Fen Eğitiminde Sosyobilimsel Konulara Yönelik Çalışmaların Bibliyometrik Analizi

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 1, 35 - 57, 31.12.2024

Hacı Mehmet Yeşiltaş , Meral Çelikoğlu , Erol Taş

Öz

Sosyo bilimsel konular, bilimsel bir temel sahip ve aynı zamanda toplum için önemli olan jtartışmalı konular olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, fen eğitiminde sosyo bilimsel konuların yer aldığı çalışmaların genel yapısının ve alandaki geçmişten günümüze olan durumun ortaya konulması amacıyla bibliyometrik analiz gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda “Scopus” veri tabanında yer alan ilgili çalışmalar belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Veri analizi için R programı kütüphanesinde yer alan bibliometrix paket programı altında yer alan “biblioshiny” bibliyometrik analiz programı kullanılmıştır. Öncelikli olarak “Socio Scientific Issues” ve “Science Education” anahat kelimeleri kullılarak 458 çalışmaya ulaşılmış ve 400 çalışma dahil etme ve hariç tutma kriterleri ile bibliyometrik analize dahil edilmiştir. Veri analizinde bibliometrix paketi için bir R Studio programı olan "biblioshiny" paket programı kullanılmıştır (Aria ve Cuccurullo, 2017). Araştırma sonucunda SBK ile ilgili Türkiye merkezli yapılan çalışmaların sayısının fazla olmasına karşın, yapılan atıf sıralamasın da ilk beş ülke arasında yer almamaktadır. SBK en çok işlenen konunun sürdürülebilirlik, vatandaşlık konuları öğrenci ve e-öğrenme merkezli çalışmalardan oluştuğu görülmektedir. En üretken yazarların Sadler, Zangori ve Ke oldukları görülmektedir. “Internatıonal Journal of Science Education” dergisi SBK ile ilgili en fazla çalışmanın yayınladığı dergi olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bunun yanı diğer çalışmalar için, SBK ile ilgili olarak yapay zeka çalışmalarının gerçekleştirlmesi önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Fen Eğitimi, Sosyobilimsel Konular, Bibliyometrik Analiz

Kaynakça

• Al-Ansi, A. M., Jaboob, M., Garad, A., & Al-Ansi, A. (2023). Analyzing augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) recent development in education. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100532
• Albe, V. (2008). When scientific knowledge, daily life experience, epistemological and social considerations intersect: Students’ argumentation in group discussions on a socio-scientific issue. Research in Science Education, 38(1), 67-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9040-2
• Amos, R., Christodoulou, A., Grace, M. & Levinson, R. (2017). Teaching science using socio scientific inquiry-based learning: UK pre-service teachers’ perspectives. Southampton, UK: University College London. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10057355/
• Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
• Badeo, J. M., & Duque, D. A. (2022). The effect of socio-scientific issues (SSI) in teaching science: a meta-analysis study. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 12(2), 291-302. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1340
• Bennett, J., & Lubben, F. (2006). Context-based chemistry: The Salters approach. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 999-1015. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600702496
• Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010). Students' questions and discursive interaction: Their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science. Journal of research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 883-908. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20385
• Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. University of Chicago Press.
• Dawson, V., & Venville, G. J. (2009). High-school students’ informal reasoning and argumentation about biotechnology: An indicator of scientific literacy? International Journal of Science Education, 31(11), 1421-1445. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690801992870
• Dewi, A. K., Maryuningsih, Y., & Ubaidillah, M. (2022). BioMagz with an approach to socio-scientific issues as a learning resource to learn environmental change materials to improve scientific literacy. Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 11(2), 130-141.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24235/sc.educatia.v11i2.11891
• Diodato, V. (1994). Dictionary of bibliometrics. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
• Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
• Eastwood, J. L., Sadler, T. D., Zeidler, D. L., Lewis, A., Amiri, L., & Applebaum, S. (2012). Contextualizing nature of science instruction in socio scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(15), 2289–2315. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.667582
• Evren-Yapıcıoğlu, A. (2021). Investigation of the Bibliometric Features of the Articles on Socioscientific Issues. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 17(36), 2402-2428. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.841772
• Faisal, F. & Martin, S. N. (2022). Exploring Indonesian biology teachers’ perceptions and attitudes towards socio-scientific issues-based instruction. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 8(1), 256-291.
• Falah, M. M., Nugroho, S. E., & Ridlo, S. (2024). Socio-Scientific Issues (SSI) research trends: a systematic literature review of publications 2011-2022. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 21(1), 61-81.
• Garrecht, C., Reiss, M. J., & Harms, U. (2021). ‘I wouldn’t want to be the animal in use nor the patient in need’ – the role of issue familiarity in students’ socio scientific argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 43(12), 2065–2086. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1950944
• Hancock, T. S., Friedrichsen, P. J., Kinslow, A. T., & Sadler, T. D. (2019). Selecting socio-scientific issues for teaching: A grounded theory study of how science teachers collaboratively design SSI-based curricula. Science & Education, 28, 639-667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00065-x
• Hofstein, A., Eilks, I., & Bybee, R. (2011). Societal issues and their importance for contemporary science education—a pedagogical justification and the state-of-the-art in Israel, Germany, and the USA. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 1459-1483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9273-9
• Ismawati, R., & Pertiwi, U. D. (2019). Socio scientific issues-based learning as an effort to train high order thinking skills in junior high school students. Indonesian Journal of Biology Education, 2(2), 21-25.
• Johnson, J., Macalalag, A. Z., & Dunphy, J. (2020). Incorporating Socioscientific Issues into a STEM Education Course: Exploring Teacher Use of Argumentation in SSI and Plans for Classroom Implementation. In Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-020-00026-3
• Krajcik, J., McNeill, K. L., & Reiser, B. J. (2008). Learning-goals-driven design model: Developing curriculum materials that align with national standards and incorporate project-based pedagogy. Science Education, 92, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20240
• Lazarides, M. K., Lazaridou, I. Z., & Papanas, N. (2023). Bibliometric analysis: Bridging informatics with science. The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds. https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346231153538
• Lin, H. S., Hong, Z. R., & Huang, T. C. (2012). The role of emotional factors in building public scientifc literacy and engagement with science. International Journal of Science Education, 34(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.551430
• Lin, S., & Mintzes, J. (2010). Learning argumentation skills through instruction in socio-scientific issues: The effect of ability level. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(6), 993-1017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9215-6
• Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington academy of sciences, 16(12), 317-323.
• Murni, A. W., Suryanti, S., & Suprapto, N. (2023). Use of bibliometric software to explore the relationship between scientific literacy and socio-scientific issues. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 450, p. 03009). EDP Sciences.
• Ng, J., Liu, H., Shah, A., Wieland, L., & Moher, D. (2023). Characteristics of bibliometric analyses of the complementary, alternative, and integrative medicine literature: A scoping review protocol. F1000research, 12, 164. doi:10.12688/f1000research.130326.1
• Ngwenya, P. (2020). Life sciences teachers’ views on teaching socio-scientific issues in genetics using an inquiry approach. University of Johannesburg (South Africa).
• Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2007). Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/63/35/37464175.pdf
• Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: socio‐scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 1-42.
• Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: a critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536.
• Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). The morality of socio scientific issues: Construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas. Science education, 88(1), 4-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10101
• Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socio-scientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112-138. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20042
• Sadler, T.D., Foulk, J.A, & Friedrichsen, P.J. (2017). Evolution of a model for socioscientific issue teaching and learning. International Journal of Education in Mathematics,Science and Technology, 5(2), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.55999
• Saka, M. (2023). Pre-service primary school teachers’ application of the features of the nature of science to socio scientific. Science Insights Education Frontiers, 14(2), 2059-2075. https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.23.or092
• Schenk, L., Hamza, K., Arvanitis, L., Lundegard, I., Wojcik, A., & Haglund, K. (2021). Socio scientific issues in science education: An opportunity to incorporate education about risk and risk analysis? Risk Analysis, 41(12), 2209-2219. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13737
• Tang, K. Y., Lin, T. C., & Hsu, Y. S. (2024). Status and trends of socioscientific issues in educational literature: insights and extensions from a co-word analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 46(11), 1073-1097.
• Tsai, C. (2017). The effect of online argumentation of socio-scientific issues on students' scientific competencies and sustainability attitudes. Computers and Education, 116, 14-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.08.009
• Topçu, M. S. (2015). Sosyobilimsel konular ve öğretimi. Pegem Akademi.
• Yadav, A., Lundeberg, M., DeSchryver, M., Kirkin, K., Schiller, N. A., Maier, K., & Herreid, C. F. (2007). Teaching science with case studies: A national survey of faculty perceptions of the benefits and challenges of using cases. Journal of College Science Teaching, 37, 34-38.
• Yadav, S., & Lenka, U. (2023). Uncovering the intellectual structure of diversity management research: A bibliometric analysis (1990–2019). Personnel Review, 52(3), 856-881.
• Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socio scientific issues as a curriculum emphasis: Theory, research, and practice. In Handbook of research on science education, Volume II (pp. 711-740). Routledge.
• Zeidler, D. L., Herman, B. C., & Sadler, T. D. (2019). New directions in socioscientific issues research. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(1),1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0008-7
• Zhang, Q. (2023). The Education of Nature of Science in the Internet Era. Science Insights Education Frontiers,14(2), 2055-2057. https://doi.org/10.15354/sief.23.co037