Fertility sparing surgery in gynecological cancers: A review of current state

Year 2024, Volume: 41 Issue: 2, 417 - 421, 19.05.2024

Utku Akgör

Abstract

Options in preserving fertility-surgery (FSS) in early-stage gynecological cancers are becoming more widespread as evidence supporting acceptable oncological and reproductive outcomes in well-selected patients continues to grow. It is crucial to thoroughly evaluate individuals' fertility potential before selecting surgical options. Fertility-sparing treatment of endometrial cancer (EC) is considered in cases confined to endometrium. Hormone therapy is considered an absolute treatment and hysteroscopic resection, particularly using the 'grasping' technique, being a preferred method. Cervical cancer (CC) is usually diagnosed in patients during their reproductive years, hence FSS is extremely crucial for their treatment. Patients with early stage, low-risk CC and a tumor size ≤ 2 cm, FSS options are available for preserving their fertility, including conization or simple/radical trachelectomy with pelvic lymph node assessment. A vaginal, abdominal or minimally invasive approach can be used to perform a trachelectomy. Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) rarely allows for FSS; however, it may be considered in specific cases, such as stage IA low-grade tumors. Unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (USO) and comprehensive surgical staging are integral components of FSS in EOC. Non-epithelial ovarian cancers, including germ cell tomors are common in young women, FSS is the main treatment option. Borderline ovarian tumors (BOT) present challenges due to recurrence risks, and the choice between cystectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy is discussed.

Keywords

Fertility sparing surgery, endometrial cancer, ovarian cancer, cervical cancer

Ethical Statement

ethical approval is not required

Thanks

Special thanks to Dr. İbrahim Yalçın for encouraging me to upload a review article.

References

• Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209-49.
• Won S, Kim MK, Seong SJ. Fertility-sparing treatment in women with endometrial cancer. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2020;47(4):237-44.
• Rodolakis A, Scambia G, Planchamp F, Acien M, Sardo ADS, Farrugia M, et al. ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE Guidelines for the fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Canc. 2023;33(2):208-23.
• Auclair MH, Yong PJ, Salvador S, Thurston J, Colgan TTJ, Sebastianelli A. Guideline No. 390-Classification and Management of Endometrial Hyperplasia. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019;41(12):1789-800.
• Ramshaw N, Narayansingh G. The implications of hysteroscopy in the updated guidelines on heavy menstrual bleeding from the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Case Rep Womens Health. 2019;22:e00117.
• Di Spiezio Sardo A, Saccone G, Carugno J, Pacheco LA, Zizolfi B, Haimovich S, et al. Endometrial biopsy under direct hysteroscopic visualisation versus blind endometrial sampling for the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2022;14(2):103-10.
• Mazzon I, Corrado G, Masciullo V, Morricone D, Ferrandina G, Scambia G. Conservative surgical management of stage IA endometrial carcinoma for fertility preservation. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(4):1286-9.
• Arendas K, Aldossary M, Cipolla A, Leader A, Leyland NA. Hysteroscopic resection in the management of early-stage endometrial cancer: report of 2 cases and review of the literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22(1):34-9.
• Di Spiezio Sardo A, De Angelis MC, Della Corte L, Carugno J, Zizolfi B, Guadagno E, et al. Should endometrial biopsy under direct hysteroscopic visualization using the grasp technique become the new gold standard for the preoperative evaluation of the patient with endometrial cancer? Gynecol Oncol. 2020;158(2):347-53.
• Amant F, Mirza MR, Koskas M, Creutzberg CL. Cancer of the corpus uteri. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;143 Suppl 2:37-50.
• Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023;73(1):17-48.
• Machida H, Iwata T, Okugawa K, Matsuo K, Saito T, Tanaka K, et al. Fertility-sparing trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A proposal of an ideal candidate. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;156(2):341-8.
• Abu-Rustum NR, Yashar CM, Arend R, Barber E, Bradley K, Brooks R, et al. NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Cervical Cancer, Version 1.2024: Featured Updates to the NCCN Guidelines. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. 2023;21(12):1224-33.
• Salman L, Covens A. Fertility Preservation in Cervical Cancer—Treatment Strategies and Indications. Current Oncology. 2024;31(1):296-306.
• Li X, Xia L, Chen X, Fu Y, Wu X. Simple conization and pelvic lymphadenectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A retrospective analysis and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;158(2):231-5.
• Bentivegna E, Gouy S, Maulard A, Chargari C, Leary A, Morice P. Oncological outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for cervical cancer: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(6):e240-e53.
• Zhang Q, Li W, Kanis MJ, Qi G, Li M, Yang X, et al. Oncologic and obstetrical outcomes with fertility-sparing treatment of cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017;8(28):46580-92.
• Halaska M, Robova H, Pluta M, Rob L. The role of trachelectomy in cervical cancer. Ecancermedicalscience. 2015;9:506.
• Salvo G, Pareja R, Ramirez PT. Minimally invasive radical trachelectomy: Considerations on surgical approach. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;75:113-22.
• Smith ES, Moon AS, O'Hanlon R, Leitao MM, Jr., Sonoda Y, Abu-Rustum NR, et al. Radical Trachelectomy for the Treatment of Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;136(3):533-42.
• Kim CH, Abu-Rustum NR, Chi DS, Gardner GJ, Leitao MM, Jr., Carter J, et al. Reproductive outcomes of patients undergoing radical trachelectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;125(3):585-8.
• Egashira K, Hiasa K, Yokota N, Kawamura T, Matsushita T, Okugawa K, et al. Infertility after abdominal trachelectomy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018;97(11):1358-64.
• Li X, Xia L, Li J, Chen X, Ju X, Wu X. Reproductive and obstetric outcomes after abdominal radical trachelectomy (ART) for patients with early-stage cervical cancers in Fudan, China. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;157(2):418-22.
• Feeney L, Harley IJ, McCluggage WG, Mullan PB, Beirne JP. Liquid biopsy in ovarian cancer: Catching the silent killer before it strikes. World J Clin Oncol. 2020;11(11):868-89.
• Canlorbe G, Chabbert-Buffet N, Uzan C. Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Ovarian Cancer. J Clin Med. 2021;10(18).
• Park HJ, Kim DW, Yim GW, Nam EJ, Kim S, Kim YT. Staging laparoscopy for the management of early-stage ovarian cancer: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(1):58.e1-8.
• Lim CK, Kim DY, Cho A, Choi J-Y, Park J-Y, Kim Y-M. Role of minimally invasive surgery in early ovarian cancer. Gland Surgery. 2020;10(3):1252-9.
• Cheung A, Shah S, Parker J, Soor P, Limbu A, Sheriff M, et al. Non-Epithelial Ovarian Cancers: How Much Do We Really Know? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(3).
• Dellino M, Silvestris E, Loizzi V, Paradiso A, Loiacono R, Minoia C, et al. Germinal ovarian tumors in reproductive age women: Fertility-sparing and outcome. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99(39):e22146.
• Johansen G, Dahm-Kähler P, Staf C, Flöter Rådestad A, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA. Fertility-sparing surgery for treatment of non-epithelial ovarian cancer: Oncological and reproductive outcomes in a prospective nationwide population-based cohort study. Gynecol Oncol. 2019;155(2):287-93.
• Vasta FM, Dellino M, Bergamini A, Gargano G, Paradiso A, Loizzi V, et al. Reproductive Outcomes and Fertility Preservation Strategies in Women with Malignant Ovarian Germ Cell Tumors after Fertility Sparing Surgery. Biomedicines. 2020;8(12):554.
• Johansen G, Dahm-Kähler P, Staf C, Flöter Rådestad A, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA. Reproductive and obstetrical outcomes with the overall survival of fertile-age women treated with fertility-sparing surgery for borderline ovarian tumors in Sweden: a prospective nationwide population-based study. Fertil Steril. 2021;115(1):157-63.
• Vasconcelos I, de Sousa Mendes M. Conservative surgery in ovarian borderline tumours: a meta-analysis with emphasis on recurrence risk. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51(5):620-31.
• du Bois A, Heitz F, Harter P. Fertility-sparing surgery in ovarian cancer: a systematic review. Onkologie. 2013;36(7-8):436-43.
• Daraï E, Fauvet R, Uzan C, Gouy S, Duvillard P, Morice P. Fertility and borderline ovarian tumor: a systematic review of conservative management, risk of recurrence and alternative options. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19(2):151-66.
• Fauvet R, Boccara J, Dufournet C, Poncelet C, Daraï E. Laparoscopic management of borderline ovarian tumors: results of a French multicenter study. Ann Oncol. 2005;16(3):403-10.
• Fan Y, Zhang Y-f, Wang M-y, Mu Y, Mo S-p, Li J-k. Influence of lymph node involvement or lymphadenectomy on prognosis of patients with borderline ovarian tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2021;162(3):797-803.