araştırmada makyavelist
kişilik eğilimini belirlemek için Mach IV ölçeği kullanılmıştır.
Frekans analizi, faktör analizi, Kolmogorov Smirnov normal
dağılım testi, Mann Whitney U ve Kruskal Wallis testleri
yapılmıştır. Netice itibariyla makyavelist kişilik eğilimi alt boyutlarından
“etik dışı davranış” boyutunun cinsiyete göre farklılık
gösterdiği bulunmuştur.

Keywords

Makyavelcilik, Makyavelist Kişilik Eğilimi, Machiavelli

A Research on the Determination of Machiavellian Personality Tendencies

Abstract

In this study, firstly, the concept of Machiavellianism is expressed. Secondly, the issue of high and low Machiavellian personality is discussed. Thirdly, it is investigated that if 370 university
students’ demographic characteristics majoring at Trakya University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences will influence Machiavellian personality tendencies. The main objective of this study is to determine whether or not Machiavellian personality tendencies show differences in participants’ demographic characteristics. The Mach IV scale was used to measure the tendency to be Machiavellian. Frequency analysis, factor analysis, Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality test, Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were carried out. The results of the study showed that the dimension of Unethical Behavior, a sub-dimension of Machiavellian personality tendencies, showed differences according to gender.

Keywords

Machiavellianism, Machiavelllian Personality Tendencies, Machiavelli

References

• Ali, F., Amorim, I.S. & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2009). Empathy deficits and trait emotional intelligence in psychopathy and Machiavellianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 758-762.
• Austin, E.J., Farrelly, D., Black, C. & Moore, H. (2007). Emotional intelligence, Machiavellianism and emotional manipulation: does EI have a dark side?. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 179-189.
• Boddy, C.R. (2011). Corporate Psychopaths: Organizational Destroyers. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Cameron, K.S. & Spreitzer, G.M. (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Positive Organizational Scholarship. New York: Oxford University Press.
• Corral, S. & Calvete, E. (2000). Machiavellianism: Dimensionality of the Mach IV and its Relation to Self-Monitoring in a Spanish Sample. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 3(1), 3-13.
• Daft, R.L. (2008). Management. Eighth Edition. USA: Thomson South-Western.
• Engeler, A. & Yargıç, İ. (2004). Makyavellinizm (MACH-IV) Ölçeğinin Türkçe Uyarlamasının Güvenilirliği. The Psychiatric Association of Turkey, 40. National Congress, Izmir, Turkey.
• Goethals, G.R., Sorenson, G.J. & Burns, J. M. (2004). Encyclopedia of Leadership. Volume III, USA: Sage Publications.
• Graham, J.H. (1996). Machiavellian project managers: do they perform better?. International Journal of Project Management, 14(2), 67-74.
• Gunnthorsdottir, A., McCabe, K. & Smith,V. (2002). Using the Machiavellianism instrument to predict trustworthiness in a bargaining game. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23, 49-66.
• Kalaycı, Ş. (2010). SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri. 5. Baskı. Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
• Kolb, R.W. (2008). Encyclopedia of Business Ethics and Society. Volume 3. USA: Sage Publications.
• Leary, M.R. & Hoyle, R.H. (2009). Handbook of Individual Differences In Social Behavior. USA: The Guilford Press.
• Lopes, J. & Fletcher, C. (2004). Fairness of Impression Management in Employment Interviews: A Cross-Country Study of the Role of Equity and Machiavellianism. Social Behavior and Personality, 32(8), 747-768.
• McGuire, D. & Hutchings, K. (2006). A Machiavellian analysis of organisational change. Journal of Organizational Change. 19(2), 192-209.
• McShane, S.L. & Von Glinow, M.A. (2010). Organizational Behavior: emerging knowledge and practice for the real world. Fifth Edition. USA: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
• Paulhus, D.L. & Williams, K.M. (2002). The Dark Triad of Personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556-563.
• Pope, K.R. (2005). Measuring the Ethical Propensities of Accounting Students: Mach IV Versus DIT. Journal of Academic Ethics, 3, 89-111.
• Rayburn, J.M. & Rayburn, L.G. (1996). Relationship Between Machiavellianism and Type A Personality and Ethical-Orientation. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 1209-1219.
• Robbins, S.P. & Coulter, M. (2012). Management. Eleventh Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
• Saruhan, Ş.C. ve Özdemirci, A. (2011). Bilim, Felsefe ve Metodoloji. 2. Baskı. İstanbul: Beta Yayınevi.
• Schermerhorn, J.R. (2010). Exploring Management. Second Edition. USA: John Wiley & Sons.
• Sinha, J.B.P. (2008). Culture and Organizational Behaviour. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
• Vigoda-Gadot, E. & Drory, A. (2006). Handbook of Organizational Politics, Great Britain: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Walter, H.L, Anderson, C.M. & Martin, M.M. (2005). How Subordinates’ Machiavellianism and Motives Relate to Satisfaction with Superiors. Communication Quarterly, 53(1), 57-70.
• Williams, C. (2009). Management. Fifth Edition. Canada: South-Western Cengage Learning.
• Wilson, D.S., Near, D. & Miller, R.R. (1996). Machiavellianism: A Synthesis of the Evolutionary and Psychological Literatures. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 285-299.