Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Year 2016, Volume: 33 Issue: 1, 23 - 26, 21.02.2016

Ünal Bıçakçı Dilek Demirel Beytullah Yağız Yaşar Issi Mithat Günaydın Burak Tander Ferit Bernay

Abstract

Comparison of treatment modalities for urinary tract dilatation in children: Open versus endoscopic surgery

Year 2016, Volume: 33 Issue: 1, 23 - 26, 21.02.2016

Ünal Bıçakçı Dilek Demirel Beytullah Yağız Yaşar Issi Mithat Günaydın Burak Tander Ferit Bernay

Abstract

Our aim is to evaluate the efficiency and outcomes of endoscopic surgery (ES) and open surgery (OS) in children with urinary tract dilatation (UTD). Between February 2009 and June 2014, 77 patients (41 male, 36 female) with UTD underwent either an OS or ES. The age, gender, final diagnosis, type of surgery, postoperative problems (hematuria, fever, urinary tract infection and length of hospital stay (LOS) are retrospectively evaluated. The ES for UTD causes less pain, less hematuria, decreased LOS after surgery. ES is superior in terms of postoperative pain management, morbidity and LOS in selected conditions. 

Keywords

Children Complications Endoscopic treatment Open treatment Urinary tract dilatation

There are 0 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Surgery Medical Sciences
Authors

Ünal Bıçakçı

Dilek Demirel This is me

Beytullah Yağız This is me

Yaşar Issi This is me

Mithat Günaydın This is me

Burak Tander This is me

Ferit Bernay This is me

Publication Date February 21, 2016
Submission Date October 8, 2015
Published in Issue Year 2016 Volume: 33 Issue: 1

Cite

APA Bıçakçı, Ü., Demirel, D., Yağız, B., Issi, Y., et al. (2016). Comparison of treatment modalities for urinary tract dilatation in children: Open versus endoscopic surgery. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, 33(1), 23-26.
AMA Bıçakçı Ü, Demirel D, Yağız B, Issi Y, Günaydın M, Tander B, Bernay F. Comparison of treatment modalities for urinary tract dilatation in children: Open versus endoscopic surgery. J. Exp. Clin. Med. March 2016;33(1):23-26.
Chicago Bıçakçı, Ünal, Dilek Demirel, Beytullah Yağız, Yaşar Issi, Mithat Günaydın, Burak Tander, and Ferit Bernay. “Comparison of Treatment Modalities for Urinary Tract Dilatation in Children: Open Versus Endoscopic Surgery”. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine 33, no. 1 (March 2016): 23-26.
EndNote Bıçakçı Ü, Demirel D, Yağız B, Issi Y, Günaydın M, Tander B, Bernay F (March 1, 2016) Comparison of treatment modalities for urinary tract dilatation in children: Open versus endoscopic surgery. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine 33 1 23–26.
IEEE Ü. Bıçakçı, “Comparison of treatment modalities for urinary tract dilatation in children: Open versus endoscopic surgery”, J. Exp. Clin. Med., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 23–26, 2016.
ISNAD Bıçakçı, Ünal et al. “Comparison of Treatment Modalities for Urinary Tract Dilatation in Children: Open Versus Endoscopic Surgery”. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine 33/1 (March 2016), 23-26.
JAMA Bıçakçı Ü, Demirel D, Yağız B, Issi Y, Günaydın M, Tander B, Bernay F. Comparison of treatment modalities for urinary tract dilatation in children: Open versus endoscopic surgery. J. Exp. Clin. Med. 2016;33:23–26.
MLA Bıçakçı, Ünal et al. “Comparison of Treatment Modalities for Urinary Tract Dilatation in Children: Open Versus Endoscopic Surgery”. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, vol. 33, no. 1, 2016, pp. 23-26.
Vancouver Bıçakçı Ü, Demirel D, Yağız B, Issi Y, Günaydın M, Tander B, Bernay F. Comparison of treatment modalities for urinary tract dilatation in children: Open versus endoscopic surgery. J. Exp. Clin. Med. 2016;33(1):23-6.
 Download Cover Image

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.