Aim: We aimed to compare Trueview EVO2
laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in terms of hemodynamic response and
intubation conditions for pediatric patients. 100 children aged between 1 month
and 4 years were included in the study.
Method: Patients were randomly divided into 2
groups. Intubation was performed via Macintosh laryngoscope in Group DL and via
Trueview EVO2TM videolaryngoscope in Group VL.
Results: Heart rates were similar between the two
groups. Systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressures 1 minute after the
intubation were significantly higher in Group VL. There was no significant
difference between groups in terms of SpO2 levels, TD, airway
demand, cricoid pressure or Cormack-Lehane scores. End-tidal CO2
levels were significantly higher in Group VL. Difficulty occurred while
inserting the tube in 6 patients in Group VL but in none of the patients in Group
DL. Intubation durations were higher in Group VL (17.81±1.31 sec) than in Group
DL (17.00±1.20 sec). There were no statistically significant difference in
terms of intubation related complications.
Conclusion: In pediatric patients, better laryngeal
visualization is acquired with Trueview videolaryngoscope but intubation
duration prolongs and has no advantage on intubation success.
Journal Section | Experimental Research |
---|---|
Authors | |
Publication Date | October 10, 2019 |
Submission Date | December 7, 2017 |
Acceptance Date | December 20, 2017 |
Published in Issue | Year 2017 Volume: 34 Issue: 4 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.